Introduction
Event-related potentials (ERPs) are used to explore the neural basis of cognition. One of the more extensively studied ERP components is the P300 (or P3), which was first described in 1965 as a positive potential elicited around 300 ms after stimulus occurrence. 1 The P300 can be elicited from an oddball task, in which subjects have to respond to a target stimulus presented in-between recurrent standard stimuli. In a visual oddball paradigm, ERPs can be calculated for rare emotionally significant pictures. Today, the P300 is understood as a marker to represent an information processing cascade of attention and memory mechanisms, particularly in the context of stimulus discrimination. 2
Taking into account processes of contextual updating, the main influencing factors of P300 amplitude were described as task relevance, motivational importance, and arousal level. 3 Research suggests that the emotional arousal dimension affects the P300 in the sense that subjects who react with high arousal generate larger amplitudes in contrast to people who react with lower arousal. 4 , 5
Valence and arousal dimensions of emotion can differentially affect the P300. 6 More precisely, valence effects were found to be reflected by amplitude modulations at frontal sites. 7 Arousal effects were observed at posterior locations for several EEG components and in particular for the P300. 8 – 11 The arousal effect was more reproducible than the valence effect and seems to be the primary determinant of affective oddball processing. 12
Various studies investigated ERPs in depressive patients, many of which have shown reductions in P300 amplitudes 13 – 15 and increases in P300 latency. 14 , 16 , 17 For example, Brush et al (2022) showed that decreased Go and No-Go P300 amplitudes were associated with increased depressive symptom severity in older adults, with the greatest variance attributable to decreased No-Go P300 amplitude. Of note, loneliness significantly moderated the relationship between No-Go P300 and depressive symptom severity in that individuals who reported low levels of loneliness had no association between No-Go P300 and depressive symptom severity. This suggests that social support provides protection against the depressive effects of poor inhibitory control in older adults. 18 An increase of the amplitude in the sense of a normalization after recovery from depression was reported only sporadically. 19 , 20 Since previous literature suggests a significant reduction in P300 amplitudes in depressive patients, successful therapeutic treatment might result in increased P300 amplitudes.
Cancer patients and survivors suffer from various physical and psychological symptoms like pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and cognitive impairments. Depression is the most common and severe comorbidity of cancer patients 21 with a prevalence of 15% with regard to major and 20% to minor depression. 22 Overall, it is known that especially older people are affected by depression. 23 Cancer being the second leading cause of death worldwide with an estimated 9.9 million deaths in 2020 24 underscores the importance of this research topic.
The technique of electroencephalographic (EEG) biofeedback or neurofeedback (NF) is a non-invasive, non-drug type of brain training and was developed in the 1970s. 25 It measures the EEG signal of a person, processes it in real time, and extracts different parameters to be trained, mostly by analyzing the frequency content of the signal. 26 The information is therefore presented in visual or auditory form. The aim of NF therapy is to modify behavior by modeling brain activity through “voluntary control”. 25 The technique is scientifically based and belongs to the innovative complementary and alternative medical therapies. 27 By modifying brain waves and thus leading to clinical changes in disease-related symptoms, NF enables the brain to learn self-regulation skills. 28 Changes in the amplitude of selected frequency bands through operant and classical conditioning lead to a training effect and thus to symptom relief. 27
Neurophysiological targets can be generally classified into three categories according to general mechanisms 25 : arousal, 29 emotional valence, 30 and sleep. 31 With respect to the main frequency bands, the literature predominantly assigns the posterior alpha rhythm to a state of relaxed wakefulness 32 and the central frontal theta and beta activity to a state of arousal. 33 , 34 Therefore, an increase of alpha frequency by alpha-NF training is applied to enhance the relaxation state and a decrease of the theta/beta frequency is attempted to decrease the arousal state.
So far, NF has been studied in patients with attention/hyperactivity disorder, addiction disorders, strokes, epilepsies, migraines, chronic insomnia, autism spectrum disorder, depression, and psychotic disorders. 25 Some studies and a recent review suggest that NF has the potential to relieve several long-term symptoms reported by cancer patients and survivors and to improve their quality of life. 35 , 36
Hetkamp et al postulated 26 the need to conduct studies with pre and post EEG data after NF training or therapy “ as standardized outcome measurement to answer the question whether cancer related anxiety and depression are modulated in the same way as the psychiatric findings implicate” . To date, this has only been investigated in a few case studies within this patient group (eg 37 ).
On this basis, the aim of this study was to determine the emotional arousal and valence effects on event-related P300 by an individualized EEG alpha and theta/beta NF intervention in cancer patients and survivors. We expected that a division of the emotional stimuli into high versus low arousal will lead to an increase of the amplitudes of these two ERPs. In the sense of normalization, this increase of the arousal-dependent amplitude will increase during and after successful NF training.
Methods
Study Design
The current study is part of a larger randomized, controlled clinical trial registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00015773). The study was approved by the ethics committee of the medical department of the University of Duisburg-Essen (No.: 18-8079-BO).
The study was designed as a waiting-list control study. First, EEG (t0) measurement was performed after written informed consent was given. After a five-week waiting period, another EEG (pre, t1) was recorded before patients received the NF intervention, which lasted five weeks as well. Following the intervention, a post EEG (t2) was conducted. In addition, on the same days as the EEG measurements were performed, patients were asked to answer questionnaires.
Regarding EEG data acquisition and analyses, the study was designed single-blinded. In conducting and reporting this clinical trial, we followed the consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioral neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist). 38
Participants
The study was conducted from October 2018 to December 2020. It was interrupted during the first COVID-19 pandemic shutdown phase in Germany from March 23, 2020 to May 6, 2020.
Twenty-one cancer patients or survivors were included in the study. Both patients currently undergoing cancer therapy as well as patients in remission participated. Three patients dropped out due to the COVID-19 pandemic. A sample of 18 (13 female, 5 male) Caucasian patients with a mean age of 53.06 years (min = 31, max = 73; median = 54.50; SD = 10.973 years) were included in the evaluation. Seventeen participants were right-handed and one was left-handed. All of them had normal or corrected-to-normal vision and provided written informed consent before the start of study participation. Prior to the experiment, the absence of exclusion criteria was examined (no severe depressive state, no history of neurological disease including neurological metastasis, or drug abuse) with the ICD-10-Checklist 39 and Psycho-Onkologische Basisdokumentation. 40 Patients had various cancer entities with a median WHO stage of III. Slightly more than half of the patients were still working; Details are given in Table 1 .
