The role of obesity and bariatric surgery-induced weight loss in breast cancer.

Introduction

Obesity is one of the most prevalent diseases in westernized societies, identified as a public health crisis both in the USA by the Surgeon General and worldwide by the World Health Organization [ 1 , 2 ]. Based on body mass index (BMI; kg/m 2 ), two-thirds of adults are considered obese (BMI > 30) or overweight (BMI 25–30), with one in three Americans identified as experiencing moderate (class 1: BMI 30 to 35 and class 2: BMI 35 to 40) to severe (class 3: BMI > 40) obesity [ 3 , 4 ]. Surveys show increasing incidence, especially in women, and disproportionately high incidence in minorities [ 5 – 9 ]. Since a landmark publication by Calle et al. in 2003, obesity has increasingly been associated with specific types of cancer [ 10 – 12 ]. Currently, thirteen cancers are associated with obesity in terms of increased risk as defined by the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) [ 13 ], including postmenopausal breast cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial/uterine cancer, esophageal adenocarcinoma, gall bladder cancer, gastric cancer, hepatocellular cancer, meningioma, multiple myeloma, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, renal cancer, and thyroid cancer [ 11 , 14 ]. Obesity is a significant, modifiable risk factor in nearly 20% of total US female cancer deaths and 30% of postmenopausal breast cancer cases [ 12 , 15 , 16 ]. Of particular interest for this review is obesity-linked breast cancer. With breast cancer being the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer death in females [ 12 , 17 – 26 ], understanding the links between obesity, adipose tissue, inflammation, immune response, and potential therapeutic interventions is critical to improving patient outcomes. This review will focus on the role of obesity in impacting breast cancer risk, prognoses, and survival, emphasizing the impacts of weight loss by bariatric surgery.

Obesity and breast cancer

Obesity and breast cancer remain a complex conundrum that truly highlights the importance of including clinically relevant data in analyses such as tumor subtypes and menopausal status, ensuring adequate representation of diverse populations, predominantly minority and younger patients, and measuring several metrics to quantify obesity in complementary ways. For example, it is well established that obesity is a metabolically dysregulated state that increases the risk for postmenopausal breast cancer, primarily represented by the more prevalent luminal A subtype (ER-positive and/or PR-positive, HER2-negative [ 27 ]). In contrast, obesity in premenopausal women has been reported to be protective or have a null effect on breast cancer risk, typically when breast cancer is considered without accounting for subtypes [ 28 – 37 ]. However, many early studies were limited by lack of minority inclusion, few younger participants, a single measure of obesity, and estrogen receptor (ER) positivity determination only from immunohistochemistry (IHC) data. When studies include mainly white, older women who are more likely to present with luminal A and ER-positive subtypes, these studies may not be powered to detect the impacts of obesity on other breast cancer subtypes that strike younger or minority women. The decreased cost of sequencing has greatly increased the ability to quantify molecular subtypes.

Likewise, while BMI is convenient for extensive studies and retrospective analyses drawing from patient medical records with relatively little measurement error, BMI is fraught with limitations. Most notably, BMI lacks the ability to account for muscle mass compared to adiposity and fails to capture the compartmentalization of visceral versus central adiposity [ 38 ]. Other measures of obesity, including waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and waist circumference, as well as more invasive measures such as DEXA scan or MRI, are complementary or improved metric options that are increasingly utilized in many studies. In addition, evaluation of obesity at cancer diagnosis may not be indicative of lifetime obesity exposure, hence some studies record obesity at a younger age along with current obesity status. Each strategy has pros and cons, influenced mainly by measurement error or cost. Likewise, the extent (classes 1–3) and duration of obesity are critical to consider. In sum, while BMI is convenient for population-based studies, including additional obesity measures adds to the ability to examine many important associations.

Once investigative teams began to oversample or enroll a disproportionately high percentage of minorities and younger women [ 27 ], include multiple breast cancer subtypes by additional IHC markers [ 39 ] or transcriptomic analysis, record pre- or postmenopausal status at the time of diagnosis, and use multiple measures of obesity, our understanding of obesity’s impact on risk became even more complex. In studies such as the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS) or consortia such as AMBER (African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk, which includes CBCS), obesity in premenopausal women was reported to be a risk factor for breast cancer, especially for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [ 34 , 40 – 43 ]. In contrast, several studies have not supported these findings, showing null results or moderately reduced risk ratios for obesity risk in premenopausal women. There is also evidence that overweight BMI reduces all-cause mortality of patients, promoting longer lifespans than normal-weight counterparts and reducing comorbidities [ 44 ], although controversy exists. Notably, a direct comparison of BMI to WHR suggests that WHR may better predict risk in African American women that is not detected by BMI alone, masking risk in many previous studies that only report BMI [ 40 ]. These findings exemplify the complexity of tumor subtypes, pre-or post-menopausal cancer, consideration of race and ethnicity, age when obese, duration of obesity, type of adiposity (visceral versus central), and use of BMI, WHR, or other quantification, which are all critical to consider in designing and evaluating studies of cancer risk. Furthermore, there is evidence that critically ill patients with obesity experience lower mortality rates [ 45 ]. This phenomenon is called the “obesity paradox.”

While the impact of obesity on cancer risk is complex, it is abundantly clear that obesity negatively impacts cancer outcomes and survival. In breast cancer patients, women with increased BMI have a higher risk of invasion [ 46 , 47 ], distant metastases [ 48 – 50 ], tumor recurrence [ 51 , 52 ], impaired delivery of systemic therapies [ 22 , 53 ], and mortality [ 12 , 54 – 60 ]. Thus, obesity represents a modifiable risk factor and is a target for cancer prevention measures and to improve cancer outcomes [ 61 – 63 ]. The exact molecular mechanisms linking obesity to breast cancer initiation (i.e., risk) or progression (i.e., outcomes) remain poorly characterized and are of great interest to the research community. As other recent reviews have examined the broad relationships between obesity, cancer, and the immune system [ 11 , 64 – 66 ], this review will focus on the importance of modifying obesity-mediated breast cancer through various methods, focusing on weight loss induced by bariatric surgery. The field has much work ahead to integrate the many complex avenues of crosstalk in obesity and cancer. Still, there is great promise in identifying causal and targetable interactions in the obese tumor microenvironment.

Weight loss and breast cancer

Benefits of weight loss

Obesity is one of the few modifiable breast cancer risk factors [ 67 ], and weight loss has been proven to lower the risk of many cancers [ 68 ]. The risk reduction is most pronounced with intentional weight loss of ≥ 5% basal body weight among postmenopausal women [ 69 , 70 ]. To date, most studies examining breast cancer risk are conducted with breast cancer survivors to measure recurrence rates as opposed to naïve patients being diagnosed with breast cancer for the first time. Weight loss improves overall prognosis [ 71 ] and reduces the risk of recurrence when combined with increased exercise [ 72 – 74 ], although not every study supports these conclusions [ 75 ]. Indeed, among breast cancer survivors, reduction in cancer recurrence resulting from weight loss varies by molecular subtype, though further analysis is needed to describe the differences [ 76 ]. Reduced risk of recurrence may be linked to weight loss-associated effects on circulating sex hormone levels [ 77 ]. In murine models, weight loss by caloric restriction has proven remarkably successful in reducing breast cancer progression, with intermittent caloric restriction proving more effective for lowering tumor incidence and size than chronic caloric restriction [ 78 , 79 ]. Likewise, time-restricted feeding or time-restricted eating, also known as intermittent fasting, is successful for weight loss, tumor initiation inhibition, and tumor size reduction in both humans and mouse models [ 80 ]. Our group and others commonly use the relatively simple switch in dietary exposure from a high fat to a low fat diet to induce rapid and sustained weight loss [ 81 , 82 ]. However, a diet switch approach includes both a change in dietary fat exposure and weight loss, which are difficult to disentangle when investigating mechanisms. Overall, findings support that weight loss by various weight loss methods such as dietary changes, caloric restriction, and increased exercise is beneficial in reducing both risk and recurrence, with the impact of bariatric surgery discussed in detail below.

Lifestyle-induced weight loss and breast cancer

Lifestyle-induced weight loss relies on dietary changes, increased exercise, and similar adaptations to daily routines focused on lowering body adiposity and increasing physical activity. The Look AHEAD studies, for example, found that significant weight loss could be achieved and maintained over eight years. However, these results were most feasible when patients received a personalized lifestyle intervention plan and attended frequent check-ins with healthy lifestyle professionals [ 83 ]. However, a majority of studies suggest poor adherence to weight loss programs, with significant numbers of patients regaining lost weight or gaining weight over their starting point [ 84 ]. As introduced above, many studies on lifestyle-induced weight loss have been performed on breast cancer survivors because these cohorts typically show excellent study retention rates and adherence to lifestyle intervention plans [ 85 ]. Indeed, at-home intervention studies and supervised exercise programs have shown healthy changes in dietary behaviors and improved quality of life, along with weight loss and increased physical activity in long-term survivors [ 86 , 87 ]. With regard to exercise alone, risk in murine models was first examined with supportive evidence showing that exercise reduces breast cancer incidence [ 88 – 90 ]. Indeed, voluntary exercise reduces tumor incidence and growth in mouse models as well as pre-operative breast cancer patients [ 91 , 92 ].

Like obesity, exercise and dietary changes induce varied and complex benefits that can be linked to reduced cancer risk or progression from immunity to growth factors to adipokines to metabolism. For example, exercise upregulates anti-tumor immunity and downregulates immunosuppressive cells [ 92 ]. Others have reported that exercise intervention alone leads to reduced circulating levels of insulin, IGF-1, and leptin, improved natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity, or elevated adiponectin in patients [ 87 , 93 ]. In patients, a healthy diet correlates to a reduction in circulatory estradiol and other sex hormones that promote oncogenesis [ 94 ], while fasting was associated with a decreased hemoglobin A1c and reduced risk of breast cancer recurrence [ 95 ].

In sum, published work supports the idea that healthy exercise habits and dietary choices are vital to reducing breast cancer risk or recurrence. This research area is expanding, with multiple randomized controlled clinical trials underway [ 74 ]. One such study, a large-scale, randomized phase III trial known as the Breast Cancer Weight Loss (BWEL, NCT02750826 ) trial, will examine the effects of weight loss due to lifestyle changes on disease-free survival among breast cancer patients [ 96 ]. Similar lifestyle changes have been shown to improve outcomes for other diseases associated with obesity as a modifiable risk factor, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and associated cardiovascular disease [ 97 ]. Further study must be completed to draw any conclusions about reducing risk or improving survival with specific successful weight loss and lifestyle intervention approaches that are sustainable.

Surgically induced weight loss and benefits

The most effective method for long-term, sustained weight loss in adolescents and adults is bariatric surgery when combined with healthy lifestyle changes [ 98 – 102 ]. Surgical methods for weight loss were first introduced in the 1950s [ 103 ] yet did not gain wide prevalence in the USA or worldwide until the 1990s, when obesity rates and associated health conditions had risen to high enough levels to be considered an epidemic by the CDC and the WHO [ 1 , 2 , 104 ]. Historically, bariatric surgeries fall into two categories: restrictive or malabsorptive. Standard procedures performed today include adjustable gastric banding (AGB), vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) [ 105 ] (Fig. 1 ). AGB and VSG are restrictive gastric surgeries that primarily restrict or limit food intake. The resectional nature of VSG is also characterized by increased gastric emptying and hormone changes, leading to sustained, long-term weight loss. The RYGB, in contrast, is both a restriction of stomach size, leaving only a small pouch, as well as a dramatic rearrangement of the gut with impacts on gut peptides and gastric emptying. Gastric banding was widely utilized but has fallen out of favor in the past five years due to adverse side effects, such as failure to sustain long-term weight loss, band slippage, and perforation [ 106 , 107 ]. The VSG, performed by removing the fundus and greater curvature of the stomach laparoscopically [ 108 ], is a technically more straightforward operation than the RYGB. In the USA, the VSG increased in prevalence from 11% to 70% of all bariatric surgeries performed from 2006 to 2015, while RYGB decreased proportionally [ 109 ]. While several studies show no significant difference in weight loss achieved and sustained by RYGB and VSG patients [ 110 – 112 ], others have shown that RYGB is more effective at supporting long-term weight loss than VSG [ 113 ]. Additionally, several studies have shown RYGB superior to VSG in comorbidity resolution, especially regarding diabetes [ 114 ]. However, the decreased level of invasiveness involved in VSG and its lower operative complexity have made it more appealing as an initial approach for many surgeons and patients. Fig. 1 Common bariatric surgery approaches . Compared with the normal intact stomach, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (AGB) maintains the gastric cavity but restricts the fundus and cardia just below the esophagus to slow the rate of feeding and induce more rapid satiety. AGB was widely utilized but has fallen out of favor in the past 5 years due to adverse side effects, such as failure to sustain long-term weight loss, band slippage, and perforation. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is both a restriction of stomach size leaving only a small pouch, as well as a dramatic rearrangement of the gut with impacts on gut peptides and gastric emptying. RYGB involves division of the upper gastric cavity from the lower, where the remaining duodenal pancreatic and hepatic secretions are diverted free of digesta and are anastomosed at a distal region of jejunum. Vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) involves removal of the fundus and greater curvature portion of the stomach, leaving a sleeve that connects the esophagus to the duodenum. VSG is characterized by increased gastric emptying and hormone changes

Benefits of bariatric surgery include weight loss as well as many molecular changes that improve health. For instance, RYGB has five principle results, known as the BRAVE effects: b ile flow alteration, r eduction of gastric size, a natomical gut rearrangement with the altered flow of nutrients, v agal manipulation, and e nteric gut hormone modulation [ 115 ]. Many of these effects are shared by the VSG procedure, except for anatomical gut rearrangement and possibly vagal manipulation. Both of these procedures are associated with an overall lack of hunger and improved gastric emptying [ 116 ]. These principles, primarily modulation of the gut microbiome, hormone signaling, and activity of various metabolic pathways, may be the true causes of both weight loss and many of the beneficial side effects of bariatric surgery, such as reducing comorbidities [ 116 , 117 ]. Interestingly, in some patients, some benefits are rapidly induced after surgery, indicating they are not necessarily a result of the weight loss per se [ 118 ]. Additional mechanisms mediating the benefits of bariatric surgery include changes in endocrine signaling, microbiome, bile acid metabolism, and impacts on neuronal pathways [ 119 – 121 ].

