Introduction
Brain tumors are one of the most severe types of malignant tumors, due to their poor prognosis, and serious impact on quality of life and cognitive function. Glioma accounts for ~30% of all primary brain tumors and 80% of malignant brain tumors ( 1 , 2 ). Meanwhile, glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive malignant glioma and constitute ~49% of malignant brain tumors ( 3 , 4 ). The main treatment methods for glioma are surgical resection combined with adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy ( 5 ). Although clinicians and researchers have explored new treatment approaches, patient survival has not yet been markedly improved ( 6 ). Glioma has obvious heterogeneity due to the fact that it can originate from different precursor cells, which complicates treatment ( 7 , 8 ). Based on the similarity of tissue morphology to that of normal brain cells, glioma is divided into different types, including astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, oligoastrocytoma, ependymoma, and neuronal and mixed neuronal-glial tumors ( 8 , 9 ). However, there are two major disadvantages of the histological classification system; one is the obvious interobserver variability and the other is the ability to accurately predict prognosis in patients with glioma ( 9 ). To overcome these shortcomings, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) underwent revisions in 2016 ( 10 ). For the first time, the WHO classification criteria used a combination of histological and molecular features to diagnose CNS tumors ( 10 ). In addition, with the development of new diagnostic technologies, an increasing number of molecular markers [including TERT promoter mutations and epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) amplification] are being introduced into diagnostic criteria, which are beneficial for more precise classification ( 11 ). These molecular markers are conducive to the accurate prediction of patient prognosis and personalized treatment. With in-depth research on the pathogenesis of glioma, novel molecular markers have emerged, including certain members of the small guanosine triphosphate (GTP)ases ( 12 - 14 ).
The small GTPases, also known as the small G proteins or RAS superfamily, is a large protein family, which can be roughly divided into five subfamilies, namely the RAS subfamily, RHO subfamily, RAB subfamily, ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF) subfamily and RAN subfamily ( 15 ), which have similar modes of action. They are binary molecular switches that can cycle between an active GTP-bound conformation and an inactive guanosine diphosphate (GDP)-bound conformation ( 16 ). This process is strictly controlled by guanine nucleotide exchange factors that facilitate GDP dissociation, GTPase-activating proteins that stimulate GTP hydrolysis, and guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors that form soluble complexes with small GTPases by shielding their lipid ( 17 , 18 ). These small GTPases participate in most cellular biological processes, including differentiation, proliferation, cell migration, apoptosis, vesicle and organelle dynamics and transport, nuclear dynamics and regulation of the cytoskeleton ( 15 , 19 ). The mutation and abnormal expression of genes encoding small GTPases serve important roles in multiple diseases, including glioma ( 12 , 20 - 32 ). To investigate structural alterations in small GTPase genes in patients with glioma, a comprehensive analysis was performed utilizing data from Glioma (MSK, Clin Cancer Res 2019) and Merged Cohort of LGG and GBM (TCGA, Cell 2016) in cBioPortal ( https://www.cbioportal.org ) ( 33 ). The results demonstrated that the incidence of changes in small GTPase gene structure is considered to be low in glioma ( Fig. 1 ) ( 33 ). Several studies have shown that the abnormal expression of genes encoding small GTPases is often influenced by epigenetic regulation in glioma ( 34 - 66 ) ( Tables I and II ). To elucidate the evolutionary relationships among subfamily members, phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA11 ( 67 ) ( Fig. 2 ).
Epigenetic regulation is defined as an inheritable change in gene activity without significant alterations in genomic sequences ( 68 ), and it is a dynamic and reversible process. Epigenetic modifications are important for normal tissue growth, and the development and regulation of temporal and spatial expression of genes ( 69 ). The abnormal epigenetic regulation of genes participates in the initiation, development and maintenance of various diseases, including neoplasms ( 70 - 77 ). Epigenetic modifications include DNA methylation, histone or chromatin post-translational modifications (PTMs) and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) regulations ( 78 ).
DNA methylation is the most quintessential epigenetic modification, which is able to regulate gene expression, genomic stability and chromatin structure ( 69 , 79 ). DNA methylation mainly occurs on CpG sites, and higher frequency CpG sites are known as CpG islands, which are usually unmethylated ( 80 - 82 ). In addition, the abnormal hypermethylation of promoter CpG islands is able to silence tumor suppressor genes that contribute to tumorigenesis ( 83 ). DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and ten-eleven translocation proteins serve important roles in CpG methylation sites ( 84 , 85 ). Nucleosomes are the most basic units of chromatin, which are formed by DNA strands wrapping around histone octamers ( 86 ). DNA methylation and histone PTMs synergistically regulate chromatin structure and gene regulation ( 87 , 88 ). The majority of histone PTMs occur on the N- or C-terminal tails of histones that extend away from the nucleosome core particle, including methylation, acetylation, ubiquitylation, phosphorylation, SUMOylation, ADP ribosylation, citrullination and biotinylation ( 78 , 89 ). For histone PTMs, most studies have focused on acetylation, and the methylation of lysine residues on H3 and H4 ( 78 , 90 - 92 ). Different histone PTMs have different biological functions ( 93 ). For example, abnormal H3K27me3 can lead to the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes (such as SOX7 and KLF6 ) ( 90 ). Conversely, the dysregulation of H3K27ac can increase the expression levels of oncogenes (such as BCL6 and BCL11A ) ( 91 , 92 ).
ncRNAs also serve an important role in epigenetic regulation. The vast majority of the genome cannot encode proteins and is transcribed into RNA termed ncRNA ( 94 ). ncRNAs can be divided into two categories based on the number of bases: Small ncRNAs and long ncRNAs (lncRNAs) ( 95 ). Small ncRNAs include Piwi-interacting RNAs, small interfering RNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) and some bacterial regulatory RNAs ( 96 ). lncRNAs comprise linear lncRNAs and circular RNAs (circRNAs) ( 97 ). The most extensively studied small ncRNAs are miRNAs, which regulate 60% of protein-coding genes through complementarily binding to the 3′UTR of target mRNAs leading to their degradation or translational repression ( 98 , 99 ). miRNAs can exert both anticancer and pro-cancer functions depending on its target genes and the cell context. lncRNAs measure >200 nucleotides in length and have a low sequence conservation among species ( 100 , 101 ); however, they are more tissue-specific than mRNAs ( 102 ). lncRNAs can biologically function as chromatin regulators, enhancers, ncRNA sponges and molecular scaffolds, among others, in the nucleus or cytoplasm ( 78 ). circRNAs are produced through the back-splicing of linear transcripts and have circular structures that make them insensitive to exonuclease; they also have a higher stability than linear RNAs ( 103 , 104 ). The similarity between circRNAs and lncRNAs lies in their obvious tissue specificity, with the difference being that circRNAs are relatively conserved in evolution. The forms in which circRNAs function are diverse. For example, they serve as adsorption sponges for miRNAs ( 105 ), and protein scaffolds or templates for translation, among others ( 106 ). The abnormal expression of lncRNAs and circRNAs can disrupt their biological functions leading to oncogenesis ( 107 ).
Small GTPases, as important biomolecules, serve vital roles in the development of glioma; however, they rarely undergo changes in gene structure in glioma, which indicates that epigenetic regulation may be involved in regulating their abnormal expression. Due to the dynamic and reversible nature of epigenetic regulation, they have the potential to become therapeutic targets. In addition, ncRNAs can be released from tumors into the blood and urine, and thus may serve a role as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, since these samples can be obtained through non-invasive means. The aforementioned advantages have led to extensive research being conducted to elucidate the mechanism underlying the epigenetic regulation of small GTPases in glioma ( 34 - 66 , 108 - 111 ) ( Tables I and II ; Fig. 3 ). In order to promote clinical translation and offer references for follow-up studies, these studies were reviewed herein.
RAS family
The RAS subfamily contains 35 members, six of which are mentioned in the current review, namely KRAS , NRAS , RRAS , RAS-associated protein-1B ( RAP1B ), RHEB and RAS like protein family member 10A ( RASL10A ) ( Fig. 2 ) ( 34 - 40 , 42 - 46 , 112 ).
There are three classic RAS genes, HRAS , NRAS and KRAS , which encode four highly homologous protein isoforms (HRAS, NRAS, KRAS4A and KRAS4B) ( 113 ). It is well known that RAS genes are proto-oncogenes, and ~19% of patients with cancer carry RAS mutations ( 114 ). Although RAS signaling pathways are often abnormally activated in patients with GBM, the RAS mutation frequency is very low ( 115 ). As is widely recognized, RAS protein is the most critical downstream effector of EGFR, which can directly activate RAS via GRB2/SOS recruitment ( 116 ). Subsequently, the RAF-MEK-ERK1/2 signaling cascade is activated, which can regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, motility, and survival ( 117 ). Abnormal EGFR often leads to aberrant RAS activation ( 118 ). Studies have demonstrated that 57.4% of patients with GBM carry EGFR amplifications or mutations, and EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII) has been reported in 25-33% of patients with GBM ( 119 , 120 ). EGFRvIII exhibits ligand-independent constitutive activation and can directly activate RAS, which results in aberrant RAS activation ( 120 ). Some studies have also shown that the upregulation of wild-type RAS can promote oncogenesis, including in glioma ( 121 , 122 ). This implies that combined therapy targeting mutant EGFR and inhibiting RAS expression could potentially improve glioma treatment outcomes.
Certain studies have shown that downregulated miRNAs, which are negative regulatory factors of RAS genes, may contribute to overactivated RAS signaling pathways in glioma ( 34 - 38 ). Wang et al ( 34 ) reported that miR-181d is downregulated and KRAS is upregulated in glioma tissues compared with those in normal tissues. In addition, this previous study confirmed that miR-181d can directly target KRAS to restrain RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and RAS/PI3K/PTEN/AKT signaling pathways, which promote apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, and restrain the proliferation of glioma cells. Furthermore, Wang et al ( 35 ) showed that the expression of miRNA let-7a is lower in high-grade glioma compared with that in low-grade glioma, and patients with a low level of miRNA let-7a have a poor prognosis. In addition, the results of this study suggested a negative association between miRNA let-7a and KRAS expression in glioma. Furthermore, it was reported that miRNA let-7a may directly target KRAS to suppress downstream signaling pathways, which affect proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion in glioma cells independent of their PTEN mutation status ( 35 ).
RRAS is a close relative of the classic RAS protein ( 123 ); however, unlike the classic RAS gene, the RRAS gene rarely undergoes mutations in human cancer ( 123 ). Certain studies have reported that the aberrant expression of RRAS contributes to tumors of the human CNS ( 124 , 125 ). Shi et al ( 36 ) reported that the expression levels of miR-124 are clearly reduced in glioma compared with those in normal tissues, and a negative correlation has been observed between the expression of miR-124 and that of RRAS/NRAS . This previous study also revealed that RRAS and NRAS are the direct targets of miR-124, and the re-expression of miR-124 can block the PI3K/AKT and RAF/ERK1/2 pathways, which are major downstream effectors of RRAS and NRAS molecules ( 36 ). These results ultimately resulted in the inhibition of cell proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis, and increased the chemosensitivity of glioma cells. In addition, it was revealed that RRAS and NRAS can synergistically regulate vascular endothelial growth factor transcriptional activation ( 36 ). Zhang et al ( 37 ) reported that activated receptor tyrosine kinases, mesenchymal to epithelial transition factor (MET), EGFR and platelet-derived growth factor receptors might be capable of decreasing the expression levels of miR-134 in glioma. Furthermore, it was confirmed that MET could suppress the expression of miR-134 via mitogen-activated protein kinase and Krüppel-like factor 4. A reduction in the expression levels of miR-134 was shown to lead to upregulation of KRAS and the transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription 5B, as targets of miR-134 ( 37 ). These aforementioned processes may promote GBM cell proliferation and GBM stem cell (GSC) neuro-sphere formation, and block the differentiation of GSCs ( 37 ). Zhao et al ( 38 ) also revealed the antitumor effects of miR-134 by targeting KRAS in glioma.
