1. Introduction
Lung exposure to various types of noxious particles, such as those present in cigarette smoke, can lead to COPD. COPD is a common and devastating respiratory disease, characterized by a progressive airflow obstruction. COPD has become the third leading cause of global death by 2010, with 2.9 million deaths annually [ 1 ]. The Global Burden of Disease Study reports a prevalence of 251 million cases of COPD globally and an incidence of 95 million cases per year in 2016 [ 2 ]. In a prospective population-based cohort study with 25 years of follow-up (Rotterdam Study), the prevalence of COPD is 4.7% and the overall incidence is approximately 9/1000 per year [ 3 ]. The major risk factor is cigarette smoke, but there is a wide variety of interindividual responses for the same amount and duration of tobacco smoking. In total, the onset of the disease results from complex interactions between cumulative exposure to air pollutants and factors related to the individual himself, such as genetic factors [ 4 ], bronchial hyperresponsiveness [ 5 ], poor respiratory function some months after birth [ 6 ], or low lung function in early adulthood [ 7 ].
The chronic course of the disease is frequently worsened by recurrent episodes of acute worsening of respiratory symptoms, called acute exacerbations, most often related to viral or bacterial infections [ 8 ]. Acute exacerbations dramatically affect quality of life and worsen the natural history of the disease: Lung function decreases more rapidly in patients with frequent exacerbations, with an increased risk of death [ 9 ]. Current pharmacological treatments for COPD patients decrease exacerbation frequency by only up to 29% compared to a placebo either alone or in combination, but they do not have any significant effect on mortality, as shown by 5 large studies (TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health (TORCH) [ 10 ], Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium (UPLIFT) [ 11 ], Study to Understand Mortality and Morbidity in COPD (SUMMIT) [ 12 ], EFfect of Indacaterol Glycopyronium Vs Fluticasone Salmeterol on COPD Exacerbations (FLAME) [ 13 ], and InforMing the PAthway of COPD Treatment (IMPACT) [ 14 ]).
COPD is associated with an early activation of structural (epithelial) and innate immune cells (in particular, macrophages, neutrophils, and eosinophils) within the lung. These early events favor the accumulation of adaptive immune cells (CD4 + and CD8 + T cells and B cells) in the airways and the alveolar compartments, leading to chronic inflammation [ 15 ]. Other distinguishing feature of COPD includes bronchial remodeling and, in particular, peribronchial fibrosis. The origin of peribronchial fibrosis remains controversial: It has been recently suggested that circulating fibrocytes recruited into the lungs could play a role in this process, either directly or indirectly [ 16 ]. Although inflammation and remodeling are distinct processes, they are related; on the one hand, the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the lungs can influence cell survival, proliferation, migration and differentiation of structural cells, and on the other hand, the modification of lung architecture could also modify and perpetuate chronic inflammation. This has led some investigators to hypothesize that both chronic inflammation and bronchial remodeling should be targeted by treatment to slow down disease progression.
In this context, molecules of the chemokine family are of particular interest. Chemokines are small molecules (8 to 12 kDa), belonging to the family of cytokines. Because they are implicated in various biological functions such as chemotaxis [ 17 ], leukocyte degranulation [ 18 ], hematopoiesis [ 19 ] and angiogenesis [ 20 ], they represent therapeutic targets in numerous diseases, such as breast cancer [ 21 ], human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) [ 22 ], and atherosclerosis [ 23 ]. Multiple studies have now established a pivotal role for chemokines in COPD development and progression. This review attempts to highlight important recent advances in this field. In particular, we systematically reviewed chemokines modifications associated with COPD ( Table 1 ), and based on the number of preclinical and clinical evidences as well as recent findings, we focus on the CXCL8-CXCR1/2, CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3, CCL2-CCR2, and CXCL12/CXCR4 axes that seem to be clearly associated with COPD pathophysiology. Research on chemokines and their receptors could pave the way for the development of new strategies of treatments which are urgently needed both to slow the natural course of the disease and to treat acute episodes of exacerbations.
2. General Considerations on Chemokines in COPD
2.1. Chemokines and their Receptors: Definition and Properties, in Relation with COPD
Chemokines are small molecules that belong to the large family of cytokines. Through their interaction with cell surface G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), they mediate various cellular processes, in particular, chemotaxis. Four groups of chemokines (CC, CXC, XC, and CX3C) are defined by the positions of sequentially conserved residues and by their quaternary structures [ 24 ]. All chemokines have a highly conserved tertiary structural fold, consisting of a flexible N-terminus and N-terminal loop, followed by a three-stranded β-sheet with a C-terminal α-helix. This conformation allows them to form oligomers, primarily homo, and heterodimers but also tetramers and higher order oligomers [ 25 ].
So far, 20 chemokine GPCRs have been described [ 26 ]. Like chemokines, they are classified into 4 groups (CCR, CXCR, XCR, and CX3CR). Each chemokine can bind to several receptors of the same group and vice versa. Atypical receptors also exist [ 27 ]. At the structural level, the N-terminal part of some GPCR is involved in chemokine interaction, while the tripeptide ELR sequence (Glu-Leu-Arg) of some CXC chemokines was shown to be crucial for binding and activating GPCR. This has allowed the distinction between ELR + CXC chemokines (CXCL1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8), that promote angiogenesis, from ELR − CXC chemokines (CXCL4, 9, 10, and 1) that have angiostatic properties [ 28 ]. Other residues such as the Arg-Phe-Phe-Arg-Glu-Ser-His sequence of CXCL12 within the N-loop between the 2 N-terminal cysteines are implicated in GPCR binding. Posttranslational modifications in the N-terminal part of GPCR, such as tyrosine-O-sulfation, participate in the specific interaction between the ligand and the receptor [ 29 ] ( Figure 1 ). For example, CXCR4 sulfation at residues 7, 12, and 21 favors the binding of CXCL12 [ 30 ].
The binding of the chemokine on its receptor triggers the GDP/GTP exchange of coupled heterotrimeric Gi proteins and the dissociation of the β/γ subunits. These events induce the activation of Src family kinases, phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (PLC) β, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), with subsequent inositol trisphosphate (IP3)-mediated calcium mobilization and protein kinase C (PKC) activation (for reviews, see References [ 31 , 32 ]). Depending on the considered chemokine receptor, its surface expression, its density, and the cellular context, several downstream signaling pathways can be activated: the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk) signaling pathway, the RhoA pathway, the Janus kinase (JAK)/signaling transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway, and the PI3K/protein kinase B (Akt) pathway. Various biological effects can then be produced, including cell migration and chemotaxis, cell proliferation, and survival. In some cases, the binding of the chemokine does not trigger cell survival: Prolonged exposure to CXCL12 induces apoptosis in T cells [ 33 ], colorectal carcinoma cells [ 34 ], and acute myeloid leukemia cell lines [ 35 ]. Thus, in the context of CXCL12-rich bone marrow, CXCL12 may promote cell apoptosis rather than cell survival, especially if the other pro-survival signals are affected. Importantly, the activation of G proteins is rapidly attenuated by a negative feedback system, called desensitization, leading to β-arrestins mediated endocytosis of the receptor [ 31 ]. Chemokines receptors can also be regulated by other molecules. For instance, IL-6 regulates CCR5 expression. In a recent study, despite an increased CCR5 expression, monocytes of COPD patients exhibit decreased migratory ability [ 36 ].
Various chemokines are often produced at the target sites of leukocyte trafficking, and combinatorial effects could occur at different levels: Chemokines heterodimers/oligomers can modify biological activity, or each chemokine can act on its respective GPCR to trigger synergistic or antagonistic effect [ 39 ]. Chemokines can also interact with endogenous damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), such as high mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1), an alarmin that enhances the activity of CXCL12 [ 40 ] and that protects CXCL12 from degradation [ 41 ]. As cigarette smoke exposure and infections promote DAMPs released by damaged cells or by the immune system, this should be taken into account when exploring chemokine function in COPD.
Chemokines also bind strongly to glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), and this interaction can drive chemokines oligomerization [ 42 ], which is critical for subsequent biological effects. For example, monomeric and dimeric CXCL12 induce selective signal transduction pathways and differ in β-arrestin recruitment, and only the monomeric type promotes cell migration [ 30 , 43 ]. For some chemokines such as CCL2, CCL4, and CCL5, GAG binding and oligomerization are required to induce cell recruitment [ 44 ]. Specific changes of pulmonary extracellular matrix (ECM) are associated with COPD and occur in all lung compartments [ 45 ]. In COPD, the major changes described are a destruction of elastic fibers, as well as elevated levels of hyaluronan (belonging to the GAG family) and tenascin C with decreased level of decorin. Interestingly, an accelerated turnover of ECM proteins has been evidenced during acute exacerbations of COPD, which could further affect chemokine expression levels and localization patterns [ 46 ]. In addition, chemokines are the target of numerous proteases, such as MMP-1, 2, 3, 9, 13, and 14; cathepsin; elastase; and DPPIV/CD26 for CXCL12. Tissue decomposition in emphysema is usually described as a result of an imbalance between protease and antiprotease activities that could also have direct implication on chemokines degradation.
Of note, the conservation of the chemokine expression pattern between human and rodent models (essentially mice) has not been thoroughly investigated in COPD. However, some studies aiming to compare the expression of specific chemokines in other contexts have shown a poor correlation between human and mice in the basal state [ 47 , 48 ]. Therefore, conclusions drawn from murine models should be taken with caution.
2.2. Chemokines Gradients in COPD
Chemokine receptor expression allows the cell to sense and to respond to a concentration gradient. While chemokines and their receptors are well-described, literature on gradients is much sparser. One of the key problems is to measure in vivo the concentrations and their dynamics to characterize chemokine gradients. In addition, the microenvironment constantly evolves, leading to temporal and spatial modification of graded signals.
Another important distinction is to know whether the considered gradient is in the fluid phase or is a gradient of immobilized chemokines by their interaction with the ECM molecules, especially GAGs. Pioneer studies, such as those performed on CCL21 mediated dendritic cell migration [ 49 ], have provided in vivo pieces of evidence of directional migration along gradients of tissue immobilized chemokines. Because chemokines have short half lives in solution, soluble gradients may be more transient, but the cues may play a role at longer range that immobilized chemokines. In the context of COPD, both immobilized and soluble gradients probably coexist. While immobilized gradients are in principle more stable and robust that soluble gradients, both are probably differently modified by COPD exacerbation.
We also propose to distinguish intra-tissue gradients from inter-tissue gradients. At the organism level, inter-tissue gradients might play a critical role in orchestrating cell trafficking between bone marrow, lymph nodes, peripheral circulation, the lungs, and the heart. In peripheral circulation, chemokines are present both in solution and immobilized on the endothelial cell surfaces, where they can trigger leukocyte arrest and extravasation. In principle, these gradients should be evidenced by measuring chemokines concentration in different organs, as already done for CXCL12 in the context of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [ 50 ]. On the other hand, intra-tissular gradients, particularly intrapulmonary gradients, are probably mostly composed of chemokines bound to the ECM.
