m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2022

Current state of CAR-T therapy for T-cell malignancies.

Название и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Luo L, Zhou X, Zhou L, Liang Z, Yang J, Tu S, Li Y

Аннотация

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has been approved for relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas and greatly improves disease outcomes. The impressive success has inspired the application of this approach to other types of tumors. The relapsed/refractory T-cell malignancies are characteristic of high heterogeneity and poor prognoses. The efficacy of current treatments for this group of diseases is limited. CAR-T therapy is a promising solution to ameliorate the current therapeutic situation. One of the major challenges is that normal T-cells typically share mutual antigens with malignant cells, which causes fratricide and serious T-cell aplasia. Moreover, T-cells collected for CAR transduction could be contaminated by malignant T-cells. The selection of suitable target antigens is of vital importance to mitigate fratricide and T-cell aplasia. Using nanobody-derived or naturally selected CAR-T is the latest method to overcome fratricide. Allogeneic CAR-T products and CAR-NK-cells are expected to avoid tumor contamination. Herein, we review the advances in promising target antigens, the current results of CAR-T therapy clinical trials in T-cell malignancies, the obstacles of CAR-T therapy in T-cell malignancies, and the solutions to these issues.

Перевод полного текста: Перевод в очереди

Читать найденный полный текст

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage ).

Introduction

Prognosis and current treatment for T-cell malignancies

T-cell malignancies are a highly heterogeneous group of diseases with poor prognoses that stem from T-cell precursors as well as mature T-cells and can be classified into T-cell leukemia and peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs). 1 T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) accounts for approximately 15% to 25% of ALL cases, and PTCLs account for approximately 15% of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) cases. 2 , 3 Overall, traditional chemotherapy remains the first-line treatment for T-cell malignancies.

A study showed that after induction therapy, T-ALL had a similar rate of complete remission (CR) (94% versus 93%) and 5-year overall survival (OS) (48% versus 42%) as B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). But the rate of relapse at 5 years after CR was as high as 42%, and only 8 of 123 relapsed patients survived after 5 years of follow-up. 4 This showed that although the response rate was nearly 50%, patients with T-ALL were prone to relapse. The salvage chemotherapy regimen for relapsed T-ALL varies and includes nelarabine, anthracycline-based regimens, methotrexate-based regimens, etc. In a study that enrolled 118 patients with R/R T-ALL who received nelarabine salvage therapy, the OS at 1 year of the patients was 37%, and the median survival was 8 months. 5

Generally, the patients who underwent relapse had dismal outcomes with no more than 10% of them surviving at 5 years. 6 Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a potential method for curing leukemias; however, the 3-year OS after HSCT was only about 30%. 7

Another study demonstrated that PTCL was also prone to relapse. The median time from primary therapy to relapse or progression was 6.7 months. Moreover, the OS and progression-free survival after relapse were only 5.5 months and 3.1 months, respectively. 8 Current treatments for T-cell lymphomas other than traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy include histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), such as chidamide, romidepsin, and belinostat; monoclonal antibodies, such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and mogamulizumab; and other agents, such as pralatrexate and nelarabine. 9 – 13 Using the anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody BV plus CHP (cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + prednisone) as the primary therapy for CD30 + PTCLs has been demonstrated to be effective and superior to CHOP (cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + vincristine + prednisone) chemotherapy. 14 However, a study found that no improvement in FFS1 and OS1 was observed after the administration of romidepsin and pralatrexate in patients with R/R diseases. 15 A similar result was reported in another study in which adding romidepsin to the CHOPE (cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + vincristine + prednisone + etoposide) regimen in the first-line treatment of PTCLs did not exhibit benefits. 16 The OR and CR of the anti-CCR4 antibody mogamulizumab for relapsed PTCLs were only 35% and 14%, respectively, in a phase II study. 17 HSCT is the only probable method to cure this disease, but approximately 1/4 to 1/3 of patients are not eligible for HSCT. Moreover, patients who undergo HSCT are confronted with graft-versus-host disease that could lower the quality of life and even be lethal. 18 A study showed that the 5-year OS rates of salvage therapy through autologous and allogeneic HSCT were 32% and 52%, respectively, whereas the OS rate for patients who did not accept transplants was only 10%. 15 The dismal outcomes of R/R T-cell malignancies call for more efficient therapies to ameliorate the current therapeutic situation.

Chimeric antigen receptors

Chimeric antigen receptors are fusion receptors that comprise the antigen-recognition domain and T-cell signaling domain. 19 The antigen-recognition domain (the extracellular part) is the antibody-derived single-chain variable fragment (scFv) that can target the tumor antigen and thus navigate T-cells to the tumor site. The intracellular part is composed of a T-cell receptor CD3ζ subunit in the first generation of chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). In the second and later generations of CARs, a costimulatory domain is introduced into the cells to enhance their activation and function 20 – 22 [ Figure 1(a)–(c) ]. Manufacturing sufficient numbers of functional chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) cells is the first step of CAR-T therapy. T-cells are collected by leukapheresis and then genetically transduced with a gene that contains CAR sequences by retrovirus or lentivirus. 23 After CAR-T-cell proliferation and lymphodepletion chemotherapy, eligible patients receive CAR-T-cell infusion. Currently, anti-CD19 CAR-T-cells have been successfully administered and improved the prognoses of patients with R/R B-cell malignancies, such as CD19 + diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and B-ALL. 24 – 27 Anti-BCMA (B-cell maturation antigen) CAR-T products were approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating R/R multiple myeloma. In the clinical trials, they demonstrated impressive efficacy and acceptable adverse events ( Table 1 ).

Figure 1. Structure of CARs: (a) The intracellular part of the first-generation CAR comprises a T-cell activation domain and, in most cases, is CD3ζ. (b) Costimulatory domain 4-1B…
Figure 1. Structure of CARs: (a) The intracellular part of the first-generation CAR comprises a T-cell activation domain and, in most cases, is CD3ζ. (b) Costimulatory domain 4-1BB or CD28 is introduced in second-generation CAR. (c) The third-generation CAR contains both of the molecules. (d) CARs design of the FDA-approved anti-CD19 CAR-T-cell products. (e) CARs design of the FDA-approved anti-BCMA CAR-T-cell product; (f) CARs design of the CAR-T-cells for T-cell malignancies. CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell.

Table 1.
The FDA-approved CAR-T products and the major published trials.
B-ALL, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; BCMA, B-cell maturation antigen; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; FL, follicular lymphoma; NTX, neurotoxicity.

Target antigenCAR designDiseaseAdverse eventsResponse rateStudy detail
CD19Axicabtagene ciloleucel; CD28 co-stimulationRelapsed or refractory DLBCLNeutropenia (78%); Anemia (43%); Thrombocytopenia (38%) Grade 3–5 CRS (13%) Grade 3–5 NTX (28%)Complete response = 54%; Objective response = 82%ZUMA-1; NCT02348216 ; n = 101; Neelapu et al. 24
CD19Brexucabtagene autoleucel; CD28 co-stimulation;Mantle cell lymphomaCytopenia (94%) Infection (32%) Grade 3–5 CRS (15%) Grade 3–5 NTX (31%)Complete response = 67% Objective response = 93%ZUMA-2; NCT02601313 ; n = 68 Wang et al. 26
CD19Brexucabtagene autoleucel; CD28 co-stimulationB-ALLAnemia (49%); Pyrexia (36%); Grade 3–5 CRS (24%); Grade 3–5 NTX (25%)Complete remission = 56%ZUMA-3; NCT02614066 ; n = 55 Shah et al. 27
CD19Tisagenlecleucel; 4-1BB co-stimulationRefractory B-cell lymphomasGrade 3–5 CRS (18%); Grade 3–5 NTX (11%)Complete remission (43% in DLBCL; 71% in FL) Overall response = 64%NCT02030834 ; n = 28 Schuster et al. 28
CD19Lisocabtagene maraleucel; 4-1BB co-stimulationRelapsed or refractory DLBCLNeutropenia (48%); Leukopenia (21%); Thrombocytopenia (20%); Any-grade CRS (38%); Any-grade NTX (31%)Overall response = 80%PILOT; NCT03483103 ; n = 61 Sehgal et al. 29
BCMAIdecaptagene cicleucel; 4-1BB co-stimulationRelapsed or refractory multiple myelomaNeutropenia (85%); Leukopenia (58%); Anemia (45%); Thrombocytopenia (45%); Any-grade CRS (76%); Grade 1–2 CRS (70%); Grade 3 CRS (6%); Any-grade NTX (42%) Grade 1–2 NTX (39%); Grade 4 NTX (3%)Complete response = 45%; Objective response = 85%NCT02658929 ; n = 33 Raje et al. 30
BCMACiltacabtagene autoleucel; 4-1BB co-stimulationRelapsed or refractory multiple myelomaNeutropenia (95%); Leukopenia (61%); Anemia (68%); Thrombocytopenia (60%); Any-grade CRS (95%) Grade 3–4 CRS (4%) Any-grade NTX (21%) Grade 3–4 NTX (9%)Complete response = 67%CARTITUDE-1 NCT03548207 n = 97 Berdeja et al. 31

Comparison of CAR-T-cells targeting B-cell and T-cell malignancies

The most significant difference in structure between CAR-T-cells targeting B-cell malignancies and T-cell malignancies is the target antigen. CD19 and BCMA molecules are not expressed in T-cells so the CAR-T-cells and normal T-cells would not be recognized. However, the CAR-T-cells targeting T-cell malignancies may also recognize and kill the normal T-cells and CAR-T-cells due to their mutual T-cell antigen. The transmembrane domain usually contains CD28 or CD8α molecules. In most clinical trials for T-cell malignancies, investigators use CAR-T-cells with 4-1BB costimulatory domain [ Figure 1(d)–(f) ; Table 2 ]. Although there was preclinical study found that 4-1BB-costimulated CAR-T-cells have greater persistence while CD28-costimulated CAR-T-cells have a higher level of cytokines release, 39 more studies are still needed to verify it.

