MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.22034/apjcp.2017.18.10.2695

Медицинская библиотека · Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017

Evaluation on Efficacy and Safety of Arsenic Trioxide Plus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization alone for Unresectable Primary Liver Cancer

Yang H, Zhou S, Shen R, Luo S, Li L, Lin H, Chen H, Liao Z, Lin W, Xie X

Перевод в очереди

Аннотация

Currently, some clinical trials of arsenic trioxide (As203) plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of unresectable primary liver cancer (PLC) had been conducted, but the results were controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis on 14 clinical trials (1076 cases) to evaluate efficacy and safety of As203 plus TACE versus TACE alone for unresectable PLC. The primary end points included objective response rate (ORR), karnofsky performance score (KPS) improvement rate, and 1-year survival rate. The second end points were adverse events consisting of leukopenia, liver dysfunction, nausea/vomiting, fever, myelosuppression and pain. Our study showed that, compared with TACE alone, As203 plus TACE appeared a significant benefit on ORR (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.15,1.50, P < 0.0001), KPS improvement rate (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03,1.48, P = 0.02) and 1-year survival rate (RR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15,1.49, P < 0.0001). Additionally, no remarkable difference of adverse events were observed between two arms: leukopenia (RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.90,2.32, P = 0.13), liver dysfunction (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.76,1.21, P = 0.71), nausea/vomiting (RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.84,1.44, P = 0.48), fever (RR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.82,1.61, P = 0.43), myelosuppression (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.74,1.56, P = 0.72) and pain (RR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.57,1.36, P = 0.57). This study demonstrated that As203 plus TACE produced a favorable efficacy without enhancing adverse events and was a promising combination therapy option for unresectable PLC.

Для цитирования: Yang H, Zhou S, Shen R, Luo S, Li L, Lin H, Chen H, Liao Z, Lin W, Xie X. Evaluation on Efficacy and Safety of Arsenic Trioxide Plus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization alone for Unresectable Primary Liver Cancer. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2017. DOI: 10.22034/apjcp.2017.18.10.2695.

Перевод полного текста: Перевод в очереди

Полный текст источника

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-SA/4.0

Introduction

Primary liver cancer (PLC) is one of the diseases severely threatening human life with a high incidence of 782451 new cases each year worldwide and 394770 cases in China (Chen et al., 2014; Ferlay et al., 2013). Due to insidious onset, high malignancy and invasive fast-growing, a large number of patients are diagnosed as unresectable PLC. With regard to the treatment of unresectable PLC, except for radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is also an effective approach (Qin et al., 2011). However, the compensatory circulation derived from TACE counteracts its anticancer effect (Ni et al., 2012; Ranieri et al., 2015). Thus, it is urgent to explore appropriate drugs combining with TACE to maximize efficacy of unresectable PLC. Arsenic trioxide (As203), a potent and cost-effective drug, after Zhang et al., (1995) reporting the favorable efficacy of As203 on acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), many studies (Yua et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2015) on its anticancer effect and molecular mechanism were conducted. Owing to its broad pattern of inhibiting proliferation, inducing apoptosis of tumor cell and suppressing intimal hyperplasia (Huang et al., 2005; Jiang et al., 2014), As203 was increasingly used to deal with several solid tumors, especially for PLC. In the past decades, some clinical trails involving As203 plus TACE had been performed in an attempt to produce synergetic effects against unresectable PLC (Cui et al., 2005; Cui et al., 2006; He et al., 2015; Hou et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2014, Nian et al., 2015; Qian et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2006; Xie et al., 2007; Xing et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2007; Zhuang et al., 2006), but the results were controversial (Zhang et al., 2010; Zhuang et al., 2006). Thereby, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of As203 plus TACE in managing unresectable PLC.

Materials and Methods

Search strategy

Relevant trials were identified from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, WanFang, CNKI and VIP databases from their inception till January 2017. The searching words were primary liver cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, arsenic trioxide, As203, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, TACE, locoregional therapy and LRT. The search was performed without any language limitation.

