Multiple myeloma (MM), also known as myeloma or plasma cell myeloma, is a progressive hematologic disease (Blade & Rosinol, 2007). This plasma cell disorder is characterized by clonal proliferation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow microenvironment, monoclonal protein in the blood or urine, and associated organ dysfunction (Palumbo & Anderson, 2011). Multiple myeloma accounts for approximately 1% of neoplastic diseases and 13% of hematologic cancers (Palumbo & Anderson, 2011). According to the International Myeloma Working Group, symptomatic myeloma diagnostic criteria include greater than 10% plasma cells in the bone marrow and/or the presence of biopsy-proven plasmacytoma, the presence of monoclonal protein in serum and/or urine, and more than one of the myeloma-related organ dysfunctions represented by the acronym CRAB (hyperCalcemia, Renal insufficiency, Anemia, or Bone disease).
Complications often associated with MM include neurologic and hematologic issues, infections, renal insufficiency, and bone involvement. It is crucial for advanced practice professionals caring for myeloma patients to assess patients accurately, be keenly aware of possible associated complications, and be familiar with appropriate interventions to prevent further injury. This article will provide an overview of MM-related renal insufficiency, with a focus on cast nephropathy, venous thromboembolism, and neurologic complications along with various causes and treatment options. Bone involvement, infections, and other hematologic complications including anemia, hypercalcemia, and hyperviscosity will be discussed in a future article.
Renal Insufficiency in Multiple Myeloma
Approximately 20% of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma present with renal failure. Moreover, this end-organ damage is the second most common cause of death in patients with MM (Dimopoulos et al., 2010a). Elevated serum creatinine levels are found in up to one-half of patients, with 20% having a creatinine level greater than 2 g/dL (Tariman, 2010). Multiple myeloma can affect the kidney through the filter, the tubules, or the tissue of the kidney itself. Other causes of renal impairment in patients with MM include acute tubulopathy, amyloid light-chain amyloidosis, light-chain deposition disease, tubulointerstitial nephritis associated with monotypic light-chain deposits, and plasma cell tumor nodules (Dimopoulos et al., 2010a). A biopsy-based diagnosis is important in the evaluation of patients with myeloma because each of the renal lesions has its own therapeutic and prognostic implications (Korbet & Schwartz, 2006). According to Tariman (2010), poor hydration and volume depletion; urinary tract infection and sepsis; nephrotoxins such as certain antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), IV contrast dyes, and bisphosphonates; hypercalcemia and nephrocalcinosis; and hyperuricemia and urate nephropathy can lead to renal dysfunction.
Cast Nephropathy
Cast nephropathy, the most common cause of myeloma-associated renal injury, occurs in at least 30% of patients (Dimopoulos et al., 2010a). This disorder, consisting of light-chain tubular damage, is often referred to as "myeloma kidney" and is the main cause of renal failure in patients with MM. Autopsy studies in patients with myeloma found cast nephropathy in 30% to 50% of cases (Korbet & Schwartz, 2006).
The major site of light-chain metabolism is the kidney, which has many filters called glomeruli. Blood passes through the glomeruli and enters the tubules, where light chains are filtered and catabolized by proximal tubular renal cells (Blade & Rosinol, 2007). This process is exceedingly efficient, and only a minute amount of light-chain protein normally appears in the urine. In the MM setting, abnormal proteins made by the plasma cell are present in the bloodstream and enter the tubules where they may encounter and connect with the Tamm-Horsfall protein, normally found in urine. Together, they form large casts, which lead to kidney damage by blocking the tubules inside the kidney (University of North Carolina [UNC] Kidney Center, 2012). Kidney biopsy is required for diagnosis of myeloma kidney (Figure 1).

Various factors such as dehydration, hypercalcemia, and use of NSAIDs can lead to a decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and promote cast formation in myeloma patients. Dehydration can cause an increase in the plasma concentrations of light chains, which may exceed the proximal tubular cells’ capacity for absorption and catabolism. Hypercalcemia can reduce the GFR by inducing vasoconstriction, and drugs such as NSAIDs can reduce renal blood flow (UNC Kidney Center, 2012). There is a strong correlation between the degree of cast formation and the severity of renal failure. One important issue is that when a light chain is nephrotoxic, it usually causes renal failure from the beginning, even before other clinical manifestations of myeloma (Cibeirab, Blade, & Ludwig, 2009).