Table 2.
Results of CAR-T therapy clinical trials in T-cell malignancies.
CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell; CR, complete remission; CRi, CR with incomplete count recovery; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; HGBCL, high-grade B-cell lymphoma; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; MPAL, mixed phenotype acute leukemia; NR, not reported; ORR, overall response rate; T-ALL, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; T-LBL, T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma.

Target antigenDiseaseReferenceCo-stimulationResponse rateAdverse eventsID
CD7Relapsed or refractory T-lymphoblastic Leukemia/lymphomaZhang et al. 32NRORR 100%; CR 75%Not mentionedNCT04004637 ( n = 8)
Relapsed or refractory T-ALL ( n = 22); T-LBL ( n = 3); MPAL ( n = 5)Zhang et al. 33NRCR/CRi = 83.3%Any-grade CRS (7/30)NCT04572308 NCT04796441 NCT04938115 ( n = 30)
Relapsed or refractory T-ALL ( n = 14); T-LBL ( n = 6)Lu et al. 34NRCR 95% (19/20)Grade 1–2 CRS (18/20)NCT04572308 ( n = 20)
Relapsed or refractory T-LBLYang et al. 354-1BBCR/CRi = 100%Grade 1–2 CRS (7/8)NCT04916860 (Donor-derived CAR-T-cells) ( n = 8)
Relapsed or refractory T-ALLPan et al. 364-1BBCR = 90%Grade 1–2 CRS (18/20); Grade 3–4 CRS (2/20); GVHD (12/20)NCT04689659 (Donor-derived CAR-T-cells) ( n = 20)
CD5Relapsed or refractory (r/r) T-cell leukemia and lymphomaRouce et al. 37CD28Response rate = 44% (4/9)Cytopenia Grade; 0–2 CRSNCT03081910 ( n = 9)
CD372 HGBCL 1 relapsed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma 1 Hodgkin’s lymphomaFrigault et al. 384-1BBCR = 75% (3/4)Low-grade CRS and ICANS ( n = 3); Grade 3 CRS and ICANS ( n = 1)NCT04136275 ( n = 4)

Challenges for CAR-T therapy in T-cell malignancies

These successes inspired investigators to apply this therapy to T-cell malignancies. However, the administration of CAR-T therapy for T-cell malignancies is confronted with several obstacles and challenges 40 ( Figure 2 ).

Figure 2. The challenges of CAR-T therapy in T-cell malignancies: (a) Normal mature T-cells that share mutual antigen with malignant T-cells are lysed after CAR-T infusion, leadin…
Figure 2. The challenges of CAR-T therapy in T-cell malignancies: (a) Normal mature T-cells that share mutual antigen with malignant T-cells are lysed after CAR-T infusion, leading to T-cell aplasia. (b) CAR-T-cells that share mutual antigen with malignant T-cells are lysed by themselves and give rise to dysfunction. (c) The contamination of circular malignant cells will eventually cause CAR-T product contamination and impair therapeutic efficacy.

T-cell aplasia and fratricide

Given that potential target antigens should be widely expressed on the T-cell surface, they are also likely expressed on normal T-cells and CAR-T-cells. 40 Thus, after infusion, the CAR-T-cells are directed to not only the tumor cells but also normal T-cells and CAR-T-cells that have the same target antigens on their surface. These cells will be destroyed once they are recognized by the infused cells. The rupture of normal T-cells would give rise to serious T-cell aplasia and immunodeficiency and further cause severe opportunistic infections that could be fatal. 41

The rupture of CAR-T-cells, which is known as fratricide, can seriously hinder the persistence, proliferation, and antitumor efficacy in vivo , leading to unsatisfactory therapeutic efficacy. 40 , 42

Tumor contamination

Moreover, circulating tumor cells exist in peripheral blood; thus, the collection of T-cells could be contaminated with these malignant cells. Circulating malignant cells have a construct and function similar to those of normal T-cells that can also be transduced by exogenous genes. As a consequence, the ultimate CAR-T products would be contaminated with ‘CAR-tumor cells’. Given attempts to inhibit the expression of the target antigen on the CAR-T-cell surface (discussed below) to ameliorate the fratricide, the mixed malignant cells would be modified similarly and subsequently result in antigen escape. This event has been reported in a patient with B-cell leukemia who relapsed by expressing anti-CD19 CAR-tumor cells. The CD19 CAR was transduced in malignant cells in error and led to the combination of CAR and CD19 antigens. This combination prevents CAR-T-cells from recognizing malignant cells and induces antigen escape. 43

Promising target antigens and solutions to the challenges

Choosing an appropriate target antigen for developing CAR-T-cells is extremely significant for this treatment. The ideal target antigen should be expressed on most malignant cells but minimally expressed on normal T-cells and other tissues. We expect that the selection of a target antigen could minimize the adverse events caused by fratricide or on-target off-tumor effects. Herein, we summarize promising target antigens and the outcomes of clinical trials ( Table 2 ). The ongoing clinical trials of these targets are listed in Table 3 . In addition, we discuss the probable solution to the aforementioned challenges.

Table 3.
Ongoing clinical trials of CAR T-cell therapy with T-cell antigens.
ALCL, anaplastic large cell lymphoma; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CAR T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell; DLBCL, diffusal large B-cell lymphoma; HL, Hodgkin’s lymphoma; NHL, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; PMBCL, Primary mediastinal Large B-cell Lymphoma; PTCL, peripheral T-cell lymphoma; T-ALL, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CLL, chronic lymphocyte leukemia.

Antigen targetTrial identifierTrial phaseDiseaseRecruitment statusCountryInstitution
CD4NCT04162340IT-NHLRecruitingChinaPeking University Shenzhen Hospital
NCT03829540IT-cell malignanciesNot recruitingUnited StatesIndiana University
NCT04219319IT-cell malignanciesRecruitingChinaThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
NCT04973527IT-cell malignanciesRecruitingChinaBeijing Boren Hospital
ChiCTR2100042782IT-cell malignanciesRecruitingChinaBeijing Boren Hospital
CD5NCT04594135IT-ALL & T-NHLRecruitingChinaPeking University Shenzhen Hospital
NCT05032599IT-ALLRecruitingChinaBeijing Boren Hospital
NCT03081910IT-ALL & T-NHLRecruitingUnited StatesBaylor College of Medicine
CD7NCT04934774IT-ALL & T-NHLRecruitingChinaPeking University Shenzhen Hospital
NCT05059912IIR/R T-NHLRecruitingChinaThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
NCT04004637IT-NHL, ALLRecruitingChinaPersonGen BioTherapeutics (Suzhou)
NCT04572308IT-ALL & T-NHLCompletedChinaHebei yanda Ludaopei Hospital
NCT04599556IT-ALL & T-NHLRecruitingChinaThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang university
NCT04762485IT-ALL/NHL & AMLRecruitingChinaThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
NCT04689659IIR/R T-ALL & T-NHLRecruitingChinaBeijing boren hospital
NCT04840875IT-ALL & T-NHLRecruitingChinaBeijing boren hospital
NCT04785833IT-ALLRecruitingChinaThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
NCT05043571IT-ALLRecruitingSingaporeNational University Hospital, Singapore
NCT04264078IT-ALL & T-NHLRecruitingChinaXinqiao Hospital of Chongqing
NCT04823091IT-ALL/CLL & T-NHLRecruitingChinaWuhan Union Hospital
NCT04480788IT-NHLRecruitingChinaFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
NCT05170568IT-cell malignanciesRecruitingChinaPersonGen BioTherapeutics
NCT03690011IT-ALL & T-NHLRecruitingUnited StatesBaylor College of Medicine
CD37NCT04136275ICD37 + malignanciesRecruitingUnited StatesMassachusetts General Hospital
CD30NCT04526834IT-NHL, DLBCL, PMBCLRecruitingUnited StatesTessa Therapeutics
NCT04008394IHL & T-NHLRecruitingChinaWuhan Union Hospital
NCT02917083IHL & NHLRecruitingUnited StatesBaylor College of Medicine
NCT04653649I/IIaHL & T-NHLRecruitingSpainHospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau
NCT03383965IHL & ALCLRecruitingChinaWeifang People’s Hospital
NCT04288726INK/T lymphoma & HLRecruitingUnited StatesBaylor College of Medicine
NCT04083495IIPTCLRecruitingUnited StatesLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina
NCT02690545Ib/IILymphomaRecruitingUnited StatesLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina
ChiCTR2000030843ICD30 + malignanciesRecruitingChinaBeijing Boren Hospital
ChiCTR2100046763ICD30 + malignanciesRecruitingChinaThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
ChiCTR2100053504ICD30+ malignanciesRecruitingChinaTongji Hospital of Tongji University
ChiCTR2100053505CD30 + lymphomaRecruitingChinaHubei Cancer Hospital
TRBC1NCT03590574I/IIT-NHLRecruitingUnited KingdomAutolus Limited
NCT04828174IT-NHLRecruitingChinaShanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Targets in clinical trials

CD7

Among the numerous latent targets, the most widely studied one is CD7. CD7 is a kind of glycoprotein expressed on the surface of most peripheral blood T-cells, T-cell precursors, and natural killer cells (NK cells). 44 , 45 CD7 is also found in over 95% of T-cell leukemia cases or a subset of PTCLs and previously served as an important clinical marker for diagnosing T-ALL. 44 , 46 Several studies have explored immunotherapy targeting CD7, demonstrating the feasibility of developing CD7 as a therapeutic target in treating T-cell malignancies. 47 – 49 Since it was the most widely studied target, most research on the problems mentioned above was based on CD7.