Reduction in all-cause mortality after bariatric surgery ranges widely by study from 30 to 60% [ 122 ]. Patients eligible for bariatric surgery are characterized as those with BMI > 40 kg/m 2 or 35–39.9 kg/m 2 in combination with one or more obesity-associated comorbidities [ 3 , 123 ]. Bariatric surgery results in sustained weight loss and decreased risk for multiple obesity-associated conditions [ 114 , 124 – 128 ]. In the long term, bariatric surgery is also more cost-effective when compared to the financial burden of obesity-associated comorbidities [ 129 ], especially for women [ 130 ]. Despite these benefits, in 2018, bariatric surgery procedures were undertaken by less than 1% of the eligible population [ 3 , 123 ]. There are several potential explanations for the low percentage of patients willing to undergo bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgery is an intensive procedure with long-term follow-up and lifestyle changes required. Patients must be healthy enough to experience such a surgery. Public distrust in the safety of such operations persists in the general population, partly because this surgery is intended for communities that are already more vulnerable to adverse complications of surgical procedures [ 131 ]. Other significant barriers include a lack of knowledge of the low risk yet high benefit of surgery by both patients and potential referring practitioners, a lack of insurance coverage, especially in public health plans, and the stigmatization of obesity, including the public perception of obesity as a lifestyle choice and not a disease. Currently, mortality rates are very low for all types of bariatric surgery, decreasing tenfold since the 1990s, and fall within accepted operative mortality rates at 0.3% for experienced hospitals [ 118 , 123 , 132 ]. Indeed, compared to the early 1990s, when open surgeries were the primary approach, laparoscopic surgery approaches now dominate bariatric surgery, which both improves outcomes and reduces recovery time [ 133 ]. Interestingly, benefits after bariatric surgery appear to be skewed towards women in the current research, as the cancer rates among men remained essentially unchanged [ 134 ]. The sex disparity in cancer risk could have biological underpinnings, but it should be noted that more women have undergone bariatric surgery and were available for analysis. Indeed, from 2002 to 2011, 80.7% of bariatric surgery patients in the USA were women [ 135 ]. Further study is necessary to determine the impact of bariatric surgery on male cancer risk and outcomes. Future studies are imminent, with the percentage of male patients receiving bariatric surgery increasing [ 135 ].

In sum, while bariatric surgeries are greatly increasing in prevalence, research is lagging to fully estimate the benefits of these approaches. As of 2022, 58.8% of studies had a follow-up time of just 1–2 years, which is a limitation to understanding the full impacts of these surgeries [ 136 ]. Thus, longer-term studies are needed to examine how and to what extent the underlying mechanisms of the benefits of bariatric surgery persist over many years.

Bariatric surgery and breast cancer

Recent bariatric surgery studies have sparked great interest in the cancer field. Several retrospective studies reported reduced risk for some types of cancer as long-term benefits of bariatric surgery [ 134 , 137 , 138 ]. The decrease in all-cause cancer mortality varies up to 60% [ 122 ]. The SPLENDID study (Surgical Procedures and Long-term Effectiveness in Neoplastic Disease Incidence and Death) had a median follow-up of 6.1 years and examines a composite obesity-associated cancer score of 13 cancer types as the primary endpoint. SPLENDID results showed that bariatric surgery was associated with a 32% reduction in obesity-associated cancer and a 48% overall cancer-related mortality [ 139 ].

Regarding breast cancer specifically, bariatric surgery reduced breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women compared to non-surgical controls, with the most significant impact on risk reduction in ER-negative tumors, with a 64% decrease in risk [ 120 , 134 , 140 ]. Moderate declines in ER-positive [ 141 ] and HER2-positive breast cancer rates were reported [ 142 ]. An additional benefit to bariatric surgery is that subsequent cancers appear less aggressive or detected earlier. When breast cancer is diagnosed in patients after bariatric surgery, it is often diagnosed early as stage I with decreased prevalence of stage III or IV breast cancer [ 143 ]. Furthermore, bariatric surgery following remission from breast cancer resulted in sustained weight loss comparable to that of patients without a history of cancer. This may lengthen the disease-free survival time for breast cancer survivors [ 144 ]. In sum, bariatric surgery is promising for maintaining long-term benefits associated with weight loss with increasing evidence of reduced risk in some cancers, especially obesity-associated cancers. However, the benefits of bariatric surgery may not be so clear-cut. A potential complicating factor to the conclusion that bariatric surgery is protective against all obesity-associated cancers is evidence of an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) after bariatric surgery [ 145 ]. Other studies have shown no increased risk of CRC associated with bariatric surgery [ 146 ]. This apparent discrepancy in risk of CRC likely reflects how the pathogenesis of cancer is heterogeneous and can be affected by different insults such as IBD, inherited germline mutations, and other factors. Further investigation is required to fully understand the benefits and risks of this life-changing surgery, especially concerning cancer risk of primary tumor development compared to recurrence. Table 1 highlights current clinical trials active or completed during this review. Table 1 Clinical trials from clinicaltrials.org . The nine cancer-associated bariatric surgery human clinical trials are summarized by title, status, and conditions examined NCT number Title Status Conditions NCT03946423 BAriaTric Surgery After Breast Cancer Treatment (BATS) Not yet recruiting Early-stage breast cancer|obesity NCT04008563 B-FiERCE—Bariatric Surgery for Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Atypical Hyperplasia and Grade 1 Cancer of the Endometrium Not yet recruiting Endometrial cancer|atypical hyperplasia|bariatric surgery candidate NCT04170335 Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Breast Density Improvement and Impact on Breast Cancer Risk in Severe Obese Patients Recruiting Breast cancer|morbid obesity|bariatric surgery candidate NCT04839614 Concurrent Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Weight Loss Surgery in Obese Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma or Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia Recruiting Endometrial carcinoma|obesity|EIN|endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia|endometrial cancer stage I NCT04284943 STARDOM- Surgical TreAtment for Obesity-Related Disease and Onco-Metabolic Surgery Recruiting Gastric cancer|diabetes mellitus, type 2 NCT01047735 TRIABETES- The TRIABETES—ARMMS-T2D Study: A Randomized Trial to Compare Surgical and Medical Treatments for Type 2 Diabetes Active, not recruiting Type 2 diabetes mellitus|obesity NCT01922778 Screening for Endometrial Abnormalities in Overweight and Obese Women Completed Endometrial cancer NCT02681120 Pilot Study of the Effect of Weight Loss on Breast Tissue and Blood Biomarkers in Women at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer Completed Breast neoplasms|obesity NCT04345328 IMPORTUNE- Impact of Bariatric Surgery on the Gut Environment Completed Bariatric surgery candidate

Modeling obesity in various mouse strains

Human cohorts offer insight into the effects of bariatric surgery and weight loss on cancer and other conditions. Still, current studies have been primarily retrospective, and this type of analysis is limited in the questions that can be answered. To be able to examine the mechanisms responsible for the benefits of weight loss, in vivo models are beneficial. Since the mid-1950s, researchers have been developing rodent models to mimic diet-induced obesity (DIO). Naturally occurring mutations in rodents and the development of transgenic mice complement DIO models, but single gene mutant mice are often not the most accurate representation of DIO observed in humans. Therefore, DIO and obesity-related conditions have been induced in murine models for decades by feeding the animals high fat diets; the effects are well-characterized [ 147 , 148 ]. However, variability in diet, timing, and mouse genetics across studies often leads to inconsistent DIO findings [ 149 ].

To best conduct diet studies in pre-clinical models, it is vital to use defined, controlled diets that are matched on important dietary factors such as protein and micronutrient content. A major concern from a nutritional standpoint is that many researchers use chow to keep mice lean as the standard diet control as compared to DIO mice fed a defined high fat diet. This is adequate and understandably cheaper to maintain lean mice, but this approach is not ideal as a proper control. Micronutrients, fiber, and dietary components like phytoestrogens vary from lot to lot in chow, creating extreme variability in studies and introducing mediators that impact cancer outcomes [ 149 ]. Murine diets from commercial sources range from 45 to 60% kcal derived from fat, with 10% fat content typically used as the matched control for the high fat diets [ 149 ]. The main component in current commercial high fat diets is a high percentage of lard, or pig fat. However, lard is now consumed by Americans at much lower levels than were common decades ago [ 150 , 151 ]. Still, lard-based diets remain the staple of pre-clinical DIO studies. Some dietary approaches modulate the fatty acid content [ 152 ]. Additional methods attempt to mimic the typical American or “Western Diet” more closely with a mixed diet of human foods, called the Cafeteria Diet [ 153 – 155 ], which varies widely from lab to lab. Others add cholesterol to a high fat diet to mimic Western Diet. Therefore, it is essential to note dietary interventions in manuscripts. Fortunately, investigators and journals pay increasing attention to diet details, exposures, and timing of diet intervention, which, taken together, will add to the clarity of our findings.

A critical factor in DIO studies is that mouse strains exhibit different extents of weight gain when exposed to high fat diets, just like individuals respond to various diets differently (Fig. 2 ). C57BL/6 mice are the classic strain used for many DIO studies because both sexes are readily obesogenic. C57BL/6 mice are highly susceptible to weight gain and tend to overeat on high fat diets [ 156 ]. Males tend to gain weight faster than females, with the male mice showing significant differences in weight gain between high and low fat diets after 6 weeks of diet, while females require 15 weeks to demonstrate such differences [ 157 ]. Notably, there can be variability in the C57BL/6 strain with some mice non-responsive to DIO weight gain. C57BL/6 variability in DIO is often attributed to differences in energy expenditure, ketogenic pathway regulation, or microbiomes [ 158 ]. Likewise, care should be taken to consider vendor and colony maintenance for consistency within studies. Mice from Jackson Labs, Inc. (C57BL/6 J) differ genetically from the NIH subline of C57BL/6 N (also sold at Jackson Labs), for example, with J or N in the strain name. The same is true for mice purchased from Taconic Inc. vs. Charles River Labs, Inc vs. Jackson, etc. [ 159 ], and the microbiome from these vendors also varies at baseline [ 160 , 161 ]. Furthermore, mouse microbiomes may change for several reasons post-shipment, including transport from one building to another. These considerations are crucial for microbiome-dependent studies, as reviewed in Hugenholtz and de Vos [ 162 ]. Taken together, C57BL/6 mice are highly reliable obesogenic models but careful attention to study design should be implemented before and during DIO studies. Fig. 2 Diet-induced obesity varies by strain and sex . The susceptibility of murine models to diet-induced obesity (DIO) varies based on sex and background strain. C57BL/6 animals are highly obesogenic, where both sexes become obese, but males are more responsive to DIO compared to females with a more rapid and greater extent of adiposity observed. FVB/N animals exhibit highly variable weight gain based on the sex, age, and study in response to DIO. BALB/c animals are DIO-resistant regardless of sex or age

FVB/N mice are a strain commonly used for cancer studies but rarely used in DIO studies. In contrast to the C57BL/6 strain, the FVB/N strain shows significantly greater variability in responsiveness to DIO [ 150 ]. For example, substantial weight gain in FVB/N males has been published [ 163 , 164 ]. In contrast, Boudina et al. showed resistance to high fat DIO and weight gain in FVB/N males [ 165 ]. Likewise, Devlin et al. reported females with no high fat diet-induced weight gain or increases in adiposity in FVB/N mice carried out to 20 weeks by body mass or body fat quantification [ 156 ]. In contrast, Zhu et al. published that a high fat diet following dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA) exposure resulted in weight gain in FVB/N female mice carried out to 37 weeks of age [ 166 ]. Our group has extensive experience with a genetic model of cancer in the FVB/N strain. We reported moderate weight gain and increases in adiposity, with obesity-like detection of crown-like structures in adipose, and elevated obesity-associated endocrine factors, including leptin, using a transgenic breast cancer model in the FVB/N strain (C3(1)-T antigen, or C3(1)-Tag) [ 81 , 82 , 167 – 169 ]. We reported that obesity-like changes were reduced in C3(1)-Tag FVB/N mice by weight loss once obese mice were switched from a high fat diet to a low fat diet [ 81 , 169 ]. Age and extent of exposure are critical to consider as well in DIO studies. In one study, young female mice introduced to a high fat diet at around 3 weeks of age gained significant amounts of weight, similar to that of age-matched C57BL/6 mice, when compared to low fat diet controls; however, when a high fat diet was introduced at 8 weeks of age, the response to diet was much less dramatic [ 170 ]. Mild weight gain was detected in older FVB/N female mice exposed to a high fat diet [ 171 ], but the difference in weight gain between low and high fat diet-fed mice was inconsequential compared to that observed in C57BL/6 female mice at the same age. Thus, FVB/N mice remain relatively controversial, with results across the spectrum of DIO. Depending on the study, FVB/N are generally perceived to be either resistant to DIO, moderately susceptible to becoming overweight but perhaps not frank obesity, or an adequate model for DIO. In sum, the model must be tested in each lab’s specific animal facility with diet details and timing of dietary exposure adequately controlled for adequate determination of DIO in FVB/N mice.

Interestingly, a third strain commonly used in cancer studies is BALB/c. It is well-established that BALB/c mice display minimal to no weight gain on a high fat diet compared to C57BL/6 and FVB/N strains. Indeed, the strain is often termed “obesity-resistant” [ 172 ]. In male BALB/c mice, high fat diet induced minimal weight gain but to a far lesser degree than that measured in C57BL/6 mice [ 173 ]. However, increases in colon cancer progression and metastases were shown in BALB/c males consuming a high fat diet, suggesting impacts of diet alone in the absence of DIO [ 174 ]. High fat diet induced changes in metabolite profiles despite the lack of significant weight gain [ 175 ]. In female BALB/c mice, a high fat diet increased tumor progression and metastases following injection with 4T1 breast cancer cells [ 176 , 177 ], while others have shown that HFD (with no weight gain) did not increase 4T1 progression [ 178 ]. Taken together, high fat diet in the DIO-resistant BALB/c needs further study. Like other strains, timing of diet intervention is critical. The introduction of a high fat diet during pubertal mammary gland development, which is 3 to 6 weeks of age, led to weight gain and changes to the mammary duct development in C57BL/6 but not BALB/C female mice of the same age [ 179 ]. However, a high fat diet during this pubertal period in BALB/c females reduced carcinogen-induced tumor latency. High fat diet elevated inflammatory factors, supporting the importance of diet exposure in the absence of obesity and understanding critical windows of exposure susceptibility [ 180 ]. In sum, the BALB/c model is excellent for studying diet-induced cancer risk or progression but fails to induce frank DIO. Thus, if the intention is to research obesity per se, the BALB/c strain is a poor model, especially when investigating weight loss impacts after dietary interventions or bariatric surgery.

Last, examining patient-derived cell lines or xenografts (PDXs) in the obese setting introduces another layer of complexity. Immunocompromised murine models are necessary to avoid rejection of human cell lines or patient-derived samples. However, there are immunocompromised mouse strains, such as severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice [ 181 ], that may be susceptible to DIO, including obesogenic (C57BL/6 J or C3H/HeJ), or DIO resistant (BALB/cBy), or NOD/ShiLtSz background, which is variable in response to HFD depending on background [ 182 , 183 ]. NSG mice are from Jackson Labs on the background NOD/ShiLtJ and are commonly used in PDX studies, but their response to HFD appears variable. These strains are just some of the available options for PDX studies. The genetic background of the strain used must be noted and DIO responsiveness carefully considered based on the research question.