Table 1.
Demographics.
N = 18.
| n | Percentage (%) | ||
| Gender | |||
| female | 13 | 72.2 | |
| male | 5 | 28.8 | |
| Relationship | |||
| with partner | 14 | 77.8 | |
| without partner | 4 | 22.2 | |
| Employment status | |||
| employed | 10 | 55.6 | |
| unemployed | 0 | 0 | |
| retired / incapacitated | 3 | 16.7 | |
| on sick leave | 4 | 22.2 | |
| other | 1 | 5.6 | |
| Education | |||
| high school diploma | 10 | 56.6 | |
| secondary school degree („ Realschule “) | 4 | 22.2 | |
| secondary school degree („ Hauptschule “) | 2 | 11.1 | |
| no data | 2 | 11,1 | |
| Cancer Type | |||
| breast | 6 | 33.3 | |
| melanoma | 3 | 16.7 | |
| lung | 2 | 11.1 | |
| lymphoma | 2 | 11.1 | |
| pancreas | 2 | 11.1 | |
| angiosarcoma | 1 | 5.6 | |
| endometrial | 1 | 5.6 | |
| multiple myeloma | 1 | 5.6 | |
| Cancer Stage | |||
| I | 3 | 16.7 | |
| II | 0 | 0 | |
| III | 7 | 38.9 | |
| IV | 8 | 44.4 |
Any participant who completed six or more NF sessions was considered a completer. All participants who completed the study met this condition, the median session number was nine (range 6–10).
EEG Acquisition
EEG was recorded using a 32-channel Brain Products Inc. (Gilching, Germany) DC EEG amplifier and matching hoods with active, sintered Ag-AgCl electrodes (Acti-Cap slim). Brain Products software (Brain Products Recorder, Version 2) was used for EEG data acquisition. EEG was recorded at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz in the frequency range from 0.016 to 250 Hz across all 32 channels according to the extended 10–20 system: Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, Fc7, Fc3, Fcz, Fc4, Fc8, T3, C3, Cz, C4, T4, Tp5, Cp3, Cpz, Cp4, Tp6, T5, P3, Pz, P4, T6, Oz, and left and right earlobes. To control for eye movements, horizontal EOG was recorded from two electrodes at the left and right outer canthi of both eyes. Vertical EOG was recorded from below the left eye and electrode Fp2. Electrode Fz served as reference, the ground electrode was mounted between Fz and Fpz. Visual stimuli and patients’ responses were managed using Presentation software (Version 20.2, Neurobehavioral Systems, Inc., CA, USA). Stimulus events and responses were registered by the EEG recording software.
Oddball Task
Pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) were used for stimulation. 41 560 standard stimuli (75,0%) and 35 deviants for each emotion condition (6,25%) were presented. Deviants were positive and negative valence and high and low arousal. This adds to a total of 700 stimuli. With 2.5 s SOA, the presentation lasted about 30 min. All neutral pictures were non-target trials. The presentation of these neutral pictures was randomly interspersed with pictures with either low or high arousal and with either positive or negative valence, resulting in four classes of target stimuli: low-positive (5%), high-positive (5%), low-negative (5%), and high-negative (5%). Participants were instructed to press a button on these emotionally significant pictures.
The oddball task comprised a total of 230 emotional target pictures. The mean (SD) arousal and valence ratings, respectively, were as follows: low-arousal-negative-valence = 4.512 (0.345) and 2.86 (0.31), high-arousal-negative-valence = 6.483 (0.321) and 2.87 (0.45); low-arousal-positive-valence = 4.44 (0.251) and 7.232 (.223); high-arousal-positive-valence = 6.547 (0.399) and 7158 (.372). IAPS picture sets differed significantly in the valence dimension (on a scale ranging from 1 - very unpleasant to 9 - very pleasant; F (4,12) = 13454.8, p ≤ .05). In the arousal dimension (scale ranging from 1 - very relaxing to 9 - very exciting), the unpleasant set and the pleasant set both differed from the neutral one ( F (4,3) = 41242.9, p ≤ .05).
EEG Procedure
Participants sat with attached electrodes on a comfortable chair in a secluded and dimly lighted room, which was minimized for electrical artifacts. The chair stood at a distance of 1.5 meters from the presentation monitor, on which the picture stimuli were presented. Patients were asked to judge the valence of the randomly presented pictures by pressing two different keys on a computer mouse (randomized for left and right) for the pleasantness of the pictures (positive vs negative); no tap for neutral pictures in their assessment. All participants were instructed to avoid blinking and to maintain their gaze on the black centered cross, which appeared on the computer screen between stimulus presentations.
EEG Data Analyses
In a first step, EEG data was controlled for gross artifacts resulting, for example, from subject, jaw, or complex eye-movements. These were excluded from further analysis. Data was then re-referenced to left and right earlobes as new reference followed by the application of a bandpass finite impulse response filter between 0.032 and 30 Hz. Eye blinks and eye-movements were corrected using independent component analysis as implemented in the Analyzer Software. Following stimulus category specific segmentation (−100 ms to 1000 ms) and baseline-correction of segments (−100-0 ms), data was averaged for each individual and each stimulus condition: 42 standard (neutral), low- and high-arousal-positive valence, and low- and high-arousal-negative-valence stimuli. From the single-subject averages, positive peak amplitudes of the P300 component at electrode Pz were identified in the time-range of 250 ms to 800 ms following stimulus onset and exported for further statistical analyses. 43 – 45
Depression Measurement
The German version of the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9 46 is a 9-item depression scale. A score under 5 is used as an indicator for the absence of a depressive disorder. Scores ranging from 5 to 9 can mostly be found in patients with a slight or subliminal depressive disorder that can be interpreted as a mild severity. Patients with a major depression most likely score higher than 9 with a moderate (10–14), strong (15–19), or highest (20–27) level of severity.