In 2017, Gomes-Silva et al. 46 proposed that using CRISPR/Cas9 to cut off the CD7 gene before CAR transduction could minimize the fratricide in anti-CD7 CAR-T without hindering the antitumor activity. In their study, CAR-T-cells expressing CD7 failed to expand, but the expansion was restored after removing the CD7 gene. They also demonstrated that the CD7 KO CD7 CAR-T-cells (CD7 gene knocked-out CAR-T) maintained potent and specific antitumor activity in vitro . Moreover, they found that CD7 KO CD7 CAR-T-cells themselves could still respond to the viral stimulation like non-transduced T-cells, which to some extent alleviates immunodeficiency due to T-cell aplasia. 46 In the same year, Png et al. 50 developed a type of protein expression blocker (PEBL). They combined a CD7-targeted scFv with an endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi-retention motif that confines the newly expressed CD7 to ER/Golgi and successfully reduces CD7 expression on the cell surface of PEBL-CAR T-cells. 50 Compared with mock-transduced T-cells, the fratricide was controlled, and no adverse impact on the T-cell expansion, INF-γ was observed. The PEBL-CD7 CAR-T showed robust cytotoxicity in T-ALL cell lines and murine models of T-ALL. In addition, this technology may be applied soon due to its fitness with existing cell manufacturing processes. 50

In a recent clinical trial, 14 patients with R/R T-ALL were enrolled, including one with Ph + T-ALL, three with ETP-ALL, and five with extramedullary infiltration. These patients had a median of 5 prior lines of therapy. Two patients were treated with a low dose of anti-CD7 CAR-T-cells (0.5×10 5 /kg), eleven with a medium dose (1–1.5×10 6 /kg), and one patient received the highest dose of 2×10 6 /kg. Thirteen of the 14 patients achieved CR or CRi in bone marrow, and 4/5 of the patients with extramedullary infiltration achieved extramedullary remission. CRS occurred in 13 patients but was mild in most patients. 51 In addition, in a study comparing anti-CD7 CAR-T-cells with anti-CD19 CAR-T-cells, the investigators found that the cells targeting CD7 proliferated quickly after infusion, and the duration was longer than that of cells targeting CD19. The anti-CD7 CAR-T-cells did not increase the incidence of adverse event compared with anti-CD19 CAR-T-cells. 33

Given that patients with T-cell malignancies, especially patients with relapsed diseases, usually experience many lines of chemotherapy. This will impair the number and function of normal lymphocytes. Moreover, the circulating malignant cells may contaminate the separated T-cells. It is difficult to collect a sufficient number of qualified T-cells for CAR transduction. Thus, using allogeneic CAR-T-cells for transduction is proposed to solve these problems. Cooper et al. reported a CD7-targeted fratricide-resistant allogeneic CAR-T-cell (UCART7) in 2018. The CD7 and TRAC genes were removed to prevent fratricide and xenogeneic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), respectively. In preclinical testing, the UCART7 exhibited excellent efficacy in vitro and in vivo without mediating GVHD. 52 Pan et al. 36 conducted a phase I trial of allogeneic anti-CD7 CAR-T-cells that involved 20 patients with R/R T-ALL. CAR-T-cells were infused at doses of 5×10 5 or 1×10 6 . Ninety percent of the patients achieved CR by the 15 th day, and 7 of them accepted allo-HSCT in tandem. At the 6th month of follow-up, the 15 patients were still in remission. All of the patients experienced CRS and cytopenia that were reversible. Twelve patients developed GVHD on the 14th day with a median duration of 3 days. All the symptoms related to GVHD have been alleviated after the administration of methylprednisolone plus ruxolitinib or ruxolitinib alone. However, one patient died of fungal pneumonia at the 5.5th month after infusion. 36

CD5

CD5 is expressed on most T-cell malignancies and normal T-cells. 53 – 55 Mamonkin et al. manufactured an anti-CD5 CAR using CD28 costimulatory domain. In their preclinical testing, the anti-CD5 CAR-T-cells succeeded in eliminating the T-ALL or PTCL cell lines and arresting the progression of the diseases in xenogeneic mice. In addition, a reduction in CD5 expression was noted after CAR transduction, which may explain the transient fratricide observed in their study. 56 Similarly, the downregulation of CD5 expression and mild fratricide were detected in another trial. 57 CD52 was induced into the CAR construct as a switch to control toxicity. Once adverse events occur, the CD52-targeted monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab can be administered to lyse CAR-T-cells carrying CD52. 57 Given the short persistence of CD28-based CAR-T-cells, Mamonkin et al. 58 decided to develop a CAR with a 4-1BB costimulatory molecule that can persist longer. However, increased cell apoptosis was noted in 4-1BB-based CAR-T-cells than in CD28-based CAR-T-cells due to 4-1BB-derived TRAF signaling. Thus, they introduced a Tet-OFF expression system to reversibly regulate CAR expression to alleviate fratricide and elucidated that 4-1BB-based CD5 CAR-T-cells with the Tet-OFF system exhibit increased persistence and antitumor activity compared with CD28-based CD5 CAR-T-cells. 58 Recently, a new CAR structure derived from a fully human heavy chain (FHV H ) domain instead of traditional scFv was developed and applied in anti-CD5 CAR-T-cells. The researchers found that FHV H -derived CAR-T-cells have higher degranulation levels and antitumor efficacy than CAR-T-cells with scFv. The V H domain has a smaller size, which is advantageous in recognizing smaller antigenic epitopes. 59

Hill et al. 37 reported a clinical study ( NCT03081910 ) on the treatment of R/R T-ALL and lymphomas with CD5-directed CAR-T-cells. They used autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells for gammaretroviral transduction and then cryopreserved them. They enrolled 4 T-ALL and 5 T-NHL patients. Three of these patients received CAR-T infusion at a dose of 1×10 7 /m², and the other six patients received 5×10 7 /m². Four to eight weeks later, four patients achieved an objective response, and three patients achieved a complete response. However, two of them relapsed at 6 weeks and 7 months postinfusion. Another patient receiving a second CAR-T infusion and undergoing allo-HSCT in tandem was still in CR at + 125 d of HSCT, suggesting that bridging allo-HSCT after CAR-T infusion may represent a strategy to acquire deeper and longer remission. 37 Three patients experienced CRS during the treatment, and only one of them developed grade 2 CRS requiring tocilizumab. The latest data from this trial demonstrated that cytopenia was the most common side effect, but patients could recover within a month. 60 Feng et al. reported a case with refractory T-cell lymphoma and CNS (Central Nervous System) infiltration. The patient received modified anti-CD5 CAR-T-cells that contained an IL-15/IL-15 sushi complex. They showed that CNS infiltration and CSF (cerebro-spinal fluid) abnormalities were mitigated in patients who had transient T-cell aplasia alone. 61 In general, anti-CD5 CAR-T-cells have good safety and efficacy in the treatment of T-cell malignancies.

TRBC1

One of the dilemmas in treating T-cell malignancy is the poor selectivity mentioned above. Given that normal T-cells and malignant cells may share mutual antigens, CAR-T-cells attack both types of cells after infusion, leading to a severe adverse effect. Unlike B-cell aplasia, it is intolerable for the organism to develop T-cell aplasia. Thus, a more specific target is urgently needed. The T-cell receptor is widely expressed in T-cells and comprises six different polypeptides, including αβ subunits. 62 The β-constant region consists of two different genes called TRBC1 and TRBC2. A single T-cell only expresses each of them, as does the malignant cell. 63 These TCR molecules have similar functions but vary slightly in amino acid sequence; thus, different T-cells can be distinguished. In a normal individual, approximately 35% of T-cells are TRBC1 positive and 65% of T-cells are TRBC2 positive. Targeting either group of cells would not deplete the function of the other group. This feature serves as the cornerstone of anti-TRBC CAR-T therapy 64 ( Figure 3 ). Ideally, the anti-TRBC1 or anti-TRBC2 CAR-T-cells could specifically target malignant cells as well as T-cells that express the corresponding TRBC molecule. Therefore, a large portion of T-cells expressing another TRBC molecule would be spared, and patients could still derive a great response from this approach by avoiding severe fratricide and nonspecific killing of T-cells. Maciocia et al. developed CAR-T-cells targeting TRBC1 and demonstrated that those cells specifically eradicate TRBC1 + cells instead of TRBC2 + cells in vitro and in vivo. Reduced tumor burden and prolonged survival periods were observed in mouse models. 64

Figure 3. The mechanism for anti-TRBC1 CAR-T therapy. Each T-cell expresses a certain TRBC molecule. The CAR-T-cells targeting TRBC1 can specifically distinguish TRBC1 + cells, in…
Figure 3. The mechanism for anti-TRBC1 CAR-T therapy. Each T-cell expresses a certain TRBC molecule. The CAR-T-cells targeting TRBC1 can specifically distinguish TRBC1 + cells, including tumor cells and normal T-cells. TRBC2+ T-cells are preserved to maintain cellular immunity. CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell.

Based on their study, two clinical trials on anti-TRBC1 CAR-T-cells are ongoing. In a trial conducted in Spain and the United Kingdom, a total of 55 patients with T-NHL, such as angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS) were enrolled and received TRBC1-directed CAR-T-cells infusions at an escalating dose of 25 to 225×10 6 cells. The trial aims to identify the safety and efficacy of this treatment ( NCT03590574 ). Another trial of anti-TRBC1 CAR-T-cells in patients with R/R TRBC1 + T-cell malignancies, including T-cell leukemia, is currently recruiting ( NCT04828174 ).

CD4

CD4 is expressed in most T lymphocytes, including malignant and normal cells. 65 Due to its rare expression beyond the hemopoietic system, CD4 exhibits the feasibility of serving as a therapeutic target. Pinz et al. conducted preclinical testing using a self-designed anti-CD4 CAR-T-cell (CD4CAR). The KARPAS 299 cells (a cell lymphoma cell line) were lysed after 24 h of coculture with the CD4 CAR, whereas the cells in the control group were still alive. Next, they tested the in vivo activity by injecting CD4CAR into xenogeneic mice and showed that malignancy expansion was arrested. 66 Another recent trial also showed that anti-CD4 CAR-T-cells successfully prevent the proliferation of malignant cells and prolong the survival time of mice with a dose-response relationship. 67 Currently, serval clinical trials are ongoing ( Table 3 ).