Overall, numerous studies use the three primary mouse strains discussed here, C57BL/6, FVB/N, and BALB/c, as models of DIO and diet-induced weight gain or resistance. There are multiple preclinical models of DIO to examine cancer risk and progression using carcinogen initiation, transgenic oncogene expression, syngeneic cell implantation, and more, which will be highly informative to the field. Primary study endpoints include obesity per se, specific dietary impacts, and the extent of weight gain or adiposity impacting cancer outcomes. The intention of the study design should inform model selection.

Modeling bariatric surgery in preclinical setting

DIO and dietary interventions to induce weight loss, such as changing diet, timed feeding, fasting, and caloric restriction, are increasingly common in cancer outcomes studies. However, examining bariatric surgery after DIO is a little studied area that holds great interest based on the epidemiological findings about bariatric surgery and cancer risk discussed above. One major limiting factor is the skill set necessary to perform these complex, expensive, and time-consuming surgeries. Despite the technical challenges of mouse survival surgery, multiple groups have employed surgical models throughout the last decade to examine a wide range of obesity-associated conditions ranging from diabetes to cardiovascular disease and even gut-brain crosstalk. This field is growing immensely with over 170 publications on PubMed in the last year alone using rodent models of bariatric surgery. A selected subset of manuscripts published since 2010 are summarized in Table 2 . Table 2 Rodent models of bariatric surgery highlighted in this review . The results of 20 preclinical studies from 2010 to 2021 are summarized based on the rodent model, sex included, type of bariatric intervention, primary outcomes, and study results [ 184 – 187 , 189 – 194 , 196 – 199 , 202 , 203 , 205 , 206 , 312 , 313 ] Study Model Sex Surgical techniques Primary outcomes Study results Stepfather et al. 2010 Long-Evans rats Male, female VSG Weight loss Weight loss is not sustained over time Chambers et al. 2011 Long-Evans rats Male RGB, VSG Weight loss and glucose regulation Both methods had similar weight loss and improvement in glucose regulation Yin et al. 2011 C57BL/6, FVB/N mice Not specified Gastric banding, VSG, RYGB, modified RYGB, biliopancreatic diversion Comparison of weight loss induced by multiple bariatric surgery procedures RYGB and biliopancreatic diversion are the most effective but also have the most side effects Asian et al. 2012 Long-Evans rats Female RYGB Effects of estradiol on weight loss and efficacy of satiation signaling Estradiol increases weight loss and satiation signaling Yin et al. 2012 C57BL/6 mice Not specified Duodenal-jejunal bypass, gastric banding, VSG, modified RYGB, biliopancreatic diversion Comparison of weight loss induced by multiple bariatric surgery procedures Duodenal-jejunal bypass is more effective than VSG, but more side effects Brinckerhoff et al. 2013 Sprague Dawley rats Female VSG Weight loss, adiponectin, and leptin levels VSG results in weight loss and improvement of adiponectin and leptin levels Grayson et al. 2013 Long-Evans rats Female VSG Effects on the female reproductive cycle and their offspring VSG improved the reproductive process, but offspring on HFD were predisposed to glucose intolerance and obesity Liou et al. 2013 C57BL/6 J mice Male RYGB Adiposity and gut microbiome composition Shifts in microbiome composition contribute to decreased adiposity Saedi et al. 2013 Long-Evans and Goto-Kakizaki rats Male RYGB Weight loss, glucose metabolism RYGB in rodents improves glucose metabolism as seen in diabetic humans Ryan et al. 2014 C57BL/6 J FXR KO and W.T. mice Male VSG Effects of FXR signaling on feeding, glucose tolerance, and gut microbiome composition Bile acid signaling plays a critical role in modulating the results of VSG surgery Hao et al. 2016 C57BL/6 J mice Male RYGB Body weight, composition, food intake, and energy expenditure Weight loss is achieved through increased energy expenditure, not decreased food intake Frikke-Schmidt et al. 2017 C57BL/6 J mice Male VSG Adipocyte tissue leukocyte profile VSG causes changes in adipose immune populations, regardless of weight loss Grayson et al. 2017 Long-Evans rats Male, female VSG Sex differences in fat loss, hepatic gene expression, and cholesterol metabolism Males see a reduction in hepatic lipids while females see an increase in the hepatic inflammatory pathway; VLDL was decreased in females alone Hao et al. 2017 C57BL/6 J mice Male RYGB, VSG RYGB vs. VSG in weight loss, food intake, energy expenditure, and glycemic control RYGB is more effective in inducing weight loss and improving glycemic control than VSG Spann et al. 2018 Long-Evans rats Female VSG Effects of VSG on DIO dams VSG reduces T cell populations, increases IL-1β, and increases placental permeability contributing to fetal demise Spann et al. 2019 Long-Evans rats Female VSG Effects on the immune system of offspring The immune system is compromised early in life but rebounds after weaning Ye et al. 2020 C57BL/6 J mice Male RGB, VSG Changes in energy balance and browning of visceral fat RYGB specifically increases resting metabolic rate and fat browning compared to VSG Chaudhari et al. 2021 A C57BL/6 J mice Male VSG Changes in bile acid levels, glucose metabolism VSG causes an increase of a TGR5 agonist, indicating the role of bile acid signaling Chaudhari et al. 2021 B C57BL/6 J mice Male VSG Changes in the gut microbiome, bile acid levels, changes in bile acid signaling VSG induces microbiome shifts that increase bile acid signaling, and this can be replicated in germ-free animals following FMT from VSG animals Stevenson et al. 2021 C57BL/6 mice Male RYGB, VSG Post-op effects of HFD on adipose tissue composition, weight alterations, and metabolic dysregulation RYGB causes lasting improvement in these outcomes, while VSG is comparable to sham control

Both rat and mouse models have been used to examine the effects of surgical weight loss following DIO. In 2010, Stefater et al. described an early method for reviewing the weight loss induced by bariatric surgery in both male and female rats. They showed that in the long term, weight rebounded due to changes in eating habits resulting in a lack of changes in overall calorie intake [ 184 ]. The same group then compared the efficacy of RYGB against VSG in Long-Evans rats; males were fed a 41% high fat, butter oil-based diet and subjected to RYGB, VSG, or accompanying sham procedures to show that both RYGB and VSG resulted in similar patterns of weight loss and glucose regulation [ 185 ]. Later work by Saeidi et al. demonstrated that the improvements to glucose metabolism observed in humans with diabetes are recapitulated in rats following RYGB [ 186 ].

In 2011, Yin et al. developed five types of bariatric surgery in C57BL/6 and FVB/N mice to treat DIO resulting from a 60% high fat diet [ 187 ]. This study was likely conducted in males, though not specified. The surgical models included gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, RYGB, a modified RYGB better adapted to mouse survival, and biliopancreatic diversion [ 187 ]. Biliopancreatic diversion combines sleeve gastrectomy with an intestinal bypass in a highly invasive method previously reserved for individuals with BMI > 50 kg/m 2 [ 188 ]. Recent innovations to decrease complexity make this procedure more attractive to patients and surgeons. Although biliopancreatic diversion and RYGB resulted in the most pronounced weight loss, a higher risk of side effects, such as anemia, was observed in the mice undergoing these procedures, which mirrors the results in patients. Further development in 2012 led to the implementation of the duodenal-jejunal bypass procedure in mice, which involves the removal of the duodenum from the gastrointestinal tract performed on some patients [ 189 ]. Like RYGB and biliopancreatic diversion, the duodenal-jejunal bypass procedure also showed worsened side effects for the mice than the sleeve gastrectomy. Despite the concerns for anemia, multiple studies have successfully used the RYGB surgical approach in preclinical models to examine its effects on estradiol metabolism, body composition, and the nervous system [ 190 – 192 ]. More recent studies have used C57BL/6 mice to compare the efficacy of RYGB versus VSG as it relates to sustained weight loss and glycemic control [ 193 – 195 ], with RYGB producing better results. However, the VSG was effective with significant weight loss with minimal side effects, and it is often used today in preclinical studies. Interestingly, VSG can also alter the immune systems of male C57BL/6 mice in a weight-independent manner [ 196 ], and many of the surgery results are influenced by bile acid signaling [ 197 – 200 ].

A significant factor to consider in interpreting studies, especially about cancers primarily or solely impacting women, such as breast, ovarian, or endometrial cancer, is that most published DIO bariatric surgery studies are completed in male rodents. There are several pros to using male rodents. First, male rodents gain much more weight on a high fat diet and gain that weight faster than females, as noted above. Second, large commercial labs like Jackson Labs, Inc. sell obese males on a high fat diet which makes completing DIO studies much more rapid and feasible. Unfortunately, Jackson Labs does not provide the same DIO service for female mice. This means that each study on female mice must be completed in house over many months to induce DIO. Third, since most publications use male mice, it is possible to compare ongoing studies to previously published work. A significant con when studying diseases specific to females is that females do not gain as much weight as males. To induce sufficient DIO, researchers must maintain mice on a high fat diet for extended periods, often 4–5 months. Some researchers remove the ovary to cause weight gain, but ovariectomy is used to generate a postmenopausal state, which may not be ideal for what the study design intends. Likewise, since Jackson Labs does not stock DIO females, responding to reviewers or implementing new therapies in DIO mice takes a long time. These long-term studies to induce DIO in female mice are costly. Furthermore, female DIO studies typically need larger sample sizes ( N ) to have sufficient statistical power due to lower weight gain compared to low fat diet control. Last, there are fewer established experimental paradigms in the literature to aid in study design or compare ongoing studies to existing literature. Yet including female DIO studies is imperative for reasons detailed below, where we focus on further studies regarding the VSG.

As of 2010, women were more likely to undergo bariatric surgery than men, as discussed above [ 201 ]. However, a model to study bariatric surgery on female rodents with DIO was yet to be published at that time. In 2013, Brinckerhoff et al. published that female Sprague Dawley rats fed a 60% high fat diet that underwent VSG causing weight loss, reducing leptin levels, and improving adiponectin concentrations compared to sham surgery controls [ 202 ]. Grayson et al. demonstrated that VSG improves many of the comorbidities of metabolic syndrome in female Long-Evans rats [ 203 ], just as had been previously reported in males. However, this group later showed that females and males respond differently to the surgery, with females showing changes in the regulation of lipid metabolism genes that are not observed in male rats [ 204 ]. Spann et al. also performed VSG on Long-Evans female rats fed a 40% high fat diet to examine the effects of bariatric surgery on the immune systems of mother and offspring [ 205 , 206 ]. Mothers with VSG-induced reversal of DIO had lower levels of circulating T cells and increased placental permeability, ultimately leading to a high percentage of fetal demise [ 205 ]. Surviving offspring of female dams with previous VSG experienced early decreases in immune competency before rebounding later in life [ 206 ]. VSG on rats is easier simply due to the large size of the animal, but bariatric surgery on female mice has also been conducted. We have reported in C57BL/6 J female mice, that DIO induced significant weight gain, increased adiposity, and leptin compared to lean low fat fed controls, which was lost in DIO mice after VSG [ 207 ]. In our study, we aimed to mimic epidemiologic findings of reduced breast cancer risk after bariatric surgery in patients discussed above. We reported that DIO induced breast cancer progression using a syngeneic transplant model. Importantly, after weight loss by VSG, tumor progression was reduced. We showed that responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) immunotherapy was increased after VSG, but not in DIO mice, suggesting unique changes after bariatric surgery that primed for elevated efficacy of therapy [ 207 ]. In sum, despite limitations of extended time and costs using female mice to reach the extremes of obesity on a high fat diet compared to male mice, the use of female mice in DIO studies undergoing bariatric surgery is increasing. However, studies involving female models of bariatric surgery are still in the minority, comprising only 19% of the papers published on PubMed at the time of this review. With increasing interest from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in benefits of bariatric surgery on cancer risk and outcomes, it is likely that increasing bariatric surgery studies on both male and female pre-clinical models are imminent.

Mechanisms of improved metabolic outcomes associated with surgical weight loss

Bariatric surgery and metabolic signaling

Obesity is a mediator of dysfunction in normal adipose tissue, mammary gland fat pads, or the breast [ 9 , 208 – 212 ]. Of this dysfunction, there are three common mechanisms related to obesity-associated cancer risk: impaired insulin and metabolic signaling, altered sex hormone metabolism, and dysregulated inflammatory conditions [ 213 ]. Bariatric surgery and other weight loss methods may impact each of these mechanisms, though the mechanistic details are under active investigation [ 214 ]. It is currently unclear whether certain benefits of bariatric surgery are associated with the surgery itself or the resulting weight loss.

Increased insulin sensitivity was noted as a beneficial outcome of bariatric surgery as early in the development and characterization process as 1949 [ 215 ]. Further investigation has shown that changes to insulin sensitivity are merely a single component in the more notable changes to glucose metabolism correlated with bariatric surgery that is highly beneficial to reversing some of the more commonly obesity-associated comorbidities: type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension [ 118 ]. As intestinal hormones are stimulated following bariatric surgery to enhance insulin secretion, metabolic regulation is shifted to improve glucose metabolism [ 215 ]. Furthermore, increased insulin sensitivity is linked to shifts in immune phenotype, promoting anti-inflammatory aspects of immunity such as Th2 differentiation and systemic decrease in reactive oxygen species (ROS) [ 216 ]. These shifts in ROS production are significant in terms of cancer risk and promotion; ROS is a known inducer of DNA damage and genetic instability (discussed below). Likewise, insulin resistance has been connected to the development and prognosis of breast cancer [ 217 – 219 ]. Therefore, surgery-associated reductions in glucose and insulin, improvements in insulin sensitivity, and impacts on various pathways, including immune and oxidative stress, are mediators of the metabolic benefit associated with bariatric surgery. Recent reviews have reported on further potential mechanisms such as incretin hormone responses, bile acid and bile acid receptor signaling, and microbiota changes [ 119 , 220 , 221 ], not discussed in detail herein.

Leptin is an adipokine released by adipocytes involved in a range of cellular functions, from proliferation and angiogenesis to differentiation and inflammation [ 219 , 222 ]. Increased serum levels have been associated with breast cancer occurrence and tumor aggression across all subtypes [ 222 , 223 ], primarily in obese and/or postmenopausal women [ 224 ]. Leptin promotes tumor initiation, development, proliferation, and metastasis through various signaling mechanisms [ 225 , 226 ]. Leptin also induces ROS production by activating NADPH oxidases and influences the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [ 227 ]. Therefore, decreased leptin is an essential mediator of beneficial outcomes associated with bariatric surgery and reduced adiposity [ 184 , 202 ].