NF Intervention
NF training was performed by using the Mind Wave Headset (NeuroSky & Inc, 2011) with the electrode being placed on Cz. BioEra Pro software (PROATECH LLC) was used to transfer signals from the headset to the computer for further processing. The raw signals were decomposed into individual frequency bands in real time within the software using Fast Fourier Transformation. The output signal was then used for feedback. The stimuli were simple geometric figures ( Figure 1 ) programmed in Processing . The clinical examiner (MF) was present during the entire NF training but did not give any verbal feedback during the sessions. The feedback was displayed on the monitor as a target state during the training. Each intervention included a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 10 training sessions over 5 weeks, which resulted in practicing twice a week. Each session consisted of a 35 to 40 min paradigm: Resting-State for about 5 min Alpha-Training (9-13 Hz moderation) and reduction of Theta/Beta (> 20 Hz) for 10 min Resting-State for about 5 min Target: Theta/Beta-Ratio ≤ 2,5 for about 5 min Resting-State for about 5 min Alpha-Training (9-13 Hz moderation) and reduction of Theta/Beta (> 20 Hz) for 10 min

Statistical Analyses
The statistical evaluation of the specific parameters was conducted with the program Statistical Program for Social Sciences SPSS (Version 26.0, New York: IBM Corp.). The level of significance for all analyses was set at α = .05. Statistical outliers with a value higher or lower than twice the standard deviation (± 2SD) for the main outcome variable ΔPHQ(t2-t1) were identified via boxplot and excluded from further analysis (n = 1). Repeated measurement analysis of variance (MANOVA, t0, t1, t2) and age as covariate was conducted to show the depression effects over time. Regarding the P300 effects, the focus remained on the intervention effect (factor therapy), so explicitly only the measurement time points before and after the NF intervention were included in the analyses. For these effects, a general linear model was conducted. For analyses of age effects, a median split (< 55 and > 55 years of age) was performed. Descriptive statistics are shown in Table 2 .
Table 2.
Descriptive Statistics.
* Statistical outliers SD ≥ 2; n = 1. ** Statistical outliers SD ≥ 2; n = 2. Abbreviations: PHQ = Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9, 46 ΔPHQ(t1-t0) = difference between the mean PHQ at t1 minus t2, ΔPHQ(t2-t1) = difference between the mean PHQ at t2 minus t1 ; poslow = positive valence low arousal; poshigh = positive valence high arousal; neglow = negative valence low arousal; neghigh = negative valence high arousal; ΔP300 (t2-t1) = difference between the mean PHQ at t2 minus t1.
| Outcome | N | M | SD | S (SE) | K (SE) |
| Depressive symptoms | |||||
| PHQ t0 | 18 | 8.88 | 4.581 | .634 (.536) | −.030 (1.038) |
| PHQ t1 | 18 | 7.71 | 4.254 | .363 (.536) | −.185 (1.038) |
| PHQ t2 | 18 | 6.71 | 4.165 | .165 (.536) | −.912 (1.038) |
| ΔPHQ(t1-t0) | 18 | −1.17 | 2.721 | −.531 (.536) | 1.523 (1.038) |
| ΔPHQ(t2-t0) | 18 | −2,18 | 3.107 | .083 (.536) | .498 (1.038) |
| ΔPHQ(t2-t1) | 17 * | −1.00 | 1.904 | −.739 (.550) | .071 (1.063) |
| Age effects in depressive symptoms | |||||
| Age | 18 | 53.06 | 10.973 | −.652 (.536) | .387 (1.038) |
| PHQ t0 Patients <55 yrs. | 9 | 9.22 | 4.116 | .446 (.717) | −1.631 (1.400) |
| PHQ t1 Patients <55 yrs. | 9 | 7.78 | 3.768 | .023 (.717) | −1.536 (1.400) |
| PHQ t2 Patients <55 yrs. | 9 | 6.11 | 3.621 | .108 (.717) | −1.207 (1.400) |
| PHQ t0 Patients ≥55 yrs. | 7 ** | 7.00 | 3.464 | −.303 (.794) | −.461 (1.587) |
| PHQ t1 Patients ≥55 yrs. | 7 ** | 6.29 | 3.546 | −.517 (.794) | −1.762 (1.587) |
| PHQ t2 Patients ≥55 yrs. | 7 ** | 6.29 | 4.071 | −413 (.794) | −2.471 (1.587) |
| ΔPHQ(t1-t0) Patients <55 yrs. | 9 | −1.44 | 3.358 | −471 (7.717) | .996 (1.400) |
| ΔPHQ(t2-t1) Patients <55 yrs. | 9 | −1.67 | 2.291 | −045 (7.717) | −.885 (1.400) |
| ΔPHQ(t1-t0) Patients ≥55 yrs. | 7 ** | −.71 | 2.059 | .108 (.794) | −2.051 (1.587) |
| ΔPHQ(t2-t1) Patients ≥55 yrs. | 7 ** | .00 | .816 | .000 (.794) | −1.200 (1.587) |
| P300 amplitude | |||||
| P300 poslow t0 | 18 | 10.797 | 3.855 | −.090 (.536) | .278 (1.038) |
| P300 poshigh t0 | 18 | 11.206 | 4.570 | .460 (.536) | −039 (1.038) |
| P300 neglow t0 | 18 | 10.766 | 5.069 | .760 (.536) | .691 (1.038) |
| P300 neghigh t0 | 18 | 11.090 | 4.770 | .357 (.536) | −1.066 (1.038) |
| P300 poslow t1 | 18 | 11.972 | 5.955 | −.644 (.536) | −686 (1.038) |
| P300 poshigh t1 | 18 | 12.000 | 6.161 | −.411 (.536) | −1.181 (1.038) |
| P300 neglow t1 | 18 | 11.149 | 6.959 | −.001 (.536) | −.700 (1.038) |
| P300 neghigh t1 | 18 | 12.512 | 7.349 | .026 (.536) | −1.315 (1.038) |
| P300 poslow t2 | 18 | 10.485 | 5.708 | .975 (.536) | .289 (1.038) |
| P300 poshigh t2 | 18 | 11.193 | 6.199 | −.032 (.536) | −.765 (1.038) |
| P300 neglow t2 | 18 | 9.420 | 5.740 | .820 (.536) | 1.051 (1.038) |
| P300 neghigh t2 | 18 | 11.144 | 5.590 | .983 (.536) | 1.278 (1.038) |
| ΔP300 poslow (t2-t1) | 18 | −1.487 | 5.417 | −.967 (.536) | .627 (1.038) |
| ΔP300 poshigh (t2-t1) | 18 | −.808 | 4.417 | −1.712 (.536) | 2.933 (1.038) |
| ΔP300 neglow (t2-t1) | 18 | −1.729 | 6.771 | −.791 (.536) | .652 (1.038) |
| ΔP300 neghigh (t2-t1) | 18 | −1.3686 | 6.158 | −1.119 (.536) | .730 (1.038) |
We computed a repeated measurement ANOVA on electrode Pz, P300 amplitudes with therapy (pre/post), arousal level (low/high), and emotion valence (positive/negative) as within factors and age as covariate. Results are reported with regard to Greenhouse-Geisser correction. While our sample covered a broad age range of 31 to 73 years we used age as a covariate in all relevant analyses. In the following age analyses, two age categories were used by the median split method.