The reversibility of renal failure in patients with MM is highly variable (20%–60%). About 50% of patients with serum creatinine lower than 4 mg/dL recover a normal renal function. In contrast, for patients with a serum creatinine higher than 4 mg/dL the recovery rate is lower than 10% (Blade & Rosinol, 2007). In the past few years, the prognosis of these patients has improved due to more effective treatment of the disease and better supportive measures. In any event, the prognosis is strongly linked to the reversibility of renal function (Cibeirab, Blade, & Ludwig, 2009). Factors associated with renal recovery include serum creatinine < 4 mg/dL, 24-hour urine protein < 2 g/24 hr, and serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL (Blade & Rosinol, 2007).
Clonal serum free light chain (FLC) levels can be measured with high sensitivity and specificity and used to rapidly screen for cast nephropathy. A sustained decrease in serum FLC levels within 3 weeks of starting treatment is associated with renal recovery; novel chemotherapy agents can maximize this early response (Cockwell & Hutchison, 2010).
Treatment for kidney disease associated with MM depends upon treating the myeloma itself. Approaches include alkylating-based conventional chemotherapy, high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (Blade & Rosinol, 2007), bortezomib (Velcade) with high-dose dexamethasone, thalidomide (Thalomid), and lenalidomide (Revlimid). The role of plasma exchange in patients with suspected light-chain cast nephropathy and renal impairment is controversial (Dimopoulos et al., 2010b). See Table 1 for key factors to consider in the treatment of biopsy-confirmed cast nephropathy.

Neurologic Complications
The more common neurologic complications seen in patients with MM are spinal cord compression, nerve root compression, intracranial plasmacytomas, peripheral neuropathy, and leptomeningeal involvement (Blade & Rosinol, 2007). It is critical for advanced practice professionals to recognize the sequelae of these complications and administer appropriate treatment as needed.
SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION
The most common and serious neurologic complication associated with MM is spinal cord compression due to a plasmacytoma arising from a vertebral body. Its incidence has been reported as 10%–20% (Blade & Rosinol, 2007). The thoracic spine is the most common site, followed by the lumbar and sacral regions. Patients can present with back pain, increased sensitivity (irritability), and paraparesis (weakness or partial paralysis) that can evolve over days or weeks. The onset can also be abrupt, with severe paraparesis occurring within a few hours. When the lumbar spine is involved, cauda equina syndrome can occur, with symptoms of low back and radicular pain and leg weakness (Gawler, 2004).
Spinal cord compression is a medical emergency that requires an urgent MRI when it is suspected. Treatment with dexamethasone plus radiation therapy must be initiated immediately if diagnosis is confirmed (Posner, 1987). In rare cases, spinal cord compression can be caused by vertebral collapse or spinal instability. Treatment in these cases involves urgent surgical decompression and insertion of a bone graft prosthesis (Gawler, 2004).
NERVE ROOT COMPRESSION
Multiple myeloma patients can also develop radicular pain without evidence of spinal cord compression, which is referred to as nerve root compression. In this case, symptoms include back pain with "radicular metameric radiation" (Blade & Rosinol, 2007) and radicular sensory involvement. This can be interpreted as radiating pain or symptoms along the distribution of a nerve root or corresponding nerve roots in a structural pattern. Treatment is similar to that for spinal cord compression: dexamethasone and radiation therapy to relieve symptoms while waiting for systemic therapy to work (Posner, 1987).
INTRACRANIAL PLASMACYTOMAS
Although the skull is frequently involved in MM, it is very rare to see intracranial plasmacytomas. Myeloma involvement of the skull base can, however, extend into the orbits, causing orbital pain, exophthalmos, and diplopia (Woodruff & Ireton, 1982). Diplopia can occur from the direct effect of an orbital plasmacytoma or from ophthalmoplegia caused by cranial nerve involvement within the orbits (Blade & Rosinol, 2007). In the evaluation of orbital involvement, CT scans are the most useful, but they must carefully explore all regions so as not to miss any lesions (Gawler, 2004). Another rare occurrence in this category is MM skull expansion resulting in subdural plasmacytoma, direct leptomeningeal infiltration, or brain plasmacytoma (Woodruff & Ireton, 1982). Primary intracranial plasmacytomas are extremely rare and can be associated with intratumor bleeding (Henson & Urich, 1982). With direct or hematogenous leptomeningeal involvement, the advanced practice professional can see spastic paraparesis on MRI imaging, suggesting a parasagittal meningioma (Gawler, 2004).
PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY
Peripheral neuropathy (PN) includes injury, inflammation, or degeneration of the peripheral nerve fibers. As it can affect the sensory, motor, and autonomic nervous systems, the advanced practice professional needs to fully assess each one of these areas. The incidence of PN can be found in over one-third of patients with MM; this is much higher than the incidence in the general population, which usually ranges from 2.4% to 8% (Tariman et al., 2008).
In some cases of PN, the M (monoclonal) protein plays a definite pathogenic role, for example, the neuropathy associated with immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti–myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) and in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (Gawler, 2004). According to Latov, Hays, and Sherman (1988), anti-MAG antibodies are found in 50% to 60% of patients with IgM peripheral neuropathies.
Characteristics of IgM-associated neuropathies include sensory impairment and a milder course. The main disabilities are caused by hand tremors and gait ataxia (Nobile-Orazio, Meucci, Baldini, DiTroia, Scarlato, 2000). Improvement in anti-MAG–associated neuropathy has been reported with plasma exchange, chlorambucil (Leukeran), fludarabine, and rituximab (Rituxan; Blade & Rosinol, 2007). As noted by Nobile-Orazio et al. (2000), in an outcome analysis of 25 patients with neuropathy and high anti-MAG IgM after a mean follow-up of 8.5 years, the majority of patients had a favorable prognosis, even after several years. Additionally, current immune therapies, though temporarily effective in half of the patients, are associated with considerable side effects that limit their prolonged use and efficacy. This would suggest that until more effective or safer therapies become available, they should most likely be reserved for patients impaired in their daily life or in a progressive phase of the disease. The effect of treatment on the long-term prognosis of the neuropathies remains unclear (Nobile-Orazio et al., 2000).
The incidence of PN in patients with IgG or IgA multiple myeloma is lower than in those with the IgM type (Blade & Rosinol, 2007). This PN resembles chronic inflammatory demyelinating PN and can be either demyelinating or axonal. Patients with IgG- or IgA-associated PN usually respond better than those with the IgM type (Gawler, 2004). A cause of PN in patients with monoclonal gammopathies may be axonal degeneration related to amyloid deposition. It has been reported that severe orthostatic hypotension may result from autonomic nervous system involvement by amyloids (Blade & Rosinol, 2007).
LEPTOMENINGEAL INVOLVEMENT
Leptomeningeal involvement of MM refers to involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) with detection of plasma cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which is very unusual (Blade & Rosinol, 2007). A series of 25 cases of leptomeningeal involvement with MM seen at the University of Arkansas has been reported by Fassas et al. (2004), as well as the features seen in 71 reported cases that were reviewed. See Table 2 for a summary of their findings.

Although leptomeningeal involvement is very rare in MM (only about 1%), the advanced practice professional needs to be aware of the presenting symptoms. These include paraparesis, symptoms associated with increased intracranial pressure, cranial nerve palsies (particularly nerves V and IV), and confusion (Woodruff & Ireton, 1982). A CSF exam usually shows plasma cells with plasmablastic morphology, as well as increased protein levels and a positive immunofixation for the M protein (Blade & Rosinol, 2007). MRI results reveal a diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement, with or without additional findings such as a mass.
Treatment includes intrathecal therapy with methotrexate, hydrocortisone, cytarabine, cranial or cranial-spinal radiation, as well as systemic MM therapy (Fassas et al., 2004). Unfortunately. the prognosis is very poor, with a median survival of only 3 months from diagnosis of CNS involvement (Fassas et al., 2004).
Venous Thromboembolism
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication of MM that presents as a deep-vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. Along with other hematologic malignancies, MM carries the highest risk of VTE, with up to a 28-fold increase in risk compared to the general population (Blom, Doggen, Osanto, & Rosendaal, 2005). Although the development of VTE has not been shown to adversely affect overall survival or time to progression, this complication not only contributes to the morbidity of myeloma but also affects the patient’s quality of life and cost of care (Menon, Rajkumar, Lacy, Falco, & Palumbo, 2008; Zangari et al., 2010; Baz et al., 2005). Advanced practitioners caring for MM patients need to accurately assess each patient’s risk for VTE and provide appropriate thrombophylaxis measures to ideally prevent this complication.
While the exact mechanism of the pathogenesis of VTE in cancer still remains unclear, Falanga and Marchetti (2009) describe this process in the context of Virchow’s triad, which purports that clot formation is a process that involves abnormalities in three areas: blood flow (venous stasis), vessel wall injury, and a hypercoagulable state. Multiple myeloma causes numerous hemostatic abnormalities that will directly or indirectly affect all three areas of the triad, ultimately resulting in a prothrombotic state. Numerous manifestations of myeloma, such as lytic lesions, anemia, and fatigue associated with advanced or progressive disease, can have a negative impact on a patient’s mobility status contributing to increased venous stasis. Additionally, the presence of a paraprotein in the blood leads to a hyperviscous state, thereby reducing the velocity of blood flow. Central venous catheters and surgeries such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty lead to vascular wall injury and damage (Rome et al., 2008).