The first case reported to undergo treatment with CD4-directed CAR-T-cells was a 54-year-old patient with Sezary syndrome. Before the CAR-T infusion, he had been resistant to prior lines of chemotherapy, and tumor infiltration was detected in his skin. The patient received CAR-T infusion at a dose of 3×10 6 /kg. On Day + 13 after infusion, the patient achieved CR. On Day + 28, the biopsy demonstrated that the skin was free from tumor infiltration. Moreover, no grade II CRS or other adverse events were observed during his treatment. 68 Targeting CD4 is effective but needs to be more cautious. Given on-target effects, patients may still develop serious CD4 + cell aplasia that resembles HIV. The solution to this issue includes shortening the lifetime of CAR-T-cells or using NK-cells for CAR transduction as their lifespan is shorter. 69

CD30

CD30 is a transmembrane receptor of the TNFR superfamily and is mainly expressed on Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), and approximately 1/3 of T-ALL. 70 – 72 ALCL is characterized by uniformly expressed CD30. Moreover, it was also reported that CD30 expression was increased during high-dose chemotherapy in T-ALL. 72 Thus, CD30 was deemed a latent target for immune therapy of T-cell malignancies. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is a flourishing antibody-drug conjugate. An anti-CD30 antibody binds to a cytotoxic agent monomethyl auristantin E (MMAE) that can disrupt microtubules to inhibit tumor cells. 73 Several published clinical trials of BV in patients with R/R ALCL showed that the outcomes were ameliorated using this approach. In a phase 2 study, the OS was as high as 79% with a median response duration not reached. 74 , 75 These results suggested that CD30 may also represent an excellent CAR-T target, and its feasibility has been demonstrated in a previous preclinical testing. 76

In 2017, Ramos et al. 77 described a clinical trial that involved two ALCL and seven R/R HL patients. The two ALCL patients were diagnosed with cutaneous ALK − ALCL and systemic ALK + ALCL, separately. The patient with ALK + ALCL received anti-CD30 CAR-T-cells (CD30. CAR-Ts) at a dose of 2×10 8 /m² and presented PR by PET/CT in the 6th week postinfusion. Furthermore, this patient received three additional infusions later and achieved CR that lasted for 9 months. However, no response was observed in the other patient with ALK - ALCL. 77 Regarding safety, the nine patients enrolled in this trial did not demonstrate any adverse reactions related to CRS or CD30 CAR-Ts. 77 In another open-label phase I trial conducted by Wang et al. , the only patient diagnosed with cutaneous ALCL received CAR-T-cells at a dose of 2×10 7 /kg. The patient underwent several lines of treatment before the infusion, including chemotherapy, BV, radiation therapy, and surgery. He achieved PR after the first infusion, and the mass on the skin disappeared after receiving the second infusion 4 weeks later. Adverse events mainly presented as increased levels of serum liver enzyme and γ-GGT. 78 In 2018, Wang et al. demonstrated that in a trial involving four patients with HL and two patients with ALCL, five of them achieved CR after anti-CD30 CAR-T infusion (including the two ALCL patients). Five patients experienced grade 0–1 CRS, but one patient with HL died of grade 4 CRS. 79 In addition, Voorhees et al. reported a case with refractory/relapsed CD30 + enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL). The patient received standard lymphodepletion chemotherapy before receiving anti-CD30 CAR-T dose of 2×10 8 /m². He experienced grade 1 CRS on the 12th day after infusion and recovered on the 15th day. In the sixth week, the patient achieved PR, and the previously affected lymph nodes all disappeared as assessed by PET/CT scan. At the 24-month follow-up, the patient maintained continued remission. 80 These findings indicated that anti-CD30 CAR-T-cells have good safety and efficacy. It has great potential for the treatment of ALCL. However, there were still cases who died of severe CRS. It suggests that we need to better select the timing and dose of treatment. As a consequence, more data from diverse clinical trials are necessary to further evaluate this novel treatment.

CD37

CD37 is a transmembrane protein of tetraspanin superfamily. It mainly distributes on B-cells and partial T-cell lymphomas. 81 For CD37 + B-lymphomas and CLL, a variety of monoclonal antibody-based drugs targeting CD37 have been assessed in clinical trials and have preliminarily revealed excellent safety and efficacy. 82 – 84 These findings suggest that CD37 could act as a therapeutic target. Scarfò et al. 85 developed an anti-CD37 CAR-T-cell (CAR-37) with 4-1BB costimulatory domain. They verified that CD37 was expressed in PTCL cell lines and cultivated the PTCL cells with CAR-37 together in vitro . After coculture, the cell lines Hut78 and Fepd were eliminated, and no obvious fratricide was observed, indicating that CAR-37 has antitumor activity against PTCL cells. 85 Given that not all T-cell lymphomas express CD37, testing CD37 expression before therapy is necessary to select suitable patients.

The only ongoing trial of CD37-directed CAR-T-cells ( NCT04136275 ) planned to enroll patients with R/R hematologic malignancy, including leukemia, B-lymphoma, and T-lymphoma, to evaluate the safety at a starting dose of 100×10 6 CAR-T-cells. Four patients received anti-CD37 CAR-T infusion, including two with high-grade B-lymphoma, one with HL, and one with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in a phase I trial. The patient with CTCL received 19×10 6 CAR-T-cells due to poor ex vivo proliferation, and he achieved CR on the 28th day postinfusion. All four patients had detectable in vivo CAR-T-cells proliferation and experienced CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Of note, two patients receiving a CAR-T dose of 100×10 6 CAR-T-cells developed prolonged pancytopenia with marrow aplasia that required allo-HSCT. 38

Other targets

CD1a

CD1a is a molecule expressing exclusively in cortical thymocytes or Langerhans cells, making it a good target for treating cortical T-ALL and Langerhans cell histiocytosis. 86 CD1a is limitedly expressed on developing cortical thymocytes but is not expressed in other types of T-cells; thus, it may represent an effective method to prevent fratricide and immune suppression in CAR-T therapy. Sánchez-Martínez et al. 87 showed that the CAR-T-cells with anti-CD1a scFv could expand without T-cell fratricide and was cytotoxic against CD1a cell lines. CD1a-redirected T-cells proliferated up to 200 times on the 12th day in vitro , which was similar to that noted for MOCK T-cells. In the xenogeneic cortical T-ALL model, the infused CD1a-directed T-cells decreased the tumor burden. However, Leong et al. 88 found that CD1a is rarely expressed in R/R T-ALL. In most cases, CD1a + is a marker associated with a good prognosis, and patients usually do not need to receive CAR-T infusion. Thus, the suitable patients for this treatment are sparse. In addition, it is only suitable for patients with cortical T-ALL, which further limits the application of anti-CD1a CAR-T products. There is currently no ongoing clinical trial for CD1a CAR-T therapy.

CD21

CD21 is regarded as a pan-B antigen expressed on normal B-cells, playing an important role in innate and specific immune responses. 89 CD21 binds to CD19/CD81 on the surface of B-cells to form a B-cell coreceptor, by which B-cells enhance their sensitivity and activation. 90 A previous study demonstrated that CD21 was expressed on T-ALL cells and was related to NOTCH signaling in T-ALL, 89 , 91 bringing it to the attention of investigators. Maciocia et al. 92 found that CD21 was extensively expressed on T-ALL cells and normal B-cells, whereas it was minimally expressed on mature normal T-cells. Hence, developing CD21 as a target is a promising method to overcome fratricide and on-target off-tumor effects. Recently, in murine models of T-ALL, anti-CD21 CAR-T-cells demonstrated superior performance in reducing tumor burden and exhibited increased OS compared with anti-CD19 CAR-T-cells. 92 Given the restricted expression of CD21 on B-cells and malignant T-cells, lethal complications caused by severe immunodeficiency are less likely to develop. The downside of CD21 is that only a portion of malignant cells express CD21. 89 , 92 Thus, antigen escape occurs at some point, and the patient ultimately relapses.

CCR4

Chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) is mainly expressed by Th2 cells, Treg cells, and skin lymphocyte antigen-positive homing T-cells. 93 CCR4, with its ligands CCL17 and CCL22, encourages the accumulation of CCR4-expressing T-cells in the skin and the migration of Treg cells to the tumor microenvironment. This mechanism is important in the pathogenesis of CTCL. 94 CCR4 expression is upregulated in CTCL, MF, SS, and ATLL. 93 , 95 , 96 Currently, a humanized monoclonal antibody against CCR4 mogamulizumab has been approved for the treatment of R/R CTCL, MF, SS, and ATLL. 97 , 98 This finding indicates that it is a potential target for CAR-T therapy.

Perera et al. designed an anti-CCR4 CAR construct with 4-1BB costimulatory molecule. They demonstrated the cytotoxicity of the CCR4-directed cells toward CTCL cell lines and noted that CCR4-targeted CAR-T-cells will not cause severe disorder in the T-cell subset. 99 However, several adverse events resembling those of mogamulizumab, including thrombocytopenia and toxic epidermal necrolysis, were noted. 99 Thus, more research on its safety and efficacy is still required before its application in patients.