Study selection

Initially, the study selection was executed by finding duplications via EndNote X7 software. Then, other pertinent articles were identified by screening titles or abstracts. Two reviewers selected articles independently according to the inclusion criteria. Disagreement on whether an article should be included was resolved by the third reviewer.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All projects which met the following criteria were eligible: (1) clinical control trials; (2) cases were pathologically or imageologically plus clinical manifestation and AFP level confirmed as PLC; (3) the intervention of experiment group was As203 plus TACE while control group was TACE alone. Single arm trials, animal experiments and trials with other interventions were excluded.

Data extraction

The basic information included author, year, study type, method, number of patients, gender, median/mean age, child-pugh stage, AFP positive rate, objective response rate (ORR), 1-year survival rate and karnofsky performance score (KPS) improvement rate. The primary end points included ORR, KPS improvement rate and 1-year survival rate. The second end points were adverse events consisting of leukopenia, liver dysfunction, nausea /vomiting, fever, myelosuppression and pain. All data were extracted independently by two reviewers. When the extracted data were not uniform, discussion was performed to make a final determination.

Definition

ORR was defined as complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR). The treatment responses were categorized according to World Health Organization criteria (1979) or Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). KPS improvement was defined as KPS improved ten or more points. Unresectable PLC were these patients: moderate/advanced PLC; inability or refusal to receive surgical therapy.

Quality assessment

The qualities of all available trials were evaluated based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of intervention (Version 5.3.0), which contains seven aspects (random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blind of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, other bias). The bias of each trial based on the criteria listed above was marked as ‘low risk’, ‘high risk’ or ‘unclear risk’. Trials were judged as low risk of bias (i.e. A rating) when all criteria were assessed as low risk; trials were judged as moderate risk of bias (i.e. B rating) or high risk of bias (i.e. C rating) when one or more criteria were assessed as unclear risk or high risk, respectively. Ten of fourteen trials (Cui et al., 2006; He et al., 2015; Hou et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2014; Qian et al., 2014; Xie et al., 2007; Xing et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2007; Zhuang et al., 2006) mentioned the term of randomization, but only 2 (Zhou et al., 2007; Zhuang et al., 2006) referred to the ways of randomization and 1 (He et al., 2015) allocated patients to experimental group and control group randomly according to the odevity of the last number of the hospital numbers. Moreover, fourteen trials (Cui et al., 2005; Cui et al., 2006; He et al., 2015; Hou et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2014; Nian et al., 2015; Qian et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2006; Xie et al., 2007; Xing et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2007; Zhuang et al., 2006) did not mention double blind and selection bias. As shown in Figure 1 , 9 trials (Cui et al., 2006; Hou et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2014; Qian et al., 2014; Xie et al., 2007; Xing et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2007; Zhuang et al., 2006) were judged as B quality scores and 5 (Cui et al., 2005; He et al., 2015; Nian et al., 2015; Tang et al., 2006; Yan et al., 2013) as C quality scores. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plot ( Figure 2 ).

Figure 1 Bias Risk and Quality Assessment of Included Studies
Figure 1 Bias Risk and Quality Assessment of Included Studies
Figure 2 The Funnel Plot of Objective Response Rate
Figure 2 The Funnel Plot of Objective Response Rate

Methods of statistics

Review Manager 5.3 was applied to analyze data. Chi-square and I-square tests were employed to measure the heterogeneity of different trials (Higgins et al., 2003). Significant heterogeneity was found if P < 0.1 and I 2 > 50%, a random effect model was utilized, otherwise, a fixed-effect model was applied (Ford et al., 2014). Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) represented the overall results of each end point.

Results

209 relevant articles were identified from 6 databases. Initially, after checking duplications and reading the titles or abstracts, 68 duplication, 112 ineligible and 9 republished articles were excluded. Then, 6 articles were excluded after performing discussion: 1 article processing beta-ultrasound guided percutaneous As203 injection to the lesions of PLC, 4 administering As203 by intravenous drip and another 1 using As203 both through the catheter of TACE and intravenous drip. Eventually, 14 trials (Cui et al., 2005; Cui et al., 2006; He et al., 2015; Hou et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2014; Nian et al., 2015; Qian et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2006; Xie et al., 2007; Xing et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2007; Zhuang et al., 2006) (1076 patients) of As203 plus TACE versus TACE alone for unresectable PLC were included ( Figure 3 ). In these trials, As203 was mostly administered by: (1) continuous regional infusion As203 through the chemotherapy pump placed beneath the skin by femoral artery transcatheter, 20 mg, qd×7, and repeated every four weeks; (2) chemotherapy embolism with As203 (20 mg) + lipiodol (10-20ml) by femoral artery transcatheter, and repeated every month. Characteristics of these trials were shown in Table 1 .

