New strategies and perspectives on managing IgA nephropathy.

Introduction

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is an inflammatory renal disease characterised by the deposition of IgA in the glomerular mesangium [ 1 ]. Described first by Jean Berger in 1968, it is now recognised as the most commonly reported primary glomerulonephritis worldwide [ 2 – 6 ]. Despite 50 years of study revealing valuable insights into its pathophysiology [ 7 , 8 ], there are still key features that remain unexplained; IgAN has a distinct geographical variation, being more common and aggressive in East and South East Asia, and only 30–40% of patients develop a progressive form of the disease, typically necessitating renal replacement therapy within two decades of diagnosis [ 9 , 10 ]. Given that the incidence of IgAN peaks among young adults, understanding why progression occurs is an issue of socioeconomic importance. Accurate individual risk stratification at diagnosis and predicting treatment response also remain a challenge.

The variation in prevalence and progression of IgAN present barriers to establishing standardised, evidence-based approaches to treatment. Robust trials have traditionally been limited by low recruitment, given the relative rarity of IgAN among Caucasians, and there has been a dearth of globally recruiting clinical research trials. Despite this, there have been some exciting advances which address these issues, including the development of international disease registries [ 11 ], non-invasive biomarkers [ 12 – 14 ], and an increase in interest in running international trials for novel and repurposed targeted therapies in IgAN. In this review we provide an overview of the evidence informing current management approaches, and then explore future directions relating to the diagnosis and treatment of IgAN.

Current approaches

The diagnosis of IgAN relies on histological examination of a renal biopsy, which will demonstrate predominant IgA deposition in the renal mesangium [ 15 ]. At diagnosis a constellation of clinicopathological parameters have been shown to provide some insight into the risk of progression. These include estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), amount of proteinuria, blood pressure, and renal histology [ 16 ]. Management typically involves supportive interventions followed in some cases by immunosuppression and/or tonsillectomy; although there is marked heterogeneity in the approaches adopted internationally, likely fuelled by regional variations in the nature of IgAN and a paucity of robust clinical trials [ 17 ]. Here we provide an overview of the evidence behind current approaches to managing IgAN, and compare key points from Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) and Japanese guidelines [ 16 , 18 ].

Supportive management

Diet modification

Low-protein diets reduce glomerular hydraulic pressures and have been reported to slow renal functional loss [ 19 ]. A Cochrane review of low-protein diets concluded that limiting protein intake reduced the occurrence of RRT or death by 31% [ 20 ]. There is, however, no specific evidence for their use in IgAN and this strategy is rarely employed. In contrast, low-sodium diets have been shown to be efficacious in IgAN. The benefits of sodium restriction are thought to be related to sodium sensitivity of blood pressure, which correlates with renal ultrastructural damage [ 21 ]. A small cross-over trial showed that low-sodium diets reduced proteinuria even in normotensive IgAN patients [ 21 ], however it was not clear if renin–angiotensin system (RAS) blockade was optimised prior to commencing a low-salt diet. The deleterious effects of heightened sodium sensitivity are thought to be mediated through the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) and indeed, sodium restriction enhances the antiproteinuric effects of RAS inhibition in IgAN [ 22 ].

Weight optimisation

Body mass index (BMI) at either extreme correlates with increased morbidity and mortality in CKD [ 23 – 25 ]. A Chinese case–control study demonstrated an association between low BMI (< 18.5 kg/m 2 ) and likelihood of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in IgAN [ 26 ], and a similar Japanese study found patients with elevated BMIs (> 23 kg/m 2 ) had lower rates of proteinuria remission following treatment [ 27 ]. Obesity is postulated to increase proteinuria by inducing ultrastructural changes to the glomerular basement membrane [ 28 , 29 ]. While these correlations are likely to have been confounded by factors such as hypertension [ 30 , 31 ], a small RCT nevertheless has demonstrated benefits of weight loss in overweight patients diagnosed with primary IgAN, beyond maximal RAS blockade, hypertension control and protein/sodium restriction [ 32 ].

Smoking cessation

There is some evidence from case–control and observational cohort studies that smoking may be an independent and dose-dependent risk factor for progressive renal function decline in IgAN [ 33 – 35 ].

Fish oil supplementation

KDIGO and Japanese guidelines both suggest use of fish oil in IgAN, with KDIGO limiting its recommendation to patients with persistent proteinuria despite optimised supportive care [ 16 , 18 ]. The evidence for benefit from fish oil is, however, mixed with a collection of small RCTs showing fish oil can slow renal function loss, but with mixed effects on proteinuria [ 36 – 38 ]. Perhaps more compelling are the meta-analyses of all fish oil data which have failed to demonstrate any consistent benefit in IgAN [ 39 ]. As such most nephrologists do not advocate fish oil in IgAN.

Renin–angiotensin system blockade

The role of RAS blockade in IgAN patients is well established. Both guidelines recommend RAS antagonism with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or an angiotensin II-receptor blocker (ARB) in patients with proteinuria greater than 1 g/day. Several RCTs have demonstrated the benefits of RAS blockade [ 40 – 42 ], and a meta-analysis of 11 such trials found ACE-I/ARBs were successful at reducing proteinuria, lowering blood pressure and slowing the rate of renal function decline. This held true even when 6 of the 11 studies that were deemed ‘poor quality’ (assessed by the Jadad score) were removed from the analysis [ 43 ]. Indeed, this finding has been corroborated by more recent studies, such as the STOP-IgAN trial, in which the use of ACE-I /ARBs in addition to other supportive measures was as effective as combination therapy with immunosuppressants in preventing decline in eGFR in IgAN [ 44 ]. RAS blockade is the first-line management in IgAN. Dual RAS blockade is controversial. While dual therapy has been shown to result in a greater reduction in proteinuria compared to monotherapy, this occurs at the cost of more frequent adverse events with no clear evidence for improvement in long-term eGFR [ 45 , 46 ].

Tonsillectomy

The evidence for tonsillectomy varies worldwide, and the practice is more common in Asia compared to Europe. It is thought to reduce upper airway infections and consequently the production of poorly O- galactosylated IgA1 (galactose deficient or Gd-IgA1) [ 47 – 50 ]. Studies from Asian cohorts report a reduction in proteinuria following tonsillectomy [ 51 – 54 ], however many of these were uncontrolled retrospective studies, and favourable outcomes were mostly seen in association with corticosteroids. Conversely, large retrospective European studies have found no benefit with tonsillectomy [ 55 – 57 ]. This difference may highlight ethnic variations in the pathogenic drivers for IgAN. Alternatively, the difference may be due to differences in the time point at which tonsillectomy is performed; the procedure is often performed soon after diagnosis in Japan, while in Europe it is employed only following recurrent episodes of tonsillitis. The KDIGO guidelines does not recommend tonsillectomy in IgAN, while the Japanese guidelines suggest its use early in the natural history of the disease irrespective of whether there is a history of tonsillitis. Both guidelines acknowledge the need for a well constructed RCT of tonsillectomy in IgAN.

