Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023
Harm due to the use of pressure bandage immobilisation in patients bitten by snakes in Australia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Little Mark
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pressure bandage immobilisation has remained the recommended first aid treatment for more than 40 years in Australia. However, whilst it is used in most people bitten by a snake, it is often applied poorly, and patients have been envenomed despite good pressure bandage immobilisation. We report two patients who suffered harm from this procedure.
CASE REPORTS: Two men, a 35-year-old and a 44-year-old, were bitten by snakes. Both had a prompt application of pressure bandage immobilisation, and both reported significant pain requiring opioid analgesia whilst being transferred from remote Australia to Cairns Hospital, Queensland. There were substantial delays (9.5 h and 7.5 h) before the pressure bandage immobilisation was released. As a result, both patients developed severe rhabdomyolysis (33,600 U/L and 16,800 U/L [normal < 171 U/L], respectively); there was no evidence of systemic envenoming. The 35-year-old developed a compartment syndrome that required urgent and repeated surgery. The 44-year-old has ongoing foot paraesthesia two years after the bite.
CONCLUSION: With limited good evidence of benefit, and many issues with its use, I recommend that pressure bandage immobilisation as a first aid measure for snakebite in Australia needs to be re-examined.
CASE REPORTS: Two men, a 35-year-old and a 44-year-old, were bitten by snakes. Both had a prompt application of pressure bandage immobilisation, and both reported significant pain requiring opioid analgesia whilst being transferred from remote Australia to Cairns Hospital, Queensland. There were substantial delays (9.5 h and 7.5 h) before the pressure bandage immobilisation was released. As a result, both patients developed severe rhabdomyolysis (33,600 U/L and 16,800 U/L [normal < 171 U/L], respectively); there was no evidence of systemic envenoming. The 35-year-old developed a compartment syndrome that required urgent and repeated surgery. The 44-year-old has ongoing foot paraesthesia two years after the bite.
CONCLUSION: With limited good evidence of benefit, and many issues with its use, I recommend that pressure bandage immobilisation as a first aid measure for snakebite in Australia needs to be re-examined.