Another obesity-associated factor impacted by bariatric surgery is estrogen signaling. Increased levels of white adipose tissue (WAT) are accompanied by increased aromatase activity [ 219 ]. Enhanced aromatase activity results in the rise of circulating sex hormones such as estradiol and other estrogens. As mentioned previously, weight loss by lifestyle intervention has been shown to reduce these circulating levels [ 77 , 94 ], as does bariatric surgery-induced weight loss [ 228 ]. Lowered estrogen exposure reduces the risk of developing ER-positive breast cancer [ 225 ]. However, a concern after bariatric surgery is decreased bone density, which could also be attributed to reduced estrogen levels [ 229 , 230 ]. Therefore, bariatric surgery-induced weight loss and reductions in adiposity would be beneficial in reducing overall estrogen concentrations, but this reduction comes with potential side effects that must be monitored. Interestingly, as noted above, the most significant impact on risk reduction after bariatric surgery was in ER-negative patients where estrogen signaling is not occurring in tumors due to low or absent ER expression. These complex interactions must be further studied to understand the benefits of bariatric surgery.

Bariatric surgery and the immune system

Excess amounts of WAT have a remarkable impact on the immune system systemically and in tissues such as adipose depots [ 231 – 234 ]. Obesity impacts various immune cells, altering the proliferation of resident cells or recruiting them to adipose depots such as the epithelium surrounding the mammary gland or the mammary fat pad, resulting in an imbalance of pro-inflammatory and regulatory or anti-inflammatory mechanisms that can impair protective immunity to increase cancer risk and progression [ 231 , 232 , 235 , 236 ]. As the extent of WAT increases and adipocytes expand with triglyceride storage, oxygen requirements exceed availability, leading adipocytes to become hypertrophic and undergo apoptosis [ 237 ]. These elevated levels of adipocyte expansion and cell death trigger innate immune responses and stimulate a pro-inflammatory immune state [ 238 ]. In the past two decades, the increase in our understanding of myeloid lineages, tissue-specific cell phenotypes, and innate and adaptive immune cell changes between preclinical models and humans has been immense [ 232 ]. The current understanding is that low-level, chronic (“smoldering”) inflammation resulting from obesity can cause oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and DNA damage as well as poor DNA repair, which results in genetic instability [ 67 , 239 , 240 ]; together, these factors can predispose cells to cancer initiation. Genetic instability (i.e., DNA integrity and stability) is necessary for tumorigenesis [ 208 ].

However, a sometimes-complicated notion is that obesity also leads to compensatory immunosuppressive mechanisms to avoid a constant, full-blown pro-inflammatory response, similar to controlling any immune reaction, to maintain homeostasis. These mechanisms include reduced absolute numbers of activated CD8 + T cells, T cell suppression by PD-1 [ 241 , 242 ], T cell exhaustion [ 243 ], and dysfunctional NK cells [ 244 ]. Thus, obesity induces a complex and dynamic state of pro-inflammatory immune cell content and function with an influx of monocyte-derived “M1”-like macrophages, combined with reductions in immunomodulatory/regulatory or dysfunctional immune cells such as regulatory T cells (Tregs), “M2”-like macrophages, or NK Cells, together with an induction of checkpoint ligands (discussed below) [ 245 – 248 ], and elevated immunosuppressive cells such as immature monocytes or myeloid-derived suppressive cells (MDSCs) [ 249 – 253 ]. Peripheral Treg levels are reduced in correlation with increasing adiposity in humans [ 254 , 255 ]. Fat resident Tregs, however, are a specific subtype of Treg cells that are abundant in adipose tissue [ 256 ], are increased in obesity [ 254 ], and likely perpetuate the obese phenotype. Paradigm shifting work described the importance of myeloid cells in adipose tissue which established adipose tissue and not merely a storage depot but an active immune depot. Macrophage infiltration to WAT was reported in back-to-back seminal publications in 2003 by Xu and Weisberg [ 257 , 258 ]. Over the past two decades, a large body of work has shown that macrophages in obese adipose display a mixed phenotype that is dependent upon the extent and duration of obesity, specific adipose depot, site of origin of myeloid precursor, and severity of insulin resistance [ 259 , 260 ]. Together, obesity’s chronic inflammation may increase the risk of immune-associated conditions such as cancer while suppressing levels of immunity that may protect against these conditions, or failed protective immunity.

Since obesity induces a pro-oncogenic state, it follows that weight loss may improve or reverse effects. Weight loss, specifically bariatric surgery, has been shown to reverse many of the impacts of obesity on the immune system, particularly low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress in both mouse models [ 261 ] and human studies [ 262 – 264 ]. Data on weight loss-induced changes to immunity after bariatric surgery is emerging. There is evidence that leukocyte infiltration of adipose tissue remains elevated above baseline for as long as 12 months following bariatric surgery in patients [ 265 ]. However, others have reported that surgically induced weight loss was shown to reverse this enrichment 3 months after gastric bypass in a human cohort [ 266 ]. Further, bariatric surgery decreased monocyte content and shifted circulatory T lymphocytes from Th2 to more pro-inflammatory Th1 [ 262 , 267 , 268 ]. Bariatric surgery has been indicated to restore pre-obesity ratios of M1/M2-like macrophages [ 269 ]. This polarization shift may be related to weight loss-induced decreases in the expression of molecules involved in macrophage chemotaxis and relief of the tissue hypoxia commonly found in obese patients [ 270 ]. Multiple studies have also described tissue-specific shifts in neutrophil populations, with increased neutrophils found in splenic and adipose tissue after bariatric surgery [ 265 , 271 – 273 ]. Considerable work has been done to examine the effects of obesity, weight loss, and bariatric surgery on the B cell compartment to restore obesity-associated dysfunction [ 272 – 277 ]. With regard to cancer risk, studies must understand how bariatric surgery will impact specific immune subtypes, which depots (circulating, WAT, breast/mammary gland, or other tissues) will be affected, and how long these changes will persist after surgery. The advances in flow cytometry, reduced RNA sequencing costs, and increasing single-cell sequencing with advanced bioinformatics will transform our understanding of changes to immune cells with weight loss by bariatric surgery to help inform our understanding of cancer risk and impacts on cancer progression.

Another factor that impacts the immune system is the gut or extra-intestinal microbiome [ 119 ]. Bariatric surgery has been shown to increase the gut microbial richness and diversity, which is lost in obesity, though not increased to the levels observed in lean patients [ 278 ]. In this aspect, not all bariatric surgeries are created equal, with RYGB exhibiting more substantial alterations than gastric banding procedures [ 279 ]. Taking probiotics may help enhance the effects of bariatric surgery on microbiome richness. However, probiotics have only been examined in a few studies showing conflicting results between RYGB, where an improvement of microbiome diversity was reported following probiotic treatment, and VSG, which saw no such effects [ 280 ]. The increase in diversity may result from reduced comorbidities allowing for discontinuance of some medications [ 278 ] or the dietary and lifestyle changes encouraged in post-surgery patients [ 280 , 281 ]. One study in a rat model observed that the changes in the microbiota occurred independently of weight loss following RYGB, indicating that other mechanisms beyond obesity and weight loss may be at work [ 282 ]. The impact of the gut and extra-intestinal microbes on cancer is a rapidly emerging field, mainly because gut microbes associate with and impact the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors [ 283 – 289 ]. Microbes and their microbially derived peptides and metabolites affect the enteric and systemic immune system, including the tumor microenvironment; the role of bariatric surgery, adaptive and innate immunity, and changes in the microbiome are areas of active study.

Overall, bariatric surgery may decrease the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and shift the phenotype of adaptive and innate immune cells towards the anti-inflammatory Th2 cells or M2-like phenotypes. This shift from a pro-inflammatory state to a regulatory state benefits tissue homeostasis. It reduces levels of cytokines and growth factors, improving comorbidities associated with obesity, such as insulin resistance. However, this loss of pro-inflammatory cells and increased regulatory cells is an apparent recipe for failed protective immune surveillance and increased cancer risk or progression through weak anti-tumor immunity. Yet, in long-term retrospective studies detailed above, epidemiologic evidence suggests the opposite: bariatric surgery reduces subsequent cancer risk. This implies that multiple factors associated with weight loss impact cancer risk. It is currently unclear as to whether the reversal of immune-mediated changes is entirely due to weight loss or instead due to the impacts of bariatric surgery, which are currently under active study. The investigation of alterations to metabolic pathways (i.e., reduced insulin, leptin, and estrogen) and varied immune cells, phenotypes, microbiome, and changes with time after bariatric surgery with weight loss are critical to examine.

Bariatric surgery and immunotherapy

Obesity serves as a unique challenge for immunotherapy. Current strategies in immunotherapy target immunosuppressive proteins such as PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4, among others. Immune checkpoint proteins are immune-inhibitory and depend on the crosstalk between the cancer cells, T cells, MDSCs, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), NK cells, and more [ 246 , 290 – 294 ]. For the past decade, immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has been a revolutionary intervention in some cancers such as melanoma, with just moderate effects in others, which is often due to the “cold” or immune excluded nature of some tumor microenvironments. Indeed, PD-1 and PD-L1 expression is correlated with worse outcomes in breast cancer patients [ 290 , 295 – 302 ]. However, greater expression of these immune checkpoint proteins is also associated with improved responsiveness to immunotherapy. For example, combination therapy of nab-paclitaxel with ICB atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1 treatment) was efficacious for a minority of TNBC patients exhibiting high PD-L1 expression [ 303 ].

A limiting factor with ICB therapy is toxicity, including immune-related adverse events (irAEs) [ 66 , 304 ]. Activation of the immune system by ICB in the obese state, which is already associated with inflammation, must be administered carefully to avoid exacerbating inflammatory mediators to inducing therapy-limiting complications [ 305 ]. In one study, a model of obese mice reported evidence of lethal cytokine storms in response to immunotherapy treatment. However, this study was not a cancer immunotherapy study [ 306 ]. Indeed, published studies in murine models have not demonstrated elevated lethality in obese mice [ 207 , 307 ].

In fact, in obese patients, obesity has proven favorable in ICB treatment, as reviewed previously [ 65 , 308 ]. PD-1 and PD-L1 expression or ligand-positive immune cells are increased by obesity, which likely allows for better efficacy of anti-PD-L1 treatments [ 245 – 247 ]. Obesity improves responsiveness to immunotherapy in melanoma and other cancers, but has not been reported for breast cancer [ 309 – 311 ]. One potential underlying mechanism is elevated inflammatory cytokines in obesity that stabilize PD-L1 or PD-1 [ 207 , 248 ]. Thus, inflammation associated with the obese tumor microenvironment may synergistically increase PD-L1 or PD-1. We have begun to investigate the impact of VSG on breast cancer and immunotherapy. VSG itself induced PD-L1 which allowed for highly effective anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in pre-clinical studies [ 207 ]. How obesity and weight loss, specifically by bariatric surgery, impacts the tumor microenvironment and systemic anti-tumor immunity, especially immune checkpoint ligands and immune cells, and response to ICB is under active investigation.

Conclusions and future directions

With this review, we have highlighted the complexity of obesity’s impacts on risk and prognoses in epidemiological studies, preclinical models, and clinical trials. Obesity is associated with chronic low-level inflammation and hypoxia that can lead to genomic instability, elevated production of growth factors and adipokines such as estrogen and leptin, altered microbiota, and pro-inflammatory signaling combined with elevated immunosuppression. In general, obesity elevates cancer risk, which is highly consistent in postmenopausal breast cancer studies. Impacts on premenopausal breast cancer risk in different studies are varied from elevated risk of obesity to null to protective, likely depending on breast cancer subtype or methods to measure obesity. As specific subtypes and a more detailed evaluation of obesity metrics with the inclusion of menopausal status, race, and ethnicity are undertaken, we believe that the picture will become more evident. It is certain that obesity negatively impacts patient outcomes, recurrence, and survival in most settings. Weight loss before cancer onset or after treatment is beneficial. These benefits of weight loss are summarized in Fig. 3 . While lifestyle interventions can reduce obesity and overweight, they often do not reach the critical levels necessary to induce positive changes and are difficult to maintain. Recent evidence suggests a long-term benefit of bariatric surgery that extends to greatly reduced cancer risks. Preclinical models, while sometimes variable, are beginning to disentangle the potential underlying mechanisms associated with dietary or bariatric surgery-associated weight loss. The impact of therapy, such as immunotherapy, on obesity-driven cancers and outcomes after lifestyle-associated weight loss or bariatric surgery is only beginning to be examined in patient populations and using preclinical models by our group and others. A deeper understanding of the immune cells, tissue signaling cascades, and cellular mechanisms underpinning these risks will lead to the identification of new targeted interventions aimed at improving outcomes. Future studies will ideally provide insight into biomarkers of obesity, immunosurveillance, and protective immunity for those at greater risk of cancer or point towards novel directions to improve therapeutic approaches in cancer patients. Fig. 3 Benefits of weight loss by lifestyle or surgical intervention . The benefits associate with weight loss through lifestyle modifications or bariatric surgery include alterations in the mammary adipose with decreased hypoxia, insulin resistance, leptin release, and aromatase expression. These changes are associated with alterations in resident and non-resident immune cell populations that may influence the risk of onset and progression in the setting of breast cancer

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Boston W. Simmons for his help in editing this manuscript.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

1. Organization, W.H. Controlling the global obesity epidemic . [Webpage] [cited 2022 01/28/2022]; Available from: https://www.who.int/activities/controlling-the-global-obesity-epidemic .

2. Services, U.S.D.o.H.a.H., The Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent and decrease overweight and obesity . 2001, Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General. 20669513

3. Altieri MS Examining the rates of obesity and bariatric surgery in the United States Obesity Surgery 2021 31 11 4754 4760 10.1007/s11695-021-05628-y 34345959

4. Prevention, C.f.D.C.a. Defining adult overweight & obesity . Overweight & obesity 2022 June 3, 2022; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/basics/adult-defining.html .