Immunosuppression

A number of traditional immunosuppressive agents have been tried in IgAN, including corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil. Much of the available evidence for efficacy of immunosuppression in IgAN is, however, weak and based on a small number of studies that do not reflect current standard of care for proteinuric glomerular disease [ 58 – 60 ]. These studies have several limitations [ 61 ], they notably lacked a ‘run in’ phase making it unclear if a benefit would have existed beyond optimised supportive therapy. Both guidelines do, however, suggest a treatment course of systemic glucocorticoids in those with proteinuria above 1 g/day and eGFR higher than 50 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (KDIGO) or 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (Japanese Guidelines) despite supportive care.

The role of corticosteroids in IgAN remains an area of contention, and practice varies considerably worldwide. The STOP-IgAN trial, conducted in Germany, included a 6-month run-in period, over which time patients were given intensive supportive management. Patients were then randomised to receive either immunosuppressive therapy (corticosteroids or cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids followed with azathioprine) or to continue on supportive management and were followed up for 3 years [ 44 ]. The STOP-IgAN study demonstrated little benefit of immunosuppressive agents over supportive therapy [ 62 , 63 ] and importantly 34% of the patients in the run-in phase had proteinuria which settled to below 0.75 g/day (the inclusion criteria for the subsequent randomisation stage), demonstrating the value of supportive management. Corticosteroids were associated with a higher rate of clinical remission compared to supportive therapy alone, however, this came at the expense of more adverse events, including glucose metabolism disturbances, weight gain and infections. A substudy of the retrospective VALIGA cohort did report benefit with corticosteroids in patients with an eGFR < 50 ml/min compared to a propensity matched cohort that did not receive corticosteroid monotherapy, although no comment on safety could be made as no adverse event data had been collected [ 64 ].

The TESTING trial, which recruited the majority of patients from China, compared methylprednisolone (0.8 mg/kg/day; maximum 48 mg/day) against placebo, and demonstrated that a relatively high corticosteroid dose had potential renal benefit, with a reduction of patients in the methylprednisolone group reaching the primary composite renal outcome (40% decrease in eGFR, ESRD or death due to kidney failure; 5.9% vs 15.9% in the placebo group), and a reduced mean annual eGFR decline in this group (− 1.79 in the methylprednisolone group vs − 6.95 ml/min/1.73 m 2 in the placebo group). However, this came at a cost with a significantly increased rate of adverse events, and the study was terminated early by the data safety monitoring committee due to the increased number of life-threatening infections in the treatment arm [ 65 ]. Of interest, the rate of annual eGFR decline in the placebo arm of the TESTING study was much higher compared to the supportive care arm of the STOP-IgAN study (− 6.95 vs − 1.6 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ), supporting findings from a previous observational study that patients of East Asian origin may have more rapid rates of renal decline in IgAN [ 66 ], and therefore could conceivably respond differently to immunosuppressive therapy. There are clearly differences in clinical practice and use of corticosteroids in IgAN worldwide, with prednisolone commonly used in Japan at an average dose of 10–15 mg/d (i.e. much lower than the original TESTING study). Further study of the effects of lower dose corticosteroids on renal decline in IgAN vs their associated adverse effects is required in the context of well-designed randomised controlled trials, and the currently recruiting TESTING low dose study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01560052 ), comparing 0.4 mg/kg/day methylprednisolone to placebo, should hopefully provide some answers.

In 2018 the role of immunosuppression in IgAN remains unclear [ 67 , 68 ]. There is no convincing evidence for the value of MMF, cyclophosphamide and azathioprine in IgAN. The current paucity of data to support the use of traditional immunosuppressive agents in IgAN highlights a need for development of novel therapies to treat this important cause of kidney disease. Over the past 5 years there has been a slowly increasing number of clinical trials testing novel and repurposed therapies in IgAN and it is an exciting time in the field of IgAN. Here, we summarise recent trials and their outcomes.

Novel therapies

Atacicept ( NCT02808429 ) and blisibimod ( NCT02062684 )

BAFF (B-cell activating factor) and April (a proliferation inducing ligand) are members of the tumour necrosis factor family which mediate B-cell function and survival [ 69 ]. Over expression of BAFF in transgenic mice has been shown to result in IgA deposition in the renal mesangium. BAFF and April levels are elevated in the serum of IgAN patients and correlate with disease activity [ 70 – 73 ]. TACI (transmembrane activator and calcium-modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor) binds BAFF and April, mediating their downstream effects through the NF-κB pathway. Atacicept is a fusion protein containing the extracellular ligand binding domain of TACI and can therefore block the downstream effects of BAFF and April (Fig. 1 ). Blisibimod is a selective antagonist of BAFF. Atacicept and blisibimod have been investigated in other autoimmune conditions, including SLE and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [ 74 , 75 ]. Phase II studies to assess safety and efficacy in IgAN are underway (Atacicept) or have recently finished (blisibimod) and results are awaited (Table 1 ).

Fig. 1 Targets of novel/repurposed drugs. Target 1: B-lymphocyte activation results in the production IgA1 poorly O- glycosylated at the hinge region (gd-IgA1, highlighted in red). This results in the generation of auto-antibodies, which leads to the formation of immune complexes. The deposition of immune complexes in the mesangium will lead to varying degrees of inflammation and fibrosis. Atacicept, blisibimod, TRF-budesonide, bortezomib and microbiome modulation can modulate B-lymphocyte activity, which may theoretically lead to a reduction in the production of Gd-IgA1, the auto-antibodies and circulating immune complexes. Target 2: Acthar, avacopan, OMS721 and LNP023 all act in the kidney to suppress local inflammation and subsequent fibrosis, dampening the downstream consequences of immune complex deposition. Fostamatinib acts both at the level of the B-cell and directly in the kidney reducing the inflammatory response to IgA deposition. IgA1 proteases are capable of digesting both circulating and deposited IgA and IgA immune complexes