Results
P300 Amplitudes
Figure 2 shows the averaged amplitudes calculated for all 18 patients as grand averages at time point t1 and t2 for each condition. Mean P300 amplitudes before (t1) and after (t2) NF intervention are shown in Figure 3.




Overall, P300 amplitudes decreased from pre to post therapy from 11.91 µV to 10.56 µV revealing a significant effect ( F (1,16) = 12.47, p < .05, η 2 = .483). Considering age as a covariate, a significant interaction ( F (1,16) = 11.07, p < .05, η 2 = .409) with therapy was found.
Other interactions between the main factors therapy, arousal, and valence, or age as the covariate revealed no significant effects.
However, the three-way interaction between therapy, arousal, and valence ( F (1,16) = 3.97, p = .064, η 2 = .199) and the interaction between age, therapy, arousal, and valence ( F (1,16) = 3.846, p = .068, η 2 = .194) showed trends.
Cronbachs's Alpha revealed different degrees of internal consistency for neutral ( α = .814), low arousal positive valence ( α = .725), high arousal positive valence ( α = .854), low arousal negative valence ( α = .603), and high arousal negative valence ( α = .713) stimuli.
Pearson correlation coefficient showed a significant relationship between t1 and t2 measurement for neutral ( r (16) = .692, p = < .001), low arousal positive valence ( r (16) = .569, p = < .05), high arousal positive valence ( r (16) = .745, p = < .001), and high arousal negative valence ( r (16) = .576, p = < .05) stimuli. In the case of low arousal negative valence ( r (16) = .445, p = .064), there was no significant relationship.
Effects on the Arousal/Valence by Treatment
In order to further understand the complex interaction trend of time, arousal and valence, we computed separate follow-up analyses with time and valence and time and arousal as within factors and age as the covariate (Table 4).
The amplitudes evoked by positive valences decreased significantly from 11.99 µV before therapy to 10.84 µV after therapy ( F (1,16) = 15.02, p = .001, η 2 = .484). The interaction between arousal level of positive valence stimuli and therapy showed a positive trend ( F (1,16) = 3.72, p = .072, η 2 = .189). Low arousal positive valence stimuli decreased more (11.97 µV to 10.49 µV) than the high arousal positive valence stimuli (12.00 µV to 11.19 µV).
High arousal amplitudes decreased significantly from t1 (12.26 µV) to t2 (11.17 µV; F (1,16) = 9.38, p < .05, η 2 = .370). The interaction between time and valence dimension in the high arousal category showed a positive trend ( F (1,16) = 4.32, p = .054, η 2 = .213). Before the intervention, negative valence stimuli (12.51 µV) elicited higher amplitudes than positive valence stimuli (12.00 µV). After the intervention, both amplitudes decreased to a similar level (negative = 11.14 µV, positive = 11.19 µV).
Interactions of therapy and arousal level of negative valence stimuli or valence dimension of low arousal stimuli did not show significant results with or without age as the covariate.
A significant therapy effect of time was observed in each condition considered individually. The interaction between age and therapy on single condition level also revealed significant effects.
Reaction Time
Mean reaction times between stimulus onset and assessment of valence decreased from t0 to t1 and t2 across all arousal and valence levels with the limitation of large standard deviations. Compared to the other categories, the response time for the strongly negative stimuli was markedly longer. Table 3 show the reaction time in ms.
Table 3.
Reaction Time in ms.
Abbreviations: poslow = positive valence low arousal; poshigh = positive valence high arousal; neglow = negative valence low arousal; neghigh = negative valence high arousal.
| N | Min | Max | Mean | SD | |
| poslow t0 | 19 | 249,65 | 885,78 | 684,738 | 214,307 |
| poshigh t0 | 19 | 250,91 | 888,10 | 681,274 | 213,841 |
| neglow t0 | 19 | 257,99 | 886,98 | 679,947 | 210,693 |
| neghigh t0 | 19 | 250,42 | 2895,57 | 842,875 | 536,409 |
| poslow t1 | 18 | 209,87 | 885,30 | 626,515 | 238,638 |
| poshigh t1 | 18 | 216,36 | 885,97 | 627,803 | 238,071 |
| neglow t1 | 18 | 210,95 | 888,56 | 627,076 | 239,329 |
| neghigh t1 | 18 | 113,78 | 11143,93 | 1215,401 | 2503,896 |
| poslow t2 | 17 | 247,89 | 887,11 | 506,968 | 223,005 |
| poshigh t2 | 17 | 245,72 | 884,47 | 504,844 | 222,404 |
| neglow t2 | 17 | 247,11 | 882,07 | 509,193 | 221,003 |
Table 4.
P300 analysis.