Figure 3 Flowchart for Study Selection
Figure 3 Flowchart for Study Selection

Table 1
The Characteristic of the Studies in the Meta-Analysis
C, control group; E, experiment group; NA, not available; TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; As203, arsenic trioxide; ORR, objective response rate; AFP+%: AFP positive rate

Study IDStudy typesMethodsPatientsMan/FemaleMedian/Mean ageChild-Pugh A%AFP+%ORR%1-year survival rateKPS improvement rate
Cui et al.2005ETACE+As20396/339(22-57)88.8988.8955.56NA55.56
CTACE3026/445(20-68)83.3383.3320NA20
Cui et al.2006ETACE+As2032621/552±1373.0873.0834.6280.77NA
CTACE2925/452±1575.8668.9731.0351.72NA
He et al.2015ETACE+As2033622/1458.1±4.561.11NA61.1177.78NA
CTACE3625/11(28-81)52.78NA36.1155.56NA
Hou et al.2015ETACE+As2036335/2856.5±3.8NANA74.6NANA
CTACE6333/3054.5±3.5NANA39.68NANA
Hu et al.2014ETACE+As2032821/759(31-80)NA10064.2967.8650
CTACE2517/851(28-70)NA100524052
Nian et al.2015ETACE+As2038196/6057.6(45-76)NANANA76.54NA
CTACE75NANANA68NA
Qian 2014ETACE+As2034032/852(33-81)NA82.557.5NA72.5
CTACE4035/550(31-68)NA87.547.5NA57.5
Tang et al.2006ETACE+As2032621/539(22-57)73.0773.0834.6280.7734.62
CTACE3026/445(20-68)83.3383.332051.7220
Xing 2012ETACE+As2032318/555.43±10.4978.26NA52.1780.3NA
CTACE2523/254.84±8.2484NA5251.4NA
Xie et al.2007ETACE+As2033325/852(21-70)NA72.7351.52NA60.61
CTACE3223/951(21-70)NA68.7543.75NA53.13
Yan et al.2013ETACE+As2033026/452(29-72)83.3356.67204650
CTACE3226/653(31-74)81.2556.2515.635243.75
Zhang et al.2010ETACE+As2033024/652(28-72)NANA60NA66.67
CTACE3025/550(31-68)NANA46.67NA56.67
Zhou et al.2007ETACE+As2034135/651(27-75)85.3763.4114.63NANA
CTACE4540/550(23-74)82.2275.568.89NANA
Zhuang et al.2006ETACE+As2036244/18(26-76)45.1674.1977.4261.29NA
CTACE5636/20(24-79)44.647578.5739.29NA

Objective response rate

Thirteen of 14 trials (Cui et al., 2005; Cui et al., 2006; He et al., 2015; Hou et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2014; Qian et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2006; Xie et al., 2007; Xing et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2007; Zhuang et al., 2006) referred to ORR of As203 plus TACE for unresectable PLC. Due to no heterogeneity in these trials (P =0.10 I 2 = 35%), a fixed effect model was applied. The result showed that compared with TACE alone, As203 plus TACE possessed noticeable superiority for unresectable PLC (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.15,1.50, P < 0.0001) ( Figure 4 ).

Figure 4 Objective Response Rate of the Study
Figure 4 Objective Response Rate of the Study

KPS improvement rate

Seven of 14 trials (Cui et al., 2005; Hu et al., 2014; Qian et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2006; Xie et al., 2007; Yan et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2010) referred to KPS improvement rate of As203 plus TACE for unresectable PLC. A fixed effect model was used to analyze KPS improvement rate because heterogeneity did not exist (P = 0.59, I 2 = 0%). The result displayed that compared with TACE alone, As203 plus TACE significantly improved quality of life (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03,1.48, P = 0.02) ( Figure 5 ).