Table 1 Clinical trials of novel/repurposed drugs in IgAN for which results are awaited Trial Intervention Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Trial design Primary end point Follow-up duration Atacicept NCT02808429 Atacicept at varying doses vs placebo Proteinuria 1–6 g/day Stabilised on RASi for 8 weeks Prior cyclophosphamide treatment Use of other immunosuppressants within 4 months Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II trial Incidence of adverse events 180 weeks BRIGHT-SC NCT02062684 Blisibimod vs placebo Proteinuria 1–6 g/day Stabilised on RASi for 8 weeks Immunosuppressant use over last 6 months or corticosteroid use over last 3 months. Malignancy over last 5 years Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II/III trial Reduction of proteinuria at 24 weeks 104 weeks SIGN NCT02112838 Fostamatinib at varying doses vs placebo Stabilised on RASi for 90 days. BP < 130/80 Proteinuria > 1 g/day at diagnosis and > 0.5 g/day at second screening visit Recent use of corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine or rituximab Randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase II trial Reduction of proteinuria at 24 weeks 24 weeks VELCADE NCT01103778 Bortezomib Proteinuria > 1 g/day Stabilised on RASi for 4 weeks Peripheral neuropathy, history of cardiac problems, malignancy within last 3 years Open-label, Phase IV trial Reduction of proteinuria at 1 year 1 year ACTHAR NCT02282930 Acthar gel Proteinuria > 1 g/day Stabilised on RASi for 3 months BP > 130/80 HSP patients included Crohn’s disease or celiac sprue Glucocorticoid treatment in last 3 months Immunosuppressive therapy in last 6 months Previous ACTH treatment History of malignancy History of cardiac or pulmonary disease Open-label, Phase III trial Reduction in proteinuria at 1 year, stabilisation of eGFR at 1 year 1 year OMS721 NCT02682407 OMS721 vs placebo Patients on immunosuppressive patients included, if on stable dose for 2 months Optimised RASi, BP < 150/90, Urine ACR > 600 mg/g Renal transplant History of malignancy Use of belimumab, rituximab, or eculizumab within last 6 months HSP within 2 years Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase II trial Incidence of adverse events 18 weeks LNP023 NCT03373461 LNP023 vs placebo Stabilised on RASi for 90 days eGFR ≥ 30, proteinuria ≥ 0.75 g/day Recent use of immunosuppression, history of drug/alcohol abuse, malignancy Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase IIa/IIb trial Reduction of proteinuria at 90 days 180 Days All RCTs required adult patients to have biopsy proven IgAN as part of their inclusion criteria, and excluded patients with secondary IgAN, liver disease, infections, and pregnant/breast feeding women. All trials, except SIGN trial, explicitly stated exclusion if evidence of significant glomerular/cortical scarring was present on biopsy RASi renin–angiotensin system inhibition, IgAV IgA vasculitis/Henoch–Schonlein purpura

Fostamatinib ( NCT01738035 )

Tyrosine kinase (TK) pathways have major roles in homeostasis and disease, and a number of TK inhibitors have been licensed for treatment of a variety of conditions [ 76 ]. Spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) is a non-receptor TK that may modulate a number of key pathogenic pathways in IgAN [ 77 ]. SYK acts as a signal transducer following B-cell receptor activation, mediating downstream signalling and promoting B-cell maturation and survival. Additionally, there is mounting evidence to suggest that SYK plays a role in the kidney in IgAN. Stimulation of mesangial cells in vitro with IgA1 purified from IgAN patients triggers SYK phosphorylation, along with the release of pro-inflammatory mediators [ 77 ]. Furthermore, patients with endocapillary hypercellularity in their biopsy (a lesion which occurs in 20–50% of patients with IgAN and may signify amenability of the disease to treatment) exhibit higher renal SYK expression compared to patients without the lesion [ 78 ]. There is therefore a strong case for targeting the SYK pathway in IgAN. Fostamatinib is a selective SYK inhibitor that has been studied in RA where it lowered disease activity compared to placebo. However, this came at the expense of adverse effects at a rate of up to 72.2%, with the commonest being diarrhoea and hypertension. There were no deaths reported [ 79 ]. A Phase II trial of fostamatinib to evaluate its safety and efficacy in IgAN has recently finished (Table 1 ).

Rituximab ( NCT00498368 )

Rituximab is a widely used monoclonal antibody which targets the CD20 receptor on B-cells. It had been postulated that rituximab could reduce Gd-IgA1 and anti-Gd-IgA1-IgG antibody production by causing B-cell depletion, which would in turn provide renoprotection [ 80 ]. However, a recent trial comparing rituximab with supportive care to supportive care alone, failed to show an effect of rituximab on Gd-IgA1/autoantibody levels, eGFR and proteinuria (Table 2 ).

Table 2 Clinical trials of novel/repurposed drugs in IgAN for which results have been published Trial Intervention Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Trial design Primary end point Follow-up Sample size Outcome Avacopan NCT02384317 Avacopan 30 mg twice daily After 4 weeks of optimised RASi eGFR > 60 eGFR > 45 if decline < 10 mL/min/1.73 m 2 over prior 24 weeks Urine PCR > 1 g/g Proteinuria > 8 g/day, Malignancy within 5 years, cardiac disease, immunosuppression in last 24 weeks. HSP within last 2 years Open-label Phase II trial Incidence of adverse events 12 weeks 7 Reduction of proteinuria in 6 of 7 patients Rituximab NCT00498368 Rituximab + supportive care vs supportive care alone After 2 months of optimised RASi Proteinuria ≥ 1 g/day BP < 130/80 HSP included eGFR < 30 > 6 months of steroids > 50% glomerular senescence or cortical scarring, history of Crohn’s disease or celiac sprue Randomised, open-label, multicentre, Phase IV trial Proteinuria and eGFR at 12 months 12 months 34, American No effect on end points NEFIGAN NCT01738035 TRF-budesonide 8 mg or 16 mg + supportive care vs supportive care alone After 6 months of optimised RASi Urine PCR ≥ 0.5 g/g OR urine protein ≥ 0.75 g/24 h eGFR ≥ 45, BP ≤ 160/100 Immunosuppression over previous 24 months, or at any time for IgAN Renal transplant, diabetes, malignancy over last 3 years Randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase II trial Urine PCR at 9 months and 12 months 12 months 149, European Reduction in urine PCR achieved by budesonide All RCTs required adult patients to have biopsy proven IgAN as part of their inclusion criteria, and excluded patients with secondary IgAN, liver disease, infections, and pregnant/breast feeding women. The rituximab trial explicitly stated exclusion of if evidence of significant glomerular/cortical scarring was present on biopsy RASi renin–angiotensin system inhibition

TRF-budesonide ( NCT01738035 )

Targeted-release formulation of budesonide (TRF-budesonide) is designed to deliver budesonide to the distal ileum, a major site of mucosal B cell localisation within the mucosal associated lymphoid tissue (MALT). It has been long established that there is an as yet ill-defined link between the mucosal immune system and IgAN [ 81 ], and therefore targeting the gut MALT represents a novel strategy in the treatment of IgAN. As TRF-budesonide is heavily degraded by first pass metabolism in the liver, with only 10% entering systemic circulation, this formulation could significantly reduce the systemic adverse effects of corticosteroid therapy while suppressing mucosal B-cell activation and proliferation [ 82 ]. The NEFIGAN Phase IIb trial investigated the efficacy and safety of two doses of TRF-budesonide compared to placebo in IgAN patients already receiving maximal supportive care (Table 2 ). The study demonstrated a significant reduction in proteinuria after 9 months treatment with TRF-budesonide, and although more adverse events were noted with treatment, this did not reach statistical significance [ 81 , 83 ]. While eGFR was stable in the treated group, there was a significant decline in the placebo treated group which was greater than expected for patients receiving optimised RAS inhibition, and commentators have questioned the robustness with which supportive therapy was administered overall [ 81 ]. It is, however, likely that the observed reduction in time averaged proteinuria seen with TRF-budesonide would likely translate to long-term improvements in renal outcome [ 84 , 85 ]. This trial represents a positive first step in the search for a targeted therapy in IgAN and highlights the importance of the gut-kidney axis in IgAN. A Phase III registration study, NefIgArd, is now underway ( NCT03643965 ).