A consideration at the gradient level is key to understand in vivo effects. For example, neutrophil recruitment to the lungs is increased in response to mutant CXCL8 that binds less strongly to the GAGs [ 51 ]. This surprising effect has been explained by tissue-specific differences in GAG interactions: The mutant CXCL8 is less active in the peritoneum but more active in the lungs. Finally, the kinetics of gradient formation, strongly regulated by the kinetics of the interaction between chemokines and GAGs is another important point to consider [ 52 ]. This has important consequences during COPD exacerbation: Chemokines that bind to GAG with rapid kinetics will form gradients slowly and vice versa, leading to potential early and late effects.
3. Chemokines at the Stable State and During Exacerbation
COPD pathophysiology is related with small airways inflammation, which is associated with increased numbers of macrophages and T cells (mostly CD8 + T cells) and, in more severe disease, increased numbers of B cells within the parenchyma and neutrophils in the lumen [ 15 ]. In the respiratory tract, cigarette smoke and other irritants might activate alveolar macrophages and airway epithelial cells to release chemotactic factors that then attract circulating leukocytes to the lungs. Eosinophils, innate immune cells, can also be found in the blood and in lung tissue in a proportion of patients with COPD [ 53 ]. The natural history of COPD is often marked by periodic exacerbations, characterized with a worsening of the functional respiratory state, as well as an increased sputum production [ 54 ]. These exacerbations can be triggered by environmental (air pollution and meteorological effect) or infectious (bacteria and viruses) factors [ 8 ]. These factors can trigger the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) which, by binding to specific pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), induce the release of chemotactic factors by resident cells. Therefore, chemokines, produced by various cell types both in the lung and in the systemic circulation (see Table 1 for details), play a key role in orchestrating the chronic inflammation in the lungs of COPD patients.
Of note, the implication of several chemokines in COPD is still controversial. First, many chemokines seem to be associated with smoking status rather than the airflow obstruction characteristic of COPD [ 82 ]. For instance, a recent study found that circulating levels of the chemokines CXCL8, CCL4, and CCL22 attain the highest levels in healthy smokers compared to nonsmokers and COPD subjects [ 91 ]. The same finding has been observed with CCL17 which has increased mRNA levels in pulmonary cells and in the broncho-alveolar lung fluid (BALF) of COPD patients compared to nonsmokers controls but not compared to current or ex-smokers [ 92 ]. Overall, it is likely that some chemokines are increased in smokers compared to nonsmokers, but their levels seem to be further increased in smokers susceptible to develop COPD (for instance, see Reference [ 93 ] where CXCL8 levels are increased in smokers with emphysema).
Because some chemokines are continuously expressed while others are specifically induced during exacerbations, we chose here to distinguish chemokine function at a stable state and during an exacerbation. Table 1 presents the list of chemokines modifications associated with COPD, as well as secreting cells and resulting attracted cells. Chemokines receptors implicated in COPD, as well as their connection/interaction with cytokines have been reviewed recently [ 90 ]. We then develop hereafter the CXCL8-CXCR1/2, CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3, CCL2-CCR2, and CXCL12-CXCR4 axes that seem to be associated with COPD pathophysiology based on in vitro as well as in vivo findings. Of note, we choose here not to focus on the CCL11-CCR3 axis which might be another key player in COPD, in particular for eosinophil trafficking. Although eosinophil count is emerging as a biomarker, the role of eosinophils as mediator of disease remains to be fully elucidated [ 53 ].
3.1. The CXCL8-CXCR1/2 Axis
3.1.1. At the Stable State
CXCL8 (IL-8) is one of the first intensively studied chemokines and a well-known mediator of neutrophilic inflammation [ 60 , 94 , 95 ]. It has first been identified as a Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated monocyte-secreted factor that stimulated neutrophil exocytosis (granule release) and oxidative burst [ 96 ]. It is also the first identified chemokine to play a role in the recruitment of inflammatory cells in COPD: Increased concentrations of CXCL8 have been found in induced sputum of COPD patients compared with smokers with normal lung function and nonsmokers, and these increased CXCL8 levels have been linked with increased neutrophil numbers in sputum [ 60 ]. Since then, many studies have confirmed the role of CXCL8 in neutrophilic inflammation occurring in COPD airways. CXCL8 is thought to be produced by alveolar macrophages as well as bronchial epithelial cells [ 90 ] ( Figure 2 ). in vitro studies have notably found a secretion by primary bronchial epithelial cell cultures exposed to diesel exhaust [ 97 ], as well as an increase in its production by the bronchial epithelial cell line (i.e., BEAS-2B) exposed to small particulate matter [ 98 ] and in another bronchial epithelial cell line (16-HBE) stimulated by HSP60 [ 99 ]. This production could stimulate the airway epithelium, leading to its contraction and an increased permeability to inflammatory cells [ 100 ]. Of note, CXCL8 is also thought to be produced by lung fibroblasts when stimulated by epithelial cell-derived IL-1α [ 61 ] but also by bronchial smooth muscle cells [ 62 ] ( Figure 2 ). Some studies have been conducted on mice models and have found that the mouse equivalent of CXCL8 (keratinocyte-derived chemokine) is also increased in the lungs of mice exposed to cigarette smoke extracts (CSE) [ 101 ].
Overall, cellular crosstalk between alveolar macrophages and epithelial-secreted CXCL8 and CXCR2-expressing neutrophils contributes to COPD physiopathology.
3.1.2. During Exacerbation
The role of CXCL8 in COPD exacerbations has been pointed out several times but not always with the same outcomes. The first study to measure CXCL8 levels during an exacerbation showed an increase in the sputum of exacerbating COPD patients compared to their basal state [ 102 ]. Of note, sputum CXCL8 levels correlate with the airways bacterial load and blood myeloperoxidase (a pro-inflammatory enzyme released by neutrophils) levels [ 103 ]. Another study showed an increase in serum CXCL8 levels from controls to stable, and exacerbation stage [ 104 ]. However, another large-scale study showed that serum CXCL8 is negatively associated with COPD moderate to severe exacerbations within the COPD Gene cohort [ 82 ]. Of note, this finding was only observed in one of the two cohorts investigated in this large-scale study. CXCL8 level was also associated with progressive emphysema. Overall, this discrepancy may be related with the fact that CXCL8 has been studied at different sites (serum vs sputum) and/or that the investigated cohorts were different. Finally, another team showed that consistent acute exacerbations (≥1 event per year for 3 years) were associated in logistic regression with higher CXCL8 concentrations in the SPIROMICS cohort [ 105 ].
The role of CXCL8 in COPD exacerbations is further supported by the correlation of sputum CXCL8 levels with the number of neutrophils [ 106 ]. Moreover, CXCR2 (but not CXCR1) mRNA is increased in bronchial epithelial biopsies in exacerbating compared to stable patients [ 58 ]. in vitro findings are consistent with these observations, since CXCL8 is upregulated in the human bronchial epithelial cell line (HBE-16) when stimulated by LPS [ 99 ].
Finally, CXCL8 is also associated with the IL-17 pathway. Indeed, IL-17F stimulation of human bronchial smooth muscle cells induces the transcription of the CXCL8 gene via the positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) composed of cyclin T1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9). IL-17F is able to trigger CDK9 phosphorylation, thus enhancing the production of CXCL8 [ 107 ]. This sheds light on different mechanisms by which CXCL8 expression is activated during an exacerbation.
3.2. The CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3 Axis
3.2.1. At the Stable State
CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 are mainly produced by alveolar macrophages [ 108 ] but also by bronchial epithelial cells [ 109 , 110 ] and bronchial smooth muscle cells [ 71 ] ( Figure 2 ). The affinity for their common receptor (CXCR3) is increasing from CXCL9 to CXCL11, suggesting a hierarchy of affinity [ 111 ]. Their concentrations are increased in the induced sputum of COPD patients and correlates with the number of neutrophils [ 68 ]. However, CXCR3 agonists are mainly known for their ability to attract both Th1 and CD8 + T lymphocytes (or type 1 cytotoxic T cells) [ 112 ]. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of COPD patients have an enhanced migratory response towards CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, compared with PBMC from nonsmokers [ 113 ], which was apparently not due to an increased number of receptors at the cell surface. Isolated lymphocytes or monocytes from COPD patients do not show enhanced migration towards these chemokines, suggesting that lymphocytes in PBMC are stimulated by the presence of other leukocytes in the PBMC fraction. This concurs with another report that only activated lymphocytes migrate towards CXCL11 [ 114 ].
Furthermore, CXCR3 expression is induced on activated Th1 and CD8 + lymphocytes and is thought to be involved in the recruitment of these cells to the sites of inflammation in COPD patients [ 72 ]. Moreover, a decline of lung function in COPD patients is associated with a high percentage of T cells that express CXCR3 [ 115 ], suggesting that CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 may be involved in the recruitment of T cells and the subsequent immune mediated lung damage observed in COPD, through the production of perforins and granzyme B [ 116 ].
By contrast, a CXCL11 gradient in the lungs of COPD patients is also associated with the resolution of pulmonary inflammation. The recruitment of effector T cells to mucosal surfaces, such as bronchial epithelium, is important to provide defense against airway pathogens, but the migration of the lymphocytes from the epithelium to the airways lumen, called “egression”, is also physiologically crucial to avoid detrimental accumulation of leukocytes within the interstitium. The polarized secretion of CXCL11 at the apical side of bronchial epithelial cells produces a basal-to-apical gradient that triggers lymphocyte egression ( Figure 2 ). This gradient is upregulated in COPD patients [ 117 ], resulting in more egression. Thus, the upregulation of CXCL11 production could also be seen as a defense mechanism. This migration may also depend on the underlying stimulus and may vary as the inflammatory responses evolves.
Overall, CXCL9/10/11 produced by macrophages and bronchial epithelial cells act on CXCR3 + cells to recruit inflammatory cells into the lungs, such as T lymphocytes, but CXCL11 seems to be also involved in lymphocyte clearance, emphasizing the possible dual role of chemokines in COPD.
3.2.2. During Exacerbation
CXCL10 has been found elevated in the sputum of COPD patients during an exacerbation compared to values after recovery [ 118 ]. CXCL10 is also elevated in the serum from COPD patients suffering from a rhinovirus-induced exacerbation compared to control serum [ 73 ] and serum CXCL10 has been proposed as a biomarker of virus-associated exacerbations of COPD [ 119 ]. in vitro, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 are overexpressed when bronchial epithelial cells are stimulated with IFN-γ [ 109 , 110 ]. Moreover, a release of these three chemokines can be potentiated by the synergistic interactions between TNF-α and IFN-γ [ 110 , 120 ]. Elevated levels of TNF-α have been found in vivo in the airways of COPD patients [ 60 ], and thus, the expression of these three chemokines by structural cells of the airways is likely to drive lymphocyte recruitment during an exacerbation. Finally, T lymphocytes and IFN-γ-stimulated mononuclear cells also produce these 3 chemokines, and it has been shown that these molecules can also have anti-microbial properties [ 121 ].