5. Flegal KM Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014 JAMA 2016 315 21 2284 2291 10.1001/jama.2016.6458 27272580 PMC11197437

6. Dietze EC Triple-negative breast cancer in African-American women: Disparities versus biology Nature Reviews Cancer 2015 15 4 248 254 10.1038/nrc3896 25673085 PMC5470637

7. Plank-Bazinet JL A report of the Women’s Health Congress Workshop on the health of women of color: A critical intersection at the corner of sex/gender and race/ethnicity Journal of Women's Health (Larchmt) 2016 25 1 4 10 10.1089/jwh.2015.5666 PMC4741201 26771559

8. Staiano AE Uncovering physiological mechanisms for health disparities in type 2 diabetes Ethnicity and Disease 2015 25 1 31 37 25812249 PMC4378536

9. Sundaram S Johnson AR Makowski L Obesity, metabolism and the microenvironment: Links to cancer Journal of Carcinogenesis 2013 12 19 10.4103/1477-3163.119606 24227994 PMC3816318

10. Sutaria S Is obesity associated with depression in children? Systematic review and meta-analysis Archives of Disease in Childhood 2019 104 1 64 74 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314608 29959128

11. Perry RJ Shulman GI Mechanistic links between obesity, insulin, and cancer Trends Cancer 2020 6 2 75 78 10.1016/j.trecan.2019.12.003 32061306 PMC7214048

12 Calle EE Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults New England Journal of Medicine 2003 348 17 1625 38 10.1056/NEJMoa021423 12711737

13. Lauby-Secretan B Body fatness and cancer—Viewpoint of the IARC working group New England Journal of Medicine 2016 375 8 794 798 10.1056/NEJMsr1606602 27557308 PMC6754861

14. Clinton SK Giovannucci EL Hursting SD The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research third expert report on diet, nutrition, physical activity, and cancer: Impact and future directions Journal of Nutrition 2020 150 4 663 671 10.1093/jn/nxz268 31758189 PMC7317613

15. Reeves GK Cancer incidence and mortality in relation to body mass index in the Million Women Study: Cohort study BMJ 2007 335 7630 1134 10.1136/bmj.39367.495995.AE 17986716 PMC2099519

16. Picon-Ruiz M Obesity and adverse breast cancer risk and outcome: Mechanistic insights and strategies for intervention CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2017 67 5 378 397 28763097 10.3322/caac.21405 PMC5591063

17. Association, A.M. AMA adopts new policies on second day of voting at annual meeting . 2013; Available from: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/news/news/2013/2013-06-18-new-ama-policies-annual-meeting.page .

18. Beral V Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study Lancet 2003 362 9382 419 427 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14065-2 12927427

19. Bliss, J.M. & Gray, R. (2003) Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy: The Million Women Study . Lancet 362 (9392):1328–9; author reply 1330–1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14591-6 14575984

20. DeSantis C Breast cancer statistics, 2011 CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2011 61 6 409 418 21969133 10.3322/caac.20134

21 Jemal A Global cancer statistics CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2011 61 2 69 90 21296855 10.3322/caac.20107

22. Ligibel, J.A., et al. (2014). American Society of Clinical Oncology position statement on obesity and cancer . Journal of Clinical Oncology . 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.4680 PMC4979237 25273035

23 Marsden J A'Hern R The Million Women Study and breast cancer British Menopause Society Journal 2003 9 3 95 97 10.1177/136218070300900302 14670192

24. Siegel R Naishadham D Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2012 CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2012 62 1 10 29 22237781 10.3322/caac.20138

25. Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2015 CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2015 65 1 5 29 25559415 10.3322/caac.21254

26. Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2016 CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2016 66 1 7 30 26742998 10.3322/caac.21332

27. Carey LA Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study JAMA 2006 295 21 2492 2502 10.1001/jama.295.21.2492 16757721

28. Keum, N., et al. (2015). Adult weight gain and adiposity-related cancers: A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 107 (2). 10.1093/jnci/djv088 25757865

29. Lega, I.C. & L.L. Lipscombe, (2020). Review: Diabetes, obesity, and cancer-pathophysiology and clinical implications . Endocrine Reviews 41 (1) 10.1210/endrev/bnz014 31722374

30. Xia X Body mass index and risk of breast cancer: A nonlinear dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies Science and Reports 2014 4 7480 10.1038/srep07480 PMC4265780 25504309

31. Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaborative Group Association of body mass index and age with subsequent breast cancer risk in premenopausal women JAMA Oncology 2018 4 11 e181771 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1771 29931120 PMC6248078

32. His M Anthropometry, body shape in early-life and risk of premenopausal breast cancer among Latin American women: Results from the PRECAMA study Science and Reports 2020 10 1 2294 10.1038/s41598-020-59056-6 PMC7010745 32042008

33. Tran TXM Association of the interaction between mammographic breast density, body mass index, and menopausal status with breast cancer risk among Korean women JAMA Network Open 2021 4 12 e2139161 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39161 34940866 PMC8703253

34. Schairer C Risk factors for inflammatory breast cancer and other invasive breast cancers Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2013 105 18 1373 1384 10.1093/jnci/djt206 24046390 PMC3776263

35. Goodwin PJ Insulin- and obesity-related variables in early-stage breast cancer: Correlations and time course of prognostic associations Journal of Clinical Oncology 2012 30 2 164 171 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.2723 22162568

36. Jiralerspong S Goodwin PJ Obesity and breast cancer prognosis: Evidence, challenges, and opportunities Journal of Clinical Oncology 2016 34 35 4203 4216 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.4480 27903149

37. Lohmann AE Association of obesity with breast cancer outcome in relation to cancer subtypes: A meta-analysis Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2021 113 11 1465 1475 10.1093/jnci/djab023 33620467 PMC8562970

38. Pischon T Body size and risk of colon and rectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98 13 920 931 10.1093/jnci/djj246 16818856

39. Benefield HC Epidemiology of basal-like and luminal breast cancers among black women in the AMBER Consortium Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 2021 30 1 71 79 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0556 33097496 PMC8935955

40. Bandera EV Obesity, body fat distribution, and risk of breast cancer subtypes in African American women participating in the AMBER Consortium Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2015 150 3 655 666 10.1007/s10549-015-3353-z 25809092 PMC4440799

41. Kerlikowske, K., et al. (2017). Risk factors that increase risk of estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer . Journal of the National Cancer Institute 109 (5). 10.1093/jnci/djw276 PMC6075570 28040694

42. McCarthy AM Relationship of established risk factors with breast cancer subtypes Cancer Medicine 2021 10 18 6456 6467 10.1002/cam4.4158 34464510 PMC8446564

43. Renehan AG Zwahlen M Egger M Adiposity and cancer risk: New mechanistic insights from epidemiology Nature Reviews Cancer 2015 15 8 484 498 10.1038/nrc3967 26205341

44. Pes, G.M., et al., (2019). Overweight: A protective factor against comorbidity in the elderly . International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16 (19). 10.3390/ijerph16193656 PMC6801595 31569448

45. Falls C Melander S Obesity in the critical care setting Nursing Clinics of North America 2021 56 4 573 581 10.1016/j.cnur.2021.08.002 34749896

46. Gillespie EF Obesity and angiolymphatic invasion in primary breast cancer Annals of Surgical Oncology 2010 17 3 752 759 10.1245/s10434-009-0797-6 19898898 PMC5912886

47. Neuhouser ML Overweight, obesity, and postmenopausal invasive breast cancer risk: A secondary analysis of the Women’s Health Initiative randomized clinical trials JAMA Oncology 2015 1 5 611 621 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1546 26182172 PMC5070941

48. Ewertz M Effect of obesity on prognosis after early-stage breast cancer Journal of Clinical Oncology 2011 29 1 25 31 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7614 21115856

49. Osman MA Hennessy BT Obesity correlation with metastases development and response to first-line metastatic chemotherapy in breast cancer Clin Med Insights Oncol 2015 9 105 112 10.4137/CMO.S32812 26628862 PMC4659439

50. Mazzarella L Obesity increases the incidence of distant metastases in oestrogen receptor-negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer patients European Journal of Cancer 2013 49 17 3588 3597 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.07.016 23953055

51. Sestak I Effect of body mass index on recurrences in tamoxifen and anastrozole treated women: An exploratory analysis from the ATAC trial Journal of Clinical Oncology 2010 28 21 3411 3415 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.2021 20547990

52. Biglia N Body mass index (BMI) and breast cancer: Impact on tumor histopathologic features, cancer subtypes and recurrence rate in pre and postmenopausal women Gynecological Endocrinology 2013 29 3 263 267 10.3109/09513590.2012.736559 23174088

53. Anders CK The evolution of triple-negative breast cancer: From biology to novel therapeutics American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book 2016 35 34 42 10.1200/EDBK_159135 27249684

54. Dawood S Prognostic value of body mass index in locally advanced breast cancer Clinical Cancer Research 2008 14 6 1718 1725 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1479 18347172

55. Azrad M Demark-Wahnefried W The association between adiposity and breast cancer recurrence and survival: A review of the recent literature Current Nutrition Reports 2014 3 1 9 15 10.1007/s13668-013-0068-9 24533234 PMC3921906

56. Chan DS Body mass index and survival in women with breast cancer-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 82 follow-up studies Annals of Oncology 2014 25 10 1901 1914 10.1093/annonc/mdu042 24769692 PMC4176449

57. Widschwendter P The influence of obesity on survival in early, high-risk breast cancer: Results from the randomized SUCCESS A trial Breast Cancer Research 2015 17 129 10.1186/s13058-015-0639-3 26385214 PMC4575482

58. von Drygalski A Obesity is an independent predictor of poor survival in metastatic breast cancer: Retrospective analysis of a patient cohort whose treatment included high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell support Int J Breast Cancer 2011 2011 523276 22295228 10.4061/2011/523276 PMC3262587

59. Loi S Obesity and outcomes in premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 2005 14 7 1686 1691 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0042 16030102

60. Abrahamson PE General and abdominal obesity and survival among young women with breast cancer Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 2006 15 10 1871 1877 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0356 17035393

61. Friedenreich CM Ryder-Burbidge C McNeil J Physical activity, obesity and sedentary behavior in cancer etiology: Epidemiologic evidence and biologic mechanisms Molecular Oncology 2021 15 3 790 800 10.1002/1878-0261.12772 32741068 PMC7931121

62. Lammert J Grill S Kiechle M Modifiable lifestyle factors: Opportunities for (hereditary) breast cancer prevention - A narrative review Breast Care (Basel) 2018 13 2 109 114 10.1159/000488995 29887787 PMC5981672

63. Goding Sauer A Current prevalence of major cancer risk factors and screening test use in the United States: Disparities by education and race/ethnicity Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 2019 28 4 629 642 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1169 30944145

64. Kulkarni A Bowers LW The role of immune dysfunction in obesity-associated cancer risk, progression, and metastasis Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 2021 78 7 3423 3442 10.1007/s00018-020-03752-z 33464384 PMC11073382

65. Woodall, M.J., et al. (2020). The effects of obesity on anti-cancer immunity and cancer immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 12 (5). 10.3390/cancers12051230 PMC7281442 32422865

66. Naik A Monjazeb AM Decock J The obesity paradox in cancer, tumor immunology, and immunotherapy: Potential therapeutic implications in triple negative breast cancer Frontiers in Immunology 2019 10 1940 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01940 31475003 PMC6703078

67. Bhardwaj P Brown KA Obese adipose tissue as a driver of breast cancer growth and development: Update and emerging evidence Frontiers in Oncology 2021 11 638918 10.3389/fonc.2021.638918 33859943 PMC8042134

68. Avgerinos KI Obesity and cancer risk: Emerging biological mechanisms and perspectives Metabolism 2019 92 121 135 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.001 30445141

69. Birks S A systematic review of the impact of weight loss on cancer incidence and mortality Obesity Reviews 2012 13 10 868 891 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01010.x 22672203

70. Chlebowski RT Weight loss and breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women Cancer 2019 125 2 205 212 10.1002/cncr.31687 30294816 PMC6890496

71. Seiler A Obesity, dietary factors, nutrition, and breast cancer risk Current Breast Cancer Reports 2018 10 1 14 27 10.1007/s12609-018-0264-0 30662586 PMC6335046

72. Ligibel JA Goodwin PJ NEW and RENEW: Building the case for weight loss in breast cancer Journal of Clinical Oncology 2012 30 19 2294 2296 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.5496 22614991

73. Pierce JP Diet and breast cancer prognosis: Making sense of the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living and Women’s Intervention Nutrition Study trials Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009 21 1 86 91 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32831da7f2 19130632 PMC2636962

74. Chlebowski RT Reeves MM Weight loss randomized intervention trials in female cancer survivors Journal of Clinical Oncology 2016 34 35 4238 4248 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4026 27903147 PMC5455319

75. Pierce JP Influence of a diet very high in vegetables, fruit, and fiber and low in fat on prognosis following treatment for breast cancer: The Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) randomized trial JAMA 2007 298 3 289 298 10.1001/jama.298.3.289 17635889 PMC2083253

76. Chlebowski RT Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: Interim efficacy results from the Women’s Intervention Nutrition Study Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98 24 1767 1776 10.1093/jnci/djj494 17179478

77. Patterson RE The effects of metformin and weight loss on biomarkers associated with breast cancer outcomes Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2018 110 11 1239 1247 10.1093/jnci/djy040 29788487 PMC6235688

78. Lv M Roles of caloric restriction, ketogenic diet and intermittent fasting during initiation, progression and metastasis of cancer in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis PLoS One 2014 9 12 e115147 10.1371/journal.pone.0115147 25502434 PMC4263749

79. Hursting SD Calorie restriction, aging, and cancer prevention: Mechanisms of action and applicability to humans Annual Review of Medicine 2003 54 131 152 10.1146/annurev.med.54.101601.152156 12525670

80. Das M Time-restricted feeding normalizes hyperinsulinemia to inhibit breast cancer in obese postmenopausal mouse models Nature Communications 2021 12 1 565 10.1038/s41467-020-20743-7 33495474 PMC7835248

81. Qin Y Weight loss reduces basal-like breast cancer through kinome reprogramming Cancer Cell International 2016 16 26 10.1186/s12935-016-0300-y 27042159 PMC4818517

82. Sundaram S Obesity-mediated regulation of HGF/c-Met is associated with reduced basal-like breast cancer latency in parous mice PLoS One 2014 9 10 e111394 10.1371/journal.pone.0111394 25354395 PMC4213021

83. Look ARG Eight-year weight losses with an intensive lifestyle intervention: The look AHEAD study Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014 22 1 5 13 10.1002/oby.20662 24307184 PMC3904491

84. Lemstra M Weight loss intervention adherence and factors promoting adherence: A meta-analysis Patient Preference and Adherence 2016 10 1547 1559 10.2147/PPA.S103649 27574404 PMC4990387

85. Demark-Wahnefried W Reach out to enhance wellness home-based diet-exercise intervention promotes reproducible and sustainable long-term improvements in health behaviors, body weight, and physical functioning in older, overweight/obese cancer survivors Journal of Clinical Oncology 2012 30 19 2354 2361 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.0895 22614994 PMC3675693

86. Morey MC Effects of home-based diet and exercise on functional outcomes among older, overweight long-term cancer survivors: RENEW: A randomized controlled trial JAMA 2009 301 18 1883 1891 10.1001/jama.2009.643 19436015 PMC2752421

87. Dieli-Conwright CM Effects of aerobic and resistance exercise on metabolic syndrome, sarcopenic obesity, and circulating biomarkers in overweight or obese survivors of breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial Journal of Clinical Oncology 2018 36 9 875 883 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.7526 29356607 PMC5858524

88. Goh J Exercise training in transgenic mice is associated with attenuation of early breast cancer growth in a dose-dependent manner PLoS One 2013 8 11 e80123 10.1371/journal.pone.0080123 24312199 PMC3842299