Bortezomib ( NCT01103778 )

Bortezomib is a semi-selective plasma cell proteasome inhibitor used in the treatment of multiple myeloma [ 86 ]. Proteasomes are essential intracellular protein complexes that degrade unneeded or damaged proteins by proteolysis [ 87 ]. Interferon gamma and alpha induce proteasomes to switch to immunoproteasomes, which have important roles in antigen processing and T cell activation [ 88 ]. Dysregulation of the proteasome:immunoproteasome axis has been shown in mononuclear cells in IgAN with over expression of the immunoproteasome, increased nuclear translocation of factors related to the NF-kB pathway, and more severe disease manifestations including increased proteinuria [ 89 ]. Use of bortezomib has expanded recently, with trials in solid tumours, amyloidosis, lymphomas and antibody mediated allograft rejection [ 90 – 92 ]. A clinical trial is currently underway to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bortezomib in IgAN (Table 1 ). A general concern is that the side effects of bortezomib (peripheral neuropathy, thrombocytopenia, rash, fatigue and anorexia) are likely to significantly limit its use in asymptomatic young patients with IgAN [ 90 ].

Acthar ( NCT01103778 )

Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) is currently licensed in the United States of America for idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and nephrotic syndrome due to lupus nephritis. ACTH exerts its renoprotective effects though steroid-dependent and independent mechanisms, the latter thought to be mediated by the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R). MC1R is found on several kidney cell types, including glomerular endothelial cells, podocytes, mesangial cells and tubular epithelial cells. MC1R agonists have renoprotective effects in vitro, and reduce proteinuria in animal models [ 93 , 94 ]. A recent multicentre retrospective case series of ACTH use in resistant nephrotic syndrome included five patients with IgAN. Of these five patients, three experienced a reduction in proteinuria of ≥ 30%, however one patient ended the treatment early due to weight gain and hypertension. Of the full set of 44 patients with a variety of glomerular pathologies, 13 reported adverse events including weight gain, hypertension, hyperglycaemia, hypokalaemia and upper respiratory tract infections [ 95 ]. It was not clear if this was dose dependent. An open-label single group trial is currently underway, with the goal of assessing the safety and efficacy of ACTHAR in IgAN (Table 1 ).

Avacopan ( NCT02384317 ), LNP023 ( NCT03373461 ) and OMS721 ( NCT02682407 )

Since the first description of IgAN it has been clear that complement activation plays an important role in the final pathway to glomerular injury in IgAN [ 96 , 97 ]. C5a is a potent local inflammatory mediator, and is generated through the cleavage of C5, following the activation of C3 convertase [ 98 ]. The presence of C5a in the kidney correlates with histological severity and proteinuria in IgAN [ 99 ]. Targeting C5a therefore offers an opportunity to suppress the local inflammation contributing to progressive renal disease, while preserving the formation of the C5b-9 (membrane attack complex) which plays a crucial role in the elimination of gram negative bacteria [ 100 ]. Avacopan, a C5a receptor blocker, has been evaluated in an open-label Phase II trial in seven patients with IgAN (Table 2 ). At the end of 12 weeks, proteinuria reduced in 6 of the 7 patients, with 3 of the 7 patients showing significant improvement to UPCR < 1 g/g. Longer term studies are needed in IgAN, however, there is an increasing literature on the safety and efficacy of avacopan in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis, where it has been shown to be effective in replacing high-dose corticosteroids, although it has been associated with hepatic dysfunction and an increased risk of infection in a small proportion of patients [ 101 ].

Both the alternative and lectin pathways of complement activation are believed to be important in IgAN [ 102 , 103 ]. The alternative pathway is an important amplification mechanism for classical and lectin-pathway activation, resulting in greater opsonisation and generation of the terminal lytic pathway. The two proteases Factor D and Factor B are essential for this tightly regulated amplification process. Selective small-molecule reversible inhibitors of Factors B and D have been developed and these inhibitors efficiently block alternative pathway activation. A Phase II Phase IIa/IIb dose ranging study of LNP023, a first in class oral inhibitor of Factor B, in IgAN has recently commenced with recruitment expected to be completed in early 2019 (Table 1 ).

Glomerular lectin pathway activation correlates with increased proteinuria and histological damage in IgAN [ 104 ]. Mannose-binding lectin associated serine protease 2 (MASP-2) is a key component of the lectin pathway and promotes C3 convertase formation and subsequent downstream inflammatory effects. Targeting MASP-2 may thus reduce glomerular lectin pathway activation while still allowing C3 convertase to be generated through the classical and alternative pathways. The MASP-2 inhibitor OMS721 is currently being evaluated in Phase II and Phase III studies in IgAN (Table 1 ).

Experimental therapies for the future

IgA1 proteases

There has been longstanding interest in the use of bacterial proteases that cleave IgA1, as a potential therapy for IgAN [ 105 ]. IgA1 proteases are produced by bacteria including Streptococcus pneumonia, Haemophilus influenzae , and Neisseria meningitides , and directly cleave the hinge region of human IgA1, but not IgA2. Evaluation of this therapy has been hampered by the lack of an appropriate mouse model, as murine IgA exists as one isoform that more closely resembles IgA2 and lacks the extended hinge region of IgA1. More recently, a humanised mouse model, that expresses human IgA1 and develops spontaneous mesangial IgA deposition, has been used to show that administering recombinant IgA1-proteases from H. influenzae reduced IgA1 and C3 deposition, glomerular macrophage infiltration and fibronectin deposition, with a corresponding reduction in haematuria [ 106 ]. However, mesangial deposits recurred shortly after completion of the treatment course, and a strong IgG response against the IgA1-protease occurred after 3 injections, suggesting that this approach may need to be part of a combined strategy with other therapies. There have been no reported studies in human IgAN to date.

Modulation of the microbiome

There has been a great deal of interest in potential associations between the microbiome and human disease. The microbiome is defined as the collective genomes of the microbes (bacteria, bacteriophages, fungi, protozoa and viruses) within a microbiota (specific niche, such as the human gut) [ 107 ]. The number of microbes in the human body far exceeds the number of human cells by approximately ten to one, with the largest number of microbes residing in the intestinal tract. It is well established that around 30% of patients experience a flare of their IgAN, in terms of visible haematuria, in conjunction with a mucosal infection, most commonly an upper respiratory tract or gastrointestinal infection. In a transgenic mouse that overexpresses BAFF and develops hyper-IgA syndrome, spontaneous glomerular IgA deposition was dependent upon the presence of gut microbiota, as mice raised in germ-free conditions were protected until gut microbiota were introduced [ 73 ]. In a cross-sectional study, patients with progressive IgAN had a reduced faecal microbial diversity, compared to those with non-progressive IgAN and healthy subjects [ 108 ]. With the advent of mucosal targeted therapies, such as TRF-budesonide, which have demonstrated efficacy in IgAN there is a heightened interest in the possible contribution of the gut microbiota in the development of IgAN. Manipulating the gut microbiota with probiotics may prove to be a viable and low risk therapeutic strategy in the future.

