MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4065/mcp.2010.0480

Медицинская библиотека · Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2011

Recent improvements in survival in primary systemic amyloidosis and the importance of an early mortality risk score.

Kumar SK, Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dingli D, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Short-Detweiler K, Zeldenrust SR, Leung N, Greipp PR, Lust JA, Russell SJ, Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A

Перевод в очереди

Аннотация

ObjectiveTo examine whether the outcome of patients with primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) has improved over time and to identify predictors of early mortality in patients with AL.Patients and methodsWe studied 2 separate cohorts of patients. The first cohort, consisting of 1998 patients with AL seen at Mayo Clinic between January 1977 and August 2006, was used to examine the trends in overall survival (OS) from diagnosis during this 30-year period. The second cohort, consisting of 313 patients seen between September 2006 and August 2009, was used to validate a model for predicting early mortality.ResultsThe 4-year OS from diagnosis improved during each decade of follow-up: 21%, 24%, and 33%, respectively, for the periods 1977-1986, 1987-1996, and 1997-2006 (PConclusionSurvival in AL has improved over time, with maximum improvement occurring in the past decade. However, early mortality remains high, and prospective identification of patients at risk of early mortality may allow development of risk-adapted strategies.

Для цитирования: Kumar SK, Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dingli D, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Short-Detweiler K, Zeldenrust SR, Leung N, Greipp PR, Lust JA, Russell SJ, Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A. Recent improvements in survival in primary systemic amyloidosis and the importance of an early mortality risk score.. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2011. DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0480.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.