RAP1 also belongs to the RAS subfamily and is involved in regulating cell adhesion, cell-cell junctions, migration and polarization ( 126 ). RAP1 possesses two isoforms: RAP1A and RAP1B; RAP1A mainly participates in maintaining cell-cell junctions, and RAP1B mainly regulates dynamic changes in cell-cell junctions ( 127 , 128 ). Previous studies have shown that the upregulation of RAP1B can contribute to the development of various types of cancer ( 129 , 130 ). She et al ( 39 , 40 ) reported that miR-181 subunits miR-128 and miR-149 are lowly expressed, and RAP1B is highly expressed in glioma, as a target of miR-181 subunits (miR-128 and miR-149). miR-181 subunits miR-128 and miR-149 have been shown to suppress cell proliferation and invasion, and affect the cytoskeleton remodeling of glioma cells by controlling RAP1B ( 39 , 40 ). Notably, miR-181 subunits miR-128 and miR-149 may enhance the chemosensitivity of glioma cells for temozolomide by targeting RAP1B ( 39 , 40 ). Li et al ( 41 ) indicated that the expression levels of lncRNA MALAT1 and RAP1B are increased, and those of miR-101 are decreased in glioma cell lines, compared with those in normal human astrocytes (NHAs). Furthermore, this previous study elucidated that lncRNA MALAT1 serves as a sponge of miR-101 to decrease miR-101 expression, and then increases RAP1B expression, which can promote the proliferation and block the apoptosis of glioma cell lines ( 41 ). Wan et al ( 42 ) identified that transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 7 facilitates the proliferation and invasion of glioma cells by suppressing miR-28-5p targeting RAP1B .
RHEB is found in species from yeast to humans, and has only a single effector, the target of rapamycin (TOR) Ser/Thr kinase ( 15 , 131 ). Aberrantly activated RHEB/mammalian TOR complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling is associated with proliferative disorders and tumorigenesis ( 132 ). RHEB upregulation is rarely observed in glioma cell lines compared with in normal brain cells ( 133 ); however, the aberrantly activated RTK/PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway serves a critical role in the development of glioma ( 134 , 135 ). RHEB is a key activator of TOR, and targeting RHEB may therefore suppress the progression of glioma by blocking mTOR signaling ( 15 ). Besse et al ( 43 ) demonstrated that miR-338-5p, which is a brain-specific miRNA, may partially exert antitumor effects by suppressing RHEB in glioma. Kalhori et al ( 44 , 45 ) reported that miR-579, miR-548x and miR-4698 are able to simultaneously target AKT1 and RHEB to inhibit proliferation, migration and process of the cell cycle, and promote apoptosis in glioma. However, these studies are limited to cell lines and lack clinical validation.
RHO family
The RHO subfamily has 20 members and can be divided into six groups: RHO subfamily (RHOA, RHOB and RHOC), RAC family small GTPase (RAC) subfamily (RAC1, RAC2, RAC3 and RHOG), cell division cycle 42 (CDC42) subfamily (CDC42, WRCH1, TC10, CHP and TCL), RND subfamily (RND1, RND2 and RND3), RHO BTB subfamily (RHOBTB1, RHOBTB2 and RHOBTB3) and MIRO subfamily (MIRO1 and MIRO2) ( 136 ). Their biological functions mainly include the regulation of cytoskeletal rearrangement, cell motility, cell polarity, axon guidance, vesicle trafficking and the cell cycle process ( 137 ). Dysfunctional RHO GTPase has been reported to be involved in the development of various diseases, including cancer, immunological disorders and neurological abnormalities ( 136 ). The present review mainly focuses on the abnormal epigenetic regulation of RHOA , RHOB , RHOG , RAC1 and CDC42 in glioma ( 47 - 52 ).
The most well-known function of RHOA is to regulate actin-myosin contractility and stress fiber formation, which drive cell motility and invasion, suggesting that RHOA signaling may be implicated in tumor invasion and metastasis ( 138 ). In addition, studies have established that the RHOA/ROCK signaling pathway can regulate the migration and invasion of glioma ( 139 - 141 ). Several research groups have concentrated on elucidating the mechanisms by which ncRNAs control RHOA expression in glioma. Tang et al ( 50 ) reported that leucine-rich repeat ( LRR ), a brain-specific gene, is able to upregulate miR-185, and indicated that the expression levels of LRR and miR-185 are lower in glioma tissues than those in normal tissues. This previous study also elucidated that miR-185 can suppress the invasion of glioma cells and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A by directly targeting CDC42 and RHOA ( 50 ). Notably, a significantly positive association has been reported between the expression of LRR and miR-185, and patient prognosis ( 50 ). RHOB regulates actin organization and vesicle transport, which is similar to that of RHOA and RHOC ( 142 ); however, RHOB mainly exerts anticancer function in several types of cancer ( 143 - 145 ). RHOA, RHOB and RHOC have homologous effector domains and the effectors of RHOA can interact with RHOB in a specific environment ( 146 ). RHOB may block the tumor-promoting function of RHOA and RHOC through competitive binding ( 146 ). The abnormal downregulation of RHOB has been shown to contribute to the progression of certain types of cancer, including glioma ( 25 , 51 , 147 , 148 ). Chen et al ( 51 ) reported that miR-19a expression is increased in glioma tissues, and glioma cell proliferation and invasion are promoted by miR-19a. Furthermore, it has been revealed that miR-19a performs cancer-promoting functions by directly targeting RHOB ( 51 ).
The RAC subfamily contains four members, namely RAC1, RAC2, RAC3 and RHOG ( 149 ). The RAC subfamily regulates membrane ruffling and lamellipodia formation by interacting with effector proteins ( 150 ). RAC1 is one of the most studied members, and it is involved in several types of cellular processes, including cell cytoskeletal reorganization, cell transformation, DNA synthesis, superoxide generation, axonal guidance and cell migration ( 151 ). Numerous studies have shown that RAC1 participates in cell transformation and tumor progression ( 152 - 154 ). Sun et al ( 48 ) reported that miR-137 expression is reduced in glioma tissues and that it is negatively correlated with RAC1 in glioma cell lines. It has also been reported that miR-137 hinders human glioma cell proliferation by directly targeting RAC1 ( 48 ). Subsequently, Qin et al ( 49 ) revealed that miR-142 can suppress the migration and invasion of glioma by targeting RAC1 . A previous study also indicated that RHOG is involved in regulating the development of glioma ( 155 ). Cai et al ( 52 ) demonstrated that there is a negative correlation between the expression levels of miR-124-3p and RHOG in patients with glioma. It was also revealed that miR-124-3p can block the viability and motility of GBM by directly targeting RHOG ( 52 ).
As members of a RHO subfamily, CDC42 regulate the actin cytoskeletal architecture ( 156 ). CDC42 has also been shown to be involved in the establishment of cell polarity ( 157 ). CDC42 is upregulated in various types of cancer, and is closely associated with oncogenic transformation, invasion and tumorigenesis ( 22 , 158 , 159 ). Shi et al ( 47 ) revealed that the expression levels of miR-29a/b/c are reduced with an increase in tumor grade and indicated that they have a good prognostic value. They also showed that miR-29a/b/c directly targets CDC42 , and there is a negative correlation between the expression of miR-29a/b/c and that of CDC42 in patients with glioma ( 47 ). In addition, miR-29a/b/c could suppress glioma invasion by blocking the CDC42-PAK pathway ( 47 ).
RASL10A, also known as Ras-related protein on chromosome 22 ( 46 ), is member of the more distal branches of the RAS family and was designated as a 'distal-RAS' by Bernal Astrain et al ( 112 ). However, phylogenetic analysis revealed its closer affinity to the RHO subfamily; therefore, the present study has elaborated on this ( Fig. 2 ). The RASL10A gene is located on a region of chromosome 22, which frequently undergoes loss of heterozygosity in human cancer and RASL10A is considered a tumor suppressor gene ( 160 ). Schmidt et al ( 46 ) reported that the mRNA levels of RASL10A are reduced in most glioma tissues compared with those in normal tissues, with few RASL10A mutations and allelic deletions observed ( 46 ). This finding is consistent with the previously mentioned results, which revealed that the incidence of changes in small GTPase gene structure is considered to be low in glioma ( Fig. 1 ). In addition, it has been reported that the hypermethylation of the RASL10A 5′-CpG island and hypoacetylation of H3 and H4 contribute to a low RASL10A mRNA level ( 46 ). Notably, RASL10A mRNA level can serve as a prognostic marker in glioma ( 46 ).
RAB family
The RAB family is the largest subgroup of the RAS superfamily, which comprises ~70 members that function as controllers of vesicle traffic, membrane tethering and fusion ( 161 - 163 ). Each RAB has its own specific membrane localization, which is beneficial for controlling the specificity and directionality of membrane trafficking pathways ( 161 ). The abnormal expression and activity of RAB s are associated with the occurrence and progression of various tumors ( 164 - 168 ). RAB1A , RAB3B , RAB5A , RAB10 , RAB21 , RAB22A , RAB27B , RAB23 and RAB18 are mentioned in the present review ( 53 - 65 ).
RAB1 is able to regulate dynamic membrane trafficking between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus, and evidence has shown that it is also involved in nutrient sensing and signaling, cell migration and the presentation of cell-surface receptors ( 169 ). RAB1 contains two isoforms, RAB1A and RAB1B, which share 92% amino-acid sequence homology and are functionally interchangeable ( 170 , 171 ). RAB1A and RAB1B are mainly located at the ER and the Golgi apparatus membrane, and are also observed in lipid rafts and autophagosomes ( 172 ). The dysregulation of RAB1A and RAB1B are associated with the initiation and development of multiple types of cancer, including glioma ( 173 - 176 ). Quan et al ( 53 ) reported that miR-1202 is decreased in glioma, and the expression levels of miR-1202 are negatively correlated with RAB1A . Furthermore, it was revealed that that miR-1202 can suppress the proliferation, and induce ER stress and apoptosis in glioma by directly targeting RAB1A ( 53 ). Subsequently, Xu et al ( 54 ) demonstrated that lncRNA DANCR is increased in glioma compared with that in normal tissues. It was also revealed that lncRNA DANCR functions as competing endogenous RNA by directly targeting miR-634, and there is an inverse correlation between the expression levels of lncRNA DANCR and miR-634 in glioma tissues ( 54 ). This previous study also verified that lncRNA DANCR promotes glioma cell proliferation through the lncRNA DANCR/miR-634/ RAB1A axis ( 54 ).
RAB5 is able to mediate intracellular trafficking, both at the level of receptor endocytosis and endosomal dynamics ( 177 ). RAB5 comprises RAB5A, RAB5B and RAB5C, which can be separately recognized by diverse kinases, but there are no differences in their function in endocytosis ( 178 ). Previous studies have indicated that RAB5A is also implicated in the regulation of autophagy ( 179 , 180 ). The abnormal expression of RAB5A has been shown to be associated with the initiation and development of various types of cancer, including glioma ( 27 , 167 , 181 , 182 ). Fu et al ( 55 ) confirmed that lncRNA MALAT1 is elevated in glioma tissues. Notably, lncRNA MALAT1 enhances the proliferation of glioma cells by activating autophagy ( 55 ) and it partially achieves the aforementioned functions through the lncRNA MALAT1/miR-101/ RAB5A axis ( 55 ). Similarly, Gao et al ( 56 ) revealed that another lncRNA TP53 target 1 (TP53TG1) is clearly increased in glioma tissues and strengthens the radioresistance of glioma cells by enhancing autophagy through the lncRNA TP53TG1/miR-524-5p/ RAB5A axis. Wu et al ( 58 ) demonstrated that lncRNA cancer susceptibility 19 is clearly increased in glioma tissues, and promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion of glioma cells through the miR-454-3p/ RAB5A axis. Zhang et al ( 57 ) showed that propofol hinders glioma cell proliferation and metastasis by regulating the circRNA non-SMC condensin I complex subunit G/miR-200a-3p/ RAB5A axis.
RAB10 is mainly located at the ER and Golgi/Trans-Golgi network ( 183 - 185 ). Moreover, it is associated with endosomes/phagosomes and primary cilia ( 186 , 187 ). RAB10 is mainly involved in regulating ER dynamics and morphology, polarized trafficking, establishment of basement membrane polarity and tubular endosome formation ( 183 , 188 - 190 ). Dysregulation of RAB10 has been shown to be associated with the initiation and progress of various types of cancer ( 191 , 192 ). Zhang et al ( 60 ) verified that circ-PTN expression is increased and that of miR-432-5p is decreased in glioma. In addition, it was reported that circ-PTN enhances the proliferation, invasion and glycolysis of glioma cells via the circ-PTN/miR-432-5p/ RAB10 axis ( 60 ). By analyzing public databases, Shen et al ( 59 ) revealed that lncRNA PSMB8-AS1 is increased in glioma and is upregulated in glioma cells via NHA. Subsequently, it was indicated that lncRNA PSMB8-AS1 activated by the ETS transcription factor ELK1 enhances glioma cell proliferation by mediating the miR-574-5p/ RAB10 axis ( 59 ). Peng et al ( 61 ) revealed that LINC00152, an oncogene, is increased in glioma and is a valuable prognostic factor. It was also reported that LINC00152 accelerates glioma cell proliferation and invasion through the miR-107/ RAB10 axis ( 61 ).