Treatment of IgAN recurrence

Treatment of IgAN recurrence post renal transplantation is an extremely understudied area, and the optimum immunosuppressive strategy is not known. The approach to treatment is generally based on evidence in IgAN in native kidneys. ACEis/ARBs are recommended, however evidence for other treatments is lacking. It is hoped that once efficacy and safety of the new therapies being tested is confirmed there will be a desire to study these drugs in IgAN transplant recurrence.

IgA vasculitis

Another understudied disease is IgA vasculitis, a condition with strong similarities to IgAN. Current treatment recommendations are based largely on the guidelines for IgAN. It is again hoped that should any of the drugs currently being evaluated prove to be efficacious and safe in IgAN that there will be a drive to test them in IgA vasculitis.

Conclusions

In 2018 the future looks bright with regard to potential new therapies to treat IgAN. The pharmaceutical industry has engaged with the IgAN community to unprecedented levels and global studies in IgAN are now becoming the standard. Including participants from different ethnic backgrounds is essential if we are to evaluate any new treatment as it is still unclear whether the underlying pathogenic pathways driving IgAN are the same in all parts of the world.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Conflict of interest

Haresh Selvaskandan, Chee Kay Cheung, Masahiro Muto have declared that no conflict of interest exists. Jonathan Barratt: Consultancies: Omeros, EMD Serono, Calliditas, Novartis, Aduro Biotech, Retrophin.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants.

References

1. Roberts ISD Pathology of IgA nephropathy Nat Rev Nephrol 2014 10 8 445 454 24861083 10.1038/nrneph.2014.92

2. Nakai S Wada A Kitaoka T Shinzato T Nagura Y Kikuchi K An overview of regular dialysis treatment in Japan (as of 31 December 2004) Ther Apher Dial 2006 10 6 476 497 17199880 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2006.00440.x

3. Berger J Hinglais N Intercapillary deposits of IgA-IgG J Urol Nephrol (Paris) 1968 74 9 694 695 4180586

4. Hwang S, Tsai J, Chen H. Epidemiology, impact and preventive care of chronic kidney disease in Taiwan. Nephrology (Carlton). 2010;15Suppl 2:3–9. 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01304.x 20586940

5. Chembo CL Marshall MR Williams LC Walker RJ Lynn KL Irvine J Long-term outcomes for primary glomerulonephritis: New Zealand Glomerulonephritis Study Nephrology (Carlton) 2015 20 12 899 907 26096749 10.1111/nep.12538

6. Murugapandian S Mansour I Hudeeb M Hamed K Hammode E Bijin B Epidemiology of glomerular disease in Southern Arizona: review of 10-year renal biopsy data Medicine 2016 95 18 e3633 27149502 10.1097/MD.0000000000003633 PMC4863819

7. Fabiano RCG Pinheiro SVB Simões E Silva A Immunoglobulin A nephropathy: a pathophysiology view Inflamm Res 2016 65 10 757 770 27351940 10.1007/s00011-016-0962-x

8. Suzuki H Kiryluk K Novak J Moldoveanu Z Herr AB Renfrow MB The pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy J Am Soc Nephrol 2011 22 10 1795 1803 21949093 10.1681/ASN.2011050464 PMC3892742

9. Wyatt RJ Julian BA IgA Nephropathy N Engl J Med 2013 368 25 2402 2414 23782179 10.1056/NEJMra1206793

10. Reid S Cawthon PM Craig JC Samuels JA Molony DA Strippoli GF Non-immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 16 3 CD003962 10.1002/14651858.CD003962.pub2 21412884

11. Selvaskandan H Dillon M Barratt J IgA nephropathy: driving innovation with a rare renal disease registry J Kidney Care 2017 2 4 205 211

12. Floege J IgA nephropathy: toward more specific diagnosis (and rescue of snails) Kidney Int 2018 93 3 542 544 29475546 10.1016/j.kint.2017.10.028

13. Suzuki H Biomarkers for IgA nephropathy on the basis of multi-hit pathogenesis Clin Exp Nephrol 2018 08 56 10.1007/s10157-018-1582-2 PMC6344607 29740706

14. Selvaskandan H Pawluczyk I Barratt J MicroRNAs: a new avenue to understand, investigate and treat immunoglobulin A nephropathy? Clin Kidney J 2018 11 1 29 37 29423198 10.1093/ckj/sfx096 PMC5798124

15. Roberts ISD Cook HT Troyanov S Alpers CE Amore A Barratt J The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: pathology definitions, correlations, and reproducibility Kidney Int 2009 76 5 546 556 19571790 10.1038/ki.2009.168

16. KDIGO KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis Kidney Int Suppl 2012 2 2 209 217

17. Kiryluk K Li Y Sanna-Cherchi S Rohanizadegan M Suzuki H Eitner F Geographic differences in genetic susceptibility to IgA nephropathy: GWAS replication study and geospatial risk analysis PLoS Genet 2012 8 6 e1002765 22737082 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002765 PMC3380840

18. The Special Study Group of the Progressive Renal Dysfunction Research Group of the Ministry of. Health Labour and Welfare. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for IgA nephropathy 2017. Tokyo-igakusha, Tokyo 2017.

19. Koulouridis E Koulouridis I Is the dietary protein restriction achievable in chronic kidney disease? The impact upon quality of life and the dialysis delay Hippokratia 2011 15 Suppl 1 3 7 21897750 PMC3139676

20. Fouque D Laville M Boissel JP Low protein diets for chronic kidney disease in non diabetic adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006 19 2 CD001892 10.1002/14651858.CD001892.pub2 16625550

21. Konishi Y Okada N Okamura M Morikawa T Okumura M Yoshioka K Sodium sensitivity of blood pressure appearing before hypertension and related to histological damage in immunoglobulin a nephropathy Hypertension 2001 38 1 81 85 11463764 10.1161/01.hyp.38.1.81

22. Suzuki T Miyazaki Y Shimizu A Ito Y Okonogi H Ogura M Sodium-sensitive variability of the antiproteinuric efficacy of RAS inhibitors in outpatients with IgA nephropathy Clin Nephrol 2009 72 4 274 285 19825333 10.5414/cnp72274

23. Bolignano D Zoccali C Effects of weight loss on renal function in obese CKD patients: a systematic review Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013 28 Suppl 4 98 10.1093/ndt/gft302 24092846

24. Iseki K Ikemiya Y Kinjo K Inoue T Iseki C Takishita S Body mass index and the risk of development of end-stage renal disease in a screened cohort Kidney Int 2004 65 5 1870 1876 15086929 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00582.x

