Ceska gynekologie · 2008
[The quality of breastfeeding preparation in the antenatal courses].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mydlilová A, Schneiderová D, Protivová I, Sípek A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of breastfeeding preparation in the antenatal courses and to identify the other sources of breastfeeding information.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Thomayer's Hospital Prague.
METHODS: Data collected from questionnaires presented on web pages of the Lactation League from 2005 to 2006 from 351 mothers were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Only 52.8% of mothers were satisfied with the course content. Women who attended the antenatal preparation were more informed about the correct breastfeeding technique, the harmfulness bottle and pacifier usage, the disadvantages of the mother and newborn separation and alternative feeding methods than those who did not. The other sources of breastfeeding information were literature, magazines and internet. The health professional participation was only 9%. During pregnancy 82.9% of women did not pass the breast examination.
CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to improve the breastfeeding preparation quality of antenatal courses and to increase the health professional participation in breastfeeding information distribution.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Thomayer's Hospital Prague.
METHODS: Data collected from questionnaires presented on web pages of the Lactation League from 2005 to 2006 from 351 mothers were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Only 52.8% of mothers were satisfied with the course content. Women who attended the antenatal preparation were more informed about the correct breastfeeding technique, the harmfulness bottle and pacifier usage, the disadvantages of the mother and newborn separation and alternative feeding methods than those who did not. The other sources of breastfeeding information were literature, magazines and internet. The health professional participation was only 9%. During pregnancy 82.9% of women did not pass the breast examination.
CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to improve the breastfeeding preparation quality of antenatal courses and to increase the health professional participation in breastfeeding information distribution.