Eukaryotic cells internalize fractions of cytomembrane, cell surface receptors and diverse soluble molecules from the extracellular fluid through the endocytosis pathway ( 193 ). These are vital to a series of cellular functions, including nutrient absorption, signaling receptor downregulation and antigen processing ( 194 ). RAB5, RAB21 and RAB22 all reside in the early endosome and regulate early endosome dynamics ( 194 , 195 ). RAB23 is also involved in mediating early endosome dynamics and is a negative regulator of hedgehog signaling ( 196 ). Previous studies have revealed that the dysregulation of these genes is able to disturb endosome dynamics, which lead to the occurrence of cancer ( 197 - 200 ). Song et al ( 62 ) reported that circ_0030018 abundance is higher in glioma cell lines compared with that in NHAs. It was subsequently suggested that circ_0030018 accelerates cell proliferation and metastasis, and blocks apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in glioma by regulating the miR-1297/ RAB21 axis ( 62 ). Similarly, RAB22A is regulated by ncRNA in glioma. Xia et al ( 63 ) reported that miR-204-5p expression is reduced in glioma tissues compared with that in normal tissues, and is negatively associated with pathology classification. It has also been shown that miR-204-5p inhibits glioma cell proliferation, migration and invasion by directly targeting RAB22A ( 63 ). Notably, miR-200b can suppress the progression of glioma by targeting a set of RABs ( 65 ). Liu et al ( 65 ) demonstrated that miR-200b, a tumor suppressor, is able to directly target RAB3B , RAB18 , RAB21 and RAB23 . Notably, their expression levels have a good prognostic value ( 65 ). RAB21 and RAB23 can regulate endosome dynamics; RAB3 serves a critical role in the regulation of exocytosis and contains two isoform, RAB3A and RAB3B ( 201 ); RAB18 is a lipid droplet-associated small GTPase, and its abnormal expression disturbs the storage and mobilization of lipids ( 202 ). It is also involved in ER structure maintenance and ER-Golgi trafficking ( 203 , 204 ). These findings indicate that miR-200b inhibits cancer progression by regulating multiple biological processes.
RAB27 is an important regulator of secretory pathways and comprises two isoforms, RAB27A and RAB27B ( 205 ). Notably, it has been reported that RAB27A and RAB27B serve different roles in specific types of secretion by interacting with various effectors ( 205 ). Ostrowski et al ( 206 ) reported that RAB27A and RAB27B are involved in multivesicular endosomes docking at the plasma membrane, but both serve different roles in the exosome secretion pathway via their effectors SLP4 and SLAC2B, respectively ( 206 ). The aberrant regulation of RAB27 is associated with the initiation and progression of cancer ( 207 ). Wang et al ( 64 ) reported that the RAB27B promoter region is hypomethylated in high-grade glioma compared with that in low-grade glioma, and identified a negative association between RAB27B abundance and RAB27B methylation level. Furthermore, it was revealed that RAB27B enhances glioma invasion by activating matrix metalloproteinase-9 ( 64 ). Notably, the RAB27B methylation level is a valuable prognostic factor of glioma ( 64 ).
ARF family
The ARF family mainly controls membrane traffic and organelle structure, and is divided into three classes: Class I (ARF1, ARF2 and ARF3), Class II (ARF4 and ARF5) and Class III (ARF6) ( 208 ). Class I ARFs exist in all eukaryotic organisms and are highly conserved ( 208 ). They are able to mediate the fabrication of various types of 'coat' complexes onto budding vesicles along the secretory pathway, and activate lipid-modifying enzymes ( 209 ). The present review focusses on ARF1.
ARF1 is the most studied mammalian ARF protein, primarily located at the Golgi apparatus ( 210 ). ARF1 mainly regulates the recruitment of effectors, coat protein complex I, adaptor protein 1 and Golgi-associated, γ-adaptin homologs, ARF-interacting proteins on the Golgi apparatus ( 211 ). Several studies have shown that the abnormal expression and activation of ARF1 are involved in the occurrence and progression of cancer ( 212 - 214 ). In a previous study, 40-50% of patients with GBM carried EGFR amplification ( 215 ). López-Ginés et al ( 66 ) explored the correlation between EGFR amplification and the promoter methylation status of 10 genes relevant to GBM. The results revealed that the ARF1 promoter methylation level was lower in the EGFR amplification group compared with that in the group without EGFR amplification; however, the mRNA expression levels of ARF1 were higher in the EGFR amplification group ( 66 ). ARF1 overexpression was also shown to cause metabolic reprogramming, which may promote the progression of glioma ( 66 ).
Clinical application prospects
Gliomas account for the vast majority of primary malignant brain tumors ( 2 ). Although there are a number of novel treatment methods for glioma, most are in the preclinical experimental stage ( 216 ). The current treatment methods for glioma are still limited, and include surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy ( 217 ). The efficacy of the treatment methods is unsatisfactory, and patients often exhibit drug resistance, relapse and metastasis ( 218 ). It is urgent to explore new diagnostic and therapeutic methods for glioma. Due to the diversity and importance of the biological functions of small GTPases, an increasing number of studies have focused on them; however, the incidence of changes in small GTPase gene structure is low in glioma ( Fig. 1 ). Numerous studies have focused on exploring the epigenetic regulation of small GTPase genes in glioma. Epigenetic regulation is a dynamic and reversible process, which implies that the reversion of abnormal epigenetic modifications is a good treatment strategy for glioma. These studies not only provide new therapeutic targets and prognostic markers, but also supply new clues for the treatment of glioma.
DNMT inhibitors (DNMTIs)
DNA methylation is more stable than other epigenetic modifications ( 219 ). The hypomethylation of oncogenes and hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes can disrupt normal gene expression, which promotes the occurrence and development of cancer ( 220 ). However, the treatment methods for the dysregulation of DNA mainly focuses on the high methylation of tumor suppressor genes. DNMTIs, include 5-azacytidine and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, the most important therapeutic drugs for abnormal DNA methylation ( 221 ). These drugs have achieved good therapeutic effects in the treatment of hematological tumors ( 222 ). Isocitrate dehydrogenase ( IDH ) mutations in glioma cause genome-wide DNA hypermethylation ( 9 ). A small sample size study previously demonstrated that 5-azacitidine treatment is suitable for a subset of patients with IDH1/2 -mutated gliomas, particularly those without prior bevacizumab treatment ( 223 ). This previous study also revealed that 5-azacitidine treatment induces adverse effects, with grade 3-4 neutropenia being the most frequently observed, which led to dose reduction and some patients having to receive concomitant granulocyte colony stimulating factor injections during the following cycles ( 223 ). Although this study had a small sample size, its findings still offer valuable clinical insights. Schmidt et al ( 46 ) demonstrated that the mRNA levels of RASL10A were reduced in most glioma tissues compared with in normal tissues, and that the hypermethylation of the RASL10A 5′-CpG island and hypoacetylation of H3 and H4 contributed to a low RASL10A mRNA level. These findings indicated that patients with glioma carrying both IDH1/2 mutations and RASL10A hypermethylation, which enhance the progression of glioma, are more likely to benefit from 5-azacitidine treatment. Complementary to conventional methylation inhibitor therapy, emerging gene editing approaches are being investigated as precision tools against epigenetically aberrant tumors. He et al ( 224 ) reported that the dCas9-TET1 fusion system can successfully remove methyl groups at CpG islands in the ZNF154 promoter region, and inhibit the proliferation and migration of esophageal squamous carcinoma cells. However, their clinical applicability, particularly for glioma treatment, requires further investigation.
Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs)
DNA methylation and histone PTMs synergistically regulate chromatin structure and gene regulation ( 225 ). Histone methylation and acetylation are the most extensively studied epigenetic modifications ( 225 ). To date, there are no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs that directly target histone methylation ( 226 ). However, accumulating studies have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of HDACIs against various malignancies, including glioma ( 227 - 230 ). Belinostat is a HDACI that can cross the blood-brain barrier. Xu et al ( 231 ) reported on the possibility of combining belinostat with standard-of-care therapy in GBM. Panobinostat represents the first HDACI approved by the FDA for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma ( 232 ). Monje et al ( 229 ) explored the tolerability of systemically administered panobinostat in children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG)/diffuse midline glioma. This study revealed constrained tolerability of panobinostat in pediatric patients with DIPG, and indicated that panobinostat did not improve the OS and PFS of patients with glioma ( 229 ). In addition, Mueller et al ( 230 ) assessed the safety and efficacy of repeated delivery of aqueous panobinostat via convection-enhanced delivery in patients with newly diagnosed DIPG. By contrast, their results demonstrated that patients with DIPG may benefit from this treatment method ( 230 ). But some treatment-related adverse events need to be taken seriously, including muscle weakness, vagus nerve dysfunction and neutropenia ( 230 ). In this previous study, patients with DIPG underwent both postoperative recovery and drug infusion, with temporal overlap between these procedures. Both interventions carry the potential to induce certain adverse effects (such as vagus nerve dysfunction), making it clinically challenging to determine the predominant causative factor. Given these considerations, only grade ≥3 neutropenia was attributed to aqueous panobinostat ( 230 ). Patients with grade ≥3 neutropenia may need to receive concomitant granulocyte colony stimulating factor injections during the following cycles; however, the precise therapeutic safety and efficacy of this strategy require further validation through large-scale cohort studies. As previously mentioned, Schmidt et al ( 46 ) reported that hypoacetylation of H3 and H4 of RASL10A , which is a potential tumor suppressor, can contribute to a low RASL10A mRNA level. Notably, patients with glioma and hypoacetylation of H3 and H4 of RASL10A have a higher chance of benefiting from repeated delivery of aqueous panobinostat via convection-enhanced delivery.
ncRNAs
The most extensively studied small ncRNAs are miRNAs that can exert both anticancer and pro-cancer functions, depending on their target genes and the cell context. Most miRNAs mentioned in the present review target different types of small GTPases and function as anticancer genes. In addition, previous studies have shown that miRNAs have strong and complex functions, and the same miRNA can target the mRNA of different genes and different miRNAs can target the mRNA of the same gene ( 35 , 38 , 65 ). Multiple miRNAs may therefore be available for selection to reverse the abnormal expression of the same gene, and the re-expression of one miRNA may reverse the dysregulation of multiple genes that mediate diverse signaling pathways in glioma. The re-expression of these tumor suppressor miRNAs may be a promising therapeutic approach for glioma. miR-34 is a tumor suppressor that serves an important role in cell proliferation in various types of cancer ( 233 ). MRX34 is a lipid-formulated miR-34 that is currently in phase I testing in patients with solid tumors, and is the first miRNA mimic to enter clinical trials ( 234 ). However, due to the presence of the blood-brain barrier, the treatment of brain tumors is different from that of other tumors. There is a lack of data supporting whether miRNAs can enter the brain tissue through the blood ( 235 ). With technological developments, these limitations are expected to be resolved. For example, biodegradable nanoparticles loaded with miRNA mimics have previously been implanted at the glioma resection site to enable localized therapeutic delivery, which circumvented the delivery bottleneck of miRNA mimics across the blood-brain barrier ( 236 ). Exosomes, liposomes and gold nanoparticles with miRNA mimics may also be used for systemic delivery ( 235 ). These methods may be applied to the miRNAs discussed in the present study, which could reverse the expression of miRNAs and small GTPases to suppress the development of glioma. To date, to the best of our knowledge, no clinical trials have been conducted to investigate the efficacy of miRNA in glioma treatment. However, some studies have shown that serum miRNAs are valuable prognostic factors for glioma ( 237 , 238 ). Compared with tissue biopsies, serum miRNA detection provides a simpler and less painful alternative for patients; however, the diagnostic value of serum miRNAs that target small GTPases in glioma needs to be explored. Furthermore, lncRNA and circRNA are rarely studied as therapeutic tools; however, they are better prognostic and progression markers than miRNAs due to their stability. Some studies have revealed that serum lncRNAs and serum exosome circRNAs are valuable diagnostic biomarkers for glioma ( 239 - 242 ). Notably, LINC00152 may have the potential to become a prognostic marker of glioma; however, further studies are needed to validate its application as a peripheral biomarker for glioma.
