Introduction
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is defined by the latest American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria [ 1 ] as a chronic and systemic disease in which immunologically mediated inflammation of synovial joints may lead to destruction of articular structures. Osteoporosis is the most common bone tissue disease where pathophysiological mechanisms involve an uncoupling between bone formation and resorption, thus leading to a reduction of bone mineral density (BMD) and to an increased risk of fractures [ 2 ]. Bone homoeostasis is regulated by the WNT pathway, an elegant (as much as complex) transcellular signaling mechanism that regulates bone formation, whose alteration has been linked to a higher number of erosions and lower bone mineral density in RA [ 3 ].
Recent papers have documented that an alteration of the cytokine pool in a pro-inflammatory sense in RA causes an imbalance of WNT signaling due to the direct effect of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 1 (IL-1) on osteoclasts, favoring their maturation and differentiation [ 4 ]. Furthermore, it seems that anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), as well as rheumatoid factor (RF), play a pathogenetic role directly activating osteoclast-mediated resorption via key osteoclastogenic cytokine receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) induction [ 5 ], thus leading to joint erosions and osteoporosis. Moreover, recent evidence demonstrated the role of activated B lymphocytes [ 6 ] in favoring loss of mineralization in RA. In addition, an altered body composition too may represent the result of a cytokine pool imbalance toward an inflammatory state [ 7 , 8 ]. For these reasons, we aimed to investigate retrospectively the effects of rituximab (RTX) on bone and body composition in a cohort of postmenopausal rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Material and methods
We studied vertebral, whole femoral and neck femoral BMD and body composition using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, Lunar prodigy version 1.72) of 20 postmenopausal women affected by RA according to ACR/EULAR criteria before and after 18 months of treatment with RTX [ 1 ]. Quality control of the device was performed every day. RTX was administered with a loading dose of two infusions of 500 mg or 1 g depending on patients’ weight during the first two weeks of treatment with a premedication of 100 mg of methylprednisolone and 1000 mg of acetaminophen; subsequently infusions were scheduled every six months. At the end of the study each patient underwent eight RTX infusion sessions and reached a methylprednisolone cumulative dose of 800 mg. Medical history, weight, height and body mass index (BMI) were collected.
Diagnosis of osteoporosis was performed when the T-score of patients deviated below –2.5 from the standard deviation compared with the reference population according to World Health Organization criteria. None of the considered subjects had vertebral or femoral osteoporosis at baseline. Also none of the RA patients included in the analysis had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic heart failure (CHF) or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Body composition of RA patients was analyzed before and after treatment with RTX, using themselves as controls. Appendicular lean mass (ALM, kg/m 2 ) was calculated as the sum of fat-free mass minus bone mineral content of lower and upper limbs. Skeletal muscle mass index (SMI, kg/m 2 ) was calculated as ALM divided by height squared according to Baumgartner’s criteria [ 7 ]. A low muscle mass was identified for women when found 2 SD below the mean value of young adults (female: < 5.5 kg/m 2 ).
Ethical standards – the presented retrospective work is based on data derived from existing medical records and did not require additional consent, all patients agreed to the diagnostics and procedures performed.
Characteristics of the studied group
Of the 20 studied patients, n = 3 had Hashimoto’s thyroiditis under levothyroxine treatment, n = 3 had hypertension, n = 1 had a history of bladder cancer and n = 1 had hypercholesterolemia. Among all studied patients n = 7 were treated with glucocorticosteroids (GCs) with a low dose of prednisone (< 7.5 mg/day), and only n = 4 patients were taking oral vitamin D. Mean ACPA and RF were available from our records for 10 patients: respectively 165 IU/l (±130) and 126 UI/l (±105). Mean disease duration at baseline was 11.86 years (±10.8). Clinical characteristics of studied patients are summarized in Table I .
Table I
Epidemiological characteristics and anthropometrics measures of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients
BMI – body mass index, F – female, RA – rheumatoid arthritis, ACPA – anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, RF – rheumatoid factor, IU – international units.
| Parameters | RA patients |
| Number | 20 |
| Gender | F |
| Age [years] | 65.07 ±12.90 |
| Weight [kg] | 67.29 ±14.27 |
| Height [cm] | 164 ±8.238 |
| BMI [kg/m 2 ] | 24.96 ±4.555 |
| Disease duration [years] | 11 ±10.8 |
| ACPA levels [IU/l] | 130 ±165 |
| RF levels [IU/l] | 126 ±105 |
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.0 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California USA ( www.graphpad.com ).