At the molecular level, endothelial injury is incurred via the proangiogenic microenvironment of myeloma, with increased production of vascular endothelial growth factor (Uaprasert, Voorhees, Mackman, & Key, 2010). Overexpression of adhesion molecules on both the tumor cells and vascular cells lead to increased interaction among the cells, adding to further vessel wall injury (Falanga & Marchetti, 2009; Hussein, 2006; Uaprasert et al., 2010). Multiple myeloma also greatly contributes to a hypercoagulable state via numerous mechanisms, including increased secretion of inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor–alpha) that upregulate the expression of tissue factor (a potent initiator of coagulation), paraprotein interference with fibrin structure resulting in delayed fibrinolysis, increased rates of acquired protein C resistance, and the presence of autoantibodies to inherent anticoagulants (Eby, 2009; Zangari et al., 2003; Menon et al., 2008; Uaprasert et al., 2010). Ultimately, all of these changes produce activation of the coagulation pathway coupled with a reduction in anticoagulation mechanisms, tipping the balance toward clot formation (Hussein, 2006).
RISK FACTORS
Risk factors for VTE in MM are numerous and can be cumulative (Kristinsson, 2010; Niesvizky & Badros, 2010). In a review of over 1,700 MM patients from a managed care database, 66.3% of patients had at least 1 VTE risk factor and 48.3% had at least 2 risk factors (Brandenburg, Goss, Knight, Xiao, & Knight, 2008). Risk level can vary depending upon differences in individual factors. Table 3 presents VTE risk factors and recommendations for prophylaxis; Table 4 provides recommendations for treatment. It is also important to note that these risks can change over time (i.e., age, comorbidities, treatment regimens), highlighting the need for ongoing risk assessment with modifications to thromboprophylaxis as the risk level changes. Patient factors that increase risk include reduced mobility status, age, presence of a central line, and any recent hospitalization/surgery or acute illness such as infection. While routine screening for inherited thrombophilia is not currently recommended, a thorough history should be conducted to determine whether the patient or any family members have had clotting disorders that may suggest an inherited or genetic risk for VTE (Kristinsson, 2010; Palumbo et al., 2008). Comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, as well as certain medications, can also escalate the risk for thrombosis.

Apart from a patient’s individual risk, clinical studies have identified both MM the disease as well as regimens used in its treatment as discrete risk factors for VTE (Palumbo et al., 2008; Uaprasert et al., 2010). Specific myeloma disease factors to consider are time from diagnosis, level of tumor burden, and the presence of hyperviscosity (Hussein 2006; Uaprasert et al., 2010, Kristinsson, 2010). In 2008, Kristinsson and colleagues identified 6,192 MM patients in a database of 4 million veterans. Compared with all other patients, the MM population had a 9.2-fold increase in deep-vein thrombosis risk, with the greatest risk observed during the first year following diagnosis (Kristinsson et al., 2008). Similarly, numerous clinical studies have documented VTEs occurring within the first few months of diagnosis, with a majority occurring within the first 2 to 6 months (Srkalovic et al., 2004; Palumbo et al., 2008).
Unusually high levels of procoagulant proteins, such as fibrinogen and factor VIII coagulant activity, have been documented in MM patients with advanced disease, supporting the theory that high tumor burden is also associated with increasing thrombosis risk (Auwerda, Sonneveld, de Maat, & Leeback, 2007; van Marion et al., 2008). Moreover, studies have documented higher rates of acquired resistance to activated protein C among MM patients, a condition that is associated with increased VTE risk. Patients who responded to treatment with a reduction in M-protein levels were documented to have decreasing levels of activated protein C resistance (Elice, Fink, Tricot, Barlogie & Zangari, 2006; Zangari et al., 2002).
More recently, the type of medication used to treat MM has been noted to dramatically affect VTE risk in MM patients. Prior to the introduction of the immunomodulatory (IMID) agents thalidomide and lenalidomide, the incidence of VTE in MM was lower than in many other malignancies (Rajkumar, 2005; Menon et al., 2008). A large part of this risk seems to be derived from the use of IMIDs in combination therapy vs. as single agents (Niesvizky & Badros, 2010; Palumbo et al., 2008). Rates of VTE with single-agent thalidomide use are approximately 5% in both newly diagnosed and relapsed refractory patients; however, when combined with dexamethasone, the risk increases 8-fold (El Accaoui, Shamseddeen & Taher, 2007). Studies examining the use of thalidomide as maintenance therapy have reported lower rates of VTE, probably due to low tumor burden (Uaprasert et al., 2010).
