MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-12-52

Медицинская библиотека · BMC medical research methodology · 2012

Improving response rate and quality of survey data with a scratch lottery ticket incentive.

Olsen Frank, Abelsen Birgit, Olsen Jan Abel

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The quality of data collected in survey research is usually indicated by the response rate; the representativeness of the sample, and; the rate of completed questions (item-response). In attempting to improve a generally declining response rate in surveys considerable efforts are being made through follow-up mailings and various types of incentives. This study examines effects of including a scratch lottery ticket in the invitation letter to a survey.

METHOD: Questionnaires concerning oral health were mailed to a random sample of 2,400 adults. A systematically selected half of the sample (1,200 adults) received a questionnaire including a scratch lottery ticket. One reminder without the incentive was sent.

RESULTS

The incentive increased the response rate and improved representativeness by reaching more respondents with lower education. Furthermore, it reduced item nonresponse. The initial incentive had no effect on the propensity to respond after the reminder.

CONCLUSION

When attempting to improve survey data, three issues become important: response rate, representativeness, and item-response. This study shows that including a scratch lottery ticket in the invitation letter performs well on all the three.

Для цитирования: Olsen Frank, Abelsen Birgit, Olsen Jan Abel. Improving response rate and quality of survey data with a scratch lottery ticket incentive.. BMC medical research methodology. 2012. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-52.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.