89. Hojman P Exercise-induced muscle-derived cytokines inhibit mammary cancer cell growth American Journal of Physiology Endocrinology and metabolism 2011 301 3 E504 E510 10.1152/ajpendo.00520.2010 21653222

90. Murphy EA Benefits of exercise training on breast cancer progression and inflammation in C3(1)SV40Tag mice Cytokine 2011 55 2 274 279 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.04.007 21600785 PMC3383660

91. Pedersen L Voluntary running suppresses tumor growth through epinephrine- and IL-6-dependent NK cell mobilization and redistribution Cell Metabolism 2016 23 3 554 562 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.01.011 26895752

92. Ligibel JA Impact of a pre-operative exercise intervention on breast cancer proliferation and gene expression: Results from the Pre-Operative Health and Body (PreHAB) Study Clinical Cancer Research 2019 25 17 5398 5406 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3143 31018921

93. Ballard-Barbash R Physical activity, biomarkers, and disease outcomes in cancer survivors: A systematic review Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2012 104 11 815 840 10.1093/jnci/djs207 22570317 PMC3465697

94. Campbell KL Reduced-calorie dietary weight loss, exercise, and sex hormones in postmenopausal women: Randomized controlled trial Journal of Clinical Oncology 2012 30 19 2314 2326 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.9792 22614972 PMC3675691

95. Marinac CR Prolonged nightly fasting and breast cancer prognosis JAMA Oncology 2016 2 8 1049 1055 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0164 27032109 PMC4982776

96. Ligibel JA Randomized phase III trial evaluating the role of weight loss in adjuvant treatment of overweight and obese women with early breast cancer (Alliance A011401): Study design NPJ Breast Cancer 2017 3 37 10.1038/s41523-017-0040-8 28948213 PMC5608692

97. Alkhatib, A., et al. (2017). Functional foods and lifestyle approaches for diabetes prevention and management. Nutrients 9 (12). 10.3390/nu9121310 PMC5748760 29194424

98. Mitchell JE Postoperative behavioral variables and weight change 3 years after bariatric surgery JAMA Surgery 2016 151 8 752 757 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0395 27096225 PMC5877401

99. Sarwer DB Preoperative eating behavior, postoperative dietary adherence, and weight loss after gastric bypass surgery Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 2008 4 5 640 646 10.1016/j.soard.2008.04.013 18586571 PMC2610859

100. Ryder JR Factors associated with long-term weight-loss maintenance following bariatric surgery in adolescents with severe obesity International Journal of Obesity (Lond) 2018 42 1 102 107 10.1038/ijo.2017.193 PMC5891093 28894289

101. Malhotra S Bariatric surgery in the treatment of adolescent obesity: Current perspectives in the United States Expert Review of Endocrinology and Metabolism 2021 16 3 123 134 10.1080/17446651.2021.1914585 33879013 PMC9912043

102. Soriano-Maldonado A Physical exercise following bariatric surgery in women with morbid obesity: Study protocol clinical trial (SPIRIT compliant) Medicine (Baltimore) 2020 99 12 e19427 10.1097/MD.0000000000019427 32195937 PMC7220774

103. Baker, M.T., (2011). The history and evolution of bariatric surgical procedures . Surgical Clinics of North America 91 (6):1181–201, viii. 10.1016/j.suc.2011.08.002 22054148

104. Pories, W.J., et al. (1995). Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Annals of Surgery 222 (3):339–50; discussion 350–2. 10.1097/00000658-199509000-00011 PMC1234815 7677463

105. Arterburn DE Benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in adults: A review JAMA 2020 324 9 879 887 10.1001/jama.2020.12567 32870301

106. Buchwald H The evolution of metabolic/bariatric surgery Obesity Surgery 2014 24 8 1126 1135 10.1007/s11695-014-1354-3 25008469

107. Campos GM Changes in utilization of bariatric surgery in the United States from 1993 to 2016 Annals of Surgery 2020 271 2 201 209 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003554 31425292

108. Melissas J Sleeve gastrectomy-a “food limiting” operation Obesity Surgery 2008 18 10 1251 1256 10.1007/s11695-008-9634-4 18663545

109. Alalwan AA US national trends in bariatric surgery: A decade of study Surgery 2021 170 1 13 17 10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.002 33714616

110. Gronroos S Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss and quality of life at 7 years in patients with morbid obesity: The SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial JAMA Surgery 2021 156 2 137 146 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5666 33295955 PMC7726698

111. Salminen P Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: The SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial JAMA 2018 319 3 241 254 10.1001/jama.2017.20313 29340676 PMC5833550

112. Peterli R Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: The SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial JAMA 2018 319 3 255 265 10.1001/jama.2017.20897 29340679 PMC5833546

113. Schauer PR Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-Year outcomes New England Journal of Medicine 2017 376 7 641 651 10.1056/NEJMoa1600869 28199805 PMC5451258

114. Buchwald H Buchwald JN McGlennon TW Systematic review and meta-analysis of medium-term outcomes after banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Obesity Surgery 2014 24 9 1536 1551 10.1007/s11695-014-1311-1 25001288

115. Ashrafian H Diabetes resolution and hyperinsulinaemia after metabolic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Obesity Reviews 2011 12 5 e257 e272 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00802.x 20880129

116. Evers SS Sandoval DA Seeley RJ The physiology and molecular underpinnings of the effects of bariatric surgery on obesity and diabetes Annual Review of Physiology 2017 79 313 334 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034423 27912678

117. Varela-Rodriguez, B.M., et al. (2020). Beneficial effects of bariatric surgery-induced by weight loss on the proteome of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue . Journal of Clinical Medicine 9 (1). 10.3390/jcm9010213 PMC7019912 31941045

118. Buchwald H Bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis JAMA 2004 292 14 1724 1737 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724 15479938

119. Sipe LM Microbiome, bile acids, and obesity: How microbially modified metabolites shape anti-tumor immunity Immunological Reviews 2020 295 1 220 239 10.1111/imr.12856 32320071 PMC7841960

120. Ashrafian H Metabolic surgery and cancer: Protective effects of bariatric procedures Cancer 2011 117 9 1788 1799 10.1002/cncr.25738 21509756

121. Gimeno RE Briere DA Seeley RJ Leveraging the gut to treat metabolic disease Cell Metabolism 2020 31 4 679 698 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.02.014 32187525 PMC7184629

122. Quail, D. F., & Dannenberg, A. J. (2018). The obese adipose tissue microenvironment in cancer development and progression . Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 10.1038/s41574-018-0126-x PMC6374176 30459447

123 Liu N Funk LM Bariatric surgery trends in the U.S.: 1% is the loneliest number Annals of Surgery 2020 271 2 210 211 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003714 31800491 PMC7474975

124. Bjornstad P Five-year kidney outcomes of bariatric surgery differ in severely obese adolescents and adults with and without type 2 diabetes Kidney International 2020 97 5 995 1005 10.1016/j.kint.2020.01.016 32229096 PMC7183894

125. Derderian SC Influence of weight loss on obesity-associated complications after metabolic and bariatric surgery in adolescents Obesity (Silver Spring) 2020 28 12 2397 2404 10.1002/oby.23038 33230961 PMC8882436

126. Mollan SP Effectiveness of bariatric surgery vs community weight management intervention for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A randomized clinical trial JAMA Neurology 2021 78 6 678 686 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0659 33900360 PMC8077040

127. Purnell JQ Diabetes remission status during seven-year follow-up of the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery study Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2021 106 3 774 788 10.1210/clinem/dgaa849 33270130 PMC7947785

128. Sjostrom L Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects New England Journal of Medicine 2007 357 8 741 752 10.1056/NEJMoa066254 17715408

129. Picot, J., et al. (2009). The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: A systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment 13 (41):1–190, 215–357, iii-iv. 10.3310/hta13410 19726018

130. Ward ZJ Association of body mass index with health care expenditures in the United States by age and sex PLoS One 2021 16 3 e0247307 10.1371/journal.pone.0247307 33760880 PMC7990296

131. Sikorski C Attitudes towards bariatric surgery in the general public Obesity Surgery 2013 23 3 338 345 10.1007/s11695-012-0767-0 22983771

132. Nguyen, N.T., et al. (2004). The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Annals of Surgery 240 (4):586–93; discussion 593–4. 10.1097/01.sla.0000140752.74893.24 PMC1356460 15383786

133. Varela JE Nguyen NT Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leads the U.S. utilization of bariatric surgery at academic medical centers Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 2015 11 5 987 90 10.1016/j.soard.2015.02.008 26003894

134. Schauer DP Bariatric surgery and the risk of cancer in a large multisite cohort Annals of Surgery 2019 269 1 95 101 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002525 28938270 PMC6201282

135. Young MT Phelan MJ Nguyen NT A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of male vs female patients who underwent bariatric surgery Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2016 222 3 226 231 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.11.033 26782151

136. Rives-Lange, C., et al. (2022). Seventy years of bariatric surgery: A systematic mapping review of randomized controlled trials. Obesity Reviews e13420 10.1111/obr.13420 35040249

137. Schauer DP Association between weight loss and the risk of cancer after bariatric surgery Obesity (Silver Spring) 2017 25 Suppl 2 S52 S57 29086527 10.1002/oby.22002 PMC5722457

138. Aminian, A.W., R.; Al-Kurd, A.; Tu, C.; Milinovich, A.; Kroh, M.; Rosenthal, R. J.; Brethauer, S. A.; Schauer, P. R.; Kattan, M. W.; Brown, J. C.; Berger, N. A.; Abraham, J.; Nissen, S. E. (2022). Association of bariatric surgery with cancer risk and mortality in adults with obesity. JAMA, 10.1001/jama.2022.9009 PMC9166218 35657620

139. Aminian, A., et al. (2022). Association of bariatric surgery with cancer risk and mortality in adults with obesity. JAMA, 10.1001/jama.2022.9009 PMC9166218 35657620

140. Wiggins T Antonowicz SS Markar SR Cancer risk following bariatric surgery-systematic review and meta-analysis of national population-based cohort studies Obesity Surgery 2019 29 3 1031 1039 10.1007/s11695-018-3501-8 30591985

141. Feigelson HS Bariatric surgery is associated with reduced risk of breast cancer in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women Annals of Surgery 2020 272 6 1053 1059 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003331 30998538

142. Heshmati K Association of bariatric surgery status with reduced HER2+ breast cancers: A retrospective cohort study Obesity Surgery 2019 29 4 1092 1098 10.1007/s11695-018-03701-7 30659466

143. Lovrics O The effect of bariatric surgery on breast cancer incidence and characteristics: A meta-analysis and systematic review American Journal of Surgery 2021 222 4 715 722 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.016 33771341

144. Zhang S The impact of bariatric surgery on breast cancer recurrence: Case series and review of literature Obesity Surgery 2020 30 2 780 785 10.1007/s11695-019-04099-6 31359344 PMC9623809

145. Bruno DS Berger NA Impact of bariatric surgery on cancer risk reduction Ann Transl Med 2020 8 Suppl 1 S13 10.21037/atm.2019.09.26 32309417 PMC7154324

146. Bailly L Colorectal cancer risk following bariatric surgery in a nationwide study of French individuals with obesity JAMA Surgery 2020 155 5 395 402 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0089 32159744 PMC7066530

147. Surwit RS Diet-induced type II diabetes in C57BL/6J mice Diabetes 1988 37 9 1163 1167 10.2337/diab.37.9.1163 3044882

148. Winzell MS Ahren B The high-fat diet-fed mouse: A model for studying mechanisms and treatment of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes Diabetes 2004 53 Suppl 3 S215 S219 10.2337/diabetes.53.suppl_3.S215 15561913

149. Engber D What models eat Nature Medicine 2018 24 6 692 695 10.1038/s41591-018-0055-1 29875464

150. Lai M Chandrasekera PC Barnard ND You are what you eat, or are you? The challenges of translating high-fat-fed rodents to human obesity and diabetes Nutrition and Diabetes 2014 4 e135 10.1038/nutd.2014.30 25198237 PMC4183971

151. Blasbalg TL Changes in consumption of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in the United States during the 20th century American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2011 93 5 950 962 10.3945/ajcn.110.006643 21367944 PMC3076650

152. Ford NA Omega-3-acid ethyl esters block the protumorigenic effects of obesity in mouse models of postmenopausal basal-like and claudin-low breast cancer Cancer Prevention Research (Philadelphia, Pa.) 2015 8 9 796 806 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0018 PMC5024781 26100521

153. Johnson AR Cafeteria diet-induced obesity causes oxidative damage in white adipose Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2016 473 2 545 550 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.113 27033600 PMC4862365

154. Sampey BP Metabolomic profiling reveals mitochondrial-derived lipid biomarkers that drive obesity-associated inflammation PLoS One 2012 7 6 e38812 10.1371/journal.pone.0038812 22701716 PMC3373493

155. Sampey BP Cafeteria diet is a robust model of human metabolic syndrome with liver and adipose inflammation: Comparison to high-fat diet Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011 19 6 1109 1117 10.1038/oby.2011.18 21331068 PMC3130193

156. Devlin MJ Differential effects of high fat diet and diet-induced obesity on skeletal acquisition in female C57BL/6J vs FVB/NJ Mice Bone Rep 2018 8 204 214 10.1016/j.bonr.2018.04.003 29955639 PMC6020275

157. Yang Y Variations in body weight, food intake and body composition after long-term high-fat diet feeding in C57BL/6J mice Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014 22 10 2147 2155 10.1002/oby.20811 24942674 PMC4180788

158. Boulange CL Early metabolic adaptation in C57BL/6 mice resistant to high fat diet induced weight gain involves an activation of mitochondrial oxidative pathways Journal of Proteome Research 2013 12 4 1956 1968 10.1021/pr400051s 23473242

159. Mekada K Yoshiki A Substrains matter in phenotyping of C57BL/6 mice Experimental Animals 2021 70 2 145 160 10.1538/expanim.20-0158 33441510 PMC8150240

160. Ivanov II Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria Cell 2009 139 3 485 498 10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.033 19836068 PMC2796826

161. Mims TS The gut mycobiome of healthy mice is shaped by the environment and correlates with metabolic outcomes in response to diet Communications Biology 2021 4 1 281 10.1038/s42003-021-01820-z 33674757 PMC7935979

162. Hugenholtz F de Vos WM Mouse models for human intestinal microbiota research: A critical evaluation Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 2018 75 1 149 160 10.1007/s00018-017-2693-8 29124307 PMC5752736

163. Metlakunta AS Sahu M Sahu A Hypothalamic phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway of leptin signaling is impaired during the development of diet-induced obesity in FVB/N mice Endocrinology 2008 149 3 1121 1128 10.1210/en.2007-1307 18048492 PMC2275357

164. Nascimento-Sales, M., et al. (2017). Is the FVB/N mouse strain truly resistant to diet-induced obesity? Physiological Reports 5 (9). 10.14814/phy2.13271 PMC5430125 28483861