More importantly, the dose of dexamethasone is correlated to level of risk, with higher dosages being associated with increasing thrombotic complications. In a recent trial examining the use of lenalidomide in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (160 mg/month) vs. high-dose dexamethasone (480 mg/month), the incidence of VTE was 8% in the low-dose arm compared to 23% in the high-dose arm (Rajkumar et al., 2010). The use of IMIDs in combination with doxorubicin, erythropoietin-stimulating agents, and multiagent chemotherapy also increases the risk of VTE (Knight, DeLap, & Zledis, 2006; Kristinsson, 2010; Zangari et al., 2003; Palumbo et al., 2008).
Prior to initiating any treatment for myeloma, advanced practitioners need to assess baseline VTE risk incurred from the selected therapy along with any individual and disease-related risk factors. The overall goal of thromboprophylaxis should be to reduce the risk of VTE to less than 10% while using the safest and least cumbersome method for each individual (Palumbo et al., 2008). To date, ongoing clinical trials have demonstrated aspirin, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and full-dose warfarin as effective methods of reducing thrombotic complications (Pulmonary Embolism Prevention [PEP] Trial Group, 2000; Zonder et al., 2006; Palumbo et al., 2008; Kristinsson, 2010).
In contrast, the use of fixed low-dose warfarin has not been shown to be effective in VTE prevention (Zangari et al., 2004; Barlogie et al., 2006). Specific recommendations from the International Myeloma Working Group are outlined in Table 3.
It is recommended that all newly diagnosed patients who receive an IMID in combination with dexamethasone or chemotherapy be given some form of VTE prophylaxis (Palumbo et al., 2008). Aspirin may be considered in patients with only one individual or myeloma risk factor and for those using low-dose dexamethasone in combination with IMIDs. Full-dose warfarin or LMWH is indicated in patients with two or more risk factors or in those receiving IMIDs combined with high-dose dexamethasone, doxorubicin, or multiagent chemotherapy (Palumbo et al., 2008). The duration of prophylaxis will vary according to the length of treatment and change in disease status, with 4 to 6 months being cited as reasonable (Niesvizky & Badros, 2010; Kristinsson, 2010). Other factors to consider are a patient’s risk of severe thrombocytopenia, in which long-acting warfarin may be contraindicated, and avoidance of LMWH, which is renally excreted, in patients with renal failure (Paydas, 2008). In patients who experience VTE, the goals of treatment should be to identify the complication as quickly as possible, prevent embolization, and prevent recurrence of DVT (Niesvizky & Badros, 2010; Palumbo et al., 2008). Recommendations for the management of VTE in myeloma patients are also highlighted in Table 4.
Implications for Advanced Practice
Disease-related complications can be numerous and may include renal insufficiency, anemia, bone marrow failure, hypercalcemia, bleeding disorders, infections, pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, spinal cord and nerve root compression, intracranial plasmacytomas, and leptomeningeal involvement (Blade & Rosinol, 2007).

Identifying and providing early intervention is crucial to preventing further injury. Without expert assessment and appropriate interventions, complications associated with this complex progressive hematologic disease may become life threatening. Advanced practice professionals must have a thorough understanding of myeloma biology and the various complications to provide expert care to patients and improve overall quality of life.
Conclusion
At any one time in the United States, there are approximately 100,000 people undergoing treatment for MM, with approximately 20,000 new cases being diagnosed each year (International Myeloma Foundation, 2012). In addition, according to Palumbo and Anderson (2011), the introduction of autologous stem-cell transplantation and the availability of agents such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib have changed the management of myeloma and extended overall survival.