Conclusions
The biological functions of small GTPases are diverse, and have an important role in the initiation and development of glioma. Notably, the incidence of changes in small GTPase gene structure is low in glioma; therefore, researchers have focused more on studying their epigenetic regulation. The present study reviewed relevant studies that explored the epigenetic regulation mechanisms of small GTPases in glioma to provide a reference for future research and to promote the clinical translation of relevant study results. Although translating these research achievements into clinical practice requires further research, the findings of the aforementioned studies provide novel prognostic factors for glioma and lay the theoretical groundwork for epigenetic therapeutic approaches in glioma. It is anticipated that progress in epigenetic drug discovery and delivery methodologies will lead to marked improvements in the prognosis of patients with glioma.
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Authors' contributions
MZ designed the study and wrote the original draft. YH conducted the literature search and study selection. QZ and XZ conducted comprehensive data extraction, data analysis and critical analysis of all literature, subsequently creating standardized tables and figures. JW and LK got funding acquisition and reviewed the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Abbreviations
ADP-ribosylation factor
cell division cycle 42
circular RNAs
central nervous system
DNA methyltransferases
epidermal growth factor receptor
endoplasmic reticulum
glioblastoma
guanosine diphosphate
glioblastoma stem cells
guanosine triphosphate
long non-coding RNAs
mesenchymal to epithelial transition factor
microRNAs
normal human astrocytes
post-translational modifications
RAC family small GTPase 1
RAS-associated protein-1
RAS like protein family member 10A
target of rapamycin
References
1 Price M Neff C Nagarajan N Kruchko C Waite KA Cioffi G Cordeiro BB Willmarth N Penas-Prado M Gilbert MR CBTRUS statistical report: American brain tumor association & NCI system tumors neuro-oncology branch adolescent and young adult primary brain and other central nervous diagnosed in the United States in 2016-2020 Neuro Oncol 26 Suppl 3 iii1 iii53 2024 10.1093/neuonc/noae047 38709657 PMC11073545
2 Weller M Wen PY Chang SM Dirven L Lim M Monje M Reifenberger G Glioma Nat Rev Dis Primers 10 33 2024 10.1038/s41572-024-00516-y 38724526
3 Sanders S Herpai DM Rodriguez A Huang Y Chou J Hsu FC Seals D Mott R Miller LD Debinski W The presence and potential role of ALDH1A2 in the glioblastoma microenvironment Cells 10 2485 2021 10.3390/cells10092485 34572134 PMC8468822
4 Schaff LR Mellinghoff IK Glioblastoma and other primary brain malignancies in adults: A Review JAMA 329 574 587 2023 10.1001/jama.2023.0023 36809318 PMC11445779
5 Yasinjan F Xing Y Geng H Guo R Yang L Liu Z Wang H Immunotherapy: A promising approach for glioma treatment Front Immunol 14 1255611 2023 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1255611 37744349 PMC10512462
6 Xu S Tang L Li X Fan F Liu Z Immunotherapy for glioma: Current management and future application Cancer Lett 476 1 12 2020 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.02.002 32044356
7 Weller M Wick W Aldape K Brada M Berger M Pfister SM Nishikawa R Rosenthal M Wen PY Stupp R Reifenberger G Glioma Nat Rev Dis Primers 1 15017 2015 10.1038/nrdp.2015.17 27188790
8 Wang LM Englander ZK Miller ML Bruce JN Malignant glioma Adv Exp Med Biol 1405 1 30 2023 10.1007/978-3-031-23705-8_1 37452933
9 Chen R Smith-Cohn M Cohen AL Colman H Glioma subclassifications and their clinical significance Neurotherapeutics 14 284 297 2017 10.1007/s13311-017-0519-x 28281173 PMC5398991
10 Louis DN Perry A Reifenberger G von Deimling A Figarella-Branger D Cavenee WK Ohgaki H Wiestler OD Kleihues P Ellison DW The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary Acta Neuropathol 131 803 820 2016 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 27157931
11 Louis DN Perry A Wesseling P Brat DJ Cree IA Figarella-Branger D Hawkins C Ng HK Pfister SM Reifenberger G The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary Neuro Oncol 23 1231 1251 2021 10.1093/neuonc/noab106 34185076 PMC8328013
12 Luo Q Liu Y Yuan Z Huang L Diao B Expression of Rab3b in human glioma: Influence on cell proliferation and apoptosis Curr Pharm Des 27 989 995 2021 10.2174/1381612826666200917145228 32940170
13 Wang M Jiang X Yang Y Chen H Zhang C Xu H Qi B Yao C Xia H Rhoj is a novel target for progression and invasion of glioblastoma by impairing cytoskeleton dynamics Neurotherapeutics 17 2028 2040 2020 10.1007/s13311-020-00910-w 32822001 PMC7851251
14 Xu J Galvanetto N Nie J Yang Y Torre V Rac1 promotes cell motility by controlling cell mechanics in human glioblastoma Cancers (Basel) 12 1667 2020 10.3390/cancers12061667 32585958 PMC7352963
15 Reiner DJ Lundquist EA Small GTPases WormBook 2018 1 65 2018 10.1895/wormbook.1.67.2 PMC6369420 27218782
16 Simanshu DK Nissley DV McCormick F RAS proteins and their regulators in human disease Cell 170 17 33 2017 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009 28666118 PMC5555610
17 Ridley AJ Life at the leading edge Cell 145 1012 1022 2011 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.010 21703446
18 Cherfils J Zeghouf M Regulation of small GTPases by GEFs, GAPs, and GDIs Physiol Rev 93 269 309 2013 10.1152/physrev.00003.2012 23303910
19 Chen K Zhang Y Qian L Wang P Emerging strategies to target RAS signaling in human cancer therapy J Hematol Oncol 14 116 2021 10.1186/s13045-021-01127-w 34301278 PMC8299671
20 Zuo T Wong S Buza N Hui P KRAS mutation of extraovarian implants of serous borderline tumor: Prognostic indicator for adverse clinical outcome Mod Pathol 31 350 357 2018 10.1038/modpathol.2017.121 29027536
21 Zhao S Li Z Zhang M Zhang L Zheng H Ning J Wang Y Wang F Zhang X Gan H A brain somatic RHEB doublet mutation causes focal cortical dysplasia type II Exp Mol Med 51 1 11 2019 10.1038/s12276-019-0277-4 PMC6802736 31337748
22 Gómez Del Pulgar T Valdés-Mora F Bandrés E Pérez-Palacios R Espina C Cejas P García-Cabezas MA Nistal M Casado E González-Barón M Cdc42 is highly expressed in colorectal adenocarcinoma and downregulates ID4 through an epigenetic mechanism Int J Oncol 33 185 193 2008 18575765
23 Schnelzer A Prechtel D Knaus U Dehne K Gerhard M Graeff H Harbeck N Schmitt M Lengyel E Rac1 in human breast cancer: Overexpression, mutation analysis, and characterization of a new isoform, Rac1b Oncogene 19 3013 3020 2000 10.1038/sj.onc.1203621 10871853
24 Li XR Ji F Ouyang J Wu W Qian LY Yang KY Overexpression of RhoA is associated with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma Eur J Surg Oncol 32 1130 1134 2006 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.05.012 16806792
25 Mazieres J Antonia T Daste G Muro-Cacho C Berchery D Tillement V Pradines A Sebti S Favre G Loss of RhoB expression in human lung cancer progression Clin Cancer Res 10 2742 2750 2004 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0149 15102679
26 Shimada K Uzawa K Kato M Endo Y Shiiba M Bukawa H Yokoe H Seki N Tanzawa H Aberrant expression of RAB1A in human tongue cancer Br J Cancer 92 1915 1921 2005 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602594 15870709 PMC2361773
27 Li Y Sun X Ji D Kong X Liu D Zhao Z Yan J Chen S Expression of Rab5a correlates with tumor progression in pancreatic carcinoma Virchows Arch 470 527 536 2017 10.1007/s00428-017-2098-y 28243729
28 Hu X Yin J He R Chao R Zhu S Circ_KCNQ5 participates in the progression of childhood acute myeloid leukemia by enhancing the expression of RAB10 via binding to miR-622 Hematology 27 431 440 2022 10.1080/16078454.2022.2056983 35413218
29 Ge J Chen Q Liu B Wang L Zhang S Ji B Knockdown of Rab21 inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in human glioma cells Cell Mol Biol Lett 22 30 2017 10.1186/s11658-017-0062-0 29270202 PMC5735509
30 Yin Y Zhang B Wang W Fei B Quan C Zhang J Song M Bian Z Wang Q Ni S miR-204-5p inhibits proliferation and invasion and enhances chemotherapeutic sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells by downregulating RAB22A Clin Cancer Res 20 6187 6199 2014 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1030 25294901
31 Zhang JX Huang XX Cai MB Tong ZT Chen JW Qian D Liao YJ Deng HX Liao DZ Huang MY Overexpression of the secretory small GTPase Rab27B in human breast cancer correlates closely with lymph node metastasis and predicts poor prognosis J Transl Med 10 242 2012 10.1186/1479-5876-10-242 23217148 PMC3539959
32 You X Liu F Zhang T Li Y Ye L Zhang X Hepatitis B virus X protein upregulates oncogene Rab18 to result in the dysregulation of lipogenesis and proliferation of hepatoma cells Carcinogenesis 34 1644 1652 2013 10.1093/carcin/bgt089 23471881
33 de Bruijn I Kundra R Mastrogiacomo B Tran TN Sikina L Mazor T Li X Ochoa A Zhao G Lai B Analysis and visualization of longitudinal genomic and clinical data from the AACR Project GENIE biopharma collaborative in cBioPortal Cancer Res 83 3861 3867 2023 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-0816 37668528 PMC10690089
34 Wang XF Shi ZM Wang XR Cao L Wang YY Zhang JX Yin Y Luo H Kang CS Liu N MiR-181d acts as a tumor suppressor in glioma by targeting K-ras and Bcl-2 J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138 573 584 2012 10.1007/s00432-011-1114-x 22207524 PMC11824363
35 Wang XR Luo H Li HL Cao L Wang XF Yan W Wang YY Zhang JX Jiang T Kang CS Overexpressed let-7a inhibits glioma cell malignancy by directly targeting K-ras, independently of PTEN Neuro Oncol 15 1491 1501 2013 10.1093/neuonc/not107 24092860 PMC3813414
36 Shi Z Chen Q Li C Wang L Qian X Jiang C Liu X Wang X Li H Kang C MiR-124 governs glioma growth and angiogenesis and enhances chemosensitivity by targeting R-Ras and N-Ras Neuro Oncol 16 1341 1353 2014 10.1093/neuonc/nou084 24861879 PMC4165420
37 Zhang Y Kim J Mueller AC Dey B Yang Y Lee DH Hachmann J Finderle S Park DM Christensen J Multiple receptor tyrosine kinases converge on microRNA-134 to control KRAS, STAT5B, and glioblastoma Cell Death Differ 21 720 734 2014 10.1038/cdd.2013.196 24440911 PMC3978301
38 Zhao Y Pang D Wang C Zhong S Wang S MicroRNA-134 modulates glioma cell U251 proliferation and invasion by targeting KRAS and suppressing the ERK pathway Tumour Biol 37 11485 11493 2016 10.1007/s13277-016-5027-9 27012554
39 She X Yu Z Cui Y Lei Q Wang Z Xu G Luo Z Li G Wu M miR-181 subunits enhance the chemosensitivity of temozolomide by Rap1B-mediated cytoskeleton remodeling in glioblastoma cells Med Oncol 31 892 2014 10.1007/s12032-014-0892-9 24573637
40 She X Yu Z Cui Y Lei Q Wang Z Xu G Xiang J Wu M Li G miR-128 and miR-149 enhance the chemosensitivity of temozolomide by Rap1B-mediated cytoskeletal remodeling in glioblastoma Oncol Rep 32 957 964 2014 10.3892/or.2014.3318 25017996