165. Boudina S Early mitochondrial adaptations in skeletal muscle to diet-induced obesity are strain dependent and determine oxidative stress and energy expenditure but not insulin sensitivity Endocrinology 2012 153 6 2677 2688 10.1210/en.2011-2147 22510273 PMC3359615

166. Zhu Y Pubertally initiated high-fat diet promotes mammary tumorigenesis in obesity-prone FVB mice similarly to obesity-resistant BALB/c mice Translational Oncology 2017 10 6 928 935 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.09.004 29024822 PMC5704096

167. Cozzo AJ cMET inhibitor crizotinib impairs angiogenesis and reduces tumor burden in the C3(1)-Tag model of basal-like breast cancer Springerplus 2016 5 348 10.1186/s40064-016-1920-3 27057482 PMC4799044

168. Sundaram S Role of HGF in obesity-associated tumorigenesis: C3(1)-TAg mice as a model for human basal-like breast cancer Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2013 142 3 489 503 10.1007/s10549-013-2741-5 24218051 PMC3904507

169. Sundaram S Weight loss reversed obesity-induced HGF/c-Met pathway and basal-like breast cancer progression Frontiers in Oncology 2014 4 175 10.3389/fonc.2014.00175 25072025 PMC4085881

170. Chamberlin T D'Amato JV Arendt LM Obesity reversibly depletes the basal cell population and enhances mammary epithelial cell estrogen receptor alpha expression and progenitor activity Breast Cancer Research 2017 19 1 128 10.1186/s13058-017-0921-7 29187227 PMC5707907

171. Hillers-Ziemer, L.E., et al. (2020). Obesity promotes cooperation of cancer stem-like cells and macrophages to enhance mammary tumor angiogenesis. Cancers (Basel) 12 (2). 10.3390/cancers12020502 PMC7072330 32098183

172. Leibowitz SF Phenotypic profile of SWR/J and A/J mice compared to control strains: Possible mechanisms underlying resistance to obesity on a high-fat diet Brain Research 2005 1047 2 137 147 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.03.047 15896725

173. Buckley TN High-fat feeding disrupts daily eating behavior rhythms in obesity-prone but not in obesity-resistant male inbred mouse strains American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 2021 320 5 R619 R629 33626995 10.1152/ajpregu.00150.2020 PMC8163612

174. Park H A high-fat diet increases angiogenesis, solid tumor growth, and lung metastasis of CT26 colon cancer cells in obesity-resistant BALB/c mice Molecular Carcinogenesis 2012 51 11 869 880 10.1002/mc.20856 21919080

175. Kim HY Lysophospholipid profile in serum and liver by high-fat diet and tumor induction in obesity-resistant BALB/c mice Nutrition 2014 30 11–12 1433 1441 10.1016/j.nut.2014.04.013 25280424

176. Kim EJ Biological features of core networks that result from a high-fat diet in hepatic and pulmonary tissues in mammary tumour-bearing, obesity-resistant mice British Journal of Nutrition 2013 110 2 241 255 10.1017/S0007114512004965 23234678

177. Kim M Benzyl isothiocyanate suppresses high-fat diet-stimulated mammary tumor progression via the alteration of tumor microenvironments in obesity-resistant BALB/c mice Molecular Carcinogenesis 2015 54 1 72 82 10.1002/mc.22159 24729546

178. Gourgue F Obesity and triple-negative-breast-cancer: Is apelin a new key target? Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 2020 24 17 10233 10244 10.1111/jcmm.15639 32681609 PMC7520321

179. Olson LK Pubertal exposure to high fat diet causes mouse strain-dependent alterations in mammary gland development and estrogen responsiveness International Journal of Obesity 2010 34 9 1415 1426 10.1038/ijo.2010.51 20231845 PMC2923244

180. Zhao Y Pubertal high fat diet: Effects on mammary cancer development Breast Cancer Research 2013 15 5 R100 10.1186/bcr3561 24156623 PMC3978633

181. Lo JC Obesity does not promote tumorigenesis of localized patient-derived prostate cancer xenografts Oncotarget 2016 7 30 47650 47662 10.18632/oncotarget.10258 27351281 PMC5216968

182. Friedline RH Genetic ablation of lymphocytes and cytokine signaling in nonobese diabetic mice prevents diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance The FASEB Journal 2016 30 3 1328 1338 10.1096/fj.15-280610 26644351 PMC4750424

183. Xue Y Maternal obesity induces gut inflammation and impairs gut epithelial barrier function in nonobese diabetic mice Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 2014 25 7 758 764 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2014.03.009 24775094 PMC4050341

184. Stefater MA Sleeve gastrectomy induces loss of weight and fat mass in obese rats, but does not affect leptin sensitivity Gastroenterology 2010 138 7 2426 36, 2436 e1-3 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.02.059 20226189 PMC2883635

185. Chambers AP Similar effects of roux-en-Y gastric bypass and vertical sleeve gastrectomy on glucose regulation in rats Physiology and Behavior 2011 105 1 120 123 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.05.026 21683726 PMC3852684

186. Saeidi N Reprogramming of intestinal glucose metabolism and glycemic control in rats after gastric bypass Science 2013 341 6144 406 410 10.1126/science.1235103 23888041 PMC4068965

187. Yin DP Assessment of different bariatric surgeries in the treatment of obesity and insulin resistance in mice Annals of Surgery 2011 254 1 73 82 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182197035 21522012 PMC3115424

188. Feng JJ Gagner M Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch Semin Laparosc Surg 2002 9 2 125 129 10.1053/slas.2002.126332 12152155

189. Yin, D.P., et al. (2012). Mouse models of bariatric surgery. Current Protocols in Mouse Biology 2012. 10.1002/9780470942390.mo120087 PMC4214370 25364628

190. Asarian L Estradiol increases body weight loss and gut-peptide satiation after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in ovariectomized rats Gastroenterology 2012 143 2 325 7 e2 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.008 22609384

191. Hao Z Body composition, food intake, and energy expenditure in a murine model of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery Obesity Surgery 2016 26 9 2173 2182 10.1007/s11695-016-2062-y 26781597 PMC4949156

192. Ye Y Endocannabinoid receptor-1 and sympathetic nervous system mediate the beneficial metabolic effects of gastric bypass Cell Reports 2020 33 4 108270 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108270 33113371 PMC7660289

193. Hao Z RYGB produces more sustained body weight loss and improvement of glycemic control compared with VSG in the diet-induced obese mouse model Obesity Surgery 2017 27 9 2424 2433 10.1007/s11695-017-2660-3 28386755 PMC5808920

194. Stevenson M RYGB is more effective than VSG at protecting mice from prolonged high-fat diet exposure: An occasion to roll up our sleeves? Obesity Surgery 2021 31 7 3227 3241 10.1007/s11695-021-05389-8 33856636

195. Stevenson M Surgical mouse models of vertical sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en Y gastric bypass: A review Obesity Surgery 2019 29 12 4084 4094 10.1007/s11695-019-04205-8 31630327

196. Frikke-Schmidt H Weight loss independent changes in adipose tissue macrophage and T cell populations after sleeve gastrectomy in mice Molecular Metabolism 2017 6 4 317 326 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.02.004 28377871 PMC5369283

197 Chaudhari SN A microbial metabolite remodels the gut-liver axis following bariatric surgery Cell Host and Microbe 2021 29 3 408 424 e7 10.1016/j.chom.2020.12.004 33434516 PMC7954942

198. Chaudhari SN Bariatric surgery reveals a gut-restricted TGR5 agonist with anti-diabetic effects Nature Chemical Biology 2021 17 1 20 29 10.1038/s41589-020-0604-z 32747812 PMC7891870

199. Ryan KK FXR is a molecular target for the effects of vertical sleeve gastrectomy Nature 2014 509 7499 183 188 10.1038/nature13135 24670636 PMC4016120

200. Ridlon JM Bariatric surgery stirs symbionts to counteract diabesity by CA(7)Sting a liver-generated bile acid into the mix Cell Host and Microbe 2021 29 3 320 322 10.1016/j.chom.2021.02.011 33705701

201. Martin M Socioeconomic disparities in eligibility and access to bariatric surgery: A national population-based analysis Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 2010 6 1 8 15 10.1016/j.soard.2009.07.003 19782647

202. Brinckerhoff TZ Metabolic effects of sleeve gastrectomy in female rat model of diet-induced obesity Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 2013 9 1 108 112 10.1016/j.soard.2011.09.025 22093377 PMC3288965

203 Grayson BE Improved rodent maternal metabolism but reduced intrauterine growth after vertical sleeve gastrectomy Science Translational Medicine 2013 5 199 199ra112 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006505 23966301 PMC3939702

204. Grayson BE Bariatric surgery emphasizes biological sex differences in rodent hepatic lipid handling Biology of Sex Differences 2017 8 4 10.1186/s13293-017-0126-x 28149499 PMC5273842

205. Spann RA Rodent vertical sleeve gastrectomy alters maternal immune health and fetoplacental development Clinical Science (London, England) 2018 132 2 295 312 10.1042/CS20171416 PMC5989318 29167317

206. Spann RA Altered immune system in offspring of rat maternal vertical sleeve gastrectomy American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 2019 317 6 R852 R863 31692364 10.1152/ajpregu.00230.2019 PMC6962624

207. Sipe LM Response to immune checkpoint blockade improved in pre-clinical model of breast cancer after bariatric surgery eLife 2022 11 e79143 10.7554/eLife.79143 35775614 PMC9342954

208. Hanahan D Robert A Weinberg, Hallmarks of cancer : The next generation Cell 2011 144 5 646 674 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 21376230

209. Bissell MJ Hines WC Why don’t we get more cancer? A proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression Nature Medicine 2011 17 3 320 329 10.1038/nm.2328 21383745 PMC3569482

210. Correia AL Bissell MJ The tumor microenvironment is a dominant force in multidrug resistance Drug Resist Updat 2012 15 1–2 39 49 10.1016/j.drup.2012.01.006 22335920 PMC3658318

211 Gatenby RAG Brown RJ Joel S Of cancer and cave fish Nature Publishing Group 2011 11 4 237 238 10.1038/nrc3036 PMC3971416 21548400

212. Johnson AR Milner JJ Makowski L The inflammation highway: Metabolism accelerates inflammatory traffic in obesity Immunologic Reviews 2012 249 1 218 238 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01151.x PMC3422768 22889225

213. Zheng J Obesity-associated digestive cancers: A review of mechanisms and interventions Tumour Biology 2017 39 3 1010428317695020 10.1177/1010428317695020 28351315

214. Courcoulas, A.P., (2022). Bariatric surgery and cancer risk. JAMA . 10.1001/jama.2022.9166 35657635

215. Douros JD Tong J D'Alessio DA The effects of bariatric surgery on islet function, insulin secretion, and glucose control Endocrine Reviews 2019 40 5 1394 1423 10.1210/er.2018-00183 31241742 PMC6749890

216. Villarreal-Calderon JR Interplay between the adaptive immune system and insulin resistance in weight loss induced by bariatric surgery Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2019 2019 3940739 10.1155/2019/3940739 31885787 PMC6925764

217. Srinivasan M A systematic review: Does insulin resistance affect the risk and survival outcome of breast cancer in women? Cureus 2022 14 1 e21712 35145826 10.7759/cureus.21712 PMC8803387

218. Pan K Insulin resistance and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women in the Women’s Health Initiative Cancer 2020 126 16 3638 3647 10.1002/cncr.33002 32530506

219. Sanchez-Jimenez F Obesity and breast cancer: Role of leptin Frontiers in Oncology 2019 9 596 10.3389/fonc.2019.00596 31380268 PMC6657346

220. Koliaki C The role of bariatric surgery to treat diabetes: Current challenges and perspectives BMC Endocrine Disorders 2017 17 1 50 10.1186/s12902-017-0202-6 28797248 PMC5553790

221. Sinclair P Brennan DJ le Roux CW Gut adaptation after metabolic surgery and its influences on the brain, liver and cancer Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2018 15 10 606 624 10.1038/s41575-018-0057-y 30181611

222. Crean-Tate KK Reizes O Leptin regulation of cancer stem cells in breast and gynecologic cancer Endocrinology 2018 159 8 3069 3080 10.1210/en.2018-00379 29955847 PMC6669812

223. Iyengar NM Systemic correlates of white adipose tissue inflammation in early-stage breast cancer Clinical Cancer Research 2016 22 9 2283 2289 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2239 26712688 PMC4854755

224. Zhao C Cancer-associated adipocytes: Emerging supporters in breast cancer Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research 2020 39 1 156 10.1186/s13046-020-01666-z 32787888 PMC7425140

225. Atoum MF Alzoughool F Al-Hourani H Linkage between obesity leptin and breast cancer Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2020 14 1178223419898458 31975779 10.1177/1178223419898458 PMC6956603

226. Maroni, P. (2020). Leptin, adiponectin, and Sam68 in bone metastasis from breast cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21 (3). 10.3390/ijms21031051 PMC7037668 32033341

227. Di Domenico M The role of oxidative stress and hormones in controlling obesity Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019 10 540 10.3389/fendo.2019.00540 31456748 PMC6701166

228 Hage MP El-Hajj Fuleihan G Bone and mineral metabolism in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Osteoporosis International 2014 25 2 423 39 10.1007/s00198-013-2480-9 24008401

229. Luhrs AR Determining changes in bone metabolism after bariatric surgery in postmenopausal women Surgical Endoscopy 2020 34 4 1754 1760 10.1007/s00464-019-06922-8 31209602 PMC7373333

230. Rinonapoli, G., et al. (2021). Obesity and bone: A complex relationship. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22 (24). 10.3390/ijms222413662 PMC8706946 34948466

231. Lengyel E Cancer as a matter of fat: The crosstalk between adipose tissue and tumors Trends Cancer 2018 4 5 374 384 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.03.004 29709261 PMC5932630

232. Cozzo AJ Fuller AM Makowski L Contribution of adipose tissue to development of cancer Comprehensive Physiology 2017 8 1 237 282 10.1002/cphy.c170008 29357128 PMC5806627

233. Rathmell JC Obesity, immunity, and cancer New England Journal of Medicine 2021 384 12 1160 1162 10.1056/NEJMcibr2035081 33761213 PMC8053443

234. Saha, S.K., et al. (2017). Correlation between oxidative stress, nutrition, and cancer initiation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18 (7). 10.3390/ijms18071544 PMC5536032 28714931

235. Franceschi C Inflammaging: A new immune-metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases Nature Reviews Endocrinology 2018 14 10 576 590 10.1038/s41574-018-0059-4 30046148

236. Caslin HL Adipose tissue macrophages: Unique polarization and bioenergetics in obesity Immunological Reviews 2020 295 1 101 113 10.1111/imr.12853 32237081 PMC8015437