Ellen Sullivan, Lisa C. Smith, and Angela M. Falco are employees of Celgene Corporation
1 Auwerda Johannes J A Sonneveld Pieter de Maat Monica P M Leebeek Frank W G Prothrombotic coagulation abnormalities in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2007 92 279 280 17296591 10.3324/haematol.10454
2 Barlogie Bart Tricot Guido Anaissie Elias Shaughnessy John Rasmussen Erik van Rhee Frits Fassas Athanasios Zangari Maurizio Hollmig Klaus Pineda-Roman Mauricio Lee Choon Talamo Giampaolo Thertulien Raymond Kiwan Elias Krishna Somashekar Fox Michele Crowley John Thalidomide and hematopoietic-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. The New England journal of medicine 2006 354 1021 1030 16525139 10.1056/NEJMoa053583
3 Baz Rachid Li Liang Kottke-Marchant Kandice Srkalovic Gordan McGowan Bridget Yiannaki Erin Karam Mary Ann Faiman Beth Jawde Rony Abou Andresen Steven Zeldis Jerome Hussein Mohamad A The role of aspirin in the prevention of thrombotic complications of thalidomide and anthracycline-based chemotherapy for multiple myeloma. Mayo Clinic proceedings 2005 80 1568 1574 16342649 10.4065/80.12.1568
4 Blade J. Rosinol L. Complications of multiple myeloma Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America 2007 21 1231 1246 17996596 10.1016/j.hoc.2007.08.006
5 Blom Jeanet W Doggen Carine J M Osanto Susanne Rosendaal Frits R Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2005 293 715 722 15701913 10.1001/jama.293.6.715
6 Brandenburg N. A. Goss T. F. Knight T. Xiao X. Knight R. Evaluation of the relationship between venous thromboembolism risk factors and the use of antithrombotic prophylaxis in multiple myeloma patients treated with thalidomide and dexamethasone combination regimens [Abstract 2369] Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2008 112
7 Terpos Evangelos Cibeira M Teresa Blade Joan Ludwig Heinz Management of complications in multiple myeloma. Seminars in hematology 2009 46 176 189 19389501 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2009.01.005
8 Cockwell Paul Hutchison Colin A Management options for cast nephropathy in multiple myeloma. Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension 2010 19 550 555 20827195 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32833ef72c
9 Dimopoulos Meletios Alegre Adrian Stadtmauer Edward A Goldschmidt Hartmut Zonder Jeffrey A de Castro Carlos M Masliak Zvenyslava Reece Donna Olesnyckyj Marta Yu Zhinuan Weber Donna M The efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma patients with impaired renal function. Cancer 2010 116 3807 3814 20564094 10.1002/cncr.25139 PMC2970911
10 Dimopoulos Meletios A Terpos Evangelos Chanan-Khan Asher Leung Nelson Ludwig Heinz Jagannath Sundar Niesvizky Ruben Giralt Sergio Fermand Jean-Paul Bladé Joan Comenzo Raymond L Sezer Orhan Palumbo Antonio Harousseau Jean-Luc Richardson Paul G Barlogie Bart Anderson Kenneth C Sonneveld Pieter Tosi Patrizia Cavo Michele Rajkumar S Vincent Durie Brian G M San Miguel Jésus Renal impairment in patients with multiple myeloma: a consensus statement on behalf of the International Myeloma Working Group. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2010 28 4976 4984 20956629 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.8791
11 Eby Charles Pathogenesis and management of bleeding and thrombosis in plasma cell dyscrasias. British journal of haematology 2009 145 151 163 19210509 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07577.x
12 El Accaoui Ramzi N Shamseddeen Wael A Taher Ali T Thalidomide and thrombosis. A meta-analysis. Thrombosis and haemostasis 2007 97 1031 1036 17549307
13 Elice Francesca Fink Louis Tricot Guido Barlogie Bart Zangari Maurizio Acquired resistance to activated protein C (aAPCR) in multiple myeloma is a transitory abnormality associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. British journal of haematology 2006 134 399 405 16882132 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06208.x
14 Falanga Anna Marchetti Marina Venous thromboembolism in the hematologic malignancies. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 27 4848 4857 19752334 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8197
15 Fassas Athanasios B T Ward Susan Muwalla Firas Van Hemert Rudy Schluterman Keith Harik Sami Tricot Guido Myeloma of the central nervous system: strong association with unfavorable chromosomal abnormalities and other high-risk disease features. Leukemia & lymphoma 2004 45 291 300 15101714 10.1080/10428190310001597964