41 Li Z Xu C Ding B Gao M Wei X Ji N Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 promotes proliferation and suppresses apoptosis of glioma cells through derepressing Rap1B by sponging miR-101 J Neurooncol 134 19 28 2017 10.1007/s11060-017-2498-5 28551849
42 Wan J Guo AA Chowdhury I TRPM7 induces mechanistic target of Rap1b through the downregulation of miR-28-5p in glioma proliferation and invasion Front Oncol 9 1413 2019 10.3389/fonc.2019.01413 31921670 PMC6928690
43 Besse A Sana J Lakomy R Kren L Fadrus P Smrcka M Hermanova M Jancalek R Reguli S Lipina R MiR-338-5p sensitizes glioblastoma cells to radiation through regulation of genes involved in DNA damage response Tumour Biol 37 7719 7727 2016 10.1007/s13277-015-4654-x 26692101
44 Kalhori MR Irani S Soleimani M Arefian E Kouhkan F The effect of miR-579 on the PI3K/AKT pathway in human glioblastoma PTEN mutant cell lines J Cell Biochem 120 16760 16774 2019 10.1002/jcb.28935 31243804
45 Kalhori MR Arefian E Fallah Atanaki F Kavousi K Soleimani M miR-548x and miR-4698 controlled cell proliferation by affecting the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in Glioblastoma cell lines Sci Rep 10 1558 2020 10.1038/s41598-020-57588-5 32005873 PMC6994486
46 Schmidt N Windmann S Reifenberger G Riemenschneider MJ DNA hypermethylation and histone modifications downregulate the candidate tumor suppressor gene RRP22 on 22q12 in human gliomas Brain Pathol 22 17 25 2012 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2011.00507.x 21631628 PMC8028980
47 Shi C Ren L Sun C Yu L Bian X Zhou X Wen Y Hua D Zhao S Luo W miR-29a/b/c function as invasion suppressors for gliomas by targeting CDC42 and predict the prognosis of patients Br J Cancer 117 1036 1047 2017 10.1038/bjc.2017.255 28787434 PMC5625669
48 Sun G Cao Y Shi L Sun L Wang Y Chen C Wan Z Fu L You Y Overexpressed miRNA-137 inhibits human glioma cells growth by targeting Rac1 Cancer Biother Radiopharm 28 327 334 2013 25310349 10.1089/cbr.2012.1380 PMC3653372
49 Qin W Rong X Dong J Yu C Yang J miR-142 inhibits the migration and invasion of glioma by targeting Rac1 Oncol Rep 38 1543 1550 2017 10.3892/or.2017.5816 28714015
50 Tang H Wang Z Liu X Liu Q Xu G Li G Wu M LRRC4 inhibits glioma cell growth and invasion through a miR-185-dependent pathway Curr Cancer Drug Targets 12 1032 1042 2012 10.2174/156800912803251180 22834685
51 Chen Q Guo W Zhang Y Wu Y Xiang J MiR-19a promotes cell proliferation and invasion by targeting RhoB in human glioma cells Neurosci Lett 628 161 166 2016 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.06.031 27329239
52 Cai S Shi CJ Lu JX Wang YP Yuan T Wang XP miR-124-3p inhibits the viability and motility of glioblastoma multiforme by targeting RhoG Int J Mol Med 47 69 2021 10.3892/ijmm.2021.4902 33649803
53 Quan Y Song Q Wang J Zhao L Lv J Gong S MiR-1202 functions as a tumor suppressor in glioma cells by targeting Rab1A Tumour Biol 39 1010428317697565 2017 10.1177/1010428317697565 28443461
54 Xu D Yu J Gao G Lu G Zhang Y Ma P LncRNA DANCR functions as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate RAB1A expression by sponging miR-634 in glioma Biosci Rep 38 BSR20171664 2018 10.1042/BSR20171664 29301870 PMC5794498
55 Fu Z Luo W Wang J Peng T Sun G Shi J Li Z Zhang B Malat1 activates autophagy and promotes cell proliferation by sponging miR-101 and upregulating STMN1, RAB5A and ATG4D expression in glioma Biochem Biophys Res Commun 492 480 486 2017 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.08.070 28834690
56 Gao W Qiao M Luo K Long noncoding RNA TP53TG1 contributes to radioresistance of glioma cells via miR-524-5p/RAB5A axis Cancer Biother Radiopharm 36 600 612 2021 32762546 10.1089/cbr.2020.3567
57 Zhang L Chen H Tian C Zheng D Propofol represses cell growth and metastasis by modulating the circular RNA Non-SMC condensin I complex subunit G/MicroRNA-200a-3p/RAB5A axis in glioma World Neurosurg 153 e46 e58 2021 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.036 34129971
58 Wu YJ Yang QS Chen H Wang JT Wang WB Zhou L Long non-coding RNA CASC19 promotes glioma progression by modulating the miR-454-3p/RAB5A axis and is associated with unfavorable MRI features Oncol Rep 45 728 737 2021 10.3892/or.2020.7876 33416169
59 Shen G Mao Y Su Z Du J Yu Y Xu F PSMB8-AS1 activated by ELK1 promotes cell proliferation in glioma via regulating miR-574-5p/RAB10 Biomed Pharmacother 122 109658 2020 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109658 31812014
60 Zhang X Wang S Lin G Wang D Down-regulation of circ-PTN suppresses cell proliferation, invasion and glycolysis in glioma by regulating miR-432-5p/RAB10 axis Neurosci Lett 735 135153 2020 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135153 32629066
61 Peng G Su J Xiao S Liu Q LINC00152 acts as a potential marker in gliomas and promotes tumor proliferation and invasion through the LINC00152/miR-107/RAB10 axis J Neurooncol 154 285 299 2021 10.1007/s11060-021-03836-1 34478013
62 Song D Ye L Xu Z Jin Y Zhang L CircRNA hsa_ circ_0030018 regulates the development of glioma via regulating the miR-1297/RAB21 axis Neoplasma 68 391 403 2021 10.4149/neo_2020_200702N682 33440987
63 Xia Z Liu F Zhang J Liu L Decreased expression of MiRNA-204-5p contributes to glioma progression and promotes glioma cell growth, migration and invasion PLoS One 10 e0132399 2015 10.1371/journal.pone.0132399 26134825 PMC4489611
64 Wang H Wang Y Bao Z Zhang C Liu Y Cai J Jiang C Hypomethylated Rab27b is a progression-associated prognostic biomarker of glioma regulating MMP-9 to promote invasion Oncol Rep 34 1503 1509 2015 10.3892/or.2015.4125 26165699
65 Liu Q Tang H Liu X Liao Y Li H Zhao Z Yuan X Jiang W miR-200b as a prognostic factor targets multiple members of RAB family in glioma Med Oncol 31 859 2014 10.1007/s12032-014-0859-x 24477653
66 López-Ginés C Navarro L Muñoz-Hidalgo L Buso E Morales JM Gil-Benso R Gregori-Romero M Megías J Roldán P Segura-Sabater R Association between epidermal growth factor receptor amplification and ADP-ribosylation factor 1 methylation in human glioblastoma Cell Oncol (Dordr) 40 389 399 2017 10.1007/s13402-017-0329-5 28631186 PMC13001540
67 Tamura K Stecher G Kumar S MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11 Mol Biol Evol 38 3022 3027 2021 10.1093/molbev/msab120 33892491 PMC8233496
68 Chen QW Zhu XY Li YY Meng ZQ Epigenetic regulation and cancer (review) Oncol Rep 31 523 532 2014 10.3892/or.2013.2913 24337819
69 Gu M Ren B Fang Y Ren J Liu X Wang X Zhou F Xiao R Luo X You L Zhao Y Epigenetic regulation in cancer MedComm (2020) 5 e495 2024 10.1002/mco2.495 38374872 PMC10876210
70 Zou Y Xu H Involvement of long noncoding RNAs in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases J Transl Autoimmun 3 100044 2020 10.1016/j.jtauto.2020.100044 32743525 PMC7388364
71 Zong L Zhou L Hou Y Zhang L Jiang W Zhang W Wang L Luo X Wang S Deng C Genetic and epigenetic regulation on the transcription of GABRB2: Genotype-dependent hydroxymethylation and methylation alterations in schizophrenia J Psychiatr Res 88 9 17 2017 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.12.019 28063323
72 Bai B Chen S Zhang Q Jiang Q Li H Abnormal epigenetic regulation of the gene expression levels of Wnt2b and Wnt7b: Implications for neural tube defects Mol Med Rep 13 99 106 2016 10.3892/mmr.2015.4514 26548512 PMC4686081
73 Li P Han M Zhao X Ren G Mei S Zhong C Abnormal epigenetic regulations in the immunocytes of sjögren's syndrome patients and therapeutic potentials Cells 11 1767 2022 10.3390/cells11111767 35681462 PMC9179300
74 Agirre X Martínez-Climent JÁ Odero M Prosper F Epigenetic regulation of miRNA genes in acute leukemia Leukemia 26 395 403 2012 10.1038/leu.2011.344 22143672
75 Zeng C Tsoi LC Gudjonsson JE Dysregulated epigenetic modifications in psoriasis Exp Dermatol 30 1156 1166 2021 10.1111/exd.14332 33756010
76 Ramazi S Dadzadi M Sahafnejad Z Allahverdi A Epigenetic regulation in lung cancer MedComm (2020) 4 e401 2023 10.1002/mco2.401 37901797 PMC10600507
77 Kondo Y Katsushima K Ohka F Natsume A Shinjo K Epigenetic dysregulation in glioma Cancer Sci 105 363 369 2014 10.1111/cas.12379 24843883 PMC4317798
78 Lu Y Chan YT Tan HY Li S Wang N Feng Y Epigenetic regulation in human cancer: The potential role of epi-drug in cancer therapy Mol Cancer 19 79 2020 10.1186/s12943-020-01197-3 32340605 PMC7184703
79 Robertson KD DNA methylation and chromatin-unraveling the tangled web Oncogene 21 5361 5379 2002 10.1038/sj.onc.1205609 12154399
80 Moore LD Le T Fan G DNA methylation and its basic function Neuropsychopharmacology 38 23 38 2013 10.1038/npp.2012.112 22781841 PMC3521964
81 Illingworth RS Bird AP CpG islands-'a rough guide' FEBS Lett 583 1713 1720 2009 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.04.012 19376112
82 Antequera F Structure, function and evolution of CpG island promoters Cell Mol Life Sci 60 1647 1658 2003 10.1007/s00018-003-3088-6 14504655 PMC11138798
83 Lopez-Serra L Ballestar E Fraga MF Alaminos M Setien F Esteller M A profile of methyl-CpG binding domain protein occupancy of hypermethylated promoter CpG islands of tumor suppressor genes in human cancer Cancer Res 66 8342 8346 2006 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1932 16951140
84 Hervouet E Peixoto P Delage-Mourroux R Boyer-Guittaut M Cartron PF Specific or not specific recruitment of DNMTs for DNA methylation, an epigenetic dilemma Clin Epigenetics 10 17 2018 10.1186/s13148-018-0450-y 29449903 PMC5807744
85 Rasmussen KD Helin K Role of TET enzymes in DNA methylation, development, and cancer Genes Dev 30 733 750 2016 10.1101/gad.276568.115 27036965 PMC4826392
86 Hatakeyama A Hartmann B Travers A Nogues C Buckle M High-resolution biophysical analysis of the dynamics of nucleosome formation Sci Rep 6 27337 2016 10.1038/srep27337 27263658 PMC4897087
87 Torres IO Fujimori DG Functional coupling between writers, erasers and readers of histone and DNA methylation Curr Opin Struct Biol 35 68 75 2015 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.09.007 26496625 PMC4688207
88 Wang G Weng R Lan Y Guo X Liu Q Liu X Lu C Kang J Synergetic effects of DNA methylation and histone modification during mouse induced pluripotent stem cell generation Sci Rep 7 39527 2017 10.1038/srep39527 28155862 PMC5290738
89 Ng MK Cheung P A brief histone in time: Understanding the combinatorial functions of histone PTMs in the nucleosome context Biochem Cell Biol 94 33 42 2016 10.1139/bcb-2015-0031 26197985
90 Ke XS Qu Y Rostad K Li WC Lin B Halvorsen OJ Haukaas SA Jonassen I Petersen K Goldfinger N Genome-wide profiling of histone h3 lysine 4 and lysine 27 trimethylation reveals an epigenetic signature in prostate carcinogenesis PLoS One 4 e4687 2009 10.1371/journal.pone.0004687 19262738 PMC2650415