25. Hsu C McCulloch CE Iribarren C Darbinian J Go AS Body mass index and risk for end-stage renal disease Ann Intern Med 2006 144 1 21 28 16389251 10.7326/0003-4819-144-1-200601030-00006

26. Ouyang Y Xie J Yang M Zhang X Ren H Wang W Underweight is an independent risk factor for renal function deterioration in patients with IgA nephropathy PLoS One 2016 11 9 e0162044 27611091 10.1371/journal.pone.0162044 PMC5017745

27. Shimamoto M Ohsawa I Suzuki H Hisada A Nagamachi S Honda D Impact of Body Mass Index on progression of IgA nephropathy among Japanese patients J Clin Lab Anal 2015 29 5 353 360 25131157 10.1002/jcla.21778 PMC6807233

28. Tanaka M Yamada S Iwasaki Y Sugishita T Yonemoto S Tsukamoto T Impact of obesity on IgA nephropathy: comparative ultrastructural study between obese and non-obese patients Nephron Clin Pract 2009 112 2 71 10.1159/000213084 19390205

29. Tanaka M Tsujii T Komiya T Iwasaki Y Sugishita T Yonemoto S Clinicopathological influence of obesity in IgA nephropathy: comparative study of 74 patients Contrib Nephrol 2007 157 90 93 17495442 10.1159/000102309

30. Bonnet F Deprele C Sassolas A Moulin P Alamartine E Berthezène F Excessive body weight as a new independent risk factor for clinical and pathological progression in primary IgA nephritis Am J Kidney Dis 2001 37 4 720 727 11273871 10.1016/s0272-6386(01)80120-7

31. Berthoux F Mariat C Maillard N Overweight/obesity revisited as a predictive risk factor in primary IgA nephropathy Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013 28 Suppl 4 166 10.1093/ndt/gft286 24026246

32. Kittiskulnam P Kanjanabuch T Tangmanjitjaroen K Chancharoenthana W Praditpornsilpa K Eiam-Ong S The beneficial effects of weight reduction in overweight patients with chronic proteinuric immunoglobulin a nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial J Ren Nutr 2014 24 3 200 207 24759301 10.1053/j.jrn.2014.01.016

33. Cha YJ Lim BJ Kim BS Kim Y Yoo TH Han SH Smoking-related renal histologic injury in IgA nephropathy patients Yonsei Med J 2016 57 1 209 216 26632403 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.1.209 PMC4696955

34. Yamamoto R Nagasawa Y Shoji T Iwatani H Hamano T Kawada N Cigarette smoking and progression of IgA nephropathy Am J Kidney Dis 2010 56 2 313 324 20471735 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.02.351

35. Orth SR Stöckmann A Conradt C Ritz E Ferro M Kreusser W Smoking as a risk factor for end-stage renal failure in men with primary renal disease Kidney Int 1998 54 3 926 931 9734618 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00067.x

36. Ferraro PM Ferraccioli GF Gambaro G Fulignati P Costanzi S Combined treatment with renin-angiotensin system blockers and polyunsaturated fatty acids in proteinuric IgA nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009 24 1 156 160 18685141 10.1093/ndt/gfn454

37. Alexopoulos E Stangou M Pantzaki A Kirmizis D Memmos D Treatment of severe IgA nephropathy with omega-3 fatty acids: the effect of a “very low dose” regimen Ren Fail 2004 26 4 453 459 15462115 10.1081/jdi-200026763

38. Donadio JV Bergstralh EJ Offord KP Spencer DC Holley KE A controlled trial of fish oil in IgA nephropathy. Mayo nephrology collaborative group N Engl J Med 1994 331 18 1194 1199 7935657 10.1056/NEJM199411033311804

39. Pettersson EE Rekola S Berglund L Sundqvist KG Angelin B Diczfalusy U Treatment of IgA nephropathy with omega-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study Clin Nephrol 1994 41 4 183 190 8026109

40. Coppo R Peruzzi L Amore A Piccoli A Cochat P Stone R IgACE: a placebo-controlled, randomized trial of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in children and young people with IgA nephropathy and moderate proteinuria J Am Soc Nephrol 2007 18 6 1880 1888 17513327 10.1681/ASN.2006040347

41. Li PK Leung CB Chow KM Cheng YL Fung SK Mak SK Hong Kong study using valsartan in IgA nephropathy (HKVIN): a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study Am J Kidney Dis 2006 47 5 751 760 16632013 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.01.017

42. Praga M Gutiérrez E González E Morales E Hernández E Treatment of IgA nephropathy with ACE inhibitors: a randomized and controlled trial J Am Soc Nephrol 2003 14 6 1578 1583 12761258 10.1097/01.asn.0000068460.37369.dc

43. Cheng J Zhang W Zhang XH He Q Tao XJ Chen JH ACEI/ARB therapy for IgA nephropathy: a meta analysis of randomised controlled trials Int J Clin Pract 2009 63 6 880 888 19490198 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02038.x

44. Rauen T Eitner F Fitzner C Sommerer C Zeier M Otte B Intensive supportive care plus immunosuppression in IgA nephropathy N Engl J Med 2015 373 23 2225 26630142 10.1056/NEJMoa1415463

45. Cheng J Zhang X Tian J Li Q Chen J Combination therapy an ACE inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker for IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis Int J Clin Pract 2012 66 10 917 923 22994326 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02970.x

46. Mann JFE Schmieder RE McQueen M Dyal L Schumacher H Pogue J Renal outcomes with telmisartan, ramipril, or both, in people at high vascular risk (the ONTARGET study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial Lancet 2008 372 9638 547 553 18707986 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61236-2

47. Novak J Moldoveanu Z Julian BA Raska M Wyatt RJ Suzuki Y Aberrant glycosylation of IgA1 and anti-glycan antibodies in IgA nephropathy: role of mucosal immune system Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2011 72 60 63 21865691 10.1159/000324607

48. Nakata J Suzuki Y Suzuki H Sato D Kano T Yanagawa H Changes in nephritogenic serum galactose-deficient IgA1 in IgA nephropathy following tonsillectomy and steroid therapy PLoS One 2014 9 2 e89707 24586974 10.1371/journal.pone.0089707 PMC3931817

49. Horie A Hiki Y Odani H Yasuda Y Takahashi M Kato M IgA1 molecules produced by tonsillar lymphocytes are under-O-glycosylated in IgA nephropathy Am J Kidney Dis 2003 42 3 486 496 12955676 10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00743-1

50. Itoh A Iwase H Takatani T Nakamura I Hayashi M Oba K Tonsillar IgA1 as a possible source of hypoglycosylated IgA1 in the serum of IgA nephropathy patients Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003 18 6 1108 1114 12748342 10.1093/ndt/gfg108

51. Komatsu H Fujimoto S Hara S Sato Y Yamada K Kitamura K Effect of tonsillectomy plus steroid pulse therapy on clinical remission of IgA nephropathy: a controlled study Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008 3 5 1301 1307 18508946 10.2215/CJN.00310108 PMC2518790

