MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100210

Медицинская библиотека · AJOG global reports · 2023

The likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer with endometrium prepared by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen: a propensity-score matching study.

Wang Ze, Zhang Yingxin, Shang Xue, Miao Ruolan, Yin Mengfei, Yang Huiming, Yu Yunhai, Wei Daimin

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The number of frozen embryo transfer cycles is increasing, but the optimal method of endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer remains controversial. Few studies have investigated the healthy live birth outcome after the natural ovulation regimen vs the programmed regimen.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore whether the likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer differs between the natural ovulation regimen and the programmed regimen.

STUDY

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 7824 ovulatory women who underwent the first frozen embryo transfer cycle of single-blastocyst transfer with endometrial preparation by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen, between June 2017 and June 2021. Propensity score matching was used to control for confounding variables in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was healthy live birth, defined as birth of a live, singleton infant born at term, with an appropriate birthweight for gestational age.

RESULTS

The natural ovulation regimen resulted in a higher probability of achieving healthy live birth compared with the programmed regimen (35.8% vs 30.6%; P<.0001). In addition, a higher rate of singleton live birth was observed after the natural ovulation regimen relative to the programmed regimen (49.6% vs 45.7%; P=.003). Women with the natural ovulation regimen were also less likely to experience clinical pregnancy loss (16.0% vs 19.7%; P=.005) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (3.9% vs 6.0%; P=.004) compared with women with the programmed regimen. Singletons born after the programmed regimen had greater mean birthweight (3441.50±539.97 vs 3394.96±503.87; P=.020) and higher risk of being large for gestational age (23.3% vs 18.7%; P=.003) than those conceived after the natural ovulation regimen.

CONCLUSION

The natural ovulation regimen may be superior to the programmed regimen with regard to higher likelihood of healthy live birth and lower risk of pregnancy loss and maternal hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Для цитирования: Wang Ze, Zhang Yingxin, Shang Xue, Miao Ruolan, Yin Mengfei, Yang Huiming, Yu Yunhai, Wei Daimin. The likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer with endometrium prepared by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen: a propensity-score matching study.. AJOG global reports. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100210.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.