Figure 5 KPS Improvement Rate of the Study
Figure 5 KPS Improvement Rate of the Study

One-year survival rate

Seven trials (He et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2014; Nian et al., 2015; Tang et al., 2006; Xing et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2013; Zhuang et al., 2006) concerning 1-year survival rate were included. Owing to no heterogeneity existed in these trials (P = 0.29 I 2 = 19%), a fixed effect model was applied and the result demonstrated that As203 plus TACE arm obtained a favorable benefit compared with TACE alone arm (RR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15,1.49, P < 0.0001) ( Figure 6 ).

Figure 6 One-Year Survival Rate of the Study
Figure 6 One-Year Survival Rate of the Study

Adverse event

The common adverse events were leukopenia, liver dysfunction, nausea/vomiting, fever, myelosuppression and pain. The data for each type of adverse events extracted from eligible trials were evaluated by a fixed effect model or a random effect model based on heterogeneity value ( Table 2 ). No distinct difference in adverse events were observed between two arms. On the whole, adverse events were mild (grade ≤ II) and tolerable.

Table 2
Adverse Events
N, the total number of patients; n, the total number of events.

Types of adverse eventsIncluded trialsExperiment groupControl groupStatistical modelHeterogeneity testMeta-analysis result
n/Nn/NI 2pRR(95% CI)P
Leukopenia433/13424/141fixed effect model35%0.21.44(0.90,2.32)0.13
Liver dysfunction6115/248130/247random effects model75%0.0010.96(0.76,1.21)0.71
Nausea/vomiting562/15257/155fixed effect model0%0.711.10(0.84,1.44)0.48
Fever447/12941/130fixed effect model0%0.841.15(0.82,1.61)0.43
Myelosuppression332/15029/143fixed effect model40%0.191.07(0.74,1.56)0.72
Pain684/23389/230fixed effect model0%0.540.88(0.57,1.36)0.57

Discussion

Based on data from 14 trials incorporating 1076 patients, our study demonstrated that compared with TACE alone, the regimen of As203 plus TACE possessed superior ORR, KPS improvement rate and 1-year survival rate in unresectable PLC without enhancing toxicity profile. These desirable results could be explained by synergistic effects of TACE and As203.

Current treatment strategies for unresectable PLC, including RFA, microwave ablation (MWA), TACE, and systematic treatment (sorafenib, FOL-FOX 4 and As203), do not yield satisfactory outcomes. TACE, one of the most widely used approaches, exerts effect through increasing the local cytotoxic agent concentration and blocking blood supply of tumor. However, it can induce the overproduction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and promote disease progression or metastasis, which counteracts its anticancer effect (Ni et al., 2012; Qin et al., 2011). Consequently, highly efficient agent combining with TACE is urgently needed to overcome the limitations and maximize efficacy. As203, a miraculous and traditional agent, gradually comes into sight in managing unresectable PLC. Some studies (Chen et al., 2013; Tan et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2004; Yin et al., 2009, Yuan et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2012) showed that it possessed a broad antitumor activity which was based on following three evidence levels: at cellular level (Chen et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2012; Yin et al., 2009; Yuan et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2009), As203 was able to inhibit many types of tumor cells, such as SMMC-7721 (Zhou et al., 2009), HepG2 (Wang et al., 2008), MDA-MB-231 (Zhang et al., 2012), T cell lymphoma cell line Hut-78 (Zhang et al., 2011), burkitt lymphoma cells (Chen et al., 2013), colorectal cancer stem cells (Yuan et al., 2012), multiple myeloma cells (Wang et al., 2012), neuroblastom cell (Yin et al., 2009); at animal trial level, many experiments (Tan et al., 2005; Xu et al., 2004) proved that As203 was a promising agent against many types of cancers; at clinical trial level, studies (Cui et al., 2005, Cui et al., 2006, He et al., 2015, Hou et al., 2015, Hu et al., 2014, Nian et al., 2015, Qian et al., 2014, Tang et al., 2006, Xie et al., 2007, Xing et al., 2012, Yan et al., 2013, Zhang et al., 1995, Zhang et al., 2010, Zhou et al., 2007, Zhuang et al., 2006) involving As203 in APL as well as solid tumors, such as PLC, acquired definite efficacy.