| Factors | N | F( 1,16) | p | η 2 |
| Time | 18 | 12.47 | <.05 | .483 |
| Arousal | 18 | 1.06 | .318 | .062 |
| Valence | 18 | 2.12 | .164 | .117 |
| Time × Arousal | 18 | 2.15 | .162 | .119 |
| Time × Valence | 18 | 1.10 | .310 | .064 |
| Time × Arousal × Valence | 18 | 3.97 | .064 | .199 |
| Age × Time | 18 | 11.07 | <.05 | .409 |
| Age × Arousal | 18 | .138 | .715 | .009 |
| Age × Valence | 18 | 2.73 | .118 | .146 |
| Age × Time × Valence | 18 | .92 | .352 | .054 |
| Age × Time × Arousal | 18 | 1.76 | .203 | .099 |
| Age × Time × Arousal × Valence | 18 | 3.846 | .068 | .194 |
| Time × Positive Valences | 18 | 15.02 | <.05 | .484 |
| Time × Positive Valences × Arousal | 18 | 3.72 | .072 | .189 |
| Time × Negative Valence | 18 | 9.50 | <.05 | .373 |
| Time × Negative Valence × Arousal | 18 | .00 | .984 | .000 |
| Time × High Arousal | 18 | 9.38 | <.05 | .370 |
| Time × High Arousal × Valence | 18 | 4.32 | .054 | .213 |
| Time × Low Arousal × Valence | 18 | .02 | .889 | .001 |
| Age × Time × Negative Valence × Arousal | 18 | .01 | .911 | .001 |
| Age × Time × Low Arousal × Valence | 18 | .04 | .845 | .002 |
| Age × Time × Positive Valence × Arousal | 18 | 1.00 | .87 | .172 |
| Time × Low Arousal × Positive Valence | 18 | 19.13 | <.05 | .545 |
| Age × Time × Low Arousal × Positive Valence | 18 | 17.10 | <.05 | .517 |
| Time × Positive Valence × High Arousal | 18 | 5.52 | <.05 | .256 |
| Age × Time × Positive Valence × High Arousal | 18 | 4.94 | <.05 | .236 |
| Time × Negative Valence × Low Arousal | 18 | 7.92 | <.05 | .331 |
| Age × Time × Negative Valence × Low Arousal | 18 | 6.85 | <.05 | .300 |
| Time × Negative Valence × High Arousal | 18 | 10.66 | <.05 | .400 |
| Age × Time × Negative Valence × High Arousal | 18 | 9.59 | <.05 | .375 |
Table 5.
Prevalence of depression symptoms before waiting list, before and after the NF Intervention.
Note: PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire-9, sum scores of ≥ 10 indicate major depression symptoms.
| t0 | t1 | t2 | |
| PHQ-9 | |||
| <10 | 12 (66.7%) | 13 (72.2%) | 12 (66.7%) |
| ≥10 | 6 (33.3%) | 5 (27.8%) | 6 (33.3%) |
| N = 18 |
Depression Prevalence
The prevalence of major depression symptoms (PHQ-9 sum scores ≥ 10) immediately after inclusion and before waiting period was 33.3% (t0) (Table 5). After a 5-week waiting period before intervention, it decreased to 27.8% (t1), and increased again to 33.3% (t2, after intervention).
Depression State
The mean PHQ-9 after inclusion was 8.88 (4.581). Before intervention it was 7.71 (4.254) and decreased during intervention to 6.71 (4.165). The analysis of variance with repeated measures showed a significant effect with F (2,14) = 4.361, p < .05, η 2 = .384, N = 17. The results of the Wilcoxon signed rank test comparing the depression state by PHQ-9 before waiting period and NF intervention ( Z = -1.698, p = .089, N = 18) and before and after NF intervention ( Z = -1.912, p = .056., N = 17) revealed no significant differences. Figure 4 shows the mean values of the depression state (PHQ-9) before waiting period (t0), before (t1) and after (t2) NF treatment.
A high degree of internal consistency was found between t0, t1, and t2 PHQ-9 measurements with Cronbach's Alpha value α = .904 and average measure ICC of .904 with a 95% confidence interval from .790 to .961 ( F (17,34) = 10.461, p < .001).
The Pearson correlation coefficient showed a significant relationship between t1 and t2 measurements ( r ( 16 ) = .803, p = < .001).
Effect of age on Depression State
The ANOVA with repeated measures using age (t0) as the covariate showed a significant main effect ( F (2,14) = 5.533, p < .05, η 2 = .269, N = 17) and a trend of the age interaction ( F (2,14) = 3.484, p = .053, η 2 = .189, N = 17). During the 5-week waiting period, patients <55 years of age showed a decrease in mean PHQ-9 score of 1.44 (3.358) points, while those ≥55 had a reduction of 0.71 (2.059) ( Figure 5 ). With treatment, the younger patients achieved a mean relief of 1.67 (2.291) points, while the older patients showed no mean change in PHQ-9 scores 0.00 (0.816). Post-hoc tests were calculated with Bonferroni correction showing significant differences between measurement points t0 and t2 ( p = .016). No significance for t1 compared with t0 ( p = .259) or t2 ( p = .666) was found.
Depressive state was not correlated with age ( rho = -.244, p = .346 for t0; rho = -.095, p = .716 for t1; rho = .212, p = .414).
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first investigation of the effects of an NF intervention on depression in cancer patients and survivors and its association with emotion processing using the P300.
Our data showed a significant reduction in P300 amplitude from pre to post therapy. Considering individual conditions, the following emerged: In the high arousal level, P300 amplitudes triggered by negative valence stimuli were larger than the amplitudes triggered by positive valence stimuli before therapy. During the course of therapy, the negative valence stimuli tended to show a greater decrease than the positive ones, so that both decreased to a similar level after therapy.
In the positive valence dimension, the amplitudes triggered by low arousal stimuli tended to decrease more than those triggered by high arousal stimuli during the course of NF training.
Concerning depression, we observed a markedly high prevalence in our patient cohort. Mean depression symptomatology as measured by the PHQ-9 showed a decrease from 8.88 before waiting list to 7.71 before the intervention to 6.71 after the intervention, thus showing a reduction approximately 2 points on the Likert scale from t0- t2. An age effect was observed, showing that patients younger than 55 years in particular had a greater reduction in depressive symptomatology.
Previous investigations on ERP changes in depressive symptoms showed a reduction in the P300 amplitude compared to healthy individuals 13 – 15 and an increase after symptom improvement. 19 , 20 According to these studies, we would have expected that, as a correlate to the decreasing burden of depression in our cohort, P300 amplitudes would have tended to increase. The current findings are not in line with previous research, which might be due to the fact that the present cohort does not consist of patients with major depression but cancer patients and survivors with depressive symptoms. In addition, our subjects received an intervention targeting brainwave activity, which to the best of our knowledge had not been previously investigated in any study. Moreover, P300 amplitudes might naturally decrease over time of a study due to habituation effects to the stimuli. Therefore, the results of this study have to be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, future studies should include analyses of P300 amplitudes over all measurement time points (t0, t1 and t2), which was not possible in this study due to economic reasons.