91 Tamura I Maekawa R Jozaki K Ohkawa Y Takagi H Doi-Tanaka Y Shirafuta Y Mihara Y Taketani T Sato S Transcription factor C/EBPβ induces genome-wide H3K27ac and upregulates gene expression during decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells Mol Cell Endocrinol 520 111085 2021 10.1016/j.mce.2020.111085 33232782
92 Sungalee S Liu Y Lambuta RA Katanayeva N Donaldson Collier M Tavernari D Roulland S Ciriello G Oricchio E Histone acetylation dynamics modulates chromatin conformation and allele-specific interactions at oncogenic loci Nat Genet 53 650 662 2021 10.1038/s41588-021-00842-x 33972799
93 Reda A Hategan LA McLean TAB Creighton SD Luo JQ Chen SES Hua S Winston S Reeves I Padmanabhan A Role of the histone variant H2A.Z.1 in memory, transcription, and alternative splicing is mediated by lysine modification Neuropsychopharmacology 49 1285 1295 2024 10.1038/s41386-024-01817-2 38366138 PMC11224360
94 Nemeth K Bayraktar R Ferracin M Calin GA Non-coding RNAs in disease: From mechanisms to therapeutics Nat Rev Genet 25 211 232 2024 10.1038/s41576-023-00662-1 37968332
95 Sana J Faltejskova P Svoboda M Slaby O Novel classes of non-coding RNAs and cancer J Transl Med 10 103 2012 10.1186/1479-5876-10-103 22613733 PMC3434024
96 Brosnan CA Voinnet O The long and the short of noncoding RNAs Curr Opin Cell Biol 21 416 425 2009 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.04.001 19447594
97 Qin T Li J Zhang KQ Structure, regulation, and function of linear and circular long non-coding RNAs Front Genet 11 150 2020 10.3389/fgene.2020.00150 32194627 PMC7063684
98 Friedman RC Farh KK Burge CB Bartel DP Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs Genome Res 19 92 105 2009 10.1101/gr.082701.108 18955434 PMC2612969
99 Shang R Lee S Senavirathne G Lai EC microRNAs in action: Biogenesis, function and regulation Nat Rev Genet 24 816 833 2023 10.1038/s41576-023-00611-y 37380761 PMC11087887
100 Uszczynska-Ratajczak B Lagarde J Frankish A Guigó R Johnson R Towards a complete map of the human long non-coding RNA transcriptome Nat Rev Genet 19 535 548 2018 10.1038/s41576-018-0017-y 29795125 PMC6451964
101 Khorkova O Hsiao J Wahlestedt C Basic biology and therapeutic implications of lncRNA Adv Drug Deliv Rev 87 15 24 2015 10.1016/j.addr.2015.05.012 26024979 PMC4544752
102 Iwakiri J Terai G Hamada M Computational prediction of lncRNA-mRNA interactionsby integrating tissue specificity in human transcriptome Biol Direct 12 15 2017 10.1186/s13062-017-0183-4 28595592 PMC5465533
103 Pisignano G Michael DC Visal TH Pirlog R Ladomery M Calin GA Going circular: History, present, and future of circRNAs in cancer Oncogene 42 2783 2800 2023 10.1038/s41388-023-02780-w 37587333 PMC10504067
104 Ma S Kong S Wang F Ju S CircRNAs: Biogenesis, functions, and role in drug-resistant Tumours Mol Cancer 19 119 2020 10.1186/s12943-020-01231-4 32758239 PMC7409473
105 Hansen TB Jensen TI Clausen BH Bramsen JB Finsen B Damgaard CK Kjems J Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges Nature 495 384 388 2013 10.1038/nature11993 23446346
106 Kristensen LS Andersen MS Stagsted LVW Ebbesen KK Hansen TB Kjems J The biogenesis, biology and characterization of circular RNAs Nat Rev Genet 20 675 691 2019 10.1038/s41576-019-0158-7 31395983
107 Yan H Bu P Non-coding RNA in cancer Essays Biochem 65 625 639 2021 10.1042/EBC20200032 33860799 PMC8564738
108 Elam C Hesson L Vos MD Eckfeld K Ellis CA Bell A Krex D Birrer MJ Latif F Clark GJ RRP22 is a farnesylated, nucleolar, Ras-related protein with tumor suppressor potential Cancer Res 65 3117 3125 2005 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0749 15833841
109 Riemenschneider MJ Reifenberger J Reifenberger G Frequent biallelic inactivation and transcriptional silencing of the DIRAS3 gene at 1p31 in oligodendroglial tumors with 1p loss Int J Cancer 122 2503 2510 2008 10.1002/ijc.23409 18302158
110 Tan Y Zhang S Xiao Q Wang J Zhao K Liu W Huang K Tian W Niu H Lei T Shu K Prognostic significance of ARL9 and its methylation in low-grade glioma Genomics 112 4808 4816 2020 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.08.035 32882327 PMC7462573
111 Rothhammer-Hampl T Liesenberg F Hansen N Hoja S Delic S Reifenberger G Riemenschneider MJ Frequent epigenetic inactivation of DIRAS-1 and DIRAS-2 contributes to chemo-resistance in gliomas Cancers (Basel) 13 5113 2021 10.3390/cancers13205113 34680261 PMC8534260
112 Bernal Astrain G Nikolova M Smith MJ Functional diversity in the RAS subfamily of small GTPases Biochem Soc Trans 50 921 933 2022 10.1042/BST20211166 35356965
113 Rásó E Splice variants of RAS-translational significance Cancer Metastasis Rev 39 1039 1049 2020 10.1007/s10555-020-09920-8 32772213 PMC7680328
114 Prior IA Hood FE Hartley JL The frequency of ras mutations in cancer Cancer Res 80 2969 2974 2020 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-3682 32209560 PMC7367715
115 Knobbe CB Reifenberger J Reifenberger G Mutation analysis of the Ras pathway genes NRAS, HRAS, KRAS and BRAF in glioblastomas Acta Neuropathol 108 467 470 2004 10.1007/s00401-004-0929-9 15517309
116 Wee P Wang Z Epidermal growth factor receptor cell proliferation signaling pathways Cancers (Basel) 9 52 2017 10.3390/cancers9050052 28513565 PMC5447962
117 Sugiura R Satoh R Takasaki T ERK: A double-edged sword in cancer. ERK-dependent apoptosis as a potential therapeutic strategy for cancer Cells 10 2509 2021 10.3390/cells10102509 34685488 PMC8533760
118 Kim EK Choi EJ Pathological roles of MAPK signaling pathways in human diseases Biochim Biophys Acta 1802 396 405 2010 10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.12.009 20079433
119 An Z Aksoy O Zheng T Fan QW Weiss WA Epidermal growth factor receptor and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma: Signaling pathways and targeted therapies Oncogene 37 1561 1575 2018 10.1038/s41388-017-0045-7 29321659 PMC5860944
120 Yang J Yan J Liu B Targeting EGFRvIII for glioblastoma multiforme Cancer Lett 403 224 230 2017 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.06.024 28649003
121 Maruyama C Tomisawa M Wakana S Yamazaki H Kijima H Suemizu H Ohnishi Y Urano K Hioki K Usui T Overexpression of human H-ras transgene is responsible for tumors induced by chemical carcinogens in mice Oncol Rep 8 233 237 2001 11182032 10.3892/or.8.2.233
122 Tsunematsu S Saito H Kagawa T Morizane T Hata J Nakamura T Ishii H Tsuchiya M Nomura T Katsuki M Hepatic tumors induced by carbon tetrachloride in transgenic mice carrying a human c-H-ras proto-oncogene without mutations Int J Cancer 59 554 559 1994 10.1002/ijc.2910590420 7960226
123 Weber SM Carroll SL The role of R-Ras proteins in normal and pathologic migration and morphologic change Am J Pathol 191 1499 1510 2021 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.05.008 34111428 PMC8420862
124 Gutierrez-Erlandsson S Herrero-Vidal P Fernandez-Alfara M Hernandez-Garcia S Gonzalo-Flores S Mudarra-Rubio A Fresno M Cubelos B R-RAS2 overexpression in tumors of the human central nervous system Mol Cancer 12 127 2013 10.1186/1476-4598-12-127 24148564 PMC3900289
125 Nakada M Niska JA Tran NL McDonough WS Berens ME EphB2/R-Ras signaling regulates glioma cell adhesion, growth, and invasion Am J Pathol 167 565 576 2005 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62998-7 16049340 PMC1603577
126 Zhang YL Wang RC Cheng K Ring BZ Su L Roles of Rap1 signaling in tumor cell migration and invasion Cancer Biol Med 14 90 99 2017 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0086 28443208 PMC5365179
127 Altschuler D Lapetina EG Mutational analysis of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase-mediated phosphorylation site of Rap1b J Biol Chem 268 7527 7531 1993 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)53207-5 8463283
128 Wittchen ES Aghajanian A Burridge K Isoform-specific differences between Rap1A and Rap1B GTPases in the formation of endothelial cell junctions Small GTPases 2 65 76 2011 10.4161/sgtp.2.2.15735 21776404 PMC3136906
129 Lin KT Yeh YM Chuang CM Yang SY Chang JW Sun SP Wang YS Chao KC Wang LH Glucocorticoids mediate induction of microRNA-708 to suppress ovarian cancer metastasis through targeting Rap1B Nat Commun 6 5917 2015 10.1038/ncomms6917 25569036 PMC4354140
130 Yang Y Li M Yan Y Zhang J Sun K Qu JK Wang JS Duan XY Expression of RAP1B is associated with poor prognosis and promotes an aggressive phenotype in gastric cancer Oncol Rep 34 2385 2394 2015 10.3892/or.2015.4234 26329876
131 Heard JJ Fong V Bathaie SZ Tamanoi F Recent progress in the study of the Rheb family GTPases Cell Signal 26 1950 1957 2014 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.05.011 24863881 PMC4134338
132 Armijo ME Campos T Fuentes-Villalobos F Palma ME Pincheira R Castro AF Rheb signaling and tumorigenesis: mTORC1 and new horizons Int J Cancer 138 1815 1823 2016 10.1002/ijc.29707 26234902
133 Basso AD Mirza A Liu G Long BJ Bishop WR Kirschmeier P The farnesyl transferase inhibitor (FTI) SCH66336 (lonafarnib) inhibits Rheb farnesylation and mTOR signaling. Role in FTI enhancement of taxane and tamoxifen anti-tumor activity J Biol Chem 280 31101 31108 2005 10.1074/jbc.M503763200 16006564
134 Mecca C Giambanco I Donato R Arcuri C Targeting mTOR in Glioblastoma: Rationale and Preclinical/Clinical Evidence Dis Markers 2018 9230479 2018 10.1155/2018/9230479 30662577 PMC6312595
135 Colardo M Segatto M Di Bartolomeo S Targeting RTK-PI3K-mTOR axis in gliomas: An update Int J Mol Sci 22 4899 2021 10.3390/ijms22094899 34063168 PMC8124221
136 Liu M Bi F Zhou X Zheng Y Rho GTPase regulation by miRNAs and covalent modifications Trends Cell Biol 22 365 373 2012 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.04.004 22572609 PMC3383930
137 Hodge RG Ridley AJ Regulating Rho GTPases and their regulators Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17 496 510 2016 10.1038/nrm.2016.67 27301673
138 O'Connor K Chen M Dynamic functions of RhoA in tumor cell migration and invasion Small GTPases 4 141 147 2013 10.4161/sgtp.25131 24025634 PMC3976970
139 Yin M Lu Q Liu X Wang T Liu Y Chen L Silencing Drp1 inhibits glioma cells proliferation and invasion by RHOA/ROCK1 pathway Biochem Biophys Res Commun 478 663 668 2016 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.08.003 27495873
140 Xiong W Yin A Mao X Zhang W Huang H Zhang X Resveratrol suppresses human glioblastoma cell migration and invasion via activation of RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway Oncol Lett 11 484 490 2016 10.3892/ol.2015.3888 26870238 PMC4727060
141 Talamillo A Grande L Ruiz-Ontañon P Velasquez C Mollinedo P Torices S Sanchez-Gomez P Aznar A Esparis-Ogando A Lopez-Lopez C ODZ1 allows glioblastoma to sustain invasiveness through a Myc-dependent transcriptional upregulation of RhoA Oncogene 36 1733 1744 2017 10.1038/onc.2016.341 27641332
