The Journal of emergency medicine · 2018
A Prospective Study of Stingray Injury and Envenomation Outcomes.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Myatt Toby, Nguyen Brian J, Clark Richard F, Coffey Christanne H, O'Connell Charles W
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Stingray injuries result in thousands of emergency department visits annually.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the complication rate and outcome of field treatment with hot water immersion.
METHODS: This was an on-site, prospective, observational study. Subjects were enrolled after having been stung by a stingray. A trained researcher obtained the following information: age, sex, health conditions and medications, and wound description. The efficacy of hot water immersion on pain was recorded. Patients were contacted on postinjury days 3, 7, and 14 for follow up.
RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects were included. No obvious foreign bodies were observed in wounds. Ten subjects were treated with hot water immersion and povidone-iodine, 12 with hot water immersion alone. Ongoing symptoms or complications were noted at the 3-day follow-up in 6 of 22 subjects (27.3%). One subject was diagnosed with cellulitis on post-sting day 8 and was treated with antibiotics. Ongoing symptoms or complications were reported more commonly in patients treated with hot water and povidone-iodine compared with those treated with hot water alone (p = 0.056). There was a significant difference in wound size between those with and without ongoing symptoms at the 3-day follow-up (p = 0.0102). No wounds <1 cm developed any complications. Average duration of water immersion was 73.6 min (range 35-145 min). The mean pain score pretreatment was 7.36 and posttreatment was 2.18, with an average decrease of 5.18 (95% confidence interval 4.22-6.15).
CONCLUSION: Stingray injuries responded well to hot water immersion for pain control. Skin and soft tissue infection was diagnosed in 1 of 22 patients (4.55%).
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the complication rate and outcome of field treatment with hot water immersion.
METHODS: This was an on-site, prospective, observational study. Subjects were enrolled after having been stung by a stingray. A trained researcher obtained the following information: age, sex, health conditions and medications, and wound description. The efficacy of hot water immersion on pain was recorded. Patients were contacted on postinjury days 3, 7, and 14 for follow up.
RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects were included. No obvious foreign bodies were observed in wounds. Ten subjects were treated with hot water immersion and povidone-iodine, 12 with hot water immersion alone. Ongoing symptoms or complications were noted at the 3-day follow-up in 6 of 22 subjects (27.3%). One subject was diagnosed with cellulitis on post-sting day 8 and was treated with antibiotics. Ongoing symptoms or complications were reported more commonly in patients treated with hot water and povidone-iodine compared with those treated with hot water alone (p = 0.056). There was a significant difference in wound size between those with and without ongoing symptoms at the 3-day follow-up (p = 0.0102). No wounds <1 cm developed any complications. Average duration of water immersion was 73.6 min (range 35-145 min). The mean pain score pretreatment was 7.36 and posttreatment was 2.18, with an average decrease of 5.18 (95% confidence interval 4.22-6.15).
CONCLUSION: Stingray injuries responded well to hot water immersion for pain control. Skin and soft tissue infection was diagnosed in 1 of 22 patients (4.55%).