Furthermore, the molecular mechanism of As203 in treating APL was elaborated by down-regulating the key protein which was able to drive APL progress (Shen et al., 2015). Meanwhile, studies (Cui et al., 2006; Huang et al., 2005; Jiang et al., 2014; Li et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2000; Liu et al., 2001; Liu TF et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2008; Tang et al., 2005; Tang et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2008; Yua et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2004) showed the anti-hepatoma molecular mechanisms probably were as follows: (1) triggering apoptosis: down-regulating the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-XI genes, up-regulating the expression of Bax, Bcl-Xs and p53 genes, activating p21 gene, increasing CDK’s activity and enhancing the expression of Fas, Fas-L (Li et al., 2003, Liu et al., 2000, Liu et al., 2001; Yua et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2004); (2) restricting tumor angiogenesis via suppressing the expression of VEGF (Liu et al., 2008; Jiang et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2009); (3) inhibiting proliferation of tumor cell through arresting cell cycle at G1/S or G2/M phase (Huang et al., 2005; Tang et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2004); (4) repressing tumor metastasis by down-regulating the expression of CD44 (Liu TF et al., 2001); (5) promoting demethylation of tumor suppressor gene via blocking the activity of DNA methyltransferase and the mRNA expressions of DNA methyltransferase 1, resulting in the death of cancer cells (Cui X et al., 2006).

With regard to the safety, our study showed no remarkable difference of adverse events between two arms. The probable mechanisms were based on: (1) due to the local administration of As203, its concentration was much higher in liver than in other tissues and blood which may partly account for the enhancing efficacy of TACE without aggravating adverse events; (2) rapid decline of As203 in blood can further explain its mild adverse events (Song et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2003; Zheng et al., 2004).

However, we encountered two limitations: first, owing to particularity of As203, the study population was only limited in Chinese; second, because of the limitation of data, the endpoints were only including the ORR, KPS improvement rate and 1-year survival rate and adverse events, but OS, PFS can not be evaluated. Thereby, more well designed trails involving different races and long-term outcomes are critical to further validate the value of this strategy in coping with unresectable PLC.

Briefly, our study demonstrated that As203 plus TACE achieved a favorable efficacy without increasing adverse events and was a promising combination therapy option for unresectable PLC.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Funding

None.

References

Chen YJ Li HM Lu W Blocking effect of arsenic trioxide on the proliferation and cell cycle of human Burkitt lymphoma cells and Its related mechanism Exp Hematol Oncol 2013 21 1454 9 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2013.06.016 24370028

Chen WQ Zhang SW Zeng HM Report of cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2010 China Cancer 2014 23 1 9

Cui SZ Song T Wang LK Clinical observation on transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with arsenic trioxide in treatment of patients with primary liver cancer Mod Dig Inter 2005 10 89 91

Cui SZ Wu YB Wang JK Clinical research of arsenic trioxide (As 2 0 3 ) continuous regional hepatic arterial infusion in the treatment of primary hepatic carcinoma J Mod Clin Med Bioeng 2006 12 433 6

Cui X Wakai T Shirai Y Arsenic trioxide inhibits DNA methyltransferase and restores methylation-silenced genes in human liver cancer cells Hum Pathol 2006 37 298 311 16613325 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.10.013

Ferlay J Soerjomataram I Ervik M GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 11 [DB/OL] 2013 2013 Lyon International Agency for Research on Cancer Available http://globocan.iarc.fr

Ford AC Forman D Hunt RH Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy to prevent gastric cancer in healthy asymptomatic infected individuals: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials BMJ 2014 348 g3174 24846275 10.1136/bmj.g3174 PMC4027797

He JM Huang CY Xu JX Effect of arsenic trioxide combined with oxaliplatin and gemcitabine arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence and metastasis ability J Xiangnan Uni Med Sci 2015 17 12 5

Higgins JP Thompson SG Deeks JJ Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 2003 327 557 60 12958120 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 PMC192859

