Commentary on stimulus-induced arousal with transient electroencephalographic improvement distinguishes nonictal from ictal generalized periodic discharges.

Here we critique recent arguments proposing to distinguish ictal from non-ictal generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) based on etiology and stimulation response, arguing that these are unreliable. We advocate for an empirical approach to GPDs: describe objectively, interpret through medication trials, and base further treatment on response. We call for evidence-based approaches considering meaningful clinical outcomes.