237. Quail DF Dannenberg AJ The obese adipose tissue microenvironment in cancer development and progression Nature Reviews. Endocrinology 2019 15 3 139 154 10.1038/s41574-018-0126-x 30459447 PMC6374176

238. Holm, J. B., Rosendahl, A. H., Borgquist, S. (2021). Local biomarkers involved in the interplay between obesity and breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 13 (24). 10.3390/cancers13246286 PMC8699696 34944905

239. Kompella P Vasquez KM Obesity and cancer: A mechanistic overview of metabolic changes in obesity that impact genetic instability Molecular Carcinogenesis 2019 58 9 1531 1550 10.1002/mc.23048 31168912 PMC6692207

240. Wlodarczyk, M., Nowicka, G., (2019). Obesity, DNA damage, and development of obesity-related diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20 (5). 10.3390/ijms20051146 PMC6429223 30845725

241 Ringel AE Obesity shapes metabolism in the tumor microenvironment to suppress anti-tumor immunity Cell 2020 183 7 1848 1866 e26 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.009 33301708 PMC8064125

242. Le CT PD-1 Blockade reverses obesity-mediated T cell priming impairment Frontiers in Immunology 2020 11 590568 10.3389/fimmu.2020.590568 33193426 PMC7658608

243. Neumann, S., et al. (2021). Obesity has a systemic effect on immune cells in naive and cancer-bearing mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22 (16). 10.3390/ijms22168803 PMC8395769 34445503

244. Weihe P Childhood obesity and cancer risk in adulthood Current Obesity Reports 2020 9 3 204 212 10.1007/s13679-020-00387-w 32519271

245. Yang S PD-1, PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression in mouse prostate cancer American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Urology 2016 4 1 1 8 27069956 PMC4749401

246. Del Corno, M., et al. (2016). Visceral fat adipocytes from obese and colorectal cancer subjects exhibit distinct secretory and omega6 polyunsaturated fatty acid profiles and deliver immunosuppressive signals to innate immunity cells. Oncotarget, 10.18632/oncotarget.10998 PMC5325349 27494857

247. Shirakawa K Abstract 11105: Obesity accelerates T cell senescence in visceral adipose tissue Circulation 2015 132 Suppl 3 A11105 A11105

248. Lim SO Deubiquitination and stabilization of PD-L1 by CSN5 Cancer Cell 2016 30 6 925 939 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.10.010 27866850 PMC5171205

249. Sanchez-Pino MD Obesity-associated myeloid immunosuppressive cells, key players in cancer risk and response to immunotherapy Obesity (Silver Spring) 2021 29 6 944 953 10.1002/oby.23108 33616242 PMC8154641

250. Fernandez-Ruiz JC Myeloid-derived suppressor cells show different frequencies in diabetics and subjects with arterial hypertension Journal of Diabetes Research 2019 2019 1568457 10.1155/2019/1568457 31915708 PMC6930726

251. Friedrich K Perturbation of the monocyte compartment in human obesity Frontiers in Immunology 2019 10 1874 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01874 31440251 PMC6694869

252. Xia S Gr-1+ CD11b+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells suppress inflammation and promote insulin sensitivity in obesity Journal of Biological Chemistry 2011 286 26 23591 23599 10.1074/jbc.M111.237123 21592961 PMC3123122

253. Okwan-Duodu D Obesity-driven inflammation and cancer risk: Role of myeloid derived suppressor cells and alternately activated macrophages American Journal of Cancer Research 2013 3 1 21 33 23359288 PMC3555202

254. Donninelli G Distinct blood and visceral adipose tissue regulatory T cell and innate lymphocyte profiles characterize obesity and colorectal cancer Frontiers in Immunology 2017 8 643 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00643 28649243 PMC5465245

255. Agabiti-Rosei C Decreased circulating T regulatory lymphocytes in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery PLoS One 2018 13 5 e0197178 10.1371/journal.pone.0197178 29758052 PMC5951588

256. Chen X Wu Y Wang L Fat-resident Tregs: An emerging guard protecting from obesity-associated metabolic disorders Obesity Reviews 2013 14 7 568 578 10.1111/obr.12033 23534927

257. Weisberg SP Obesity is associated with macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue The Journal of Clinical Investigation 2003 112 12 1796 1808 10.1172/JCI200319246 14679176 PMC296995

258. Xu H Chronic inflammation in fat plays a crucial role in the development of obesity-related insulin resistance The Journal of Clinical Investigation 2003 112 12 1821 1830 10.1172/JCI200319451 14679177 PMC296998

259. Sun S Mechanisms of inflammatory responses in obese adipose tissue Annual Review of Nutrition 2012 32 261 286 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071811-150623 22404118 PMC4041712

260. Diedrich J Gusky HC Podgorski I Adipose tissue dysfunction and its effects on tumor metabolism Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation 2015 21 1 17 41 10.1515/hmbci-2014-0045 25781550 PMC4940190

261. Ahn CH Vertical sleeve gastrectomy induces distinctive transcriptomic responses in liver, fat and muscle Science and Reports 2021 11 1 2310 10.1038/s41598-021-81866-5 PMC7840766 33504853

262. Viardot A Lord RV Samaras K The effects of weight loss and gastric banding on the innate and adaptive immune system in type 2 diabetes and prediabetes Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2010 95 6 2845 2850 10.1210/jc.2009-2371 20375213

263. Rao SR Inflammatory markers and bariatric surgery: A meta-analysis Inflammation Research 2012 61 8 789 807 10.1007/s00011-012-0473-3 22588278

264. Poitou C Bariatric surgery induces disruption in inflammatory signaling pathways mediated by immune cells in adipose tissue: A RNA-Seq study PLoS One 2015 10 5 e0125718 10.1371/journal.pone.0125718 25938420 PMC4418598

265. Hagman DK The short-term and long-term effects of bariatric/metabolic surgery on subcutaneous adipose tissue inflammation in humans Metabolism 2017 70 12 22 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.01.030 28403936 PMC5407411

266. Cancello R Reduction of macrophage infiltration and chemoattractant gene expression changes in white adipose tissue of morbidly obese subjects after surgery-induced weight loss Diabetes 2005 54 8 2277 2286 10.2337/diabetes.54.8.2277 16046292

267. Aguilar EG Murphy WJ Obesity induced T cell dysfunction and implications for cancer immunotherapy Current Opinion in Immunology 2018 51 181 186 10.1016/j.coi.2018.03.012 29655021 PMC6338436

268. Ignacio RM Kim CS Kim SK Immunological profiling of obesity Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 2014 4 1 1 7 10.15280/jlm.2014.4.1.1 26064849 PMC4390759

269. Hess DA Vascular risk reduction in obesity through reduced granulocyte burden and improved angiogenic monocyte content following bariatric surgery Cell Reports Medicine 2020 1 2 100018 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100018 33205058 PMC7659601

270. Kabon B Obesity decreases perioperative tissue oxygenation Anesthesiology 2004 100 2 274 280 10.1097/00000542-200402000-00015 14739800 PMC1395476

271. Kratz M Improvements in glycemic control after gastric bypass occur despite persistent adipose tissue inflammation Obesity (Silver Spring) 2016 24 7 1438 1445 10.1002/oby.21524 27228052 PMC4925247

272. Himel AR Splenectomy fails to attenuate immuno-hematologic changes after rodent vertical sleeve gastrectomy Experimental Biology and Medicine (Maywood, N.J.) 2019 244 13 1125 1135 10.1177/1535370219857991 PMC6775572 31213084

273. Harris DA Weight and organ specific immune cell profiling of sleeve gastrectomy in mice Metabolism 2021 118 154729 10.1016/j.metabol.2021.154729 33607195

274. Zhang C Improvements in humoral immune function and glucolipid metabolism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with obesity Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 2019 15 9 1455 1463 10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.021 31345725

275. DeFuria J B cells promote inflammation in obesity and type 2 diabetes through regulation of T-cell function and an inflammatory cytokine profile Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A 2013 110 13 5133 5138 10.1073/pnas.1215840110 PMC3612635 23479618

276. Winer DA B cells promote insulin resistance through modulation of T cells and production of pathogenic IgG antibodies Nature Medicine 2011 17 5 610 617 10.1038/nm.2353 21499269 PMC3270885

277. Winer DA The intestinal immune system in obesity and insulin resistance Cell Metabolism 2016 23 3 413 426 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.01.003 26853748

278. Debedat J Clement K Aron-Wisnewsky J Gut microbiota dysbiosis in human obesity: Impact of bariatric surgery Current Obesity Reports 2019 8 3 229 242 10.1007/s13679-019-00351-3 31197613

279. Ilhan ZE Distinctive microbiomes and metabolites linked with weight loss after gastric bypass, but not gastric banding ISME Journal 2017 11 9 2047 2058 10.1038/ismej.2017.71 28548658 PMC5563958

280. Ciobarca, D., et al. (2020). Bariatric surgery in obesity: Effects on gut microbiota and micronutrient status. Nutrients 12 (1). 10.3390/nu12010235 PMC7019602 31963247

281. Santos JM Pre and post-operative alterations of the gastrointestinal microbiome following bariatric surgery Cureus 2021 13 2 e13057 33680599 10.7759/cureus.13057 PMC7929544

282. Haange SB Gastric bypass surgery in a rat model alters the community structure and functional composition of the intestinal microbiota independently of weight loss Microbiome 2020 8 1 13 10.1186/s40168-020-0788-1 32033593 PMC7007695

283. Langan EA Does the gastrointestinal microbiome contribute to the ‘obesity paradox’ in melanoma survival? British Journal of Dermatology 2018 179 1 225 226 10.1111/bjd.16681 29663324

284. Gopalakrishnan V Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients Science 2018 359 6371 97 103 10.1126/science.aan4236 29097493 PMC5827966

285. Frankel AE Metagenomic shotgun sequencing and unbiased metabolomic profiling identify specific human gut microbiota and metabolites associated with immune checkpoint therapy efficacy in melanoma patients Neoplasia 2017 19 10 848 855 10.1016/j.neo.2017.08.004 28923537 PMC5602478

286. Vetizou M Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota Science 2015 350 6264 1079 1084 10.1126/science.aad1329 26541610 PMC4721659

287. Matson V The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients Science 2018 359 6371 104 108 10.1126/science.aao3290 29302014 PMC6707353

288. Routy B Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors Science 2018 359 6371 91 97 10.1126/science.aan3706 29097494

289. Iida N Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment Science 2013 342 6161 967 970 10.1126/science.1240527 24264989 PMC6709532

290. Dawood S Rugo HS Targeting the host immune system: PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies and breast cancer Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care 2016 10 4 336 342 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000243 27755140

291. Chen L Han X Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy of human cancer: Past, present, and future The Journal of Clinical Investigation 2015 125 9 3384 3391 10.1172/JCI80011 26325035 PMC4588282

292. Josefsson A Imaging, biodistribution, and dosimetry of radionuclide-labeled PD-L1 antibody in an immunocompetent mouse model of breast cancer Cancer Research 2016 76 2 472 479 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2141 26554829 PMC4715915

293. Beatson R The mucin MUC1 modulates the tumor immunological microenvironment through engagement of the lectin Siglec-9 Nature Immunology 2016 17 11 1273 1281 10.1038/ni.3552 27595232 PMC5257269

294. Wu B Adipose PD-L1 modulates PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade immunotherapy efficacy in breast cancer Oncoimmunology 2018 7 11 e1500107 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1500107 30393583 PMC6209395

295. Mittendorf EA PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer Cancer Immunology Research 2014 2 4 361 370 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0127 24764583 PMC4000553

296. Muenst S The presence of programmed death 1 (PD-1)-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is associated with poor prognosis in human breast cancer Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2013 139 3 667 676 10.1007/s10549-013-2581-3 23756627 PMC3885332

297. Ali HR PD-L1 protein expression in breast cancer is rare, enriched in basal-like tumours and associated with infiltrating lymphocytes Annals of Oncology 2015 26 7 1488 1493 10.1093/annonc/mdv192 25897014

298. Cancer Genome Atlas Network Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours Nature 2012 490 7418 61 70 10.1038/nature11412 23000897 PMC3465532

299. Guo L PD-L1 expression and CD274 gene alteration in triple-negative breast cancer: Implication for prognostic biomarker Springerplus 2016 5 1 805 10.1186/s40064-016-2513-x 27390646 PMC4916110

300. Li Z PD-L1 expression is associated with tumor FOXP3(+) regulatory T-cell infiltration of breast cancer and poor prognosis of patient Journal of Cancer 2016 7 7 784 793 10.7150/jca.14549 27162536 PMC4860794

301. Muenst S Expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is associated with poor prognosis in human breast cancer Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2014 146 1 15 24 10.1007/s10549-014-2988-5 24842267 PMC4180714

302. Nanda R Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer: Phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 Study Journal of Clinical Oncology 2016 34 21 2460 2467 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.8931 27138582 PMC6816000

303. Schmid P Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer New England Journal of Medicine 2018 379 22 2108 2121 10.1056/NEJMoa1809615 30345906

304. Larkin J Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma New England Journal of Medicine 2015 373 1 23 34 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030 26027431 PMC5698905

305. Zhao C Current landscape: The mechanism and therapeutic impact of obesity for breast cancer Frontiers in Oncology 2021 11 704893 10.3389/fonc.2021.704893 34350120 PMC8326839

306. Mirsoian A Adiposity induces lethal cytokine storm after systemic administration of stimulatory immunotherapy regimens in aged mice Journal of Experimental Medicine 2014 211 12 2373 2383 10.1084/jem.20140116 25366964 PMC4235633

307. Pingili AK Immune checkpoint blockade reprograms systemic immune landscape and tumor microenvironment in obesity-associated breast cancer Cell Reports 2021 35 12 109285 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109285 34161764 PMC8574993

308. Canter RJ Obesity as an immune-modifying factor in cancer immunotherapy Journal of Leukocyte Biology 2018 104 3 487 497 10.1002/JLB.5RI1017-401RR 29762866 PMC6113103

309. Richtig G Body mass index may predict the response to ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: An observational multi-centre study PLoS One 2018 13 10 e0204729 10.1371/journal.pone.0204729 30273398 PMC6166940

310. McQuade JL Association of body-mass index and outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or chemotherapy: A retrospective, multicohort analysis The lancet Oncology 2018 19 3 310 322 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30078-0 29449192 PMC5840029

311. Cortellini A A multicenter study of body mass index in cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors: When overweight becomes favorable Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer 2019 7 1 57 10.1186/s40425-019-0527-y 30813970 PMC6391761

312. Greenlee H Association between body mass index and cancer survival in a pooled analysis of 22 clinical trials Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 2017 26 1 21 29 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1336 27986655 PMC5370550

313. Liou AP Conserved shifts in the gut microbiota due to gastric bypass reduce host weight and adiposity Science Translational Medicine 2013 5 178 178ra41 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005687 23536013 PMC3652229