Hou YB Liu Q Duan GF Interventional treatment effects of arsenic trioxide for advanced primary liver cancer J North Pharm 2015 12 24 5

Hu Q Wei YM Guan R Clinical effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with arsenic trioxide in treatment of primary liver cancer Mod Oncol 2014 22 2679 81

Huang JF Tan B Wei Q Zhang H Ni RZ Anti-hepatoma effect of arsenic trioxide on rat liver cancers induced by 2-acetamidofluorene Chin J Hepatol 2005 13 623 5 16093000

Jiang F Wang XX Liu QQ Inhibition of TGF-b/SMAD3/NF-kB signaling by microRNA-491 is involved in arsenic trioxide-induced anti-angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells Toxicol Lett 2014 231 55 61 25196641 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.08.024

Li JT Qu QJ Liu YB Wang XB Xu B Significance of expression of bcl-2 mRNA and bax mRNA in arsenic trioxide-induced apoptcsis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells Chin J Hepatobiliary Surg 2003 9 241 7

Liu L Qin SK Chen HY An experimental study on arsenic trioxide-selectively induced human hepatocarcinoma cell lines apoptosis and its related genes Chin J Hepatol 2000 8 367 9 11135700

Liu LX Jiang HC Zhuan AL Arsenic trioxide induces apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells and to elucidate the possible mechanism Natl Med J China 2001 81 1526 7

Liu TF Cheng BL Guan YG Liang T Study on relationship between expressions of CD44 and inhibition effect of arsenic trioxide on carcinoma J Harbin Med Univ 2001 35 111 2

Liu L Qin SK Chen BA Effect of arsenic trioxide on the anti-angiogenesis of hepatocarcinoma J Southeast Univ (Med Sci Edi) 2008 27 330 5

Ni JY Huang KH Xu LF Relationship between HIF-1αexpression after TACE and recurrence and metastasis of hepatoma Int J Med Radiol 2012 35 349 52

Nian DF Yan AF Hou LY Yu YC Clinical application of arsenic trioxide combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatment of advanced primary liver cancer Chin Imaging J Integr Tradit West Med 2015 13 211 3

Qin SK Fan J Shen F Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (V2011) JClini Hepatol 2011 27 1141 59

Qian LK Clinical observation on arsenic trioxide combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in treatment of patients with primary liver cancer China Medical University 2014 1 33 Available online: http://istic.wanfangdata.com.cn/Search/Detail?db=zw_xw&uniqueId=0620151100549217

Ranieri G Ammendola M Marech I Vascular endothelial growth factor and tryptase changes after chemoembolization in hepatocarcinoma patients World J Gastroenterol 2015 21 6018 25 26019468 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.6018 PMC4438038

Shen Y Fu YK Zhu YM Mutations of epigenetic modifier genes as a poor prognostic factor in acute promyelocytic leukemia under treatment with all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide EBio Medicine 2015 2 563 71 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.04.006 PMC4535155 26285909

Song YX Du X Jin Y Zhang Y Pharmacokinetics of As203 in rabbit after iv administration with different dose Chin J Hosp Pharm 2000 20 27 8

Tan B Huang JF Wei Q Zhang H Ni RZ Anti-hepatoma effect of arsenic trioxide on experimental liver cancer induced by 2-acetamidofluorene in rats World J Gastroenterol 2005 11 5938 43 16273603 10.3748/wjg.v11.i38.5938 PMC4436714

Tang YH Tian YG Liu TF Inhibitory effect of arsenic trioxide on proliferation of hepatoma cells in mice WorId Chin J Digestol 2005 13 2074 7

Tang RJ Cui SZ Tan ZM Arsenic trioxide continuous regional hepatic arterial infusion after TACE in the treatment of primary hepatic carcinoma;a report of 26 cases J Chin Med Res 2006 6 925 6

Tang YH Shang GY Liang T Effect of As203 on VEGF and COX-2 expression in mouse hepatocacinoma J Harbin Med Univ 2009 43 435 40

Wang SS Zhang T Wang XL Hong Li Qi QH Effect of arsenic trioxide on rat hepatocarcinoma and its renal cytotoxicity World J Gastroenterol 2003 9 930 5 12717832 10.3748/wjg.v9.i5.930 PMC4611399