16 Gawler J. Malpas J. S. Bergsagel D. E. Kyle R. A. Neurological manifestations of multiple myeloma and their management Myeloma: Biology and management Philadelphia Saunders 2004 269 293
17 Goldschmidt H Lannert H Bommer J Ho A D Multiple myeloma and renal failure. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association 2000 15 301 304 10.1093/ndt/15.3.301 10692511
18 Henson R. A. Urich H. Cancer and nervous system: The neurological manifestations of systemic malignant disease Oxford: Blackwell Scientific 1982
19 Hussein Mohamad A Thromboembolism risk reduction in multiple myeloma patients treated with immunomodulatory drug combinations. Thrombosis and haemostasis 2006 95 924 930 16732369 10.1160/TH06-02-0080
20 International Myeloma Foundation 2012 Retrieved from www.myeloma.org
21 Klein Ulrike Kosely Florentina Hillengass Jens Hundemer Michael Schmitt Stefan Neben Kai Moehler Thomas Hegenbart Ute Ho Anthony D Goldschmidt Hartmut Effective prophylaxis of thromboembolic complications with low molecular weight heparin in relapsed multiple myeloma patients treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Annals of hematology 2009 88 67 71 18668241 10.1007/s00277-008-0561-1
22 Knight Robert DeLap Robert J Zeldis Jerome B Lenalidomide and venous thrombosis in multiple myeloma. The New England journal of medicine 2006 354 2079 2080 16687729 10.1056/NEJMc053530
23 Korbet Stephen M Schwartz Melvin M Multiple myeloma. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN 2006 17 2533 2545 16885408 10.1681/ASN.2006020139
24 Kristinsson Sigurdur Yngvi Thrombosis in multiple myeloma. Hematology / the Education Program of the American Society of Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program 2010 2010 437 444 21239832 10.1182/asheducation-2010.1.437
25 Kristinsson Sigurdur Y Fears Thomas R Gridley Gloria Turesson Ingemar Mellqvist Ulf-Henrik Björkholm Magnus Landgren Ola Deep vein thrombosis after monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma. Blood 2008 112 3582 3586 18559977 10.1182/blood-2008-04-151076 PMC2572787
26 Latov N Hays A P Sherman W H Peripheral neuropathy and anti-MAG antibodies. Critical reviews in neurobiology 1988 3 301 332 2458847
27 Menon Smitha Patiyil Rajkumar S Vincent Lacy Martha Falco Patrizia Palumbo Antonio Thromboembolic events with lenalidomide-based therapy for multiple myeloma. Cancer 2008 112 1522 1528 18278812 10.1002/cncr.23336 PMC2614405
28 Niesvizky Ruben Badros Ashraf Z Complications of multiple myeloma therapy, part 2: risk reduction and management of venous thromboembolism, osteonecrosis of the jaw, renal complications, and anemia. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN 2010 8 Suppl 1 S13 20 20141670 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0112
29 Nobile-Orazio E Meucci N Baldini L Di Troia A Scarlato G Long-term prognosis of neuropathy associated with anti-MAG IgM M-proteins and its relationship to immune therapies. Brain : a journal of neurology 2000 123 ( Pt 4) 710 717 10734002 10.1093/brain/123.4.710
30 Palumbo Antonio Anderson Kenneth Multiple myeloma. The New England journal of medicine 2011 364 1046 1060 21410373 10.1056/NEJMra1011442
31 Palumbo A Rajkumar S V Dimopoulos M A Richardson P G San Miguel J Barlogie B Harousseau J Zonder J A Cavo M Zangari M Attal M Belch A Knop S Joshua D Sezer O Ludwig H Vesole D Bladé J Kyle R Westin J Weber D Bringhen S Niesvizky R Waage A von Lilienfeld-Toal M Lonial S Morgan G J Orlowski R Z Shimizu K Anderson K C Boccadoro M Durie B G Sonneveld P Hussein M A Prevention of thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated thrombosis in myeloma. Leukemia 2008 22 414 423 18094721 10.1038/sj.leu.2405062
32 Parmar M. S. Light chain-associated renal disorders 2011 Retrieved from http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/244082-overview
33 Paydas Semra Tailored thromboprophylaxis for patients with multiple myeloma treated by IMIDs. Leukemia & lymphoma 2008 49 1644 1645 18766977 10.1080/10428190802187155
34 Posner J B Back pain and epidural spinal cord compression. The Medical clinics of North America 1987 71 185 205 2950289 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30865-3
35 Pulmonary Embolism Prevention (PEP) Trial Collaborative Group. 2000 Prevention of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis with low dose aspirin: Pulmonary Embolism Prevention (PEP) Trial. Lancet 35 1295 1302 10776741
36 Rajkumar S Vincent Hayman Suzanne R Lacy Martha Q Dispenzieri Angela Geyer Susan M Kabat Brian Zeldenrust Steven R Kumar Shaji Greipp Philip R Fonseca Rafael Lust John A Russell Stephen J Kyle Robert A Witzig Thomas E Gertz Morie A Combination therapy with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rev/Dex) for newly diagnosed myeloma. Blood 2005 106 4050 4053 16118317 10.1182/blood-2005-07-2817 PMC1895238