3.3. The CCL2-CCR2 Axis
3.3.1. At the Stable State
CCL2 activates CCR2 mainly expressed on monocytes and T cells. In the lungs, CCL2 is mainly produced by alveolar macrophages, T cells, and endothelial cells, and this increase results in local monocyte recruitment ( Figure 2 ). CCL2 levels have been found to be increased in COPD patients compared to healthy controls in various studies and organs, such as whole blood, induced sputum, and in situ lung tissue (see Table 1 ). Of note, polymorphisms in the CCL2 gene, as well as in that of CCR2 have been found associated with COPD development [ 122 ].
3.3.2. During an Exacerbation
CCL2 has been implicated in a systemic inflammatory response (with elevated CCL2 serum level) which may be due to a virus-induced activation of macrophages in virus-infected COPD patients compared to healthy controls [ 123 ]. Furthermore, a mouse model of COPD exacerbation (porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE) and LPS-triggered) used to determine the role of IFN regulatory factor III (IRF3) showed a decrease in CCL2 mRNA transcripts in the lungs of IRF3-/- mice. This finding suggests that CCL2 is implicated in LPS/bacteria-induced COPD exacerbation [ 124 ].
3.4. The CXCL12-CXCR4 Axis
3.4.1. At the Stable State
The CXCL12-CXCR4 axis also represents an important chemotactic axis for numerous cells, such as T cells, monocytes, immature B cells, bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), and fibrocytes. CXCL12 is expressed by various cells, such as inflammatory cells, bronchial epithelial cells, hematopoietic cells, endothelial cells, and perivascular stromal cells [ 125 , 126 ] and in different tissues, such as the bone marrow, the lungs, and the blood vessels. CXCL12 directs stem-cell homing [ 127 ] and mediates angiogenesis [ 128 ]. Importantly, CXCL12 also binds to CXCR7, a receptor which has been more recently described [ 129 ].
Until recently, the role of the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis was unexplored in COPD. In mice exposed to cigarette smoke during 6 months, the level of CXCL12 is decreased in the lungs [ 74 ]. In COPD patients, both the number of CXCR4 positive circulating fibrocytes and the blood level of CXCL12 are unchanged at the stable state [ 76 ]. However, we very recently demonstrated that bronchial fibrocytes are increased in both distal and proximal airways of COPD patients at a stable state compared to controls [ 130 ]. The level of proximal bronchial fibrocytes is correlated with both a loss in lung function (i.e., FEV1 decrease) and bronchial thickness assessed by CT scan [ 130 ]. In addition, the level of distal bronchial fibrocytes is correlated with both functional obstruction (i.e., FEV1/FVC decrease) and air trapping assessed by mean lung attenuation during expiration assessed by CT scan [ 130 ]. It is thus tempting to speculate that these tissue fibrocytes could participate in tissue repair and bronchial remodeling. By contrast, the levels of both CXCR4 and CXCL12 mRNA are decreased in BM-MSCs of COPD patients [ 75 ], suggesting that their chemotactic properties are altered. The migratory and repair capacities of EPCs from COPD patients are also impaired, which could be related to a decreased expression of CXCR4 [ 131 ]. An alteration of the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis at the stable state seems, therefore, associated with stem cell senescence and defect in repair function in COPD.
3.4.2. During Exacerbation
The level of CXCR4 expressing fibrocytes is enhanced in the blood of COPD patients during an exacerbation, and the chemotactic properties of these cells in response to CXCL12 are also increased [ 76 ]. This is apparently not due to a modification of CXCR4 expression level, as the total amount of CXCR4 is not modified in these cells [ 76 ]. This is also not related to the blood level of CXCL12, which is not increased during an exacerbation [ 76 ]. Such an increased fibrocyte migratory capacity during exacerbation may thus participate to their bronchial infiltration in the airways of COPD patients, even at a stable state (i.e., after exacerbations) [ 130 ]. In an influenza-infected mouse model, it has been shown that the neutrophils early recruited within the tissues leave CXCL12-containing trails behind [ 132 ]. CXCL12 derived from neutrophils but not from epithelial cells is critical for virus-specific CD8 + T cell recruitment [ 132 ]. Altogether, this suggests that the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis is modified during an exacerbation, providing one of the inflammatory cues necessary to guide immune cells into inflamed tissues.
4. Chemokines in COPD: Therapeutic Implications
4.1. Chemokine Levels as Biomarkers in COPD
Biomarkers in COPD are essential to predict the risk of developing the disease among people exposed to risk factors or to predict the severity of the COPD course. Lungs being at the first line of exposure to airborne particles, lungs biomarkers seem the most fitted option. Sampling can be done in the exhaled breath condensate (easily accessible but low protein content and low reproducibility), induced sputum (noninvasive but requires expertise and time), BALF, lung brushes, and biopsies (the most accurate but all invasive and expensive) [ 82 ].
Another option is to measure chemokines level in the blood, hypothesizing that COPD is a systemic disease or at least has features of a systemic disease. Of note, several protein biomarkers measured in the blood are already known: For instance, fibrinogen and C-reactive protein are correlated with COPD severity and risk of exacerbations [ 133 , 134 ]; soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE) is inversely correlated with emphysema and airflow obstruction [ 135 ]; surfactant protein D (SP-D) has been associated with COPD and emphysema [ 136 , 137 ]; and club cell-16 (CC16) might be correlated with airflow obstruction and emphysema [ 137 , 138 ]. The ECLIPSE study has been a breakthrough concerning the assessment of biomarkers in COPD (see Reference [ 139 ] for an exhaustive review). Among chemokines, serum CCL18 has been identified as associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular hospitalization or mortality [ 86 ]. We present hereafter recent data concerning chemokines we have focused on in the previous part.
4.1.1. CXCL8 as a Biomarker of Disease Severity
According to Baker et al., CXCL8 belongs to a category of molecules classically associated with cellular senescence, mirroring many inflammatory diseases such as COPD [ 140 ]. Indeed, CXCL8 is independently associated with severe COPD, notably worse airflow obstruction (FEV1% and FEV1/FVC), and with a progression of CT assessed emphysema over 5 years [ 82 ].
CXCL8 is also used as a biomarker in murine models of COPD (for instance, to validate the efficiency of a ghrelin-based therapy in a murine model of emphysema [ 141 ]).
4.1.2. CXCL10 as a Genetic Biomarker of Disease Susceptibility
Polymorphisms in CXCL10 gene promoter could also contribute to susceptibility to COPD: The “rs56061981” single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is significantly associated with a reduced risk of developing COPD, and the “rs56216945” SNP is associated with an increased risk; the implicated mechanism could be an alteration of monocyte recruitment [ 142 ].
Future research should aim to assess the predictive value of other important chemokines (CCL2, CXCL12…) to determine biomarker combinations in order to better predict personalized risk, as well as to develop new techniques to better assess biomarkers in non-invasive lung samples.
4.2. Chemokines or Chemokine Receptors Neutralization in COPD
As several chemokines are implicated in COPD, the neutralization of chemokines and/or their receptors has received considerable interest. Most strategies directly antagonize the GPCR (for excellent review, see Reference [ 108 ]). Although very successful in some cases, attested by the example of plerixafor [ 143 ] and maraviroc [ 144 ], the respective antagonists of CXCR4 and CCR5, most of the pharmacological agents that target chemokine receptors inhibit both G protein signaling and β-arrestins-mediated endocytosis, promoting receptor accumulation at cell surface, a process called “antagonist tolerance” [ 145 ]. As a result, the efficacy of this type of antagonist is reduced after a long time of treatment. Other molecules, called “biased antagonists”, selectively inhibit G protein signalization without preventing β-arrestins recruitment to the receptor. These biased antagonists could offer in the future a solution for patients developing tolerance. Although in principle more complicated because chemokines are often considered too small and to have too shallow surfaces to be “druggable”, recent successes in drug discovery show that chemokines can also be targeted and neutralized [ 146 ]. Other approaches include interfering with chemokine-GAG interaction [ 42 ] and designing specific chemokine heterodimer agonists [ 147 ].
4.2.1. The CXCL8-CXCR1/2 Axis as Therapeutic Target
Because neutrophils are often described as the main effector cells of tissue destruction, blocking CXCL8 was expected to lower neutrophilic inflammation and to slow down disease progression. Antibody-mediated blockade of CXCL8 partially inhibits sputum-induced neutrophil chemotaxis [ 57 ]. Targeting CXCL8 with an antibody only slightly improves dyspnea in COPD patients [ 148 ]. This modest effect can be probably explained by the fact that the antibody only blocks free and not bound CXCL8 and by the existence of other neutrophil chemotactic factors, such as leukotriene B4. Interfering with CXCL8 binding property with GAG could represent an alternative strategy: TNF-stimulated gene/protein-6 (TSG-6) inhibits neutrophil chemotaxis through a direct interaction between TSG-6 and the GAG binding site of CXCL8, which prevents the association of CXCL8 with heparin [ 149 ].
Neutralization of the CXCL8 receptors might be more promising. A specific CXCR2 antagonist, SB-332235, decreases neutrophil infiltration into the lungs in a rat model of acute cigarette smoke exposure [ 150 ]. In a similar mouse model, SCH-N, an orally active small molecule inhibitor of CXCR2 also lowers neutrophilic inflammation in the BALF, lung neutrophil infiltration and the level of tissue damaging enzymes [ 151 ]. In a phase II study, a CXCR2 antagonist, MK-7123, significantly improves the FEV1 and time to the first exacerbation, and it reduces inflammation after 6 months of treatment [ 152 ]. Another CXCR2 antagonist, danirixin, has been shown to improve respiratory symptoms and health status of treated patients [ 153 ] https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?s0lRNK . Of note, although preclinical evidences are lacking due to species differences in CXCR1, dual CXCR1/2 therapy may be even more effective than selective CXCR2 antagonists [ 154 ]. A CXCR1/2 antagonist given orally for 3 days appears to markedly reduce neutrophils and macrophages counts in sputum after inhaled LPS challenge in healthy subjects [ 155 ], making it likely that these drugs may reduce pulmonary inflammation in patients with COPD.
4.2.2. The CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3 Axis as a Therapeutic Target
Targeting CXCL10 seems an interesting option. An in vitro study has shown that CXCL10-neutralizing antibody can inhibit CSE-induced cell necrosis and activation of inflammatory cytokines in the 16HBE cell line [ 79 ]. In the same study, mice treated with CXCL10 neutralizing antibody did not develop COPD features (weight loss; reduction of lung function, increased levels of IL-6, and CCL2 in BALF and lung homogenate) as compared to cigarette smoke-exposed mice. Antagonists of the receptor CXCR3 have been developed [ 156 ], but so far, none of them has been tested yet in clinical trials for COPD.