Wang XJ Liu XM Zeng CY Zhang Y Liang XQ Apoptosis and cell cycle-blockade of human hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells induced by arsenic trioxide J Beijing Univ Tradi Chin Med 2008 31 404 7

Wang MM Hu JP Ou LF Effects of arsenic trioxide on intracellular SOCS-1gene methylation and P-STAT3 expression in multiple myeloma cells J Int Oncol 2012 39 633 6

Xing R Randomized controlled study of lipiodol-arsenic trioxide emulsion in the treatment of primary hepatic carcinoma China Medical University 2012 1 33 Available online: http://d.g.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis_Y2092205.aspx

Xie YR Zhou YF Ying XL Efficiency evaluation on arsenic trioxide containing regimen in treatment of patients with middle or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma by intervention Zhejiang Clin Med J 2007 9 1161 2

Xu HY Yang YL Liu SM Li B Chen SX Effect of arsenic trioxide on human hepatocarcinoma in nude mice World J Gastroenterol 2004 10 3677 9 15534931 10.3748/wjg.v10.i24.3677 PMC4612017

Yan TH Xu WD Gu WL Yu JY Clinical observation of arsenic trioxide combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatment of advanced primary liver cancer Chin J Clin Oncol Rehabil 2013 20 1377 80

Yin H Tang SQ Feng C Yu F Experimental study on effect of arsenic trioxide on suppression of neuroblastom cell invasion J Appl Clin Pediatr 2009 24 209 15

Yua ZY Wu FL Chen L ETME, a novel β-elemene derivative, synergizes with arsenic trioxide in inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in hepatocarcinoma cells via a p53-dependent pathway Acta Pharm Sin B 2014 4 424 9 26579413 10.1016/j.apsb.2014.10.001 PMC4629106

Yuan HM Cheng HM Arsenic trioxide induced colorectal cancer stem cells apoptosis and inhibited clonal hyperolasia Acta Acad Med Xuzhou 2012 32 281 5

Zhang P Wang SY Hu LH The Clinical observation and mechanism discussion of “713” in the treatment of 117 cases acute promyelocytic leukemia J Harbin Med Univ 1995 29 243

Zhang X Wang PL Tao XH Study on arsenic trioxide induced apoptosis in hepatoma cells and its molecular mechanism J Chongqing Med Univ 2004 29 444 7

Zhang XB Xie JG Tan ZM Clinical study of arsenic trioxide in the treatment of primary hepatic carcinoma by interventional ways Contemporary Med 2010 16 112 3

Zhang XM Wang T Li XJ Zhao L Li HM Effect of arsenic trioxide on proliferation of T cell lymphoma cell line Hut-78 J Clin Rehabil Tissue Eng Res 2011 15 4325 9

Zhang WJ Xu DF Fan QX Arsenic trioxide restores ERαexpression in ERα-negative human breast cancer cells and its treatment efficacy in combination with tamoxifen in xenografts in nude mice Chin J Oncol 2012 34 645 51 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.09.002 23159075

Zhang HN Yang LN Ling JY Systematic identification of arsenic-binding proteins reveals that hexokinase-2 is inhibited by arsenic Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015 112 15084 9 26598702 10.1073/pnas.1521316112 PMC4679019

Zheng MY Yu XD Wang T Hepatic toxicity of arsenic trioxide on rabbits with hepatic Vx-2 carcinoma by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization J Chin Physician 2004 6 1465 7

Zhou ZT Lin XJ Cui BK Li GH Clinical study on arsenic trioxide-containing regimen in treatment of patients with middle or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma by TACE Chin J Cancer Prev Treat 2007 14 1094 6

Zhou Y Yu JW Wu HX Yu ZJ Apoptosis induced by arsenic trioxide and its effects on OPN expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma SMMC-7721 cell Shandong Med J 2009 49 7 9

Zhuang XL Wu XQ Wu WY Efficacy of hepatic artery infusion of arsenic trioxide in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma Chin J Cancer Prev Treat 2006 13 1106 7

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.