CCR9

CCR9 expression is limited to immature T lymphocytes and intestinal cells. CCR9 is expressed in greater than 70% of T-ALL cases and less than 5% of normal cells. 100 , 101 CCR9 promotes the migration, infiltration, and expansion of leukemia cells when it binds to its ligand CCL25. 101 , 102 Somovilla-Crespo et al. 103 generated a type of anti-CCR9 antibody and demonstrated that it inhibits the growth of CCR9 + leukemia cells in a mouse model. Recently, Maciocia et al. designed a CAR-T-cell with anti-CCR9 scFv, and the anti-CCR9 CAR-T-cells showed excellent antitumor efficacy in their study. Moreover, it effectively alleviated fratricide and T-cell aplasia for its limited expression in normal tissue. 100

Solutions to overcome the current challenges and enhance efficacy

Solutions to T-cell aplasia

Patients with T-cell aplasia are predisposed to opportunistic infections that are sometimes fatal. Unlike the injection of immunoglobulin for B-cell aplasia caused by anti-CD19 CAR-Ts, an similar effective approach to T-cell aplasia has not been developed. Thus, taking precautions against T-cell aplasia is important. (1) Choosing a highly specific target to manufacture CAR-T products is the basic measure to avert T-cell aplasia. The ideal target should be expressed exclusively on malignant cells and rarely expressed on normal T-cells such that CAR-T-cells can identify the tumor precisely. One of the examples involves targeting the TRBC previously mentioned. The CAR-T-cells are transduced with scFv targeting TRBC1 or TRBC2, and these CAR-T-cells would only kill either cell population (TRBC1 + cells or TRBC2 + cells; Figure 3 ). 64 (2) Introducing the suicide gene as a ‘switch’ to regulate the CAR-T-cells is also an effective method. Researchers have incorporated the inducible caspase-9-based suicide gene as suicide gene in CAR. 104 , 105 By activating the suicide gene, CAR-T-cells could be eliminated quickly when unwanted adverse events occur. (3) Using logic gates (AND gate) technology may be useful to reduce adverse effects of CAR-T-cells ( Figure 4 ). 106 Roybal et al. introduced the synNotch receptor in CAR-T-cells. When binding an antigen, the synNotch receptor releases a transcription factor to activate the expression of another CAR that targets a different antigen. The CAR-T-cells only function when both of the antigens are recognized. This feature enhances the specificity of CAR-T-cells, but sufficient target antigens must be identified. 107 However, enhanced safety is typically accompanied by impaired efficacy. It is important to strike a balance between safety and efficacy. Moreover, bridging allo-HSCT after CAR-T infusion is necessary if serious T-cell aplasia has occurred. 108

Figure 4. Solutions to overcome the current challenges: (a) T-cell aplasia. (b) Fratricide. (C) Tumor contamination. CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; NK cells, natural killer cells…
Figure 4. Solutions to overcome the current challenges: (a) T-cell aplasia. (b) Fratricide. (C) Tumor contamination. CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; NK cells, natural killer cells; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Solutions to fratricide

Fratricide causes CAR-T-cells to recognize and lyse each other, which exerts a negative effect on the activity, proliferation, and survival of CAR-T-cells. (1) Finding a target antigen expressing on malignant cells while not on therapeutic CAR-T-cells. For instance, CD1a is a target antigen expressed mainly on developing cortical thymocytes but rarely expressed in other stages of T-cells. 87 The expression of CD5 on CAR-T-cell is downregulated after CD5 CAR-T-cell infusion. 56 (2) Inhibition of the target antigens expression on CAR-T-cells will help reduce fratricide. Knocking out TCR or the gene of target antigen by genome editing may greatly ameliorate fratricide. 109 A study showed that the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TCR knockout eliminated the alloreactivity of allogenic CD19 CAR-T-cells. 110 It is possible that this type of technology would be effective in fratricide. For CD7 CAR-T-cells, the CD7 gene was knocked out in CAR-T-cells or PEBL technology/anti-CD7 antibody were employed to prevent the mutual recognition of CD7. 46 , 50 , 111 The inhibition of CD7 expression successfully eliminates fratricide. (3) Using the cells without mutual antigen expressed on its surface, such as NK-cells. 112 It has been demonstrated that NK-cells have similar efficacy to T-cells in killing malignant cells. 113 To date, the NK-92 cell line has shown antitumor activity and has been used to develop CAR products with CD4 and CD5 as targets. 69 , 114 , 115 However, NK-cells do not exhibit long-term viability when the cytokine is absent. 116 (4) Novel approaches to fratricide, such as using nanobody-derived CAR-T-cells or naturally selected fratricide-resistant CAR-T-cells, have demonstrated superiority in the treatment of CD7+ malignancy ( Figure 4 ). 34 , 117 They provided a new way to overcome fratricide excluding gene editing, which may help maintain the natural characteristics of cells and enhance the safety as well as efficacy. Liu et al. cultivated anti-CD7 CAR-T-cells in vitro and selected cells that survived after fratricidal natural selection. In their study, this type of CAR-T products presented better cytotoxicity and resistance to fratricide than CAR-T-cells edited by CRISPR/Cas9. The naturally selected CAR-T-cells (NS7CAR) decreased the tumor burden in mouse models in the first 2 weeks after infusion. 118 In their later phase I clinical trial, NS7CAR was applied to 20 patients (14 with T-ALL and 6 with T-LBL). By Day 28, 94.12% (16/17) of patients with bone marrow infiltration achieved MRD negative CR, and 55.6% (5/9) of patients with extramedullary infiltration achieved extramedullary CR with a median time of 29 days. Most patients did not experience severe CRS (grade ⩽ 2) except 1 patient who developed grade 3 CRS. 34 In another study, Chen et al. used an anti-CD7 nanobody fragment connected to an ER/Golgi retention domain to manufacture CAR-T-cells ( CD7Δ CD7-CAR-T-cells). These researchers demonstrated that nanobody-derived CAR-T-cells can avoid fratricide and have a great antitumor effect. 119 Zhang et al. 117 reported a clinical trial with this kind of anti-CD7 CAR-T-cells. Of the eight patients enrolled in the trial, the CR rate at 3 months was 87.5% (7/8), and no life-threatening CRS or ICANS was observed.

Solutions to tumor contamination

Given that T malignant cells are derived from normal T-cells or their precursors, they are similar to each other. Thus, it is often prone to incorporate the malignant cells into collected T-cells. One way to avoid contamination involves the use of NK-cells that are easier to distinguish. The markers of NK-cells are different from T-cells. 120 Therefore, NK-cells are less likely contaminated by T malignant cells. Another solution to this problem involves the use of T-cells from allogeneic donors ( Figure 4 ). However, the allogeneic CAR-T-cells may give rise to intolerable GVHD or be eliminated by immune system, which impairs the efficacy of this therapy. 121 Cooper et al. reported the feasibility of an allogeneic anti-CD7 CAR-T product UCART7. It showed satisfactory antitumor efficacy in vitro and in vivo without mediating GVHD. 52 Pan et al. initially administered the allogeneic anti-CD7 CAR-T-cells to patients with R/R T-ALL. The result of their clinical trial demonstrated that the infused cells effectively proliferated and the CR rate of enrolled patients was up to 90%. Although some patients developed GVHD, they were mild and reversible. 36 Moreover, given that the transduction efficiency and vector copy number of CAR-T-cells can be detected and evaluated by flow cytometry and qPCR, improvements in these technologies may be helpful to this problem. 122

Other solutions to enhance CAR-T efficacy

For the CAR-T therapy for B-cell malignancies, investigators have explored a variety of methods to enhance the efficacy, such as combination strategies and dual-target CAR-T-cell therapy. 123 , 124

A preclinical study showed that the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was upregulated after CAR-T infusion, which will inhibit the effector function of CAR-T-cells. However, the injection of anti-PD-1 antibody enhanced the accumulation of CAR-T-cells and the cytokine secretion. 125 And the enhanced efficacy was observed in a clinical trial that combined anti-CD19 CAR-T-cells and Nivolumab. 126 This suggests that combination therapy may similarly improve the efficacy of CAR-T-cells in the treatment of T-cell malignancies. However, there is no such study in the treatment of T-cell malignancies and more studies are required to confirm it.

Recently, Dai et al. developed a kind of CD5/CD7 bispecific CAR-T-cell to treat R/R T-cell malignancies. Although the dual-target CAR-T-cells can mitigate tumor antigen escape, targeting multiple antigens will give rise to more severe T-cell aplasia and fratricide. Thus, they knocked out the CD5 gene and CD7 gene before CAR transduction to prevent fratricide. In their study, the CD5/CD7 bispecific CAR-T therapy showed satisfactory antitumor efficacy in mouse model. 127 This may be an effective way of improving CAR-T therapeutic efficacy but it needs clinical trials to verify its safety in humans.

Conclusion and future direction

The development of CAR-based immunotherapy is a landmark in the treatment of hematological malignancies. Compared with B-cell malignancies, T-cell malignancies are associated with greater heterogeneity and worse prognoses. Distinctive challenges of CAR-based treatment in T-cell malignancies have been noted. Severe T-cell aplasia caused by the on-target off-tumor effect, CAR-T-cells fratricide, and contamination of malignant cells represent urgent problems that need to be solved. Selecting target antigens with increased specificity, introducing the suicide gene as a ‘switch’, removing the target genes by gene editing, and using NK-cells or donor-derived T-cells for CAR transduction are current solutions to these problems. To date, many targets under development have demonstrated good efficacy in preclinical testing. However, given the safety and applicability, only a few of these targets entered the clinical trial stage. CD7 is the most widely studied target at present. It exhibited impressive efficacy and safety of both allogeneic and autologous CAR-T products in phase I studies, and a phase II trial of allogeneic anti-CD7 CAR-T-cells is ongoing. 36 The TRBC1 or TRBC2 gene is only expressed on half of the T-cells, so these genes might be a good target to overcome T-cell aplasia and fratricide. 64 CD21 and CCR9 are newly proposed target antigen that are restricted to malignant T-cell compartments, which may help to avoid the T-cell aplasia and fratricide. Some patients underwent the cytokine release syndrome in diverse trials. However, the toxicity was reversible and transient in most cases. The main work in the future is still to find solutions to overcome the obstacles mentioned above. The combination therapy and dual-target CAR-T are potential way to enhance the efficacy. The development of this treatment is still at an early stage. Thus, more research are still needed for the approval of this treatment.

Not applicable.

ORCID iD: Liangkui Luo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1757-6992

Declaration

Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable.

Consent for publication: Not applicable.

Author contributions: Liangkui Luo: Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.

Xuan Zhou: Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.

Lijuan Zhou: Visualization.

Zhao Liang: Visualization.

Jilong Yang: Supervision; Visualization.

Sanfang Tu: Conceptualization; Writing – review & editing.

Yuhua Li: Conceptualization; Writing – review & editing.

Funding: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. U2001224); Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory (grant no. 2018GZR110105014)

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Availability of data and material: Not applicable.