4.2.3. The CXCL12-CXCR4 Axis as a Therapeutic Target
The CXCL12-CXCR4 axis is another attractive target, and various strategies of neutralization have already been developed, such as locking CXCL12 in an homodimer structure [ 157 ], neutralizing CXCL12 [ 158 , 159 , 160 ], interfering with GAG binding properties of CXCL12 [ 161 ], and antagonizing CXCR4 by small molecules (for review, see Reference [ 162 ]) or blocking antibodies [ 21 ]. So far, plerixafor (also called AMD3100; brand name Mozobil) is the only FDA-approved CXCR4 antagonist. It is used to mobilize stem cells from the bone marrow for autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [ 143 ]. In a recent study regarding WHIM syndrome, patients have been treated daily by plerixafor at low dose for at least 19 weeks [ 163 ], opening perspectives for chronic treatment.
Recent evidences suggest that targeting the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis may be promising for COPD treatment. In a mouse model of cigarette smoke exposure, the intermittent administration of plerixafor decreases emphysema damages, without affecting CXCL12 level and inflammation in BALF [ 74 ]. Plerixafor has a protective effect on the number of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) in the bone marrow following chronic smoke exposure [ 74 ] https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?Ltp2HU , suggesting that increased HPCs available for lung repair might explain, at least partially, the beneficial effect of plerixafor ( Figure 3 ). How plerixafor increases the number of HPCs remains unknown, but it could be explained by the good efficiency of marrow homing of plerixafor mobilized HPCs [ 164 ], or it could interfere with CXCL12-mediated apoptosis that have been described in various cells [ 33 , 34 , 35 ].
Plerixafor also significantly reduced the in vitro plasma-induced migration of fibrocytes purified from the blood of exacerbating COPD patients [ 76 ], suggesting that the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis could participate to the recruitment of fibrocytes to the lungs during COPD exacerbations [ 130 ]. Antagonizing CXCR4 may therefore reduce the tissular content of fibrocyte-derived fibroblasts and myofibroblasts and subsequent fibrosis, as shown in other clinical settings such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [ 50 ] ( Figure 3 ). We can speculate that this type of treatment could interfere not only with fibrocyte migration but also with their adherence to vessels, as CXCR4 activation has been shown to enhance β1 integrin function in melanoma cells, resulting in increased adhesion to endothelial cells [ 165 ].
In mice, an acute treatment with a high dose of plerixafor has also been shown to promote neutrophil demargination from the lungs [ 166 ]. In an influenza-infected mouse model, plerixafor treatment as well as genetic deletion of CXCL12 in neutrophils recapitulates the effect of neutrophil depletion on CD8 + T cell recruitment [ 132 ]. Thus, CXCR4 antagonists may also reduce lung inflammation in COPD in which neutrophils and cytotoxic CD8 + T lymphocytes are implicated ( Figure 3 ). Although one could expect that this type of treatment could result in reduced CD8 + T cell effector function and could delay the clearance of the virus, it seems that T cell priming and expansion is not altered in this mouse model [ 132 ].
In addition to its effect on the lung and the bone marrow, plerixafor could have a protective effect on the heart: a single injection of plerixafor after myocardial infarction preserves mouse cardiac function by mobilizing the endothelial progenitor cells from bone marrow into peripheral blood [ 167 ]. This effect seems to be dependent on MMP-9 up-regulation, mediated by plerixafor-induced VEGF. Similar findings were found in a rat model of myocardial infarction [ 168 ]. As cardiovascular diseases are the most frequent comorbidities in COPD patients, it reinforces plerixafor interest as therapeutic option for COPD. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that most of the data obtained in mice regarding plerixafor effect were obtained using acute treatment with high dose of plerixafor (usually, 5 mg/kg), and it is therefore possible that chronic exposure with a lower dose in humans may not produce the same effects.
In total, although potential detrimental effects can be expected, antagonizing the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis seems to represent an important opportunity to treat COPD, as recapitulated in the Figure 3 .
5. Conclusions
The study of chemokines has led to substantial progress in our understanding of COPD pathogenesis and has major implications for potential COPD treatment. The role of chemokines in orchestrating the traffic of immune cells in COPD is now well-recognized, but additional key functions are emerging, albeit their direct contribution to COPD remains to be fully explored. Building novel tools and models to dissect these functions and to assess their roles in COPD remains a major goal for the field. In particular, deciphering the role of chemokines at the gradient level in bone marrow, lymph nodes, peripheral circulation, lungs, and heart will be important to grasp their logic and the potential beneficial and detrimental effects of chemokines or chemokine receptors neutralization. Finally, as COPD is a heterogeneous disease, we strongly believe that selecting subtypes of patients for future clinical trials may improve success in therapeutic development.
Author Contributions
Conception and design: P.H., P.B., and I.D.; writing—original draft preparation: P.H. and I.D.; writing—review and editing: P.H., R.P., P.B., and I.D.; final approval of the manuscript: P.H., R.P., P.B., and I.D.; all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This review was supported by a grant from the “Fondation Bordeaux Université”, with funding from “Assistance Ventilatoire à Domicile” (AVAD) and “Fédération Girondine de Lutte contre les Maladies Respiratoires” (FGLMR).
Conflicts of Interest
Dr. Berger reports grants from Nycomed; grants from Takeda; grants from Fondation du Souffle–Fonds de dotation Recherche en Santé Respiratoire; grants and personal fees from Novartis; personal fees and non-financial support from Chiesi; grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca; personal fees and non-financial support from Sanofi; personal fees from Menarinni; and personal fees from TEVA outside the submitted work. In addition, Dr. Berger and Dr Dupin have a patent (EP N°15152886.6, i.e., New compositions and methods of treating and/or preventing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) pending.
Abbreviation
References
1. Lozano R. Naghavi M. Foreman K. Lim S. Shibuya K. Aboyans V. Abraham J. Adair T. Aggarwal R. Ahn S.Y. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 Lancet Lond. Engl. 2012 380 2095 2128 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0 PMC10790329 23245604
2. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 Lancet Lond. Engl. 2017 390 1211 1259 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2 PMC5605509 28919117
3. Terzikhan N. Verhamme K.M.C. Hofman A. Stricker B.H. Brusselle G.G. Lahousse L. Prevalence and incidence of COPD in smokers and non-smokers: The Rotterdam Study Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2016 31 785 792 10.1007/s10654-016-0132-z 26946425 PMC5005388
4. Stoller J.K. Aboussouan L.S. Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency Lancet Lond. Engl. 2005 365 2225 2236 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66781-5 15978931
5. Tashkin D.P. Altose M.D. Bleecker E.R. Connett J.E. Kanner R.E. Lee W.W. Wise R. The lung health study: Airway responsiveness to inhaled methacholine in smokers with mild to moderate airflow limitation. The Lung Health Study Research Group Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1992 145 301 310 10.1164/ajrccm/145.2_Pt_1.301 1736734
6. Stern D.A. Morgan W.J. Wright A.L. Guerra S. Martinez F.D. Poor airway function in early infancy and lung function by age 22 years: A non-selective longitudinal cohort study Lancet Lond. Engl. 2007 370 758 764 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61379-8 PMC2831283 17765525
7. Lange P. Celli B. Agustí A. Boje Jensen G. Divo M. Faner R. Guerra S. Marott J.L. Martinez F.D. Martinez-Camblor P. Lung-Function Trajectories Leading to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 373 111 122 10.1056/NEJMoa1411532 26154786
8. Ko F.W. Chan K.P. Hui D.S. Goddard J.R. Shaw J.G. Reid D.W. Yang I.A. Acute exacerbation of COPD Respirol. Carlton VIC 2016 21 1152 1165 10.1111/resp.12780 27028990 PMC7169165
9. Wedzicha J.A. Brill S.E. Allinson J.P. Donaldson G.C. Mechanisms and impact of the frequent exacerbator phenotype in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease BMC Med. 2013 11 181 10.1186/1741-7015-11-181 23945277 PMC3750926
10. Calverley P.M.A. Anderson J.A. Celli B. Ferguson G.T. Jenkins C. Jones P.W. Yates J.C. Vestbo J. TORCH investigators Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease N. Engl. J. Med. 2007 356 775 789 10.1056/NEJMoa063070 17314337
11. Tashkin D.P. Celli B. Senn S. Burkhart D. Kesten S. Menjoge S. Decramer M. UPLIFT Study Investigators A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease N. Engl. J. Med. 2008 359 1543 1554 10.1056/NEJMoa0805800 18836213
12. Vestbo J. Anderson J.A. Brook R.D. Calverley P.M.A. Celli B.R. Crim C. Martinez F. Yates J. Newby D.E. SUMMIT Investigators Fluticasone furoate and vilanterol and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with heightened cardiovascular risk (SUMMIT): A double-blind randomised controlled trial Lancet Lond. Engl. 2016 387 1817 1826 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30069-1 27203508
13. Wedzicha J.A. Banerji D. Chapman K.R. Vestbo J. Roche N. Ayers R.T. Thach C. Fogel R. Patalano F. Vogelmeier C.F. Indacaterol-Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol-Fluticasone for COPD N. Engl. J. Med. 2016 374 2222 2234 10.1056/NEJMoa1516385 27181606
