MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/ijerph17020404

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020

The Prevalence of E-Gambling and of Problem E-Gambling in Poland.

Lelonek-Kuleta Bernadeta, Bartczuk Rafał P, Wiechetek Michał, Chwaszcz Joanna, Niewiadomska Iwona

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study estimated the levels of involvement in e-gambling and problem e-gambling in Poland and identified selected sociodemographic variables associated with e-gambling activities. The study was conducted using a representative sample of the adult inhabitants of Poland (n = 2000). The survey contained questions measuring three aspects of gambling (involvement in e-gambling, types of e-gambling activity, and problematic e-gambling). Results suggested that 4.1% of respondents were involved in e-gambling and 26.8% of them could be classified as problem gamblers. The most popular e-gambling games were lotteries and sports betting. Gender, age, size of city of residence, level of education, and income were identified as significant predictors of involvement in e-gambling. The results indicated that men, younger people, and people who earnt less were more often involved in e-gambling. Having children, playing online scratch cards, and online sport betting-but not online lotteries-turned out to be typical for problem online gamblers. The prevalence of problem gambling among Polish e-gamblers suggests that extended research in this area is needed.

Для цитирования: Lelonek-Kuleta Bernadeta, Bartczuk Rafał P, Wiechetek Michał, Chwaszcz Joanna, Niewiadomska Iwona. The Prevalence of E-Gambling and of Problem E-Gambling in Poland.. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020404.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.