Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021
First step in assessment of VipGrade®, a computerized clinical decision system to assess Vipera envenomation grading: a single-center interrater reliability study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boels David, Courtois Arnaud, Paradis Camille, Caillet Pascal, Labadie Magali
Аннотация
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of Vipera spp. snakebite cases registered by the PCC of Bordeaux, France, between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, evaluating the agreement between VipGrade® assessments, toxicologists' assessments, and current guidelines.
RESULTS: 133 patients with Vipera aspis snakebites were included. There was 100% agreement in severity grading by PCC guidelines and VipGrade®. However, grading by toxicologists and VipGrade® diverged in 19 cases (85% agreement; κ = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.87).
CONCLUSIONS: The VipGrade® tool's grading reflects current PCC guidelines, which are authoritative in France, and may allow for a more rapid and standardized determination of management and follow-up of viper-bitten patients. It should be noted, however, that the more complex and dynamic aspects of management are not included in VipGrade®. Its purpose is to supplement, not replace, the advice of the PCC's clinical toxicologists, and this advice should be sought whenever a viper bite is encountered in clinical practice.
RESULTS: 133 patients with Vipera aspis snakebites were included. There was 100% agreement in severity grading by PCC guidelines and VipGrade®. However, grading by toxicologists and VipGrade® diverged in 19 cases (85% agreement; κ = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.87).
CONCLUSIONS: The VipGrade® tool's grading reflects current PCC guidelines, which are authoritative in France, and may allow for a more rapid and standardized determination of management and follow-up of viper-bitten patients. It should be noted, however, that the more complex and dynamic aspects of management are not included in VipGrade®. Its purpose is to supplement, not replace, the advice of the PCC's clinical toxicologists, and this advice should be sought whenever a viper bite is encountered in clinical practice.