14. Lipson D.A. Barnhart F. Brealey N. Brooks J. Criner G.J. Day N.C. Dransfield M.T. Halpin D.M.G. Han M.K. Jones C.E. Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with COPD N. Engl. J. Med. 2018 378 1671 1680 10.1056/NEJMoa1713901 29668352
15. Barnes P.J. Shapiro S.D. Pauwels R.A. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Molecular and cellular mechanisms Eur. Respir. J. 2003 22 672 688 10.1183/09031936.03.00040703 14582923
16. Dupin I. Contin-Bordes C. Berger P. Fibrocytes in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Variations on the Same Theme Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2018 58 288 298 10.1165/rcmb.2017-0301PS 29087726
17. Baggiolini M. Chemokines and leukocyte traffic Nature 1998 392 565 568 10.1038/33340 9560152
18. Mackay C.R. Chemokines: immunology’s high impact factors Nat. Immunol. 2001 2 95 101 10.1038/84298 11175800
19. Youn B.S. Mantel C. Broxmeyer H.E. Chemokines, chemokine receptors and hematopoiesis Immunol. Rev. 2000 177 150 174 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2000.17701.x 11138773
20. Belperio J.A. Keane M.P. Arenberg D.A. Addison C.L. Ehlert J.E. Burdick M.D. Strieter R.M. CXC chemokines in angiogenesis J. Leukoc. Biol. 2000 68 1 8 10914483
21. Müller A. Homey B. Soto H. Ge N. Catron D. Buchanan M.E. McClanahan T. Murphy E. Yuan W. Wagner S.N. Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis Nature 2001 410 50 56 10.1038/35065016 11242036
22. Kinter A. Arthos J. Cicala C. Fauci A.S. Chemokines, cytokines and HIV: A complex network of interactions that influence HIV pathogenesis Immunol. Rev. 2000 177 88 98 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2000.17708.x 11138789
23. Koenen R.R. Weber C. Therapeutic targeting of chemokine interactions in atherosclerosis Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010 9 141 153 10.1038/nrd3048 20118962
24. Zlotnik A. Yoshie O. Chemokines: A new classification system and their role in immunity Immunity 2000 12 121 127 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80165-X 10714678
25. Miller M.C. Mayo K.H. Chemokines from a Structural Perspective Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017 18 2088 10.3390/ijms18102088 28974038 PMC5666770
26. Allen S.J. Crown S.E. Handel T.M. Chemokine: Receptor structure, interactions, and antagonism Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2007 25 787 820 10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090529 17291188
27. Nibbs R.J.B. Graham G.J. Immune regulation by atypical chemokine receptors Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013 13 815 829 10.1038/nri3544 24319779
28. Strieter R.M. Polverini P.J. Kunkel S.L. Arenberg D.A. Burdick M.D. Kasper J. Dzuiba J. Van Damme J. Walz A. Marriott D. The functional role of the ELR motif in CXC chemokine-mediated angiogenesis J. Biol. Chem. 1995 270 27348 27357 10.1074/jbc.270.45.27348 7592998
29. Ludeman J.P. Stone M.J. The structural role of receptor tyrosine sulfation in chemokine recognition Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014 171 1167 1179 10.1111/bph.12455 24116930 PMC3952796
30. Veldkamp C.T. Seibert C. Peterson F.C. De la Cruz N.B. Haugner J.C. Basnet H. Sakmar T.P. Volkman B.F. Structural basis of CXCR4 sulfotyrosine recognition by the chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12 Sci. Signal. 2008 1 ra4 10.1126/scisignal.1160755 18799424 PMC2692298
31. Legler D.F. Thelen M. New insights in chemokine signaling F1000Research 2018 7 95 10.12688/f1000research.13130.1 29416853 PMC5782407
32. Thelen M. Dancing to the tune of chemokines Nat. Immunol. 2001 2 129 134 10.1038/84224 11175805
33. Colamussi M.L. Secchiero P. Gonelli A. Marchisio M. Zauli G. Capitani S. Stromal derived factor-1 alpha (SDF-1 alpha) induces CD4+ T cell apoptosis via the functional up-regulation of the Fas (CD95)/Fas ligand (CD95L) pathway J. Leukoc. Biol. 2001 69 263 270 11272277
34. Drury L.J. Wendt M.K. Dwinell M.B. CXCL12 chemokine expression and secretion regulates colorectal carcinoma cell anoikis through Bim-mediated intrinsic apoptosis PLoS ONE 2010 5 e12895 10.1371/journal.pone.0012895 20877573 PMC2943927
35. Kremer K.N. Peterson K.L. Schneider P.A. Meng X.W. Dai H. Hess A.D. Smith B.D. Rodriguez-Ramirez C. Karp J.E. Kaufmann S.H. CXCR4 chemokine receptor signaling induces apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia cells via regulation of the Bcl-2 family members Bcl-XL, Noxa, and Bak J. Biol. Chem. 2013 288 22899 22914 10.1074/jbc.M113.449926 23798675 PMC3743469
36. Ravi A.K. Plumb J. Gaskell R. Mason S. Broome C.S. Booth G. Catley M. Vestbo J. Singh D. COPD monocytes demonstrate impaired migratory ability Respir. Res. 2017 18 90 10.1186/s12931-017-0569-y 28494757 PMC5425971
37. Kufareva I. Gustavsson M. Zheng Y. Stephens B.S. Handel T.M. What Do Structures Tell Us About Chemokine Receptor Function and Antagonism? Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2017 46 175 198 10.1146/annurev-biophys-051013-022942 28532213 PMC5764094
38. Arimont M. Sun S.-L. Leurs R. Smit M. de Esch I.J.P. de Graaf C. Structural Analysis of Chemokine Receptor-Ligand Interactions J. Med. Chem. 2017 60 4735 4779 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01309 28165741 PMC5483895
39. Proudfoot A.E.I. Uguccioni M. Modulation of Chemokine Responses: Synergy and Cooperativity Front. Immunol. 2016 7 183 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00183 27242790 PMC4871875
40. Schiraldi M. Raucci A. Muñoz L.M. Livoti E. Celona B. Venereau E. Apuzzo T. De Marchis F. Pedotti M. Bachi A. HMGB1 promotes recruitment of inflammatory cells to damaged tissues by forming a complex with CXCL12 and signaling via CXCR4 J. Exp. Med. 2012 209 551 563 10.1084/jem.20111739 22370717 PMC3302219
41. Campana L. Bosurgi L. Bianchi M.E. Manfredi A.A. Rovere-Querini P. Requirement of HMGB1 for stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCL12-dependent migration of macrophages and dendritic cells J. Leukoc. Biol. 2009 86 609 615 10.1189/jlb.0908576 19414537
42. Proudfoot A.E.I. Chemokines and Glycosaminoglycans Front. Immunol. 2015 6 246 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00246 26074917 PMC4443743
43. Drury L.J. Ziarek J.J. Gravel S. Veldkamp C.T. Takekoshi T. Hwang S.T. Heveker N. Volkman B.F. Dwinell M.B. Monomeric and dimeric CXCL12 inhibit metastasis through distinct CXCR4 interactions and signaling pathways Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011 108 17655 17660 10.1073/pnas.1101133108 21990345 PMC3203819
44. Proudfoot A.E.I. Handel T.M. Johnson Z. Lau E.K. LiWang P. Clark-Lewis I. Borlat F. Wells T.N.C. Kosco-Vilbois M.H. Glycosaminoglycan binding and oligomerization are essential for the in vivo activity of certain chemokines Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003 100 1885 1890 10.1073/pnas.0334864100 12571364 PMC149928
45. Burgstaller G. Oehrle B. Gerckens M. White E.S. Schiller H.B. Eickelberg O. The instructive extracellular matrix of the lung: Basic composition and alterations in chronic lung disease Eur. Respir. J. 2017 50 1601805 10.1183/13993003.01805-2016 28679607
46. Sand J.M.B. Knox A.J. Lange P. Sun S. Kristensen J.H. Leeming D.J. Karsdal M.A. Bolton C.E. Johnson S.R. Accelerated extracellular matrix turnover during exacerbations of COPD Respir. Res. 2015 16 69 10.1186/s12931-015-0225-3 26062683 PMC4491243
47. Mestas J. Hughes C.C.W. Of Mice and Not Men: Differences between Mouse and Human Immunology J. Immunol. 2004 172 2731 2738 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.2731 14978070
48. Du Y. Deng W. Wang Z. Ning M. Zhang W. Zhou Y. Lo E.H. Xing C. Differential subnetwork of chemokines/cytokines in human, mouse, and rat brain cells after oxygen-glucose deprivation J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017 37 1425 1434 10.1177/0271678X16656199 27328691 PMC5453462
49. Weber M. Hauschild R. Schwarz J. Moussion C. de Vries I. Legler D.F. Luther S.A. Bollenbach T. Sixt M. Interstitial dendritic cell guidance by haptotactic chemokine gradients Science 2013 339 328 332 10.1126/science.1228456 23329049
50. Phillips R.J. Burdick M.D. Hong K. Lutz M.A. Murray L.A. Xue Y.Y. Belperio J.A. Keane M.P. Strieter R.M. Circulating fibrocytes traffic to the lungs in response to CXCL12 and mediate fibrosis J. Clin. Investig. 2004 114 438 446 10.1172/JCI200420997 15286810 PMC484979
51. Gangavarapu P. Rajagopalan L. Kolli D. Guerrero-Plata A. Garofalo R.P. Rajarathnam K. The monomer-dimer equilibrium and glycosaminoglycan interactions of chemokine CXCL8 regulate tissue-specific neutrophil recruitment J. Leukoc. Biol. 2012 91 259 265 10.1189/jlb.0511239 22140266 PMC3290428
52. Tanino Y. Coombe D.R. Gill S.E. Kett W.C. Kajikawa O. Proudfoot A.E.I. Wells T.N.C. Parks W.C. Wight T.N. Martin T.R. Kinetics of chemokine-glycosaminoglycan interactions control neutrophil migration into the airspaces of the lungs J. Immunol. 2010 184 2677 2685 10.4049/jimmunol.0903274 20124102 PMC4113427
53. GOLD 1998. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. NIH Publication (Updated 2019) Available online: http://www.goldcopd.org (accessed on 1 April 2019)
54. Pauwels R.A. Buist A.S. Calverley P.M. Jenkins C.R. Hurd S.S. GOLD Scientific Committee Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001 163 1256 1276 10.1164/ajrccm.163.5.2101039 11316667
55. Inui T. Watanabe M. Nakamoto K. Sada M. Hirata A. Nakamura M. Honda K. Ogawa Y. Takata S. Yokoyama T. Bronchial epithelial cells produce CXCL1 in response to LPS and TNFα: A potential role in the pathogenesis of COPD Exp. Lung Res. 2019 44 323 331 10.1080/01902148.2018.1520936 30676127
56. Traves S.L. Culpitt S.V. Russell R.E.K. Barnes P.J. Donnelly L.E. Increased levels of the chemokines GROalpha and MCP-1 in sputum samples from patients with COPD Thorax 2002 57 590 595 10.1136/thorax.57.7.590 12096201 PMC1746378
57. Beeh K.M. Kornmann O. Buhl R. Culpitt S.V. Giembycz M.A. Barnes P.J. Neutrophil chemotactic activity of sputum from patients with COPD: Role of interleukin 8 and leukotriene B4 Chest 2003 123 1240 1247 10.1378/chest.123.4.1240 12684317
58. Qiu Y. Zhu J. Bandi V. Atmar R.L. Hattotuwa K. Guntupalli K.K. Jeffery P.K. Biopsy neutrophilia, neutrophil chemokine and receptor gene expression in severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003 168 968 975 10.1164/rccm.200208-794OC 12857718
