Intraoperative ultrasound during repeat cesarean delivery facilitates sampling of uterine scar tissue.

OBJECTIVES

Histological examination of uterine scars provides insight into uterine wound healing and helps to develop prevention methods of uterine wall rupture after previous uterine surgery. Therefore, exact intraoperative scar identification is needed for specimen collection from the actual scar tissue. The aim of this study was to correlate pre- and intraoperative ultrasound measurements of the lower uterine segment (LUS) with histological findings of scar tissue and to evaluate the relevance of intraoperative ultrasound.

METHODS

In a prospective observational study, preoperative and intraoperative sonographic measurements of the LUS thickness were performed in 33 women with a history of at least one cesarean delivery. Intraoperative ultrasound with a linear transducer placed directly on the uterus identified the scar area and uterotomy was performed 2 cm cranially. Tissue samples were taken after extraction of the fetus, embedded in paraffin wax, and stained according to Gomori Trichrome to identify scar tissue. Collagen content was evaluated with imaging software Fiji (NIH, Bethesda, USA). Preoperative and intraoperative sonographic measurements were correlated with histologic evidence of scar tissue.

RESULTS

Histological evidence of scar tissue was found in 11 out of 33 samples with significantly lower ultrasonographic thickness of the lower uterine segment compared to the other 22 samples, both antepartum (1.4 mm [1.3-1.9] vs. 2.0 mm [1.6-2.6], p=0.03) and intrapartum (1.6 mm [1.3-1.9] vs. 3.7 mm [2.0-4.7], p<0.01). Intraoperative ultrasound had a significantly higher predictive power (AUC difference 0.18 [0.03-0.33], p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative sonography identifies the uterine wall area with histologically confirmable scar tissue far better than preoperative sonography.