MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2460/javma.238.5.631

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · 2011

Rattlesnake envenomation in horses: 58 cases (1992-2009).

Fielding C Langdon, Pusterla Nicola, Magdesian K Gary, Higgins Jill C, Meier Chloe A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To characterize signalment, clinical and laboratory findings, treatment, and outcome in horses with rattlesnake envenomation in northern California.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

ANIMALS: 58 client-owned horses evaluated for rattlesnake envenomation at 2 referral hospitals from 1992 to 2009.

PROCEDURES: Records of horses with rattlesnake envenomation were reviewed, and data concerning signalment, clinical and laboratory findings, treatment, and outcome were collected. In addition, a rattlesnake-bite severity score (RBSS) was assigned to each horse. Variables were compared between horses that survived and those that did not.

RESULTS

The overall mortality rate was 9%. Nine horses received antivenin; no complications were reported and none of the 9 died. The most common laboratory findings associated with severity of envenomation were thrombocytopenia, hypoproteinemia, hyperlactatemia, and a high RBSS.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Most horses in this study had a good prognosis after being bitten by rattlesnakes. Laboratory and clinical examination findings may be useful for identifying horses with a poorer prognosis. Treatment with antivenin may be beneficial and warrants further evaluation.

Для цитирования: Fielding C Langdon, Pusterla Nicola, Magdesian K Gary, Higgins Jill C, Meier Chloe A. Rattlesnake envenomation in horses: 58 cases (1992-2009).. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2011. DOI: 10.2460/javma.238.5.631.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.