59. Stefano A.D. Caramori G. Gnemmi I. Contoli M. Bristot L. Capelli A. Ricciardolo F.L.M. Magno F. D’Anna S.E. Zanini A. Association of increased CCL5 and CXCL7 chemokine expression with neutrophil activation in severe stable COPD Thorax 2009 64 968 975 10.1136/thx.2009.113647 19703829
60. Keatings V.M. Collins P.D. Scott D.M. Barnes P.J. Differences in interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in induced sputum from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1996 153 530 534 10.1164/ajrccm.153.2.8564092 8564092
61. Osei E.T. Noordhoek J.A. Hackett T.L. Spanjer A.I.R. Postma D.S. Timens W. Brandsma C.-A. Heijink I.H. Interleukin-1α drives the dysfunctional cross-talk of the airway epithelium and lung fibroblasts in COPD Eur. Respir. J. 2016 48 359 369 10.1183/13993003.01911-2015 27418555
62. Patel B.S. Kugel M.J. Baehring G. Ammit A.J. Doxofylline does not increase formoterol-induced cAMP nor MKP-1 expression in ASM cells resulting in lack of anti-inflammatory effect Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017 45 34 39 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.04.006 28414142
63. Ikari J. Nelson A.J. Obaid J. Giron-Martinez A. Ikari K. Makino F. Iwasawa S. Gunji Y. Farid M. Wang X. Reduced microRNA-503 expression augments lung fibroblast VEGF production in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease PLoS ONE 2017 12 e0184039 10.1371/journal.pone.0184039 28880936 PMC5589164
64. De Llano L.P. Cosío B.G. Iglesias A. de Las Cuevas N. Soler-Cataluña J.J. Izquierdo J.L. López-Campos J.L. Calero C. Plaza V. Miravitlles M. Mixed Th2 and non-Th2 inflammatory pattern in the asthma-COPD overlap: A network approach Int. J. Chronic Obstruct. Pulm. Dis. 2018 13 591 601 10.2147/COPD.S153694 29483774 PMC5813946
65. De Boer W.I. Sont J.K. van Schadewijk A. Stolk J. van Krieken J.H. Hiemstra P.S. Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, interleukin 8, and chronic airways inflammation in COPD J. Pathol. 2000 190 619 626 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(200004)190:5<619::AID-PATH555>3.0.CO;2-6 10727989
66. Belchamber K.B.R. Donnelly L.E. Macrophage Dysfunction in Respiratory Disease Results Probl. Cell Differ. 2017 62 299 313 28455714 10.1007/978-3-319-54090-0_12
67. Huang Z.-W. Lien G.-S. Lin C.-H. Jiang C.-P. Chen B.-C. p300 and C/EBPβ-regulated IKKβ expression are involved in thrombin-induced IL-8/CXCL8 expression in human lung epithelial cells Pharmacol. Res. 2017 121 33 41 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.04.020 28428115
68. Costa C. Rufino R. Traves S.L. Lapa E Silva J.R. Barnes P.J. Donnelly L.E. CXCR3 and CCR5 chemokines in induced sputum from patients with COPD Chest 2008 133 26 33 10.1378/chest.07-0393 17925429
69. Kelsen S.G. Aksoy M.O. Georgy M. Hershman R. Ji R. Li X. Hurford M. Solomides C. Chatila W. Kim V. Lymphoid Follicle Cells in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overexpress the Chemokine Receptor CXCR3 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009 179 799 805 10.1164/rccm.200807-1089OC 19218194 PMC5803653
70. Tura-Ceide O. Lobo B. Paul T. Puig-Pey R. Coll-Bonfill N. García-Lucio J. Smolders V. Blanco I. Barberà J.A. Peinado V.I. Cigarette smoke challenges bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell capacities in guinea pig Respir. Res. 2017 18 50 10.1186/s12931-017-0530-0 28330488 PMC5363047
71. Hardaker E.L. Bacon A.M. Carlson K. Roshak A.K. Foley J.J. Schmidt D.B. Buckley P.T. Comegys M. Panettieri R.A. Sarau H.M. Regulation of TNF-alpha- and IFN-gamma-induced CXCL10 expression: Participation of the airway smooth muscle in the pulmonary inflammatory response in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2004 18 191 193 10.1096/fj.03-0170fje 14597565
72. Saetta M. Mariani M. Panina-Bordignon P. Turato G. Buonsanti C. Baraldo S. Bellettato C.M. Papi A. Corbetta L. Zuin R. Increased expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 and its ligand CXCL10 in peripheral airways of smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002 165 1404 1409 10.1164/rccm.2107139 12016104
73. Quint J.K. Donaldson G.C. Goldring J.J.P. Baghai-Ravary R. Hurst J.R. Wedzicha J.A. Serum IP-10 as a biomarker of human rhinovirus infection at exacerbation of COPD Chest 2010 137 812 822 10.1378/chest.09-1541 19837822 PMC2851557
74. Barwinska D. Oueini H. Poirier C. Albrecht M.E. Bogatcheva N.V. Justice M.J. Saliba J. Schweitzer K.S. Broxmeyer H.E. March K.L. AMD3100 ameliorates cigarette smoke-induced emphysema-like manifestations in mice Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2018 315 L382 L386 10.1152/ajplung.00185.2018 29745251 PMC6172621
75. Karagiannis K. Proklou A. Tsitoura E. Lasithiotaki I. Kalpadaki C. Moraitaki D. Sperelakis I. Kontakis G. Antoniou K.M. Tzanakis N. Impaired mRNA Expression of the Migration Related Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 in Mesenchymal Stem Cells of COPD Patients Int. J. Inflamm. 2017 2017 6089425 10.1155/2017/6089425 PMC5539942 28804668
76. Dupin I. Allard B. Ozier A. Maurat E. Ousova O. Delbrel E. Trian T. Bui H.-N. Dromer C. Guisset O. Blood fibrocytes are recruited during acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease through a CXCR4-dependent pathway J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016 137 1036.e7 1042.e7 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.08.043 26602164
77. Vishweswaraiah S. Thimraj T.A. George L. Krishnarao C.S. Lokesh K.S. Siddaiah J.B. Larsson K. Upadhyay S. Palmberg L. Anand M.P. Putative Systemic Biomarkers of Biomass Smoke-Induced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease among Women in a Rural South Indian Population Dis. Mark. 2018 2018 4949175 10.1155/2018/4949175 30595762 PMC6282129
78. Marques P. Collado A. Escudero P. Rius C. González C. Servera E. Piqueras L. Sanz M.-J. Cigarette Smoke Increases Endothelial CXCL16-Leukocyte CXCR6 Adhesion In Vitro and In Vivo. Potential Consequences in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Front. Immunol. 2017 8 1766 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01766 29326688 PMC5733535
79. Jing H. Liu L. Zhou J. Yao H. Inhibition of C-X-C Motif Chemokine 10 (CXCL10) Protects Mice from Cigarette Smoke-Induced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Med. Sci. Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2018 24 5748 5753 10.12659/MSM.909864 PMC6109363 30118441
80. Di Stefano A. Coccini T. Roda E. Signorini C. Balbi B. Brunetti G. Ceriana P. Blood MCP-1 levels are increased in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with prevalent emphysema Int. J. Chronic Obstruct. Pulm. Dis. 2018 13 1691 1700 10.2147/COPD.S159915 PMC5973466 29872287
81. Ravi A.K. Khurana S. Lemon J. Plumb J. Booth G. Healy L. Catley M. Vestbo J. Singh D. Increased levels of soluble interleukin-6 receptor and CCL3 in COPD sputum Respir. Res. 2014 15 103 10.1186/s12931-014-0103-4 25183374 PMC4156958
82. Bradford E. Jacobson S. Varasteh J. Comellas A.P. Woodruff P. O’Neal W. DeMeo D.L. Li X. Kim V. Cho M. The value of blood cytokines and chemokines in assessing COPD Respir. Res. 2017 18 180 10.1186/s12931-017-0662-2 29065892 PMC5655820
83. D’Armiento J.M. Scharf S.M. Roth M.D. Connett J.E. Ghio A. Sternberg D. Goldin J.G. Louis T.A. Mao J.T. O’Connor G.T. Eosinophil and T cell markers predict functional decline in COPD patients Respir. Res. 2009 10 113 10.1186/1465-9921-10-113 19925666 PMC2785783
84. Bocchino V. Bertorelli G. Bertrand C.P. Ponath P.D. Newman W. Franco C. Marruchella A. Merlini S. Del Donno M. Zhuo X. Eotaxin and CCR3 are up-regulated in exacerbations of chronic bronchitis Allergy 2002 57 17 22 11991282
85. Miller M. Ramsdell J. Friedman P.J. Cho J.Y. Renvall M. Broide D.H. Computed tomographic scan-diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-emphysema: Eotaxin-1 is associated with bronchodilator response and extent of emphysema J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007 120 1118 1125 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.045 17983873
86. Sin D.D. Miller B.E. Duvoix A. Man S.F.P. Zhang X. Silverman E.K. Connett J.E. Anthonisen N.A. Wise R.A. Tashkin D. Serum PARC/CCL-18 concentrations and health outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011 183 1187 1192 10.1164/rccm.201008-1220OC 21216880 PMC3114051
87. Muñoz-Esquerre M. Aliagas E. López-Sánchez M. Escobar I. Huertas D. Penín R. Dorca J. Santos S. Vascular disease in COPD: Systemic and pulmonary expression of PARC (Pulmonary and Activation-Regulated Chemokine) PLoS ONE 2017 12 e0177218 10.1371/journal.pone.0177218 28545096 PMC5436690
88. Demedts I.K. Bracke K.R. Van Pottelberge G. Testelmans D. Verleden G.M. Vermassen F.E. Joos G.F. Brusselle G.G. Accumulation of dendritic cells and increased CCL20 levels in the airways of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007 175 998 1005 10.1164/rccm.200608-1113OC 17332482
89. Hao W. Li M. Zhang C. Zhang Y. Xue Y. High Serum Fractalkine/CX3CL1 in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Relationship with Emphysema Severity and Frequent Exacerbation Lung 2019 197 29 35 10.1007/s00408-018-0176-9 30382361
90. Barnes P.J. The Cytokine Network in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2009 41 631 638 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0220TR 19717810
91. Kim V. Cornwell W.D. Oros M. Durra H. Criner G.J. Rogers T.J. Plasma Chemokine signature correlates with lung goblet cell hyperplasia in smokers with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease BMC Pulm. Med. 2015 15 111 10.1186/s12890-015-0103-2 26424214 PMC4589974
92. Ying S. O’Connor B. Ratoff J. Meng Q. Fang C. Cousins D. Zhang G. Gu S. Gao Z. Shamji B. Expression and cellular provenance of thymic stromal lymphopoietin and chemokines in patients with severe asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease J. Immunol. 2008 181 2790 2798 10.4049/jimmunol.181.4.2790 18684970
93. Tanino M. Betsuyaku T. Takeyabu K. Tanino Y. Yamaguchi E. Miyamoto K. Nishimura M. Increased levels of interleukin-8 in BAL fluid from smokers susceptible to pulmonary emphysema Thorax 2002 57 405 411 10.1136/thorax.57.5.405 11978916 PMC1746319