142 Ridley AJ Rho GTPases and actin dynamics in membrane protrusions and vesicle trafficking Trends Cell Biol 16 522 529 2006 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.08.006 16949823
143 Huang M Prendergast GC RhoB in cancer suppression Histol Histopathol 21 213 218 2006 16329046 10.14670/HH-21.213
144 Zaoui K Duhamel S RhoB as a tumor suppressor: It's all about localization Eur J Cell Biol 102 151313 2023 10.1016/j.ejcb.2023.151313 36996579
145 Wei LJ Li JA Bai DM Song Y miR-223-RhoB signaling pathway regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of colon adenocarcinoma Chem Biol Interact 289 9 14 2018 10.1016/j.cbi.2018.04.016 29660302
146 Prendergast GC Actin' up: RhoB in cancer and apoptosis Nat Rev Cancer 1 162 168 2001 10.1038/35101096 11905808
147 Liu M Tang Q Qiu M Lang N Li M Zheng Y Bi F miR-21 targets the tumor suppressor RhoB and regulates proliferation, invasion and apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells FEBS Lett 585 2998 3005 2011 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.08.014 21872591
148 Cimbora-Zovko T Fritz G Mikac N Osmak M Downregulation of RhoB GTPase confers resistance to cisplatin in human laryngeal carcinoma cells Cancer Lett 295 182 190 2010 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.02.025 20303648
149 Kazanietz MG Caloca MJ The Rac GTPase in cancer: From old concepts to new paradigms Cancer Res 77 5445 5451 2017 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1456 28807941 PMC5645227
150 Steffen A Ladwein M Dimchev GA Hein A Schwenkmezger L Arens S Ladwein KI Margit Holleboom J Schur F Victor Small J Rac function is crucial for cell migration but is not required for spreading and focal adhesion formation J Cell Sci 126 4572 4588 2013 23902686 10.1242/jcs.118232 PMC3817791
151 Bosco EE Mulloy JC Zheng Y Rac1 GTPase: A 'Rac' of all trades Cell Mol Life Sci 66 370 374 2009 10.1007/s00018-008-8552-x 19151919 PMC6669905
152 Leng R Liao G Wang H Kuang J Tang L Rac1 expression in epithelial ovarian cancer: effect on cell EMT and clinical outcome Med Oncol 32 329 2015 10.1007/s12032-014-0329-5 25585684
153 Dokmanovic M Hirsch DS Shen Y Wu WJ Rac1 contributes to trastuzumab resistance of breast cancer cells: Rac1 as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer Mol Cancer Ther 8 1557 1569 2009 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0140 19509242
154 Heid I Lubeseder-Martellato C Sipos B Mazur PK Lesina M Schmid RM Siveke JT Early requirement of Rac1 in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer Gastroenterology 141 719 730 730.e1 7 2011 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.043 21684285
155 Kwiatkowska A Didier S Fortin S Chuang Y White T Berens ME Rushing E Eschbacher J Tran NL Chan A Symons M The small GTPase RhoG mediates glioblastoma cell invasion Mol Cancer 11 65 2012 10.1186/1476-4598-11-65 22966858 PMC3557187
156 Cerione RA Cdc42: New roads to travel Trends Cell Biol 14 127 132 2004 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.01.008 15003621
157 Etienne-Manneville S Cdc42-the centre of polarity J Cell Sci 117 1291 1300 2004 10.1242/jcs.01115 15020669
158 Kamai T Yamanishi T Shirataki H Takagi K Asami H Ito Y Yoshida K Overexpression of RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 GTPases is associated with progression in testicular cancer Clin Cancer Res 10 4799 4805 2004 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0436-03 15269155
159 Chen QY Jiao DM Yao QH Yan J Song J Chen FY Lu GH Zhou JY Expression analysis of Cdc42 in lung cancer and modulation of its expression by curcumin in lung cancer cell lines Int J Oncol 40 1561 1568 2012 22266952 10.3892/ijo.2012.1336
160 Zucman-Rossi J Legoix P Thomas G Identification of new members of the Gas2 and Ras families in the 22q12 chromosome region Genomics 38 247 254 1996 10.1006/geno.1996.0625 8975699
161 Zhen Y Stenmark H Cellular functions of Rab GTPases at a glance J Cell Sci 128 3171 3176 2015 26272922 10.1242/jcs.166074
162 Stenmark H Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10 513 525 2009 10.1038/nrm2728 19603039
163 Homma Y Hiragi S Fukuda M Rab family of small GTPases: An updated view on their regulation and functions FEBS J 288 36 55 2021 10.1111/febs.15453 32542850 PMC7818423
164 Liu Y Wang X Zhang Z Xiao B An B Zhang J The overexpression of Rab9 promotes tumor progression regulated by XBP1 in breast cancer Onco Targets Ther 12 1815 1824 2019 10.2147/OTT.S183748 30881034 PMC6404677
165 Li Z Li Y Jia Y Ding B Yu J Rab1A knockdown represses proliferation and promotes apoptosis in gastric cancer cells by inhibition of mTOR/p70S6K pathway Arch Biochem Biophys 685 108352 2020 10.1016/j.abb.2020.108352 32240637
166 Zhao Z Liu XF Wu HC Zou SB Wang JY Ni PH Chen XH Fan QS Rab5a overexpression promoting ovarian cancer cell proliferation may be associated with APPL1-related epidermal growth factor signaling pathway Cancer Sci 101 1454 1462 2010 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01558.x 20412119 PMC11159928
167 Zhang D Lu C Ai H Rab5a is overexpressed in oral cancer and promotes invasion through ERK/MMP signaling Mol Med Rep 16 4569 4576 2017 10.3892/mmr.2017.7214 28849149 PMC5646994
168 Ge J Ge C Rab14 overexpression regulates gemcitabine sensitivity through regulation of Bcl-2 and mitochondrial function in pancreatic cancer Virchows Arch 474 59 69 2019 10.1007/s00428-018-2455-5 30267303
169 Yang XZ Li XX Zhang YJ Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Xiang MQ Wang HY Zheng XF Rab1 in cell signaling, cancer and other diseases Oncogene 35 5699 5704 2016 10.1038/onc.2016.81 27041585 PMC5396462
170 Zenner HL Yoshimura S Barr FA Crump CM Analysis of Rab GTPase-activating proteins indicates that Rab1a/b and Rab43 are important for herpes simplex virus 1 secondary envelopment J Virol 85 8012 8021 2011 10.1128/JVI.00500-11 21680502 PMC3147948
171 Nuoffer C Davidson HW Matteson J Meinkoth J Balch WE A GDP-bound of rab1 inhibits protein export from the endoplasmic reticulum and transport between Golgi compartments J Cell Biol 125 225 237 1994 10.1083/jcb.125.2.225 8163542 PMC2120023
172 Zhang Y Wang L Lv Y Jiang C Wu G Dull RO Minshall RD Malik AB Hu G The GTPase Rab1 is required for NLRP3 inflammasome activation and inflammatory lung injury J Immunol 202 194 206 2019 10.4049/jimmunol.1800777 30455398 PMC6345506
173 Yang XZ Cui SZ Zeng LS Cheng TT Li XX Chi J Wang R Zheng XF Wang HY Overexpression of Rab1B and MMP9 predicts poor survival and good response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer Aging (Albany NY) 9 914 931 2017 10.18632/aging.101200 28316326 PMC5391239
174 Wang X Liu F Qin X Huang T Huang B Zhang Y Jiang B Expression of Rab1A is upregulated in human lung cancer and associated with tumor size and T stage Aging (Albany NY) 8 2790 2798 2016 10.18632/aging.101087 27902464 PMC5191870
175 Xu M Shao X Kuai X Zhang L Zhou C Cheng Z Expression analysis and implication of Rab1A in gastrointestinal relevant tumor Sci Rep 9 13384 2019 10.1038/s41598-019-49786-7 31527621 PMC6746845
176 Ren B Wang L Nan Y Liu T Zhao L Ma H Li J Zhang Y Ren X RAB1A regulates glioma cellular proliferation and invasion via the mTOR signaling pathway and epithelial-mesenchymal transition Future Oncol 17 3203 3216 2021 10.2217/fon-2021-0116 33947216
177 Lanzetti L Palamidessi A Areces L Scita G Di Fiore PP Rab5 is a signalling GTPase involved in actin remodelling by receptor tyrosine kinases Nature 429 309 314 2004 10.1038/nature02542 15152255
178 Chiariello M Bruni CB Bucci C The small GTPases Rab5a, Rab5b and Rab5c are differentially phosphorylated in vitro FEBS Lett 453 20 24 1999 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00686-9 10403367
179 Tan JY Jia LQ Shi WH He Q Zhu L Yu B Rab5a-mediated autophagy regulates the phenotype and behavior of vascular smooth muscle cells Mol Med Rep 14 4445 4453 2016 10.3892/mmr.2016.5774 27666726 PMC5101961
180 Li Y Zhao Y Hu J Xiao J Qu L Wang Z Ma D Chen Y A novel ER-localized transmembrane protein, EMC6, interacts with RAB5A and regulates cell autophagy Autophagy 9 150 163 2013 10.4161/auto.22742 23182941 PMC3552880
181 Yu MH Luo Y Qin SL Zhong M Increased expression of Rab5A predicts metastasis and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients Int J Clin Exp Pathol 8 6974 6980 2015 26261586 PMC4525920
182 Engebraaten O Yau C Berg K Borgen E Garred Ø Berstad MEB Fremstedal ASV DeMichele A Veer LV' Esserman L Weyergang A RAB5A expression is a predictive biomarker for trastuzumab emtansine in breast cancer Nat Commun 12 6427 2021 10.1038/s41467-021-26018-z 34741021 PMC8571323
183 English AR Voeltz GK Rab10 GTPase regulates ER dynamics and morphology Nat Cell Biol 15 169 178 2013 10.1038/ncb2647 23263280 PMC3582403
184 Chen YT Holcomb C Moore HP Expression and localization of two low molecular weight GTP-binding proteins, Rab8 and Rab10, by epitope tag Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90 6508 6512 1993 10.1073/pnas.90.14.6508 7688123 PMC46961
185 Leaf DS Blum LD Analysis of rab10 localization in sea urchin embryonic cells by three-dimensional reconstruction Exp Cell Res 243 39 49 1998 10.1006/excr.1997.3917 9716447
186 Cardoso CM Jordao L Vieira OV Rab10 regulates phagosome maturation and its overexpression rescues Mycobacterium-containing phagosomes maturation Traffic 11 221 235 2010 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.01013.x 20028485
187 Babbey CM Bacallao RL Dunn KW Rab10 associates with primary cilia and the exocyst complex in renal epithelial cells Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 299 F495 F506 2010 10.1152/ajprenal.00198.2010 20576682 PMC2944301
188 Lerner DW McCoy D Isabella AJ Mahowald AP Gerlach GF Chaudhry TA Horne-Badovinac S A Rab10-dependent mechanism for polarized basement membrane secretion during organ morphogenesis Dev Cell 24 159 168 2013 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.12.005 23369713 PMC3562474
189 Isabella AJ Horne-Badovinac S Rab10-mediated secretion synergizes with tissue movement to build a polarized basement membrane architecture for organ morphogenesis Dev Cell 38 47 60 2016 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.009 27404358 PMC4942852
190 Etoh K Fukuda M Rab10 regulates tubular endosome formation through KIF13A and KIF13B motors J Cell Sci 132 jcs226977 2019 10.1242/jcs.226977 30700496
191 Zhuo J Han J Zhao Y Hao R Shen C Li H Dai L Sheng A Yao H Yang X Liu W RAB10 promotes breast cancer proliferation migration and invasion predicting a poor prognosis for breast cancer Sci Rep 13 15252 2023 10.1038/s41598-023-42434-1 37709911 PMC10502149
192 Wang W Jia WD Hu B Pan YY RAB10 overexpression promotes tumor growth and indicates poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma Oncotarget 8 26434 26447 2017 10.18632/oncotarget.15507 28460436 PMC5432270
193 Scita G Di Fiore PP The endocytic matrix Nature 463 464 473 2010 10.1038/nature08910 20110990
