Reproductive biomedicine online · 2022
Pregnancy outcomes after fresh versus vitrified-warmed embryo transfer in women with adenomyosis: a retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhu Xingwang, Dongye Houjin, Lu Shaoming, Zhao Xingbo, Yan Lei
Аннотация
RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the singleton live birth rate superior for vitrified-warmed versus fresh embryo transfer in women with adenomyosis?
DESIGN: This cohort study retrospectively analysed data from the Reproductive Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University between January 2013 and December 2018. A total of 612 women diagnosed with adenomyosis, with 322 fresh embryo transfer cycles and 290 vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycles, were included in this study. The primary outcome was singleton live birth. Outcomes were adjusted using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Vitrified-warmed embryo transfer was associated with a higher rate of singleton live birth than fresh embryo transfer (25.9% versus 17.4%; P = 0.011). Although there was a trend towards a lower miscarriage rate after vitrified-warmed embryo transfer, the difference did not reach statistical significance (31.3% versus 40.6%; P = 0.111). The clinical pregnancy rate was comparable in the two groups (44.1% versus 44.4%; P = 0.946). Vitrified-warmed embryo transfer also resulted in a lower risk of preterm birth than fresh embryo transfer (7.0% versus 17.5%; P = 0.010).
CONCLUSIONS: Vitrified-warmed embryo transfer may be associated with better pregnancy outcomes than fresh embryo transfer among women with adenomyosis. It seems that vitrified-warmed embryo transfer is more appropriate for specific populations.
DESIGN: This cohort study retrospectively analysed data from the Reproductive Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University between January 2013 and December 2018. A total of 612 women diagnosed with adenomyosis, with 322 fresh embryo transfer cycles and 290 vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycles, were included in this study. The primary outcome was singleton live birth. Outcomes were adjusted using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Vitrified-warmed embryo transfer was associated with a higher rate of singleton live birth than fresh embryo transfer (25.9% versus 17.4%; P = 0.011). Although there was a trend towards a lower miscarriage rate after vitrified-warmed embryo transfer, the difference did not reach statistical significance (31.3% versus 40.6%; P = 0.111). The clinical pregnancy rate was comparable in the two groups (44.1% versus 44.4%; P = 0.946). Vitrified-warmed embryo transfer also resulted in a lower risk of preterm birth than fresh embryo transfer (7.0% versus 17.5%; P = 0.010).
CONCLUSIONS: Vitrified-warmed embryo transfer may be associated with better pregnancy outcomes than fresh embryo transfer among women with adenomyosis. It seems that vitrified-warmed embryo transfer is more appropriate for specific populations.