94. Yamamoto C. Yoneda T. Yoshikawa M. Fu A. Tokuyama T. Tsukaguchi K. Narita N. Airway inflammation in COPD assessed by sputum levels of interleukin-8 Chest 1997 112 505 510 10.1378/chest.112.2.505 9266891
95. Woolhouse I.S. Bayley D.L. Stockley R.A. Sputum chemotactic activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Effect of alpha(1)-antitrypsin deficiency and the role of leukotriene B(4) and interleukin 8 Thorax 2002 57 709 714 10.1136/thorax.57.8.709 12149532 PMC1746407
96. Peveri P. Walz A. Dewald B. Baggiolini M. A novel neutrophil-activating factor produced by human mononuclear phagocytes J. Exp. Med. 1988 167 1547 1559 10.1084/jem.167.5.1547 2835419 PMC2188939
97. Zarcone M.C. Duistermaat E. Alblas M.J. van Schadewijk A. Ninaber D.K. Clarijs V. Moerman M.M. Vaessen D. Hiemstra P.S. Kooter I.M. Effect of diesel exhaust generated by a city bus engine on stress responses and innate immunity in primary bronchial epithelial cell cultures Toxicol. In Vitro Int. J. Publ. Assoc. BIBRA 2018 48 221 231 10.1016/j.tiv.2018.01.024 29408669
98. Liu L. Wan C. Zhang W. Guan L. Tian G. Zhang F. Ding W. MiR-146a regulates PM1-induced inflammation via NF-κB signaling pathway in BEAS-2B cells Environ. Toxicol. 2018 33 743 751 10.1002/tox.22561 29667303
99. Sangiorgi C. Vallese D. Gnemmi I. Bucchieri F. Balbi B. Brun P. Leone A. Giordano A. Conway de Macario E. Macario A.J. HSP60 activity on human bronchial epithelial cells Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2017 30 333 340 10.1177/0394632017734479 28976240 PMC5806805
100. Reutershan J. Morris M.A. Burcin T.L. Smith D.F. Chang D. Saprito M.S. Ley K. Critical role of endothelial CXCR2 in LPS-induced neutrophil migration into the lung J. Clin. Investig. 2006 116 695 702 10.1172/JCI27009 16485040 PMC1366502
101. Jiang J.-X. Zhang S.-J. Shen H.-J. Guan Y. Liu Q. Zhao W. Jia Y.-L. Shen J. Yan X.-F. Xie Q.-M. Rac1 signaling regulates cigarette smoke-induced inflammation in the lung via the Erk1/2 MAPK and STAT3 pathways Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2017 1863 1778 1788 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.04.013 28428003
102. Aaron S.D. Angel J.B. Lunau M. Wright K. Fex C. Le Saux N. Dales R.E. Granulocyte inflammatory markers and airway infection during acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001 163 349 355 10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.2003122 11179105
103. Mikami M. Llewellyn-Jones C.G. Bayley D. Hill S.L. Stockley R.A. The chemotactic activity of sputum from patients with bronchiectasis Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1998 157 723 728 10.1164/ajrccm.157.3.9606120 9517582
104. Zhang J. Bai C. The Significance of Serum Interleukin-8 in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Tanaffos 2018 17 13 21 30116274 PMC6087525
105. Han M.K. Quibrera P.M. Carretta E.E. Barr R.G. Bleecker E.R. Bowler R.P. Cooper C.B. Comellas A. Couper D.J. Curtis J.L. Frequency of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: An analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort Lancet Respir. Med. 2017 5 619 626 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30207-2 28668356 PMC5558856
106. Soler N. Ewig S. Torres A. Filella X. Gonzalez J. Zaubet A. Airway inflammation and bronchial microbial patterns in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Eur. Respir. J. 1999 14 1015 1022 10.1183/09031936.99.14510159 10596683
107. Nakajima M. Kawaguchi M. Matsuyama M. Ota K. Fujita J. Matsukura S. Huang S.-K. Morishima Y. Ishii Y. Satoh H. Transcription Elongation Factor P-TEFb Is Involved in IL-17F Signaling in Airway Smooth Muscle Cells Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2018 176 83 90 10.1159/000488154 29649811
108. Donnelly L.E. Barnes P.J. Chemokine receptors as therapeutic targets in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2006 27 546 553 10.1016/j.tips.2006.08.001 16911834
109. Pechkovsky D.V. Goldmann T. Ludwig C. Prasse A. Vollmer E. Müller-Quernheim J. Zissel G. CCR2 and CXCR3 agonistic chemokines are differently expressed and regulated in human alveolar epithelial cells type II Respir. Res. 2005 6 75 10.1186/1465-9921-6-75 16033640 PMC1185567
110. Sauty A. Dziejman M. Taha R.A. Iarossi A.S. Neote K. Garcia-Zepeda E.A. Hamid Q. Luster A.D. The T cell-specific CXC chemokines IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC are expressed by activated human bronchial epithelial cells J. Immunol. 1999 162 3549 3558 10092813
111. Groom J.R. Luster A.D. CXCR3 ligands: Redundant, collaborative and antagonistic functions Immunol. Cell Biol. 2011 89 207 215 10.1038/icb.2010.158 21221121 PMC3863330
112. Barnes P.J. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of asthma and COPD Clin. Sci. Lond. Engl. 2017 131 1541 1558 10.1042/CS20160487 28659395
113. Costa C. Traves S.L. Tudhope S.J. Fenwick P.S. Belchamber K.B.R. Russell R.E.K. Barnes P.J. Donnelly L.E. Enhanced monocyte migration to CXCR3 and CCR5 chemokines in COPD Eur. Respir. J. 2016 47 1093 1102 10.1183/13993003.01642-2015 26965295
114. Cole K.E. Strick C.A. Paradis T.J. Ogborne K.T. Loetscher M. Gladue R.P. Lin W. Boyd J.G. Moser B. Wood D.E. Interferon-inducible T cell alpha chemoattractant (I-TAC): A novel non-ELR CXC chemokine with potent activity on activated T cells through selective high affinity binding to CXCR3 J. Exp. Med. 1998 187 2009 2021 10.1084/jem.187.12.2009 9625760 PMC2212354
115. Grumelli S. Corry D.B. Song L.-Z. Song L. Green L. Huh J. Hacken J. Espada R. Bag R. Lewis D.E. An immune basis for lung parenchymal destruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema PLoS Med. 2004 1 e8 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010008 15526056 PMC523885
116. Cosio M.G. Majo J. Cosio M.G. Inflammation of the airways and lung parenchyma in COPD: Role of T cells Chest 2002 121 160S 165S 10.1378/chest.121.5_suppl.160S 12010846
117. Porter J.C. Falzon M. Hall A. Polarized localization of epithelial CXCL11 in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mechanisms of T cell egression J. Immunol. 2008 180 1866 1877 10.4049/jimmunol.180.3.1866 18209084 PMC2274894
118. Warwick G. Thomas P.S. Yates D.H. Non-invasive biomarkers in exacerbations of obstructive lung disease Respirol. Carlton VIC 2013 18 874 884 10.1111/resp.12089 23521049
119. Bafadhel M. McKenna S. Terry S. Mistry V. Reid C. Haldar P. McCormick M. Haldar K. Kebadze T. Duvoix A. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Identification of biologic clusters and their biomarkers Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011 184 662 671 10.1164/rccm.201104-0597OC 21680942
120. Clarke D.L. Clifford R.L. Jindarat S. Proud D. Pang L. Belvisi M. Knox A.J. TNFα and IFNγ synergistically enhance transcriptional activation of CXCL10 in human airway smooth muscle cells via STAT-1, NF-κB, and the transcriptional coactivator CREB-binding protein J. Biol. Chem. 2010 285 29101 29110 10.1074/jbc.M109.099952 20833730 PMC2937941
121. Cole A.M. Ganz T. Liese A.M. Burdick M.D. Liu L. Strieter R.M. Cutting edge: IFN-inducible ELR- CXC chemokines display defensin-like antimicrobial activity J. Immunol. 2001 167 623 627 10.4049/jimmunol.167.2.623 11441062
122. Bai J. Song H. Cai C. Zhang M. Xu S. Tan J. The association of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and CC chemokine receptor 2 gene variants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DNA Cell Biol. 2012 31 1058 1063 10.1089/dna.2011.1520 22276574
123. Zheng J. Shi Y. Xiong L. Zhang W. Li Y. Gibson P.G. Simpson J.L. Zhang C. Lu J. Sai J. The Expression of IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 in Respiratory Viral Infection in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease J. Immunol. Res. 2017 2017 8539294 10.1155/2017/8539294 28352642 PMC5352889
124. Ishii T. Hosoki K. Nikura Y. Yamashita N. Nagase T. Yamashita N. IFN Regulatory Factor 3 Potentiates Emphysematous Aggravation by Lipopolysaccharide J. Immunol. 2017 198 3637 3649 10.4049/jimmunol.1601069 28363903
125. Ding L. Morrison S.J. Haematopoietic stem cells and early lymphoid progenitors occupy distinct bone marrow niches Nature 2013 495 231 235 10.1038/nature11885 23434755 PMC3600153
126. Gomperts B.N. Belperio J.A. Rao P.N. Randell S.H. Fishbein M.C. Burdick M.D. Strieter R.M. Circulating progenitor epithelial cells traffic via CXCR4/CXCL12 in response to airway injury J. Immunol. 2006 176 1916 1927 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1916 16424223
127. Hattori K. Heissig B. Tashiro K. Honjo T. Tateno M. Shieh J.H. Hackett N.R. Quitoriano M.S. Crystal R.G. Rafii S. Plasma elevation of stromal cell-derived factor-1 induces mobilization of mature and immature hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells Blood 2001 97 3354 3360 10.1182/blood.V97.11.3354 11369624
128. Salcedo R. Oppenheim J.J. Role of chemokines in angiogenesis: CXCL12/SDF-1 and CXCR4 interaction, a key regulator of endothelial cell responses Microcirculation 2003 10 359 370 10.1080/mic.10.3-4.359.370 12851652
129. Balabanian K. Lagane B. Infantino S. Chow K.Y.C. Harriague J. Moepps B. Arenzana-Seisdedos F. Thelen M. Bachelerie F. The chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12 binds to and signals through the orphan receptor RDC1 in T lymphocytes J. Biol. Chem. 2005 280 35760 35766 10.1074/jbc.M508234200 16107333
130. Dupin I. Thumerel M. Maurat E. Coste F. Eyraud E. Begueret H. Trian T. Montaudon M. Marthan R. Girodet P.-O. Fibrocyte accumulation in the airway walls of COPD patients Eur. Respir. J. in press 10.1183/13993003.02173-2018 31196946
131. Liu X. Xie C. Human endothelial progenitor cells isolated from COPD patients are dysfunctional Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2012 363 53 63 10.1007/s11010-011-1157-y 22139347
132. Lim K. Hyun Y.-M. Lambert-Emo K. Capece T. Bae S. Miller R. Topham D.J. Kim M. Neutrophil trails guide influenza-specific CD8+ T cells in the airways Science 2015 349 aaa4352 10.1126/science.aaa4352 26339033 PMC4809646