Our pre therapy observation that among high arousal stimuli, negative pictures triggered higher P300 amplitudes than positive pictures is consistent with earlier studies. 12 , 47 – 49 Most of these studies were conducted as a single-stage oddball experiment rather than a pre-post investigation in the context of an intervention. Ito et al described 48 the overall stronger reactions to negative stimuli as negativity bias, meaning that negative stimuli influence cognitive assessments stronger than positive stimuli.
As Prinsloo et al showed, 50 NF is an intervention with measurable brain outcomes and can achieve a reduction in peripheral neuropathy in cancer patients and survivors by increasing alpha activity and reducing beta activity.
In this context, the greater decrease of amplitudes generated by intensely negative pictures could be interpreted as a correlate of a more relaxed brain activity level due to the EEG frequency band modulation by NF (resulting in a more relaxed handling of pronounced negative stimuli).
Concerning the overall reduction of P300 amplitudes, the trend that amplitudes triggered by high arousal pictures do not decrease in the same amount as those triggered by low arousal pictures could emphasize the importance of strong positive stimuli.
The tendency to preserve the reaction to strong positive stimuli while showing more balanced reactions to mild positive and strong negative stimuli could be interpreted as a correlate of a generally more moderate state of mind due to the decrease of depression load.
The present study demonstrated a high prevalence of depression in cancer patients and survivors, which is in line with existing literature. 51 – 53 A clinical need for intervention is seen by many authors (see 54 – 58 ). To date, NF as a non-invasive but evidence-based alternative medical method is rarely used in this patient cohort 26 although it is already well established and well-researched in depressive disorders. 27 , 35 , 36 , 59 – 62 These studies also suggest an alleviation of depressive symptoms by NF in the cohort of cancer patients and survivors. In our findings, depressive symptoms were not correlated with the age of the patients. However, a larger intervention effect for patients younger than 55 years of age was detected. These results suggest that younger patients would potentially benefit more from an NF intervention. Since there are only few efficacy studies for NF therapy in the field of psycho-oncology, 26 this could be an important implication for future therapy offers in this patient group.
Limitations
Clearly, many statistical analyses did not reach the significance level due to the small sample size of 18 participants. In the context of the relatively small number of subjects, the lack of a cross-over design is also a weak point. Moreover, the conduct of the study was hampered by the shutdown during the COVID-19 pandemic. We believe that a study with a larger sample would confirm the statistical trends and show more significant results. Furthermore, it is limiting that this study was only designed as an observational trial. In future surveys, the change in P300 amplitude from t0 to t1 (5 weeks without NF intervention) in addition to psychometrics should be used as a control condition. This was not possible at the time of our survey for this sub-study due to economic reasons. Moreover, another limitation is that the P300 amplitude was measured at coordinate Pz. However, literature suggests a maximal amplitude at right medial coordinates, 63 , 64 which should be taken into account in future studies.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the decrease of the P300, especially to intensely negative pictures, could reflect a therapeutic effect on brain activity. Further studies are necessary to investigate the profound correlation between brain wave modification by NF therapy and event-related potentials.
Moreover, this study provides initial evidence that EEG-NF may alleviate depressive symptoms in cancer patients and cancer survivors. Especially patients under 55 years of age may benefit from this therapy. However, this should be validated by future studies with larger sample sizes.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical Statement: The study was approved by the ethics committee of the medical department of the University of Duisburg-Essen (No.: 18-8079-BO).
Funding: This study was supported by the Essen University Medicine Foundation and the Wiedenfeld-Stiftung for Cancer Research (Duisburg). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study, management, collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript, and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Trial Registration: The current study is part of a larger randomized, controlled clinical trial registered at the German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00015773.
ORCID iDs: Madeleine Fink https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1028-0064
Bernhard W. Müller https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9573-1417
References
1 Sutton S Braren M Zubin J John ER . Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty . Science . 1965 ; 150 ( 3700 ): 1187 – 1188 . doi: 10.1126/science.150.3700.1187 . 5852977
2 Polich J . Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b . Clin Neurophysiol . 2007 ; 118 ( 10 ): 2128 – 2148 . doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019 . 17573239 PMC2715154
3 Olofsson JK Nordin S Sequeira H Polich J . Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings . Biol Psychol . 2008 ; 77 ( 3 ): 247 – 265 . doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006 . 18164800 PMC2443061
4 Stenberg G . Personality and the eeg - arousal and emotional arousability . Pers Individ Dif. 1992 ; 13 ( 10 ): 1097 – 1113 . doi:Doi 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90025-K .
5 Brocke B Tasche KG Beauducel A . Biopsychological foundations of extraversion: Differential effort reactivity and the differential P300 effect . Pers Individ Dif. 1996 ; 21 ( 5 ): 727 – 738 . doi:Doi 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00117-1 .