37 Rajkumar S Vincent Jacobus Susanna Callander Natalie S Fonseca Rafael Vesole David H Williams Michael E Abonour Rafat Siegel David S Katz Michael Greipp Philip R Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an open-label randomised controlled trial. The lancet oncology 2010 11 29 37 19853510 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70284-0 PMC3042271
38 Rome Sandra Doss Deborah Miller Kena Westphal Jeanne Thromboembolic events associated with novel therapies in patients with multiple myeloma: consensus statement of the IMF Nurse Leadership Board. Clinical journal of oncology nursing 2008 12 21 28 18490254 10.1188/08.CJON.S1.21-27
39 Srkalovic Gordan Cameron Marte G Rybicki Lisa Deitcher Steven R Kattke-Marchant Kandice Hussein Mohamad A Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma are associated with an increased incidence of venothromboembolic disease. Cancer 2004 101 558 566 15274069 10.1002/cncr.20405
40 Tariman J. D. Pittsburgh,PA: Oncology Nursing Society Multiple myeloma—A textbook for nurses 2010
41 Tariman Joseph D Love Ginger McCullagh Emily Sandifer Stacey Peripheral neuropathy associated with novel therapies in patients with multiple myeloma: consensus statement of the IMF Nurse Leadership Board. Clinical journal of oncology nursing 2008 12 29 36 18490255 10.1188/08.CJON.S1.29-35 PMC4042669
42 Uaprasert Noppacharn Voorhees Peter M Mackman Nigel Key Nigel S Venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma: current perspectives in pathogenesis. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) 2010 46 1790 1799 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.007 20385482
43 Myeloma kidney University of North Carolina Kidney Center 2012 Retrieved from http://unckidneycenter.org/kidneyhealthlibrary/myeloma.html
44 van Marion Adriana M W Auwerda Johannes J A Lisman Ton Sonneveld Pieter de Maat M P M Lokhorst Henk M Leebeek Frank W G Prospective evaluation of coagulopathy in multiple myeloma patients before, during and after various chemotherapeutic regimens. Leukemia research 2008 32 1078 1084 18241919 10.1016/j.leukres.2007.12.002
45 Woodruff R K Ireton H J Multiple cranial nerve palsies as the presenting feature of meningeal myelomatosis. Cancer 1982 49 1710 1712 7066871 10.1002/1097-0142(19820415)49:8<1710::aid-cncr2820490829>3.0.co;2-h
46 Zangari Maurizio Barlogie Bart Anaissie Elias Saghafifar Fariba Eddlemon Paul Jacobson Joth Lee Choon-Kee Thertulien Raymond Talamo Giampaolo Thomas Teri Van Rhee Frits Fassas Athanasios Fink Louis Tricot Guido Deep vein thrombosis in patients with multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide and chemotherapy: effects of prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation. British journal of haematology 2004 126 715 721 15327525 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05078.x
47 Zangari Maurizio Barlogie Bart Cavallo Federica Bolejack Vanessa Fink Louis Tricot Guido Effect on survival of treatment-associated venous thromboembolism in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis 2007 18 595 598 17890944 10.1097/MBC.0b013e3281067fb2
48 Zangari M Saghafifar F Anaissie E Badros A Desikan R Fassas A Mehta P Morris C Toor A Whitfield D Siegel E Barlogie B Fink L Tricot G Activated protein C resistance in the absence of factor V Leiden mutation is a common finding in multiple myeloma and is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic complications. Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis 2002 13 187 192 11943931 10.1097/00001721-200204000-00003
49 Zangari Maurizio Saghafifar Fariba Mehta Paulette Barlogie Bart Fink Louis Tricot Guido The blood coagulation mechanism in multiple myeloma. Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 2003 29 275 282 12888931 10.1055/s-2003-40965
50 Zangari Maurizio Tricot Guido Polavaram Latha Zhan Fenghuang Finlayson Ashlie Knight Robert Fu Tommy Weber Donna Dimopoulos Meletios A Niesvizky Ruben Fink Louis Survival effect of venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and high-dose dexamethasone. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2010 28 132 135 19901114 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0169
51 Zonder J. A. Barlogie B. Drurie B. G. McCoy J. Crowley J. Hussein M. A. Thrombotic complications in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Benefit of aspirin prophylaxis Blood 2006 108 403 403 10.1182/blood-2006-01-0154 16790586