MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4142/jvs.22105

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of veterinary science · 2022

Clinical features and management of snake bites in 70 dogs in Korea.

Kim Dongseok, Kim Seonghoon, Kim Jin-Kyung, Lim Jae Hyun, Choi Geonho, Bae Seulgi, Kwon Young-Sam, Jang Min

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Snakebites remain a devastating and life-threatening environmental hazard. While the management of snakebites has been well described in humans, few clinical data and guidelines exist for dogs, especially in Korea.

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study evaluated the clinical features of 70 dogs with snakebite wounds in Korea.

METHODS

The medical records of 72 dogs that presented to three animal hospitals from June 2008 to July 2021 were reviewed; among these, 70 dogs that met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Their signalment, history, clinical signs, physical examination, blood analysis, treatment, and prognosis were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 70 dog owners, 35 (50%) witnessed the bite, with a mean time between bite and hospital presentation of 9.7 ± 4.1 h in 58 dogs. Blood smears were evaluated in 45 dogs, of which 28 (62%) showed echinocytosis. Anemia and acute kidney injury were found in 21 (29%) and 2 dogs (3%), respectively. A total of 37 dogs (53%) were hospitalized, 5 (7%) of which died.

CONCLUSIONS

The most significant finding was the high prevalence of echinocytosis. The data from this retrospective study could inform the management of dogs bitten by snakes in Korea.

Для цитирования: Kim Dongseok, Kim Seonghoon, Kim Jin-Kyung, Lim Jae Hyun, Choi Geonho, Bae Seulgi, Kwon Young-Sam, Jang Min. Clinical features and management of snake bites in 70 dogs in Korea.. Journal of veterinary science. 2022. DOI: 10.4142/jvs.22105.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.