Demographic data were analyzed, and each variable expressed as mean plus standard deviation using descriptive statistics. Inferential statistical tests were used to compare means of each region previously analyzed with DXA. Subsequently, we compared BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and whole femur with the t -test for paired observations if data followed a normal distribution, or using Wilcoxon’s test for paired statistics when data deviated from a Gaussian distribution. The same tests were run to compare each variable derived from body composition analysis. Results were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.
Results
The results showed a significant increase in lumbar spine BMD (1.031 ±0.11 vs. 1.110 ±0.10, p < 0.005), while no significant difference was found for femoral BMD. The data are shown in Figure 1 and Table II .
Table II
Differences in bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline and after 18 months of rituximab (RTX) therapy
Mean values of BMD (g/cm 2 ) at baseline and after 18 months therapy with rituximab ** p < 0.005, ns – not statistically significant.
| BMD [g/cm 2 ] | Baseline ( n = 20) | After 18 months ( n = 20) | p -value |
| Lumbar spine (L1–L4) | 1.031 ±0.11 | 1.110 ±0.10 | 0.0029 ** |
| Whole femur | 0.848 ±0.15 | 0.853 ±0.14 | 0.622 (ns) |
| Femur neck | 0.793 ±0.14 | 0.808 ±0.12 | 0.140 (ns) |

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) expressed in millimeters/hour (available for only 13 matched comparisons) displayed a significant reduction from baseline (32 ±16 vs. 25 ±14, p < 0.0205).
Lean mass and fat mass values increased from baseline, although not significantly (ALM 16.21 ±3.60 vs. 17.84 ±4.03; SMI 6.03 ±0.99 vs. 6.42 ±1.85 ns; body fat % 37.45 ±10.82 vs. 40.19 ±8.44 ns). The results are shown in Table III .
Table III
Changes in body analysis composition at baseline and after 18 months of rituximab (RTX) therapy
Body composition features of RA patients before and after treatment with rituximab, BF – body fat, ALM – appendicular lean mass, SMI – skeletal muscle index.
| Body composition analysis | Baseline | After 18 months | p -value |
| Total lean mass [kg] | 39.94 ±8.74 | 38.64 ±8.19 | 0.278 (ns) |
| BF [%] | 37.45 ±10.82 | 40.19 ±8.44 | 0.248 (ns) |
| ALM [kg] | 16.21 ±3.60 | 17.84 ±4.03 | 0.476 (ns) |
| SMI [kg/m 2 ] | 6.03 ±0.99 | 6.42 ±1.85 | 0.445 (ns) |
| Total fat mass [kg] | 25 ±10.45 | 26.58 ±9.43 | 0.382 (ns) |
| Android fat [%] | 43.07 ±13.33 | 45.89 ±10.54 | 0.320 (ns) |
| Gynoid fat [%] | 40.28 ±10.08 | 43.02 ±10.65 | 0.099 (ns) |
| Android/gynoid fat ratio | 1.07 ±0.28 | 1.10 ±0.31 | 0.999 (ns) |
Discussion
The investigation highlighted a clear and significant increase of vertebral BMD and documented the stability of femoral mineralization in RA patients after 18 months of treatment with B cell depleting therapy. Obtained results may confirm the pathogenic role of activated B cells in bone loss in RA, accordingly with what is reported in the literature [ 6 ].
Several papers demonstrated the active role of B lymphocytes in modulating key osteoclastogenic cytokine RANKL and RANKL/osteoprotegerin (OPG) ratio, therefore actively intervening in bone homeostasis and being the bridge between immune and skeletal systems [ 6 , 8 , 9 ].
Osteoprotegerin belongs to the superfamily of tumor necrosis factor receptors (TNFR), exists only in soluble form and can prevent bone resorption acting as a decoy receptor binding RANKL, thus being a bone savior.
Receptor activator for NF-κB ligand is also a part of the TNFR superfamily, but unlike OPG, which prevents bone loss, is the main actor of bone resorption by promoting osteoclast formation.
B lymphocytes represent an important source of OPG, nevertheless during inflammatory circumstances OPG production decreases, shifting toward RANKL produced by T lymphocytes activated by pro-inflammatory cytokines. The chronic inflammatory stimulus in arthritic patients plays a pivotal role in bone loss by promoting the shift toward RANKL production in B activated lymphocytes, thus altering the RANKL/OPG ratio and facilitating BMD reduction. A significant loss of bone mineralization attributable to an immunological dysfunction of activated B cells is also described in multiple myeloma, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [ 8 ] and periodontal pathology [ 9 ]. Diseases very different from each other but united by RANKL/OPG ratio imbalance and by a high inflammatory load which may lead to the development of bone loss and osteoporosis.