133. Dahl M. Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Vestbo J. Lange P. Nordestgaard B.G. Elevated plasma fibrinogen associated with reduced pulmonary function and increased risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001 164 1008 1011 10.1164/ajrccm.164.6.2010067 11587987
134. Dahl M. Vestbo J. Lange P. Bojesen S.E. Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Nordestgaard B.G. C-reactive protein as a predictor of prognosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007 175 250 255 10.1164/rccm.200605-713OC 17053205
135. Cheng D.T. Kim D.K. Cockayne D.A. Belousov A. Bitter H. Cho M.H. Duvoix A. Edwards L.D. Lomas D.A. Miller B.E. Systemic soluble receptor for advanced glycation endproducts is a biomarker of emphysema and associated with AGER genetic variants in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013 188 948 957 10.1164/rccm.201302-0247OC 23947473
136. Winkler C. Atochina-Vasserman E.N. Holz O. Beers M.F. Erpenbeck V.J. Krug N. Roepcke S. Lauer G. Elmlinger M. Hohlfeld J.M. Comprehensive characterisation of pulmonary and serum surfactant protein D in COPD Respir. Res. 2011 12 29 10.1186/1465-9921-12-29 21396106 PMC3061904
137. Coxson H.O. Dirksen A. Edwards L.D. Yates J.C. Agusti A. Bakke P. Calverley P.M. Celli B. Crim C. Duvoix A. The presence and progression of emphysema in COPD as determined by CT scanning and biomarker expression: A prospective analysis from the ECLIPSE study Lancet Respir. Med. 2013 1 129 136 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70006-7 24429093
138. Lomas D.A. Silverman E.K. Edwards L.D. Miller B.E. Coxson H.O. Tal-Singer R. Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) investigators Evaluation of serum CC-16 as a biomarker for COPD in the ECLIPSE cohort Thorax 2008 63 1058 1063 10.1136/thx.2008.102574 18757456
139. Faner R. Tal-Singer R. Riley J.H. Celli B. Vestbo J. MacNee W. Bakke P. Calverley P.M.A. Coxson H. Crim C. Lessons from ECLIPSE: A review of COPD biomarkers Thorax 2014 69 666 672 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204778 24310110
140. Baker J.R. Vuppusetty C. Colley T. Hassibi S. Fenwick P.S. Donnelly L.E. Ito K. Barnes P.J. MicroRNA-570 is a novel regulator of cellular senescence and inflammaging FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2018 33 1605 1616 10.1096/fj.201800965R PMC6338629 30156909
141. De Novaes Rocha N. de Oliveira M.V. Braga C.L. Guimarães G. de Albuquerque Maia L. de Araújo Padilha G. Silva J.D. Takiya C.M. Capelozzi V.L. Silva P.L. Ghrelin therapy improves lung and cardiovascular function in experimental emphysema Respir. Res. 2017 18 185 10.1186/s12931-017-0668-9 29100513 PMC5670513
142. Wang Y. Zhou Q. Dong L. Xiong M. Jiang H. Guo M. Zhao L. Yuan L. Li Z. Liu H. The effects of CXCL10 polymorphisms on COPD susceptibility Mol. Genet. Genom. MGG 2018 293 649 655 10.1007/s00438-017-1408-z 29285564
143. Devine S.M. Flomenberg N. Vesole D.H. Liesveld J. Weisdorf D. Badel K. Calandra G. DiPersio J.F. Rapid mobilization of CD34+ cells following administration of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 to patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2004 22 1095 1102 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.131 15020611
144. Gulick R.M. Lalezari J. Goodrich J. Clumeck N. DeJesus E. Horban A. Nadler J. Clotet B. Karlsson A. Wohlfeiler M. Maraviroc for previously treated patients with R5 HIV-1 infection N. Engl. J. Med. 2008 359 1429 1441 10.1056/NEJMoa0803152 18832244 PMC3078519
145. Hitchinson B. Eby J.M. Gao X. Guite-Vinet F. Ziarek J.J. Abdelkarim H. Lee Y. Okamoto Y. Shikano S. Majetschak M. Biased antagonism of CXCR4 avoids antagonist tolerance Sci. Signal. 2018 11 eaat2214 10.1126/scisignal.aat2214 30327409 PMC6422681
146. Galzi J.-L. Hachet-Haas M. Bonnet D. Daubeuf F. Lecat S. Hibert M. Haiech J. Frossard N. Neutralizing endogenous chemokines with small molecules. Principles and potential therapeutic applications Pharmacol. Ther. 2010 126 39 55 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.12.003 20117133 PMC7112609
147. Von Hundelshausen P. Agten S.M. Eckardt V. Blanchet X. Schmitt M.M. Ippel H. Neideck C. Bidzhekov K. Leberzammer J. Wichapong K. Chemokine interactome mapping enables tailored intervention in acute and chronic inflammation Sci. Transl. Med. 2017 9 eaah6650 10.1126/scitranslmed.aah6650 28381538
148. Mahler D.A. Huang S. Tabrizi M. Bell G.M. Efficacy and safety of a monoclonal antibody recognizing interleukin-8 in COPD: A pilot study Chest 2004 126 926 934 10.1378/chest.126.3.926 15364775
149. Dyer D.P. Thomson J.M. Hermant A. Jowitt T.A. Handel T.M. Proudfoot A.E.I. Day A.J. Milner C.M. TSG-6 inhibits neutrophil migration via direct interaction with the chemokine CXCL8 J. Immunol. 2014 192 2177 2185 10.4049/jimmunol.1300194 24501198 PMC3988464
150. Stevenson C.S. Coote K. Webster R. Johnston H. Atherton H.C. Nicholls A. Giddings J. Sugar R. Jackson A. Press N.J. Characterization of cigarette smoke-induced inflammatory and mucus hypersecretory changes in rat lung and the role of CXCR2 ligands in mediating this effect Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2005 288 L514 L522 10.1152/ajplung.00317.2004 15516486
151. Thatcher T.H. McHugh N.A. Egan R.W. Chapman R.W. Hey J.A. Turner C.K. Redonnet M.R. Seweryniak K.E. Sime P.J. Phipps R.P. Role of CXCR2 in cigarette smoke-induced lung inflammation Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2005 289 L322 L328 10.1152/ajplung.00039.2005 15833762 PMC2491909
152. Rennard S.I. Dale D.C. Donohue J.F. Kanniess F. Magnussen H. Sutherland E.R. Watz H. Lu S. Stryszak P. Rosenberg E. CXCR2 Antagonist MK-7123. A Phase 2 Proof-of-Concept Trial for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015 191 1001 1011 10.1164/rccm.201405-0992OC 25695403
153. Lazaar A.L. Miller B.E. Tabberer M. Yonchuk J. Leidy N. Ambery C. Bloomer J. Watz H. Tal-Singer R. Effect of the CXCR2 antagonist danirixin on symptoms and health status in COPD Eur. Respir. J. 2018 52 1801020 10.1183/13993003.01020-2018 30139779
154. Planagumà A. Domènech T. Pont M. Calama E. García-González V. López R. Aulí M. López M. Fonquerna S. Ramos I. Combined anti CXC receptors 1 and 2 therapy is a promising anti-inflammatory treatment for respiratory diseases by reducing neutrophil migration and activation Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015 34 37 45 10.1016/j.pupt.2015.08.002 26271598
155. Leaker B.R. Barnes P.J. O’Connor B. Inhibition of LPS-induced airway neutrophilic inflammation in healthy volunteers with an oral CXCR2 antagonist Respir. Res. 2013 14 137 10.1186/1465-9921-14-137 24341382 PMC3867427
156. Andrews S.P. Cox R.J. Small Molecule CXCR3 Antagonists J. Med. Chem. 2016 59 2894 2917 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01337 26535614
157. Takekoshi T. Ziarek J.J. Volkman B.F. Hwang S.T. A locked, dimeric CXCL12 variant effectively inhibits pulmonary metastasis of CXCR4-expressing melanoma cells due to enhanced serum stability Mol. Cancer Ther. 2012 11 2516 2525 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0494 22869557 PMC3496366
158. Smith E.W. Liu Y. Getschman A.E. Peterson F.C. Ziarek J.J. Li R. Volkman B.F. Chen Y. Structural analysis of a novel small molecule ligand bound to the CXCL12 chemokine J. Med. Chem. 2014 57 9693 9699 10.1021/jm501194p 25356720 PMC4255719
159. Veldkamp C.T. Ziarek J.J. Peterson F.C. Chen Y. Volkman B.F. Targeting SDF-1/CXCL12 with a ligand that prevents activation of CXCR4 through structure-based drug design J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010 132 7242 7243 10.1021/ja1002263 20459090 PMC2941798
160. Hachet-Haas M. Balabanian K. Rohmer F. Pons F. Franchet C. Lecat S. Chow K.Y.C. Dagher R. Gizzi P. Didier B. Small neutralizing molecules to inhibit actions of the chemokine CXCL12 J. Biol. Chem. 2008 283 23189 23199 10.1074/jbc.M803947200 18556651
161. Hoellenriegel J. Zboralski D. Maasch C. Rosin N.Y. Wierda W.G. Keating M.J. Kruschinski A. Burger J.A. The Spiegelmer NOX-A12, a novel CXCL12 inhibitor, interferes with chronic lymphocytic leukemia cell motility and causes chemosensitization Blood 2014 123 1032 1039 10.1182/blood-2013-03-493924 24277076 PMC4123413
162. Peng D. Cao B. Zhou Y.-J. Long Y.-Q. The chemical diversity and structure-based evolution of non-peptide CXCR4 antagonists with diverse therapeutic potential Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018 149 148 169 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.02.043 29500940
163. McDermott D.H. Pastrana D.V. Calvo K.R. Pittaluga S. Velez D. Cho E. Liu Q. Trout H.H. Neves J.F. Gardner P.J. Plerixafor for the Treatment of WHIM Syndrome N. Engl. J. Med. 2019 380 163 170 10.1056/NEJMoa1808575 30625055 PMC6425947
164. Bonig H. Chudziak D. Priestley G. Papayannopoulou T. Insights into the biology of mobilized hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells through innovative treatment schedules of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 Exp. Hematol. 2009 37 402 415.e1 10.1016/j.exphem.2008.10.017 19157683 PMC2669109
165. Cardones A.R. Murakami T. Hwang S.T. CXCR4 enhances adhesion of B16 tumor cells to endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo via beta(1) integrin Cancer Res. 2003 63 6751 6757 14583470
166. Devi S. Wang Y. Chew W.K. Lima R. A-González N. Mattar C.N.Z. Chong S.Z. Schlitzer A. Bakocevic N. Chew S. Neutrophil mobilization via plerixafor-mediated CXCR4 inhibition arises from lung demargination and blockade of neutrophil homing to the bone marrow J. Exp. Med. 2013 210 2321 2336 10.1084/jem.20130056 24081949 PMC3804935
167. Jujo K. Hamada H. Iwakura A. Thorne T. Sekiguchi H. Clarke T. Ito A. Misener S. Tanaka T. Klyachko E. CXCR4 blockade augments bone marrow progenitor cell recruitment to the neovasculature and reduces mortality after myocardial infarction Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010 107 11008 11013 10.1073/pnas.0914248107 20534467 PMC2890743
168. Luo Y. Zhao X. Zhou X. Ji W. Zhang L. Luo T. Liu H. Huang T. Jiang T. Li Y. Short-term intermittent administration of CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 facilitates myocardial repair in experimental myocardial infarction Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2013 45 561 569 10.1093/abbs/gmt045 23676772