References

1 Sehn LH Soulier J . Introduction to the review series on T-cell malignancies . Blood 2017 ; 129 : 1059 – 1060 . 28115370 10.1182/blood-2017-01-741389

2 Savage KJ Chhanabhai M Gascoyne RD , et al . Characterization of peripheral T-cell lymphomas in a single North American institution by the WHO classification . Ann Oncol 2004 ; 15 : 1467 – 1475 . 15367405 10.1093/annonc/mdh392

3 Belver L Ferrando A . The genetics and mechanisms of T cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia . Nat Rev Cancer 2016 ; 16 : 494 – 507 . 27451956 10.1038/nrc.2016.63

4 Marks DI Paietta EM Moorman AV , et al . T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults: clinical features, immunophenotype, cytogenetics, and outcome from the large randomized prospective trial (UKALL XII/ECOG 2993) . Blood 2009 ; 114 : 5136 – 5145 . 19828704 10.1182/blood-2009-08-231217 PMC2792210

5 Candoni A Lazzarotto D Ferrara F , et al . Nelarabine as salvage therapy and bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplant in 118 adult patients with relapsed/refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. A CAMPUS ALL study . Am J Hematol 2020 ; 95 : 1466 – 1472 . 32777149 10.1002/ajh.25957

6 Marks DI Rowntree C . Management of adults with T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia . Blood 2017 ; 129 : 1134 – 1142 . 28115371 10.1182/blood-2016-07-692608

7 Kamiunten A Sekine M Kameda T , et al . Outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with adult T-cell leukemia . Hematol Oncol 2018 ; 36 : 651 – 655 . 30117169 10.1002/hon.2549 PMC6221141

8 Mak V Hamm J Chhanabhai M , et al . Survival of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma after first relapse or progression: spectrum of disease and rare long-term survivors . J Clin Oncol 2013 ; 31 : 1970 – 1976 . 23610113 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.7524

9 O’Connor OA Pro B Pinter-Brown L , et al . Pralatrexate in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: results from the pivotal PROPEL study . J Clin Oncol 2011 ; 29 : 1182 – 1189 . 21245435 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.9024 PMC3083873

10 Coiffier B Pro B Prince HM , et al . Results from a pivotal, open-label, phase II study of romidepsin in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma after prior systemic therapy . J Clin Oncol 2012 ; 30 : 631 – 636 . 22271479 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.4223

11 O’Connor OA Horwitz S Masszi T , et al . Belinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: results of the pivotal phase II BELIEF (CLN-19) study . J Clin Oncol 2015 ; 33 : 2492 – 2499 . 26101246 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.2782 PMC5087312

12 Shi Y Jia B Xu W , et al . Chidamide in relapsed or refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma: a multicenter real-world study in China . J Hematol Oncol 2017 ; 10 : 69 . 28298231 10.1186/s13045-017-0439-6 PMC5351273

13 Dunsmore KP Winter SS Devidas M , et al . Children’s oncology group AALL0434: a phase III randomized clinical trial testing nelarabine in newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia . J Clin Oncol 2020 ; 38 : 3282 – 3293 . 32813610 10.1200/JCO.20.00256 PMC7526719

14 Herrera AF Zain J Savage KJ , et al . Brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and prednisone (CHEP-BV) followed by BV consolidation in patients with CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas . Blood 2021 ; 138 : 133 .

15 Chihara D Fanale MA Miranda RN , et al . The survival outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma . Br J Haematol 2017 ; 176 : 750 – 758 . 27983760 10.1111/bjh.14477 PMC5836501

16 Chiappella A Carniti C Re A , et al . Adding romidepsin to CHOEP in first line treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphomas does not improve the response rate: final analysis of phase II PTCL13 study . Blood 2021 ; 138 : 134 .

17 Ogura M Ishida T Hatake K , et al . Multicenter phase II study of mogamulizumab (KW-0761), a defucosylated anti-cc chemokine receptor 4 antibody, in patients with relapsed peripheral T-cell lymphoma and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma . J Clin Oncol 2014 ; 32 : 1157 – 1163 . 24616310 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.0924

18 Schmitz N Lenz G Stelljes M . Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for T-cell lymphomas . Blood 2018 ; 132 : 245 – 253 . 29699989 10.1182/blood-2018-01-791335

19 Sadelain M Brentjens R Rivière I . The basic principles of chimeric antigen receptor design . Cancer Discov 2013 ; 3 : 388 – 398 . 23550147 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0548 PMC3667586

20 Carpenito C Milone MC Hassan R , et al . Control of large, established tumor xenografts with genetically retargeted human T cells containing CD28 and CD137 domains . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 ; 106 : 3360 – 3365 . 19211796 10.1073/pnas.0813101106 PMC2651342

21 Kochenderfer JN Feldman SA Zhao Y , et al . Construction and preclinical evaluation of an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor . J Immunother 2009 ; 32 : 689 – 702 . 19561539 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181ac6138 PMC2747302

22 van der Stegen SJ Hamieh M Sadelain M . The pharmacology of second-generation chimeric antigen receptors . Nat Rev Drug Discov 2015 ; 14 : 499 – 509 . 26129802 10.1038/nrd4597 PMC6410718

23 Levine BL Miskin J Wonnacott K , et al . Global manufacturing of CAR T cell therapy . Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 2017 ; 4 : 92 – 101 . 28344995 10.1016/j.omtm.2016.12.006 PMC5363291

24 Neelapu SS Locke FL Bartlett NL , et al . Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma . N Engl J Med 2017 ; 377 : 2531 – 2544 . 29226797 10.1056/NEJMoa1707447 PMC5882485

25 Schuster SJ Bishop MR Tam CS , et al . Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma . N Engl J Med 2019 ; 380 : 45 – 56 . 30501490 10.1056/NEJMoa1804980

26 Wang M Munoz J Goy A , et al . KTE-X19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma . N Engl J Med 2020 ; 382 : 1331 – 1342 . 32242358 10.1056/NEJMoa1914347 PMC7731441

27 Shah BD Ghobadi A Oluwole OO , et al . KTE-X19 for relapsed or refractory adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: phase 2 results of the single-arm, open-label, multicentre ZUMA-3 study . Lancet 2021 ; 398 : 491 – 502 . 34097852 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01222-8 PMC11613962

28 Schuster SJ Svoboda J Chong EA , et al . Chimeric antigen receptor T cells in refractory B-cell lymphomas . N Engl J Med 2017 ; 377 : 2545 – 2554 . 29226764 10.1056/NEJMoa1708566 PMC5788566

29 Sehgal A Hoda D Riedell PA , et al . Lisocabtagene maraleucel as second-line therapy in adults with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who were not intended for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (PILOT): an open-label, phase 2 study . Lancet Oncol 2022 ; 23 : 1066 – 1077 . 35839786 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00339-4

30 Raje N Berdeja J Lin Y , et al . Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy bb2121 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma . N Engl J Med 2019 ; 380 : 1726 – 1737 . 31042825 10.1056/NEJMoa1817226 PMC8202968

31 Berdeja JG Madduri D Usmani SZ , et al . Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-1): a phase 1b/2 open-label study . Lancet 2021 ; 398 : 314 – 324 . 34175021 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00933-8

32 Zhang M Fu X Meng H , et al . A single-arm, open-label, pilot trial of autologous CD7-CAR-T cells for CD7 positive relapsed and refractory T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma . Blood 2021 ; 138 : 3829 .

33 Zhang X Zhang G Li W , et al . Evolution and proliferation of CD7 CAR-T cells compared to CD19 CAR-T cells therapies for acute leukemia . Blood 2021 ; 138 : 2820.

34 Lu P Liu Y Yang J , et al . Naturally selected CD7 CAR-T therapy without genetic manipulations for T-ALL/LBL: first-in-human phase I clinical trial . Blood 2022 ; 140 : 321 – 334 . 35500125 10.1182/blood.2021014498

35 Yang J Yang X Liu Y , et al . A novel and successful patient or donor-derived CD7-targeted CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (R/R T-LBL) . Blood 2021 ; 138 : 652 .

36 Pan J Tan Y Wang G , et al . Donor-derived CD7 chimeric antigen receptor T cells for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: first-in-human, phase I trial . J Clin Oncol 2021 ; 39 : 3340 – 3351 . 34324392 10.1200/JCO.21.00389

37 Hill LC Rouce RH Smith TS , et al . Safety and anti-tumor activity of CD5 CAR T-cells in patients with relapsed/refractory T-cell malignancies . Blood 2019 ; 134 : 199 .31064751

38 Frigault MJ Chen Y-B Gallagher KME , et al . Phase 1 study of CD37-directed CAR T cells in patients with relapsed or refractory CD37+ hematologic malignancies . Blood 2021 ; 138 : 653 .

39 Cappell KM Kochenderfer JN . A comparison of chimeric antigen receptors containing CD28 versus 4-1BB costimulatory domains . Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021 ; 18 : 715 – 727 . 34230645 10.1038/s41571-021-00530-z

40 Alcantara M Tesio M June CH , et al . CAR T-cells for T-cell malignancies: challenges in distinguishing between therapeutic, normal, and neoplastic T-cells . Leukemia 2018 ; 32 : 2307 – 2315 . 30315238 10.1038/s41375-018-0285-8 PMC7433349

41 Leonard WJ . Cytokines and immunodeficiency diseases . Nat Rev Immunol 2001 ; 1 : 200 – 208 . 11905829 10.1038/35105066

42 Izykowska K Rassek K Korsak D , et al . Novel targeted therapies of T cell lymphomas . J Hematol Oncol 2020 ; 13 : 176 . 33384022 10.1186/s13045-020-01006-w PMC7775630

43 Ruella M Xu J Barrett DM , et al . Induction of resistance to chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy by transduction of a single leukemic B cell . Nat Med 2018 ; 24 : 1499 – 1503 . 30275568 10.1038/s41591-018-0201-9 PMC6511988

44 Ware RE Scearce RM Dietz MA , et al . Characterization of the surface topography and putative tertiary structure of the human CD7 molecule . J Immunol 1989 ; 143 : 3632 – 3640 . 2479685

45 Rabinowich H Pricop L Herberman RB , et al . Expression and function of CD7 molecule on human natural killer cells . J Immunol 1994 ; 152 : 517 – 526 . 7506726

46 Gomes-Silva D Srinivasan M Sharma S , et al . CD7-edited T cells expressing a CD7-specific CAR for the therapy of T-cell malignancies . Blood 2017 ; 130 : 285 – 296 . 28539325 10.1182/blood-2017-01-761320 PMC5520470

47 Gunther R Chelstrom LM Finnegan D , et al . In vivo anti-leukemic efficacy of anti-CD7-pokeweed antiviral protein immunotoxin against human T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma in mice with severe combined immunodeficiency . Leukemia 1993 ; 7 : 298 – 309 . 7678882

48 Waurzyniak B Schneider EA Tumer N , et al . In vivo toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and antileukemic activity of TXU (anti-CD7)-pokeweed antiviral protein immunotoxin . Clin Cancer Res 1997 ; 3 : 881 – 890 . 9815763

49 Yu Y Li J Zhu X , et al . Humanized CD7 nanobody-based immunotoxins exhibit promising anti-T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia potential . Int J Nanomedicine 2017 ; 12 : 1969 – 1983 . 28331319 10.2147/IJN.S127575 PMC5357075

50 Png YT Vinanica N Kamiya T , et al . Blockade of CD7 expression in T cells for effective chimeric antigen receptor targeting of T-cell malignancies . Blood Adv 2017 ; 1 : 2348 – 2360 . 29296885 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017009928 PMC5729624

51 Yang J Zhang X Liu Y , et al . High effectiveness and safety of anti-CD7 CAR T-cell therapy in treating relapsed or refractory (R/R) T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) . Blood 2021 ; 138 : 473 .