Our results differ from those reported in other papers, where RTX therapy did not produce effects on vertebral BMD and indeed displayed bone loss at the femoral level [ 10 ]. Although these investigations were conducted longitudinally, the follow-up of patients did not exceed 12 months, a time probably insufficient to observe significant changes in BMD. None of our patients were osteoporotic at the beginning of the study and perhaps, starting from a lower degree of mineralization and a larger sample, an improvement in BMD could be observed at the femoral level too. Furthermore, increases of lumbar spine BMD and of muscle masses occurred in patients despite low dose GC therapy in 7 patients and 800 mg of methyl-prednisolone used as premedication during 18 months of therapy. Although the deleterious effects of GCs on bone [ 11 ] and muscle tissues [ 12 ] are known, a paper [ 13 ] demonstrated that a high dose GC pulse therapy did not lower BMD of RA patients during 18 months of follow-up.
Whether these observations are due to a direct effect of therapy on cytokine resources, or to an improvement in quality of life and in an increase of physical activity among RA individuals, remains to be investigated.
An altered body composition, such as an increase in percentage of fat mass, a reduction of muscle mass and a prevalent android fat distribution, in concert with an increased incidence of metabolic syndrome, is widely described in RA [ 14 ]. Several studies have demonstrated that blocking IL-6 [ 15 ] or TNF-α [ 16 ] produced an increase in the BMD in RA patients and improved their body composition [ 17 ]. Contrary to what we expected, RTX therapy did not cause any significant change in patients’ muscle mass or fat mass representation. The anti-CD20 receptor can be expressed by other cell lines [ 18 ] and in RA there is reported an increase in circulating TNF-α as well as IL-6 [ 19 , 20 ]. Many studies highlight the correlation between metabolic syndrome, increased inflammatory state, altered body composition and cardiovascular diseases [ 21 ]. An interesting paper reported that RTX may even lower IL-6 levels [ 12 ].
Based on these assumptions, it would have been expected that in our patients, alongside the preservation of BMD, the B cell depletion therapy produced a change in patients’ body composition too.
Lack of this effect could be due to normal body fat (BF) percentage and muscle mass values displayed by most of our cases, allowing us to speculate that perhaps, in patients with an altered body composition at baseline, an improvement could also be observed in this regard as a consequence of a reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokine serum levels. There was an increase in gynoid masses, although not statistically significant.
Furthermore, an altered body composition [ 14 , 22 ] and low bone mineral density are proven to share the same pathological mechanism of cardiovascular diseases [ 23 ], and this paper may prompt further research on the topic by highlighting the bone sparing effect in RA patients treated with RTX: an impairment of the RANKL/OPG ratio is reported in correlation with arterial atherosclerosis [ 24 ] and in an increase of cardiovascular risk in RA [ 25 ], and thus RTX may play a cardioprotective effect in RA patients, although further investigations are needed to ascertain the validity of this hypothesis.