52. Xie Y Nishi S Ueno M Imai N Sakatsume M Narita I The efficacy of tonsillectomy on long-term renal survival in patients with IgA nephropathy Kidney Int 2003 63 5 1861 1867 12675864 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00935.x

53. Matsumoto K Ikeda Y Yamaguchi S Sanematsu M Fukuda M Takashima T Long-term outcomes of tonsillectomy for IgA nephropathy patients: a retrospective cohort study, two-center analysis with the inverse probability therapy weighting method Nephrology (Carlton) 2017 13 56 10.1111/nep.13108 28703898

54. Kawamura T Yoshimura M Miyazaki Y Okamoto H Kimura K Hirano K A multicenter randomized controlled trial of tonsillectomy combined with steroid pulse therapy in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014 29 8 1546 1553 24596084 10.1093/ndt/gfu020 PMC4106640

55. Rasche FM Schwarz A Keller F Tonsillectomy does not prevent a progressive course in IgA nephropathy Clin Nephrol 1999 51 3 147 152 10099887

56. Feehally J Coppo R Troyanov S Bellur SS Cattran D Cook T Tonsillectomy in a European Cohort of 1147 patients with IgA nephropathy Nephron 2016 132 1 15 24 26586175 10.1159/000441852

57. Ponticelli C Tonsillectomy and IgA nephritis Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012 27 7 2610 2613 22802576 10.1093/ndt/gfs093

58. Pozzi C Bolasco PG Fogazzi GB Andrulli S Altieri P Ponticelli C Corticosteroids in IgA nephropathy: a randomised controlled trial Lancet 1999 353 9156 883 887 10093981 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)03563-6

59. Manno C Torres DD Rossini M Pesce F Schena FP Randomized controlled clinical trial of corticosteroids plus ACE-inhibitors with long-term follow-up in proteinuric IgA nephropathy Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009 24 12 3694 3701 19628647 10.1093/ndt/gfp356

60. Lv J Zhang H Chen Y Li G Jiang L Singh AK Combination therapy of prednisone and ACE inhibitor versus ACE-inhibitor therapy alone in patients with IgA nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial Am J Kidney Dis 2009 53 1 26 32 18930568 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.07.029

61. Barbour S Feehally J An update on the treatment of IgA nephropathy Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2017 07 4 319 326 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000336 28399021

62. Rauen T Fitzner C Eitner F Sommerer C Zeier M Otte B Effects of two immunosuppressive treatment protocols for IgA nephropathy J Am Soc Nephrol 2018 29 1 317 325 29042456 10.1681/ASN.2017060713 PMC5748925

63. Feehally J Immunosuppression in IgA nephropathy: guideline medicine versus personalized medicine Semin Nephrol 2017 37 5 464 477 28863793 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2017.05.019

64. Coppo R Troyanov S Bellur S Cattran D Cook HT Feehally J Validation of the Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy in cohorts with different presentations and treatments Kidney Int 2014 86 4 828 836 24694989 10.1038/ki.2014.63 PMC4184028

65. Tam FWK Pusey CD TESTING corticosteroids in IgA nephropathy: a continuing challenge Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018 13 1 158 160 29237704 10.2215/CJN.10560917 PMC5753322

66. Barbour SJ Cattran DC Kim SJ Levin A Wald R Hladunewich MA Individuals of Pacific Asian origin with IgA nephropathy have an increased risk of progression to end-stage renal disease Kidney Int 2013 84 5 1017 1024 23739233 10.1038/ki.2013.210

67. Rauen T Eitner F Fitzner C Floege J Con: STOP immunosuppression in IgA nephropathy Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016 11 11 1771 1774 10.1093/ndt/gfw286 27515693

68. Pozzi C Pro STOP immunosuppression in IgA nephropathy? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016 11 11 1766 1770 10.1093/ndt/gfw285 27515694

69. Samy E Wax S Huard B Hess H Schneider P Targeting BAFF and APRIL in systemic lupus erythematosus and other antibody-associated diseases Int Rev Immunol 2017 36 1 3 19 28215100 10.1080/08830185.2016.1276903

70. Zhai Y Zhu L Shi S Liu L Lv J Zhang H Increased APRIL expression induces IgA1 Aberrant glycosylation in IgA nephropathy Medicine (Baltimore) 2016 95 11 e3099 26986150 10.1097/MD.0000000000003099 PMC4839931

71. McCarthy DD Chiu S Gao Y Summers-deLuca LE Gommerman JL BAFF induces a hyper-IgA syndrome in the intestinal lamina propria concomitant with IgA deposition in the kidney independent of LIGHT Cell Immunol 2006 241 2 85 94 16987502 10.1016/j.cellimm.2006.08.002

72. Li W Peng X Liu Y Liu H Liu F He L TLR9 and BAFF: their expression in patients with IgA nephropathy Mol Med Rep 2014 10 3 1469 1474 24993857 10.3892/mmr.2014.2359

73. McCarthy DD Kujawa J Wilson C Papandile A Poreci U Porfilio EA Mice overexpressing BAFF develop a commensal flora-dependent, IgA-associated nephropathy J Clin Invest 2011 121 10 3991 4002 21881212 10.1172/JCI45563 PMC3195458

74. Isenberg D Gordon C Licu D Copt S Rossi CP Wofsy D Efficacy and safety of atacicept for prevention of flares in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): 52-week data (APRIL-SLE randomised trial) Ann Rheum Dis 2015 74 11 2006 2015 24951103 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205067 PMC4680140

75. Lenert A Niewold TB Lenert P Spotlight on blisibimod and its potential in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: evidence to date Drug Des Devel Ther 2017 11 747 757 10.2147/DDDT.S114552 PMC5357079 28331294

76. Ma TK McAdoo SP Tam FWK Targeting the tyrosine kinase signalling pathways for treatment of immune-mediated glomerulonephritis: from bench to bedside and beyond Nephrol Dial Transplant 2017 32 1 i138 10.1093/ndt/gfw336 PMC5410974 28391340

77. Kim MJ McDaid JP McAdoo SP Barratt J Molyneux K Masuda ES Spleen tyrosine kinase is important in the production of proinflammatory cytokines and cell proliferation in human mesangial cells following stimulation with IgA1 isolated from IgA nephropathy patients J Immunol 2012 189 7 3751 3758 22956578 10.4049/jimmunol.1102603

78. McAdoo SP Bhangal G Page T Cook HT Pusey CD Tam FWK Correlation of disease activity in proliferative glomerulonephritis with glomerular spleen tyrosine kinase expression Kidney Int 2015 88 1 52 60 25715120 10.1038/ki.2015.29 PMC4488852

79. Taylor PC Genovese MC Greenwood M Ho M Nasonov E Oemar B OSKIRA-4: a phase IIb randomised, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of fostamatinib monotherapy Ann Rheum Dis 2015 74 12 2123 2129 25074688 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205361

80. Lafayette RA Canetta PA Rovin BH Appel GB Novak J Nath KA A randomized, controlled trial of Rituximab in IgA nephropathy with proteinuria and renal dysfunction J Am Soc Nephrol 2017 28 4 1306 1313 27821627 10.1681/ASN.2016060640 PMC5373458

