MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1365-263x.2006.00752.x

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of paediatric dentistry · 2006

Assessment of a palatal approach-anterior superior alveolar (P-ASA) nerve block with the Wand in paediatric dental patients.

Ram D, Kassirer J

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of the study were to compare the reaction of children while receiving local anaesthesia for anaesthetizing maxillary incisors with a computerized device Wand: a periodontal ligament injection (PDLi) and a palatal approach-anterior superior alveolar (P-ASA) nerve block compared with a conventional buccal infiltration (CBi), and to assess the efficacy of the anaesthesia and children's reaction after treatment.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-eight children aged 24-48 months participated in this study.

RESULTS

More children reacted negatively during injection while receiving the CBi and positively during the injection with the Wand. After treatment, significantly more children scratched the upper lip and/or the nose or complained of numbness of the region after the CBi (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Same effectiveness was achieved with the Wand and the CBi. Children displayed better behaviour during injection when they received local anaesthesia with the WanD than they did when the CBi was used. They did not scratch the upper lip/nose and/or cried after treatment when they received the PDLi and the P-ASA, whereas they did when receiving a CBi.

Для цитирования: Ram D, Kassirer J. Assessment of a palatal approach-anterior superior alveolar (P-ASA) nerve block with the Wand in paediatric dental patients.. International journal of paediatric dentistry. 2006. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263x.2006.00752.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.