This study had several limitations due to its retrospective nature: it was not possible to further stratify patients according to their serum vitamin D levels, smoking habits, previous therapies and immunological status. Therefore, it will be necessary to assess prospectively and for an adequate time the effects of RTX on bone homeostasis and body composition.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrated that 20 non-osteoporotic RA patients had a significant increase in vertebral BMD and maintained their femoral BMD unchanged after 18 months of therapy with RTX. This evidence strengthens the hypothesis of bone sparing effects of RTX, despite a bolus of GCs for premedication prior to administration of this biological drug.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1 Aletaha D Neogi T Silman AJ 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative Arthritis Rheum 2010 62 2569 2581 10.1002/art.27584 20872595
2 Compston JE McClung MR Leslie WD Osteoporosis Lancet 2019 393 364 376 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32112-3 30696576
3 Maruotti N Corrado A Cantatore FP Cantatore FP Osteoporosis and rheumatic diseases Reumatismo 2014 66 125 135 10.4081/reumatismo.2014.785 25069494
4 Redlich K Smolen JS Inflammatory bone loss: Pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention Nat Rev Drug Discov 2012 11 234 250 10.1038/nrd3669 22378270
5 Harre U Georgess D Bang H Induction of osteoclastogenesis and bone loss by human autoantibodies against citrullinated vimentin J Clin Invest 2012 122 1791 1802 10.1172/JCI60975 22505457 PMC3336988
6 Titanji K Beyond antibodies: B cells and the OPG/RANK--RANKL pathway in health, non-HIV disease and HIV-induced bone loss Front Immunol 2017 8 1851 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01851 29312334 PMC5743755
7 Baumgartner R Koehler K Gallagher D Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico Am J Epidemiol 1998 147 755 763 [published erratum appears in Am J Epidemiol 1999; 149: 1161] 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009520 9554417
8 Titanji K Vunnava A Sheth AN Dysregulated B cell expression of RANKL and OPG correlates with loss of bone mineral density in HIV infection PLoS Pathog 2014 10 e1004497 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004497 25393853 PMC4231117
9 Nikolajczyk BS B cells as under-appreciated mediators of non-auto-immune inflammatory disease Cytokine 2010 50 234 242 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.02.022 20382544 PMC2917985
10 Wheater G Elshahaly M Naraghi K Changes in bone density and bone turnover in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with rituximab, results from an exploratory, prospective study PLoS One 2018 13 e0201527 10.1371/journal.pone.0201527 30080871 PMC6078302
11 Mitra R Adverse effects of corticosteroids on bone metabolism: A review PM R 2011 3 466 471 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.02.017 21570035
12 Jackman RW Kandarian SC The molecular basis of skeletal muscle atrophy Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2004 287 C834 843 10.1152/ajpcell.00579.2003 15355854
13 Frediani B Falsetti P Bisogno S Effects of high dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy on bone mass and biochemical markers of bone metabolism in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A 12-month randomized prospective controlled study J Rheumatol 2004 31 1083 1087 15170918
14 Kerekes G Nurmohamed MT González-Gay MA Rheumatoid arthritis and metabolic syndrome Nat Rev Rheumatol 2014 10 691 696 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.121 25090948
15 Chen YM Chen HH Huang WN Tocilizumab potentially prevents bone loss in patients with anticitrullinated protein antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis PLoS One 2017 12 e0188454 10.1371/journal.pone.0188454 29155868 PMC5695761
16 Zerbini CAF Clark P Mendez-Sanchez L Biologic therapies and bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis Osteoporos Int 2017 28 429 446 10.1007/s00198-016-3769-2 27796445
17 Tournadre A Pereira B Dutheil F Changes in body composition and metabolic profile during interleukin 6 inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2017 8 639 646 10.1002/jcsm.12189 28316139 PMC5566648
18 Alunno A Carubbi F Bistoni O Interleukin (IL)-17-producing pathogenic T lymphocytes co-express CD20 and are depleted by rituximab in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: A pilot study Clin Exp Immunol 2016 184 284 292 10.1111/cei.12771 26814615 PMC4872384
19 Wei ST Sun YH Zong SH Xiang YB Serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α may correlate with activity and severity of rheumatoid arthritis Med Sci Monit 2015 21 4030 4038 10.12659/MSM.895116 26704133 PMC4694713
20 Barr TA Shen P Brown S B cell depletion therapy ameliorates autoimmune disease through ablation of IL-6-producing B cells J Exp Med 2012 209 1001 1010 10.1084/jem.20111675 22547654 PMC3348102
21 Srikanthan K Feyh A Visweshwar H Systematic review of metabolic syndrome biomarkers: A panel for early detection, management, and risk stratification in the West Virginian population Int J Med Sci 2016 13 25 38 10.7150/ijms.13800 26816492 PMC4716817
22 Gremese E Tolusso B Gigante MR Ferraccioli G Obesity as a risk and severity factor in rheumatic diseases (autoimmune chronic inflammatory diseases) Front Immunol 2014 5 576 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00576 25426122 PMC4227519
23 Lampropoulos CE Papaioannou I D’Cruz DP Osteoporosis – A risk factor for cardiovascular disease? Nat Rev Rheumatol 2012 8 587 598 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.120 22890244
24 Golledge J McCann M Mangan S Osteoprotegerin and osteopontin are expressed at high concentrations within symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis Stroke 2004 35 1636 1641 10.1161/01.STR.0000129790.00318.a3 15143295
25 López-Mejias R Ubilla B Genre F Osteoprotegerin concentrations relate independently to established cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis J Rheumatol 2015 42 39 45 10.3899/jrheum.140690 25362655