81. Floege J Mucosal corticosteroid therapy of IgA nephropathy Kidney Int 2017 92 2 278 280 28709593 10.1016/j.kint.2017.05.021

82. Edsbäcker S Wollmer P Nilsson A Nillson M Pharmacokinetics and gastrointestinal transit of budesonide controlled ileal release (CIR) capsules Gastroenterology 1993 104 A695

83. Fellström BC Barratt J Cook H Coppo R Feehally J de Fijter JW Targeted-release budesonide versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy (NEFIGAN): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial Lancet 2017 389 10084 2117 2127 28363480 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30550-0

84. Reich HN Troyanov S Scholey JW Cattran DC Remission of proteinuria improves prognosis in IgA nephropathy J Am Soc Nephrol 2007 18 12 3177 3183 17978307 10.1681/ASN.2007050526

85. Le W Liang S Hu Y Deng K Bao H Zeng C Long-term renal survival and related risk factors in patients with IgA nephropathy: results from a cohort of 1155 cases in a Chinese adult population Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012 27 4 1479 1485 21965586 10.1093/ndt/gfr527

86. Richardson PG Barlogie B Berenson J Singhal S Jagannath S Irwin D A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma N Engl J Med 2003 26 26 2609 2617 10.1056/NEJMoa030288 12826635

87. Rock KL York IA Saric T Goldberg AL Protein degradation and the generation of MHC class I-presented peptides Adv Immunol 2002 80 1 70 12078479 10.1016/s0065-2776(02)80012-8

88. Shin E Seifert U Kato T Rice CM Feinstone SM Kloetzel P Virus-induced type I IFN stimulates generation of immunoproteasomes at the site of infection J Clin Invest 2006 116 11 3006 3014 17039255 10.1172/JCI29832 PMC1592549

89. Coppo R Camilla R Alfarano A Balegno S Mancuso D Peruzzi L Upregulation of the immunoproteasome in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with IgA nephropathy Kidney Int 2009 75 5 536 541 19037255 10.1038/ki.2008.579

90. Bahleda R Le Deley M Bernard A Chaturvedi S Hanley M Poterie A Phase I trial of bortezomib daily dose: safety, pharmacokinetic profile, biological effects and early clinical evaluation in patients with advanced solid tumors Invest New Drugs 2017 5 66 10.1007/s10637-017-0531-3 29094232

91. Leonard JP Kolibaba KS Reeves JA Tulpule A Flinn IW Kolevska T Randomized phase II study of R-CHOP with or without Bortezomib in previously untreated patients with non-germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma J Clin Oncol 2017 35 31 3538 3546 28862883 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.2784

92. Sanchorawala V Palladini G Kukreti V Zonder JA Cohen AD Seldin DC A phase 1/2 study of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed or refractory AL amyloidosis Blood 2017 130 5 597 605 28550039 10.1182/blood-2017-03-771220 PMC6911836

93. Gong R Leveraging melanocortin pathways to treat glomerular diseases Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2014 21 2 134 151 24602463 10.1053/j.ackd.2013.09.004 PMC3950821

94. Lindskog A Ebefors K Johansson ME Stefánsson B Granqvist A Arnadottir M Melanocortin 1 receptor agonists reduce proteinuria J Am Soc Nephrol 2010 21 8 1290 1298 20507942 10.1681/ASN.2009101025 PMC2938589

95. Madan A Mijovic-Das S Stankovic A Teehan G Milward AS Khastgir A Acthar gel in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome: a multicenter retrospective case series BMC Nephrol 2016 17 37 27036111 10.1186/s12882-016-0241-7 PMC4815175

96. Daha MR van Kooten C Role of complement in IgA nephropathy J Nephrol 2016 29 1 1 4 26567162 10.1007/s40620-015-0245-6 PMC4733139

97. Maillard N Wyatt RJ Julian BA Kiryluk K Gharavi A Fremeaux-Bacchi V Current understanding of the role of complement in IgA nephropathy J Am Soc Nephrol 2015 26 7 1503 1512 25694468 10.1681/ASN.2014101000 PMC4483595

98. Guo R Ward PA Role of C5a in inflammatory responses Annu Rev Immunol 2005 23 821 852 15771587 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115835

99. Liu L Zhang Y Duan X Peng Q Liu Q Zhou Y C3a, C5a renal expression and their receptors are correlated to severity of IgA nephropathy J Clin Immunol 2014 34 2 224 232 24327134 10.1007/s10875-013-9970-6

100. Figueroa JE Densen P Infectious diseases associated with complement deficiencies Clin Microbiol Rev 1991 4 3 359 395 1889047 10.1128/cmr.4.3.359 PMC358203

101. Jayne DRW Bruchfeld AN Harper L Schaier M Venning MC Hamilton P Randomized trial of C5a receptor inhibitor Avacopan in ANCA-associated vasculitis J Am Soc Nephrol 2017 28 9 2756 2767 28400446 10.1681/ASN.2016111179 PMC5576933

102. Maeng Y Kim M Park J Cho C Oh H Sung WJ Glomerular and tubular C4d depositions in IgA nephropathy: relations with histopathology and with albuminuria Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2013 6 5 904 910 23638222 PMC3638101

103. Endo M Ohi H Ohsawa I Fujita T Matsushita M Fujita T Glomerular deposition of mannose-binding lectin (MBL) indicates a novel mechanism of complement activation in IgA nephropathy Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998 13 8 1984 1990 9719152 10.1093/ndt/13.8.1984

104. Roos A Rastaldi MP Calvaresi N Oortwijn BD Schlagwein N van Gijlswijk-Janssen DJ Glomerular activation of the lectin pathway of complement in IgA nephropathy is associated with more severe renal disease J Am Soc Nephrol 2006 17 6 1724 1734 16687629 10.1681/ASN.2005090923

105. Lamm ME Emancipator SN Robinson JK Yamashita M Fujioka H Qiu J Microbial IgA protease removes IgA immune complexes from mouse glomeruli in vivo: potential therapy for IgA nephropathy Am J Pathol 2008 172 1 31 36 18165266 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070131 PMC2189629

106. Lechner SM Abbad L Boedec E Papista C Le Stang M Moal C IgA1 protease treatment reverses mesangial deposits and hematuria in a model of IgA nephropathy J Am Soc Nephrol 2016 27 9 2622 2629 26850635 10.1681/ASN.2015080856 PMC5004657

107. Turnbaugh PJ Ley RE Hamady M Fraser-Liggett CM Knight R Gordon JI The human microbiome project Nature 2007 449 7164 804 810 17943116 10.1038/nature06244 PMC3709439

108. De Angelis M Montemurno E Piccolo M Vannini L Lauriero G Maranzano V Microbiota and metabolome associated with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) PLoS One 2014 9 6 e99006 24922509 10.1371/journal.pone.0099006 PMC4055632