194 Simpson JC Jones AT Early endocytic Rabs: Functional prediction to functional characterization Biochem Soc Symp 72 99 108 2005 10.1042/bss0720099 15649134
195 Simpson JC Griffiths G Wessling-Resnick M Fransen JA Bennett H Jones AT A role for the small GTPase Rab21 in the early endocytic pathway J Cell Sci 117 Pt 26 6297 6311 2004 10.1242/jcs.01560 15561770
196 Evans TM Ferguson C Wainwright BJ Parton RG Wicking C Rab23, a negative regulator of hedgehog signaling, localizes to the plasma membrane and the endocytic pathway Traffic 4 869 884 2003 10.1046/j.1600-0854.2003.00141.x 14617350
197 Pellinen T Arjonen A Vuoriluoto K Kallio K Fransen JA Ivaska J Small GTPase Rab21 regulates cell adhesion and controls endosomal traffic of beta1-integrins J Cell Biol 173 767 780 2006 10.1083/jcb.200509019 16754960 PMC2063892
198 Zhou Y Wu B Li JH Nan G Jiang JL Chen ZN Rab22a enhances CD147 recycling and is required for lung cancer cell migration and invasion Exp Cell Res 357 9 16 2017 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.04.020 28433697
199 Takeda M Koseki J Takahashi H Miyoshi N Nishida N Nishimura J Hata T Matsuda C Mizushima T Yamamoto H Disruption of Endolysosomal RAB5/7 efficiently eliminates colorectal cancer stem cells Cancer Res 79 1426 1437 2019 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-2192 30765602
200 Chen Y Ng F Tang BL Rab23 activities and human cancer-emerging connections and mechanisms Tumour Biol 37 12959 12967 2016 10.1007/s13277-016-5207-7 27449041
201 Lledo PM Johannes L Vernier P Zorec R Darchen F Vincent JD Henry JP Mason WT Rab3 proteins: Key players in the control of exocytosis Trends Neurosci 17 426 432 1994 10.1016/0166-2236(94)90017-5 7530881
202 Martin S Parton RG Characterization of Rab18, a lipid droplet-associated small GTPase Methods Enzymol 438 109 129 2008 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)38008-7 18413244
203 Gerondopoulos A Bastos RN Yoshimura S Anderson R Carpanini S Aligianis I Handley MT Barr FA Rab18 and a Rab18 GEF complex are required for normal ER structure J Cell Biol 205 707 720 2014 10.1083/jcb.201403026 24891604 PMC4050724
204 Dejgaard SY Murshid A Erman A Kizilay O Verbich D Lodge R Dejgaard K Ly-Hartig TB Pepperkok R Simpson JC Presley JF Rab18 and Rab43 have key roles in ER-Golgi trafficking J Cell Sci 121 Pt 16 2768 2781 2008 10.1242/jcs.021808 18664496
205 Fukuda M Rab27 effectors, pleiotropic regulators in secretory pathways Traffic 14 949 963 2013 10.1111/tra.12083 23678941
206 Ostrowski M Carmo NB Krumeich S Fanget I Raposo G Savina A Moita CF Schauer K Hume AN Freitas RP Rab27a and Rab27b control different steps of the exosome secretion pathway Nat Cell Biol 12 19 30 2010 10.1038/ncb2000 19966785
207 Li Z Fang R Fang J He S Liu T Functional implications of Rab27 GTPases in cancer Cell Commun Signal 16 44 2018 10.1186/s12964-018-0255-9 30081925 PMC6080553
208 Donaldson JG Jackson CL ARF family G proteins and their regulators: Roles in membrane transport, development and disease Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12 362 375 2011 10.1038/nrm3117 21587297 PMC3245550
209 D'Souza-Schorey C Chavrier P ARF proteins: Roles in membrane traffic and beyond Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7 347 358 2006 10.1038/nrm1910 16633337
210 Donaldson JG Honda A Localization and function of Arf family GTPases Biochem Soc Trans 33 Pt 4 639 642 2005 10.1042/BST0330639 16042562
211 Gillingham AK Munro S The small G proteins of the Arf family and their regulators Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23 579 611 2007 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123209 17506703
212 Schlienger S Campbell S Claing A ARF1 regulates the Rho/MLC pathway to control EGF-dependent breast cancer cell invasion Mol Biol Cell 25 17 29 2014 10.1091/mbc.e13-06-0335 24196838 PMC3873888
213 Boulay PL Schlienger S Lewis-Saravalli S Vitale N Ferbeyre G Claing A ARF1 controls proliferation of breast cancer cells by regulating the retinoblastoma protein Oncogene 30 3846 3861 2011 10.1038/onc.2011.100 21478909
214 Ma H Fang W Li Q Wang Y Hou SX Arf1 ablation in colorectal cancer cells activates a super signal complex in DC to enhance anti-tumor immunity Adv Sci (Weinh) 10 e2305089 2023 10.1002/advs.202305089 37786300 PMC10646219
215 Wen PY Kesari S Malignant gliomas in adults N Engl J Med 359 492 507 2008 10.1056/NEJMra0708126 18669428
216 Rong L Li N Zhang Z Emerging therapies for glioblastoma: Current state and future directions J Exp Clin Cancer Res 41 142 2022 10.1186/s13046-022-02349-7 35428347 PMC9013078
217 Weller M van den Bent M Preusser M Le Rhun E Tonn JC Minniti G Bendszus M Balana C Chinot O Dirven L EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood Nat Rev Clin Oncol 18 170 186 2021 10.1038/s41571-020-00447-z 33293629 PMC7904519
218 Li T Li J Chen Z Zhang S Li S Wageh S Al-Hartomy OA Al-Sehemi AG Xie Z Kankala RK Zhang H Glioma diagnosis and therapy: Current challenges and nanomaterial-based solutions J Control Release 352 338 370 2022 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.065 36206948
219 Liu F Wang Y Gu H Wang X Technologies and applications of single-cell DNA methylation sequencing Theranostics 13 2439 2454 2023 10.7150/thno.82582 37215576 PMC10196823
220 Alshammari E Zhang Y Sobota J Yang Z Aberrant DNA methylation of tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes as cancer biomarkers Genomic and Epigenomic Biomarkers of Toxicology and Disease: Clinical and Therapeutic Actions Sahu SC Wiley Oxford 251 271 2022 10.1002/9781119807704.ch12
221 Da Costa EM McInnes G Beaudry A Raynal NJ DNA Methylation-targeted drugs Cancer J 23 270 276 2017 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000278 28926427
222 Diesch J Zwick A Garz AK Palau A Buschbeck M Götze KS A clinical-molecular update on azanucleoside-based therapy for the treatment of hematologic cancers Clin Epigenetics 8 71 2016 10.1186/s13148-016-0237-y 27330573 PMC4915187
223 Federici L Capelle L Annereau M Bielle F Willekens C Dehais C Laigle-Donadey F Hoang-Xuan K Delattre JY Idbaih A 5-Azacitidine in patients with IDH1/2-mutant recurrent glioma Neuro Oncol 22 1226 1228 2020 10.1093/neuonc/noaa074 32215616 PMC7594550
224 He W Lin S Guo Y Wu Y Zhang LL Deng Q Du ZM Wei M Zhu W Chen WJ Targeted demethylation at ZNF154 promotor upregulates ZNF154 expression and inhibits the proliferation and migration of Esophageal squamous carcinoma cells Oncogene 41 4537 4546 2022 10.1038/s41388-022-02366-y 36064578 PMC9525237
225 Zaib S Rana N Khan I Histone modifications and their role in epigenetics of cancer Curr Med Chem 29 2399 2411 2022 10.2174/0929867328666211108105214 34749606
226 Chen R Zhang M Zhou Y Guo W Yi M Zhang Z Ding Y Wang Y The application of histone deacetylases inhibitors in glioblastoma J Exp Clin Cancer Res 39 138 2020 10.1186/s13046-020-01643-6 32682428 PMC7368699
227 Wang F Jin Y Wang M Luo HY Fang WJ Wang YN Chen YX Huang RJ Guan WL Li JB Combined anti-PD-1, HDAC inhibitor and anti-VEGF for MSS/pMMR colorectal cancer: A randomized phase 2 trial Nat Med 30 1035 1043 2024 10.1038/s41591-024-02813-1 38438735
228 Gao Y He H Li X Zhang L Xu W Feng R Li W Xiao Y Liu X Chen Y Sintilimab (anti-PD-1 antibody) plus chidamide (histone deacetylase inhibitor) in relapsed or refractory extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma (SCENT): A phase Ib/II study Signal Transduct Target Ther 9 121 2024 10.1038/s41392-024-01825-0 38755119 PMC11099117
229 Monje M Cooney T Glod J Huang J Peer CJ Faury D Baxter P Kramer K Lenzen A Robison NJ Phase I trial of panobinostat in children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A report from the Pediatric brain tumor consortium (PBTC-047) Neuro Oncol 25 2262 2272 2023 10.1093/neuonc/noad141 37526549 PMC10708931
230 Mueller S Kline C Stoller S Lundy S Christopher L Reddy AT Banerjee A Cooney TM Raber S Hoffman C PNOC015: Repeated convection-enhanced delivery of MTX110 (aqueous panobinostat) in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma Neuro Oncol 25 2074 2086 2023 10.1093/neuonc/noad105 37318058 PMC10628948
231 Xu K Ramesh K Huang V Gurbani SS Cordova JS Schreibmann E Weinberg BD Sengupta S Voloschin AD Holdhoff M Final report on clinical outcomes and tumor recurrence patterns of a pilot study assessing efficacy of belinostat (PXD-101) with chemoradiation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma Tomography 8 688 700 2022 10.3390/tomography8020057 35314634 PMC8938806
232 Raedler LA Farydak (Panobinostat): First HDAC inhibitor approved for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma Am Health Drug Benefits 9 Spec Feature 84 87 2016 27668050 PMC5013857
233 Zhang L Liao Y Tang L MicroRNA-34 family: A potential tumor suppressor and therapeutic candidate in cancer J Exp Clin Cancer Res 38 53 2019 10.1186/s13046-019-1059-5 30717802 PMC6360685
234 Li Z Rana TM Therapeutic targeting of microRNAs: current status and future challenges Nat Rev Drug Discov 13 622 638 2014 10.1038/nrd4359 25011539
235 Petrescu GED Sabo AA Torsin LI Calin GA Dragomir MP MicroRNA based theranostics for brain cancer: Basic principles J Exp Clin Cancer Res 38 231 2019 10.1186/s13046-019-1180-5 31142339 PMC6542029
236 Mathupala SP Mittal S Guthikonda M Sloan AE MicroRNA and brain tumors: A cause and a cure? DNA Cell Biol 26 301 310 2007 10.1089/dna.2006.0560 17504026 PMC3385864
237 Morokoff A Jones J Nguyen H Ma C Lasocki A Gaillard F Bennett I Luwor R Stylli S Paradiso L Serum microRNA is a biomarker for post-operative monitoring in glioma J Neurooncol 149 391 400 2020 10.1007/s11060-020-03566-w 32915353
238 Yue X Lan F Hu M Pan Q Wang Q Wang J Downregulation of serum microRNA-205 as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for human glioma J Neurosurg 124 122 128 2016 10.3171/2015.1.JNS141577 26230475
239 Sun Y Jing Y Zhang Y Serum lncRNA-ANRIL and SOX9 expression levels in glioma patients and their relationship with poor prognosis World J Surg Oncol 19 287 2021 10.1186/s12957-021-02392-2 34556140 PMC8461887
240 Tan SK Pastori C Penas C Komotar RJ Ivan ME Wahlestedt C Ayad NG Serum long noncoding RNA HOTAIR as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in glioblastoma multiforme Mol Cancer 17 74 2018 10.1186/s12943-018-0822-0 29558959 PMC5861620
241 Stella M Falzone L Caponnetto A Gattuso G Barbagallo C Battaglia R Mirabella F Broggi G Altieri R Certo F Serum extracellular vesicle-derived circHIPK3 and circS-MARCA5 are two novel diagnostic biomarkers for glioblastoma multiforme Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 14 618 2021 10.3390/ph14070618 34198978 PMC8308516
242 Li P Xu Z Liu T Liu Q Zhou H Meng S Feng Z Tang Y Liu C Feng J Circular RNA sequencing reveals serum exosome circular RNA panel for high-grade astrocytoma diagnosis Clin Chem 68 332 343 2022 10.1093/clinchem/hvab254 34942001