6 Dolcos F Cabeza R . Event-related potentials of emotional memory: Encoding pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures . Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci . 2002 ; 2 ( 3 ): 252 – 263 . doi: 10.3758/cabn.2.3.252 . 12775189
7 Delplanque S Lavoie ME Hot P Silvert L Sequeira H . Modulation of cognitive processing by emotional valence studied through event-related potentials in humans . Neurosci Lett . 2004 ; 356 ( 1 ): 1 – 4 . doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.10.014 . 14746887
8 Kayser J Tenke C Nordby H Hammerborg D Hugdahl K Erdmann G . Event-related potential (ERP) asymmetries to emotional stimuli in a visual half-field paradigm . Psychophysiology . 1997 ; 34 ( 4 ): 414 – 426 . doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02385.x . 9260494
9 Keil A Bradley MM Hauk O Rockstroh B Elbert T Lang PJ . Large-scale neural correlates of affective picture processing . Psychophysiology . 2002 ; 39 ( 5 ): 641 – 649 . doi:10.1017.S0048577202394162 . 12236331 10.1017/S0048577202394162
10 Palomba D Angrilli A Mini A . Visual evoked potentials, heart rate responses and memory to emotional pictorial stimuli . Int J Psychophysiol . 1997 ; 27 ( 1 ): 55 – 67 . doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(97)00751-4 . 9161892
11 Johnson Jr R . A triarchic model of P300 amplitude . Psychophysiology . 1986 ; 23 ( 4 ): 367 – 384 . doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00649.x . 3774922
12 Rozenkrants B Polich J . Affective ERP processing in a visual oddball task: Arousal, valence, and gender . Clin Neurophysiol . 2008 ; 119 ( 10 ): 2260 – 2265 . doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.213 . 18783987 PMC2605010
13 Roth WT Pfefferbaum A Kelly AF Berger PA Kopell BS . Auditory event-related potentials in schizophrenia and depression . Psychiatry Res . 1981 ; 4 ( 2 ): 199 – 212 . doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(81)90023-8 . 6939010
14 Pfefferbaum A Wenegrat BG Ford JM Roth WT Kopell BS . Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials. II. Dementia, depression and schizophrenia . Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol . 1984 ; 59 ( 2 ): 104 – 124 . doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(84)90027-3 . 6200305
15 Roschke J Wagner P . A confirmatory study on the mechanisms behind reduced P300 waves in depression . Neuropsychopharmacology . 2003 ; 28 ( Suppl 1(1) ): S9 – 12 . doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300139 . 12827138
16 Himani A Tandon O Bhatia M . A study of p300-event related evoked potential in the pateints of major depression . Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1999 ; 43 : 367 – 372 . 10776486
17 Vandoolaeghe E van Hunsel F Nuyten D Maes M . Auditory event related potentials in major depression: Prolonged P300 latency and increased P200 amplitude . J Affect Disord . 1998 ; 48 ( 2-3 ): 105 – 113 . doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(97)00165-1 . 9543199
18 Brush C Kallen AM Meynadasy MA King T Hajcak G Sheffler JL . The P300, loneliness, and depression in older adults . Biol Psychol. 2022 ; 171 : 108339 . 35512481 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108339 PMC13312223
19 Blackwood DH Whalley LJ Christie JE Blackburn IM St Clair DM McInnes A . Changes in auditory P3 event-related potential in schizophrenia and depression . Br J Psychiatry . 1987 ; 150 ( 2 ): 154 – 160 . doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.2.154 . 2888501
20 Gangadhar BN Ancy J Janakiramaiah N Umapathy C . P300 amplitude in non-bipolar, melancholic depression . J Affect Disord . 1993 ; 28 ( 1 ): 57 – 60 . doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(93)90077-w . 8326081
21 Sellick SM Crooks DL . Depression and cancer: An appraisal of the literature for prevalence, detection, and practice guideline development for psychological interventions . Psychooncology. 1999 ; 8 ( 4 ): 315 – 333 . doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199907/08)8:4<315::AID-PON391>3.0.CO;2-G . 10474850
22 Mitchell AJ Chan M Bhatti H , et al. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: A meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies . Lancet Oncol . 2011 ; 12 ( 2 ): 160 – 174 . doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70002-X . 21251875
23 Mirowsky J Ross CE . Age and depression . J Health Soc Behav . 1992 ; 33 ( 3 ): 187 – 205 ; discussion 206-12. doi:doi.org/10.2307/2137349 . 1401846
24 Sung H Ferlay J Siegel RL , et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries . CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 ; 71 ( 3 ): 209 – 249 . doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 . 33538338
25 Micoulaud-Franchi JA McGonigal A Lopez R Daudet C Kotwas I Bartolomei F . Electroencephalographic neurofeedback: Level of evidence in mental and brain disorders and suggestions for good clinical practice . Neurophysiol Clin . 2015 ; 45 ( 6 ): 423 – 433 . doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.10.077 . 26553293
26 Hetkamp M Bender J Rheindorf N , et al. A systematic review of the effect of neurofeedback in cancer patients . Integr Cancer Ther . 2019 ; 18 : 1534735419832361 . doi: 10.1177/1534735419832361 . 30832518 PMC6416750
27 Luctkar-Flude M Groll D . A systematic review of the safety and effect of neurofeedback on fatigue and cognition . Integr Cancer Ther . 2015 ; 14 ( 4 ): 318 – 340 . doi: 10.1177/1534735415572886 . 25716351
28 Collura TF . Technical Foundations of Neurofeedback . 1 st ed. Routledge ; 2013 .
29 Hegerl U Hensch T . The vigilance regulation model of affective disorders and ADHD . Neurosci Biobehav Rev . 2014 ; 44 : 45 – 57 . doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.10.008 . 23092655
30 Johnston SJ Boehm SG Healy D Goebel R Linden DE . Neurofeedback: A promising tool for the self-regulation of emotion networks . Neuroimage . 2010 ; 49 ( 1 ): 1066 – 1072 . doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.056 . 19646532
31 Halson SL . Neurofeedback as a potential nonpharmacological treatment for insomnia . Biofeedback . 2017 ; 45 ( 1 ): 19 – 20 . doi: 10.5298/1081-5937-45.1.08 .
32 Niedermeyer E . Alpha rhythms as physiological and abnormal phenomena . Int J Psychophysiol. 1997 ; 26 ( 1-3 ): 31 – 49 . 9202993 10.1016/s0167-8760(97)00754-x
33 Strijkstra AM Beersma DG Drayer B Halbesma N Daan S . Subjective sleepiness correlates negatively with global alpha (8–12 hz) and positively with central frontal theta (4–8 hz) frequencies in the human resting awake electroencephalogram . Neurosci Lett. 2003 ; 340 ( 1 ): 17 – 20 . 12648748 10.1016/s0304-3940(03)00033-8
34 Haenschel C Baldeweg T Croft RJ Whittington M Gruzelier J . Gamma and beta frequency oscillations in response to novel auditory stimuli: A comparison of human electroencephalogram (EEG) data with in vitro models . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000 ; 97 ( 13 ): 7645 – 7650 . 10852953 10.1073/pnas.120162397 PMC16599
35 Peeters F Oehlen M Ronner J van Os J Lousberg R . Neurofeedback as a treatment for Major depressive disorder - A pilot study . Plos One . 2014 ; 9 ( 3 ): e91837 . doi:ARTN e9183710.1371/journal.pone.0091837 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0091837 PMC3958393 24642756
36 Cheon EJ Koo BH Choi JH . The efficacy of neurofeedback in patients with Major depressive disorder: An open labeled prospective study . Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback . 2016 ; 41 ( 1 ): 103 – 110 . doi: 10.1007/s10484-015-9315-8 . 26392114
37 Prinsloo S Gabel S Park L Lyle R . Neurofeedback for chemotherapy induced neuropathic symptoms: A case study . NeuroRegulation . 2014 ; 1 ( 2 ): 165 – 165 . doi:doi.org/10.15540/nr.1.2.165 .
