DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.07.018
Surgical Pain Control With Ropivacaine by Atomized Delivery (Spray): A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Аннотация
STUDY
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the role of intraoperative atomized intraperitoneal ropivacaine (AIR) as an adjuvant to anesthetic agents at the time of minimally invasive pelvic surgery.
DESIGN
Double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
CLASSIFICATION: Randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).
SETTING
Tertiary care teaching hospital.
PARTICIPANTS
Fifty-five patients who underwent laparoscopic and robotic gynecologic procedures.
INTERVENTION: Patients received AIR or atomized intraperitoneal saline (AIS) (dose, 2 mg/kg) immediately after the initiation of pneumoperitoneum.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
RESULTS
Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and narcotic use (in morphine equivalents) were collected and recorded at 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours postoperatively.
RESULTS
Fifty-five patients completed the study protocol and data collection, with 30 patients allocated to the AIS group and 25 patients allocated to the AIR group. Demographic and surgical variables did not vary between the groups, with the exception of median operative duration. Postoperative VAS scores at 2, 4, 8, and 12 postoperative hours were higher in the AIS group, but the difference failed to reach statistical significance. Narcotic use was also similar in the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION
The use of intraperitoneal ropivacaine was not associated with a statistically significant difference in patients' postoperative VAS scores. Thus, in contrast to findings of similar studies performed in general surgery, AIR might not confer a benefit in women undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic procedures.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.