52 Cooper ML Choi J Staser K , et al . An ‘off-the-shelf’ fratricide-resistant CAR-T for the treatment of T cell hematologic malignancies . Leukemia 2018 ; 32 : 1970 – 1983 . 29483708 10.1038/s41375-018-0065-5 PMC6102094

53 Campana D van Dongen JJ Mehta A , et al . Stages of T-cell receptor protein expression in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia . Blood 1991 ; 77 : 1546 – 1554 . 1826223

54 Pui CH Behm FG Crist WM . Clinical and biologic relevance of immunologic marker studies in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia . Blood 1993 ; 82 : 343 – 362 . 8329694

55 Lu X Axtell RC Collawn JF , et al . AP2 adaptor complex-dependent internalization of CD5: differential regulation in T and B cells . J Immunol 2002 ; 168 : 5612 – 5620 . 12023358 10.4049/jimmunol.168.11.5612

56 Mamonkin M Rouce RH Tashiro H , et al . A T-cell–directed chimeric antigen receptor for the selective treatment of T-cell malignancies . Blood 2015 ; 126 : 983 – 992 . 26056165 10.1182/blood-2015-02-629527 PMC4543231

57 Wada M Zhang H Fang L , et al . Characterization of an anti-CD5 directed CAR T-cell against T-cell malignancies . Stem Cell Rev Rep 2020 ; 16 : 369 – 384 . 32008159 10.1007/s12015-019-09937-9

58 Mamonkin M Mukherjee M Srinivasan M , et al . Reversible transgene expression reduces fratricide and permits 4-1BB costimulation of CAR T cells directed to T-cell malignancies . Cancer Immunol Res 2018 ; 6 : 47 – 58 . 29079655 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0126 PMC5963729

59 Dai Z Mu W Zhao Y , et al . The rational development of CD5-targeting biepitopic CARs with fully human heavy-chain-only antigen recognition domains . Mol Ther 2021 ; 29 : 2707 – 2722 . 34274536 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.07.001 PMC8417515

60 Rouce RH Hill LC Smith TS , et al . Early signals of anti-tumor efficacy and safety with autologous CD5.CAR T-cells in patients with refractory/relapsed T-cell lymphoma . Blood 2021 ; 138 : 654 .

61 Feng J Xu H Cinquina A , et al . Treatment of aggressive T cell lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia using anti-CD5 CAR T cells . Stem Cell Rev Rep 2021 ; 17 : 652 – 661 . 33410096 10.1007/s12015-020-10092-9 PMC8036178

62 Alcover A Alarcón B Di Bartolo V . Cell biology of T cell receptor expression and regulation . Annu Rev Immunol 2018 ; 36 : 103 – 125 . 29261409 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053429

63 Berg H Otteson GE Corley H , et al . Flow cytometric evaluation of TRBC1 expression in tissue specimens and body fluids is a novel and specific method for assessment of T-cell clonality and diagnosis of T-cell neoplasms . Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2021 ; 100 : 361 – 369 . 32333725 10.1002/cyto.b.21881

64 Maciocia PM Wawrzyniecka PA Philip B , et al . Targeting the T cell receptor beta-chain constant region for immunotherapy of T cell malignancies . Nat Med 2017 ; 23 : 1416 – 1423 . 29131157 10.1038/nm.4444

65 Morrison WJ Offner H Vandenbark AA . Understanding the CD4 molecule: surface expression and function . J Neurosci Res 1994 ; 38 : 1 – 5 . 8057386 10.1002/jnr.490380102

66 Pinz K Liu H Golightly M , et al . Preclinical targeting of human T-cell malignancies using CD4-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells . Leukemia 2016 ; 30 : 701 – 707 . 26526988 10.1038/leu.2015.311

67 Cheng J Chen G Lv H , et al . CD4-targeted T cells rapidly induce remissions in mice with T cell lymphoma . Biomed Res Int 2021 ; 2021 : 6614784 . 33855074 10.1155/2021/6614784 PMC8019637

68 Zhang H Feng J Zhang W , et al . First-in-human CD4 CAR clinical trial on peripheral T-cell lymphoma . Blood 2019 ; 134 : 2881.

69 Pinz KG Yakaboski E Jares A , et al . Targeting T-cell malignancies using anti-CD4 CAR NK-92 cells . Oncotarget 2017 ; 8 : 112783 – 112796 . 29348865 10.18632/oncotarget.22626 PMC5762550

70 Falini B Pileri S Pizzolo G , et al . CD30 (Ki-1) molecule: a new cytokine receptor of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily as a tool for diagnosis and immunotherapy . Blood 1995 ; 85 : 1 – 14 . 7803786

71 Sabattini E Pizzi M Tabanelli V , et al . CD30 expression in peripheral T-cell lymphomas . Haematologica 2013 ; 98 : e81 – e82 . 23716537 10.3324/haematol.2013.084913 PMC3729886

72 Zheng W Medeiros LJ Young KH , et al . CD30 expression in acute lymphoblastic leukemia as assessed by flow cytometry analysis . Leuk Lymphoma 2014 ; 55 : 624 – 627 . 23937105 10.3109/10428194.2013.820293 PMC4188389

73 Deng C Pan B O’Connor OA . Brentuximab vedotin . Clin Cancer Res 2013 ; 19 : 22 – 27 . 23155186 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0290

74 Pro B Advani R Brice P , et al . Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) in patients with relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: results of a phase II study . J Clin Oncol 2012 ; 30 : 2190 – 2196 . 22614995 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0402

75 Pro B Advani R Brice P , et al . Five-year results of brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma . Blood 2017 ; 130 : 2709 – 2717 . 28974506 10.1182/blood-2017-05-780049 PMC5746164

76 Hombach A Heuser C Sircar R , et al . An anti-CD30 chimeric receptor that mediates CD3-zeta-independent T-cell activation against Hodgkin’s lymphoma cells in the presence of soluble CD30 . Cancer Res 1998 ; 58 : 1116 – 1119 . 9515791

77 Ramos CA Ballard B Zhang H , et al . Clinical and immunological responses after CD30-specific chimeric antigen receptor-redirected lymphocytes . J Clin Invest 2017 ; 127 : 3462 – 3471 . 28805662 10.1172/JCI94306 PMC5669573

78 Wang CM Wu ZQ Wang Y , et al . Autologous T cells expressing CD30 chimeric antigen receptors for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: an open-label phase I trial . Clin Cancer Res 2017 ; 23 : 1156 – 1166 . 27582488 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1365

79 Wang D Xiao Y Li C , et al . Anti-CD30 chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for CD30+ relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphoma patients . Blood 2018 ; 132 : 1660.

80 Voorhees TJ Ghosh N Grover N , et al . Long-term remission in multiply relapsed enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma following CD30 CAR T-cell therapy . Blood Adv 2020 ; 4 : 5925 – 5928 . 33259598 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003218 PMC7724914

81 Pereira DS Guevara CI Jin L , et al . AGS67E, an anti-CD37 monomethyl auristatin E antibody-drug conjugate as a potential therapeutic for B/T-cell malignancies and AML: a new role for CD37 in AML . Mol Cancer Ther 2015 ; 14 : 1650 – 1660 . 25934707 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0067 PMC4557793

82 Byrd JC Pagel JM Awan FT , et al . A phase 1 study evaluating the safety and tolerability of otlertuzumab, an anti-CD37 mono-specific ADAPTIR therapeutic protein in chronic lymphocytic leukemia . Blood 2014 ; 123 : 1302 – 1308 . 24381226 10.1182/blood-2013-07-512137 PMC3938145

83 Pagel JM Spurgeon SE Byrd JC , et al . Otlertuzumab (TRU-016), an anti-CD37 monospecific ADAPTIR(™) therapeutic protein, for relapsed or refractory NHL patients . Br J Haematol 2015 ; 168 : 38 – 45 . 25146490 10.1111/bjh.13099

84 Stilgenbauer S Aurran Schleinitz T Eichhorst B , et al . Phase 1 first-in-human trial of the anti-CD37 antibody BI 836826 in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia . Leukemia 2019 ; 33 : 2531 – 2535 . 31089249 10.1038/s41375-019-0475-z

85 Scarfò I Ormhøj M Frigault MJ , et al . Anti-CD37 chimeric antigen receptor T cells are active against B- and T-cell lymphomas . Blood 2018 ; 132 : 1495 – 1506 . 30089630 10.1182/blood-2018-04-842708 PMC6172564

86 Bechan GI Lee DW Zajonc DM , et al . Phage display generation of a novel human anti-CD1A monoclonal antibody with potent cytolytic activity . Br J Haematol 2012 ; 159 : 299 – 310 . 22934889 10.1111/bjh.12033 PMC7372535

87 Sánchez-Martínez D Baroni ML Gutierrez-Agüera F , et al . Fratricide-resistant CD1a-specific CAR T cells for the treatment of cortical T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia . Blood 2019 ; 133 : 2291 – 2304 . 30796021 10.1182/blood-2018-10-882944 PMC6554538

88 Leong S Inglott S Papaleonidopoulou F , et al . CD1a is rarely expressed in pediatric or adult relapsed/refractory T-ALL: implications for immunotherapy . Blood Adv 2020 ; 4 : 4665 – 4668 . 33002130 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002502 PMC7556151

89 Tatsumi E Yoneda N Kawano S , et al . CD21 antigen in T-lineage neoplastic lymphoid cells: characteristic expression at thymic stage . Am J Hematol 1994 ; 45 : 150 – 155 . 7511331 10.1002/ajh.2830450211

90 Zabel MD Weis JH . Cell-specific regulation of the CD21 gene . Int Immunopharmacol 2001 ; 1 : 483 – 493 . 11367532 10.1016/s1567-5769(00)00046-1

91 Shepherd C Banerjee L Cheung CW , et al . PI3K/mTOR inhibition upregulates NOTCH-MYC signalling leading to an impaired cytotoxic response . Leukemia 2012 ; 27 : 650 – 660 . 23038273 10.1038/leu.2012.285

92 Maciocia NC Burley A Nannini F , et al . Anti-CD21 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells for T cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL) . Blood 2021 ; 138 : 902 .