38 Ros T Enriquez-Geppert S Zotev V , et al. Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist) . Brain . 2020 ; 143 ( 6 ): 1674 – 1685 . doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa009 . 32176800 PMC7296848
39 Dilling H Mombour W Schmidt M Schulte-Markwort E Remschmidt H . ICD-10 Kapitel V (F). Klinisch-diagnostische Leitlinien . Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen . 2010 ; 3 .
40 Herschbach P Book K Brandl T Keller M Marten-Mittag B . The basic documentation for psycho-oncology (PO-bado): An expert rating scale for the psychosocial experience of cancer patients . Onkologie . 2008 ; 31 ( 11 ): 591 – 596 . doi: 10.1159/000162287 . 19145091
41 Lang P Bradley M . The international affective picture system (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention . In: Allen JACJJB , ed. Series in affective science handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment . Oxford University Press ; 2007 : 29 – 46 : chap 2 .
42 Müller BW Specka M Steinchen N , et al. Auditory target processing in methadone substituted opiate addicts: The effect of nicotine in controls . BMC psychiatry . 2007 ; 7 : 1 – 9 . 17986348 10.1186/1471-244X-7-63 PMC2198909
43 Heukrodt C Powazek M Brown WS , et al. Electrophysiological signs of neurocognitive deficits in long-term leukemia survivors . J Pediatr Psychol. 1988 ; 13 ( 2 ): 223 – 236 . 3171815 10.1093/jpepsy/13.2.223
44 Schagen SB Hamburger HL Muller MJ Boogerd W van Dam FS . Neurophysiological evaluation of late effects of adjuvant high-dose chemotherapy on cognitive function . J Neuro-Oncol. 2001 ; 51 : 159 – 165 . 10.1023/a:1010635229762 11386413
45 Polich J . Meta-analysis of P300 normative aging studies . Psychophysiology . 1996 ; 33 ( 4 ): 334 – 353 . 8753933 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb01058.x
46 Kroenke K Spitzer RL Williams JB . The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure . J Gen Intern Med . 2001 ; 16 ( 9 ): 606 – 613 . doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x . 11556941 PMC1495268
47 Delplanque S Silvert L Hot P Rigoulot S Sequeira H . Arousal and valence effects on event-related P3a and P3b during emotional categorization . Int J Psychophysiol . 2006 ; 60 ( 3 ): 315 – 322 . doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.06.006 . 16226819
48 Ito TA Larsen JT Smith NK Cacioppo JT . Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations . J Pers Soc Psychol . 1998 ; 75 ( 4 ): 887 – 900 . doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.887 . 9825526
49 Yuan J Tian Y Huang X Fan H Wei X . Emotional bias varies with stimulus type, arousal and task setting: Meta-analytic evidences . Neurosci Biobehav Rev . 2019 ; 107 : 461 – 472 . doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.035 . 31557549
50 Prinsloo S Novy D Driver L , et al. Randomized controlled trial of neurofeedback on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A pilot study . Cancer . 2017 ; 123 ( 11 ): 1989 – 1997 . doi: 10.1002/cncr.30649 . 28257146 PMC5470539
51 Walker J Holm Hansen C Martin P , et al. Prevalence of depression in adults with cancer: A systematic review . Ann Oncol . 2013 ; 24 ( 4 ): 895 – 900 . doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds575 . 23175625
52 Linden W Vodermaier A Mackenzie R Greig D . Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: Prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age . J Affect Disord . 2012 ; 141 ( 2-3 ): 343 – 351 . doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.025 . 22727334
53 Massie MJ . Prevalence of depression in patients with cancer . J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr . 2004 ; 2004 ( 32 ): 57 – 71 . doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh014 . 15263042
54 Ewertz M Jensen AB . Late effects of breast cancer treatment and potentials for rehabilitation . Acta Oncol . 2011 ; 50 ( 2 ): 187 – 193 . doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.533190 . 21231780
55 Christensen S Zachariae R Jensen AB , et al. Prevalence and risk of depressive symptoms 3-4 months post-surgery in a nationwide cohort study of danish women treated for early stage breast-cancer . Breast Cancer Res Treat . 2009 ; 113 ( 2 ): 339 – 355 . doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9920-9 . 18278553
56 Spiegel D Giese-Davis J . Depression and cancer: Mechanisms and disease progression . Biol Psychiatry . 2003 ; 54 ( 3 ): 269 – 282 . doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00566-3 . 12893103
57 Massie MJ Holland JC . Depression and the cancer patient . J Clin Psychiatry . 1990 ; 51 ( Suppl ): 12 – 7 ; discussion 18-9 . doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(94)90192-9 . 2195008
58 Bottomley A . Depression in cancer patients: A literature review . Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) . 1998 ; 7 ( 3 ): 181 – 191 . doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.1998.00100.x . 9793010
59 Schoenberg PL David AS . Biofeedback for psychiatric disorders: A systematic review . Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback . 2014 ; 39 ( 2 ): 109 – 135 . doi: 10.1007/s10484-014-9246-9 . 24806535
60 Walker JE Lawson R . FP02 beta training for drug-resistant depression—A new protocol that usually reduces depression and keeps it reduced . J Neurother. 2013 ; 17 ( 3 ): 198 – 200 . doi:doi.org/10.1080/10874208.2013.785784 .
61 Ratanasiripong P Kaewboonchoo O Ratanasiripong N Hanklang S Chumchai P . Biofeedback Intervention for Stress, Anxiety, and Depression among Graduate Students in Public Health Nursing . Nurs Res Pract. 2015 ; 2015 . doi:Artn 16074610.1155/2015/160746 . 10.1155/2015/160746 PMC4411437 25954515
62 Swingle PG . Biofeedback for the brain: How neurotherapy effectively treats depression, ADHD, autism, and more . Rutgers university press ; 2008 .
63 Polich J Alexander JE Bauer LO , et al. P300 topography of amplitude/latency correlations . Brain Topogr. 1997 ; 9 : 275 – 282 . 9217986 10.1007/BF01464482
64 Alexander JE Porjesz B Bauer LO , et al. P300 hemispheric amplitude asymmetries from a visual oddball task . Psychophysiology . 1995 ; 32 ( 5 ): 467 – 475 . 7568641 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb02098.x