93 Yoshie O Matsushima K . CCR4 and its ligands: from bench to bedside . Int Immunol 2015 ; 27 : 11 – 20 . 25087232 10.1093/intimm/dxu079

94 Nicolay JP Albrecht JD Alberti-Violetti S , et al . CCR4 in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: therapeutic targeting of a pathogenic driver . Eur J Immunol 2021 ; 51 : 1660 – 1671 . 33811642 10.1002/eji.202049043

95 Ferenczi K Fuhlbrigge RC Pinkus J , et al . Increased CCR4 expression in cutaneous T cell lymphoma . J Invest Dermatol 2002 ; 119 : 1405 – 1410 . 12485447 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.19610.x

96 Ishida T Utsunomiya A Iida S , et al . Clinical significance of CCR4 expression in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma: its close association with skin involvement and unfavorable outcome . Clin Cancer Res 2003 ; 9 : 3625 – 3634 . 14506150

97 Ureshino H Kamachi K Kimura S . Mogamulizumab for the treatment of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma . Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2019 ; 19 : 326 – 331 . 30981611 10.1016/j.clml.2019.03.004

98 Moore DC Elmes JB Shibu PA , et al . Mogamulizumab: an anti-CC chemokine receptor 4 antibody for T-cell lymphomas . Ann Pharmacother 2020 ; 54 : 371 – 379 . 31648540 10.1177/1060028019884863

99 Perera LP Zhang M Nakagawa M , et al . Chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells that target chemokine receptor CCR4 as a therapeutic modality for T-cell malignancies . Am J Hematol 2017 ; 92 : 892 – 901 . 28543380 10.1002/ajh.24794 PMC5546946

100 Maciocia PM Wawrzyniecka PA Maciocia NC , et al . Anti-CCR9 chimeric antigen receptor T cells for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia . Blood 2022 ; 140 : 25 – 37 . 35507686 10.1182/blood.2021013648

101 Tu Z Xiao R Xiong J , et al . CCR9 in cancer: oncogenic role and therapeutic targeting . J Hematol Oncol 2016 ; 9 : 10 . 26879872 10.1186/s13045-016-0236-7 PMC4754913

102 Hong Z Wei Z Xie T , et al . Targeting chemokines for acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy . J Hematol Oncol 2021 ; 14 : 48 . 33743810 10.1186/s13045-021-01060-y PMC7981899

103 Somovilla-Crespo B Martín Monzón MT Vela M , et al . 92R monoclonal antibody inhibits human CCR9 leukemia cells growth in NSG mice xenografts . Front Immunol 2018 ; 9 : 77 . 29434597 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00077 PMC5797297

104 Hoyos V Savoldo B Quintarelli C , et al . Engineering CD19-specific T lymphocytes with interleukin-15 and a suicide gene to enhance their anti-lymphoma/leukemia effects and safety . Leukemia 2010 ; 24 : 1160 – 1170 . 20428207 10.1038/leu.2010.75 PMC2888148

105 Di Stasi A Tey S-K Dotti G , et al . Inducible apoptosis as a safety switch for adoptive cell therapy . N Engl J Med 2011 ; 365 : 1673 – 1683 . 22047558 10.1056/NEJMoa1106152 PMC3236370

106 Roybal KT Williams JZ Morsut L , et al . Engineering T cells with customized therapeutic response programs using synthetic notch receptors . Cell 2016 ; 167 : 419–432.e16. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.011 PMC5072533 27693353

107 Srivastava S Salter AI Liggitt D , et al . Logic-gated ROR1 chimeric antigen receptor expression rescues T cell-mediated toxicity to normal tissues and enables selective tumor targeting . Cancer Cell 2019 ; 35 : 489–503.e8. 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.02.003 PMC6450658 30889382

108 Slatter MA Gennery AR . Hematopoietic cell transplantation in primary immunodeficiency – conventional and emerging indications . Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2018 ; 14 : 103 – 114 . 29300535 10.1080/1744666X.2018.1424627

109 Georgiadis C Rasaiyaah J Gkazi SA , et al . Universal’ fratricide-resistant CAR T cells against T cell leukemia generated by coupled & uncoupled deamination mediated base editing . Blood 2019 ; 134 : 3219 .

110 Stenger D Stief TA Kaeuferle T , et al . Endogenous TCR promotes in vivo persistence of CD19-CAR-T cells compared to a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TCR knockout CAR . Blood 2020 ; 136 : 1407 – 1418 . 32483603 10.1182/blood.2020005185 PMC7612202

111 Ye J Jia Y Tuhin IJ , et al . Feasibility study of a novel preparation strategy for anti-CD7 CAR-T cells with a recombinant anti-CD7 blocking antibody . Mol Ther Oncolytics 2022 ; 24 : 719 – 728 . 35317521 10.1016/j.omto.2022.02.013 PMC8913247

112 Xie G Dong H Liang Y , et al . CAR-NK cells: a promising cellular immunotherapy for cancer . EBioMedicine 2020 ; 59 : 102975 . 32853984 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102975 PMC7452675

113 Rezvani K Rouce R Liu E , et al . Engineering natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy . Mol Ther 2017 ; 25 : 1769 – 1781 . 28668320 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.06.012 PMC5542803

114 Klingemann H Boissel L Toneguzzo F . Natural killer cells for immunotherapy – advantages of the NK-92 cell line over blood NK cells . Front Immunol 2016 ; 7 : 91 . 27014270 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00091 PMC4789404

115 Chen KH Wada M Pinz KG , et al . Preclinical targeting of aggressive T-cell malignancies using anti-CD5 chimeric antigen receptor . Leukemia 2017 ; 31 : 2151 – 2160 . 28074066 10.1038/leu.2017.8 PMC5629371

116 Basar R Daher M Rezvani K . Next-generation cell therapies: the emerging role of CAR-NK cells . Hematology 2020 ; 2020 : 570 – 578 . 33275752 10.1182/hematology.2020002547 PMC7727537

117 Zhang M Chen D Fu X , et al . Autologous nanobody-derived fratricide-resistant CD7-CAR T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed and refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma . Clin Cancer Res 2022 ; 28 : 2830 – 2843 . 35435984 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-4097

118 Liu Y Li W Wang L , et al . Naturally selected anti-CD7 CAR-T cells without additional genetic manipulations as a potentially superior therapy for T-cell malignancies . Blood 2021 ; 138 : 1696.

119 Chen D You F Xiang S , et al . Chimeric antigen receptor T cells derived from CD7 nanobody exhibit robust antitumor potential against CD7-positive malignancies . Am J Cancer Res 2021 ; 11 : 5263 – 5281 . 34873460 PMC8640809

120 Hauser A Schrattbauer K Najdanovic D , et al . Optimized quantification of lymphocyte subsets by use of CD7 and CD33 . Cytometry A 2013 ; 83 : 316 – 323 . 23315982 10.1002/cyto.a.22245

121 Depil S Duchateau P Grupp SA , et al . ‘Off-the-shelf’ allogeneic CAR T cells: development and challenges . Nat Rev Drug Discov 2020 ; 19 : 185 – 199 . 31900462 10.1038/s41573-019-0051-2

122 Schanda N Sauer T Kunz A , et al . Sensitivity and specificity of CD19.CAR-T cell detection by flow cytometry and PCR . Cells 2021 ; 10 : 3208 . 34831430 10.3390/cells10113208 PMC8621201

123 Cronk RJ Zurko J Shah NN . Bispecific chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for B cell malignancies and multiple myeloma . Cancers 2020 ; 12 : 2523. 10.3390/cancers12092523 PMC7564024 32899464

124 Bansal R Reshef R . Revving the CAR – combination strategies to enhance CAR T cell effectiveness . Blood Rev 2021 ; 45 : 100695 . 32402724 10.1016/j.blre.2020.100695

125 Cherkassky L Morello A Villena-Vargas J , et al . Human CAR T cells with cell-intrinsic PD-1 checkpoint blockade resist tumor-mediated inhibition . J Clin Invest 2016 ; 126 : 3130 – 3144 . 27454297 10.1172/JCI83092 PMC4966328

126 Cao Y Lu W Sun R , et al . Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in combination with nivolumab are safe and effective against relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma . Front Oncol 2019 ; 9 : 767 . 31482064 10.3389/fonc.2019.00767 PMC6709654

127 Dai Z Mu W Zhao Y , et al . T cells expressing CD5/CD7 bispecific chimeric antigen receptors with fully human heavy-chain-only domains mitigate tumor antigen escape . Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022 ; 7 : 85 . 35332132 10.1038/s41392-022-00898-z PMC8948246

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты