m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of epidemiology · 2002

Utilities measured by rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble: review and reference for health care professionals.

Название и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Morimoto T, Fukui T

Аннотация

Utility is a simple expression of health-related quality of life in individuals with different states of health. A number of studies on utility measurements were conducted and published in the past. We retrieved 164 English-language articles which appeared in 1966 through 1999 for a systematic review. The number of reports has been increasing at an accelerating pace, especially during the past decade. The most widely used method of utility measurement was time trade-off, TTO (40%), followed by rating scale, RS (31%) and standard gamble, SG (29%). The utility of chronic health status was more frequently reported as compared with acute health status (907 vs 86). Accordingly, frequently explored clinical categories were cardiology, neurology, nephrology, and gastroenterology. Specifically, coronary heart disease (52 utilities), physical disability due to neurological diseases (45 utilities), chronic renal failure (74 utilities), and colorectal cancer (29 utilities) were subject to utility measurement. Mental or social dysfunctioning accounted for only a small proportion (48 utilities). There is a strong tendency for RS to yield the lowest and SG to yield the highest values. We compiled an extensive list of the results of studies on utility as a reference for health care professionals in this field.

Перевод полного текста: Перевод в очереди

Читать найденный полный текст

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

INTRODUCTION

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is now widely recognized as one of the major health outcome indices in clinical studies, health services research, and health policy formation, thus making HRQOL itself a truly important research subject. There are many ways to measure HRQOL as related to a specific disease or individual health status 1 ) , all of which have both strength and weakness. Among these, utility is one of the simplest ways to represent HRQOL and many studies have evaluated the utilities of various states of health or disease. The concept of health state utility was developed in the early 1970s and has now a solid body of theory and a set of compelling axioms 2 , 3 ) . The utility of any health state or disease is assessed as a number between zero and one. Typically, Zero means death and one perfect health. Since the utility approach provides a single cardinal measure of HRQOL and its reliability had been verified in many studies 4 ) , it is suitable for quantitative and statistical analysis 5 ) . Accordingly, many researchers have used utilities for decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. In fact, utility is the only way to make use of HRQOL in cost-effectiveness analysis 2 , 3 ) .

A number of methods have been proposed to measure utility, of which rating scale (RS), standard gamble (SG) and time trade-off (TTO) have been used most frequently. The RS consists of a line on a page with zero at one end, equivalent to death, and one at the other, equivalent to perfect health. The subjective health status, i.e., preference, is placed on the line between zero and one in such a way that the distance from zero to the placement corresponds to the degree of preference as perceived by the subject. The SG was developed by von Neumann and Morgenstern 6 ) . It is based on a paired comparison in which the subjects choose one of the two strategies. One strategy has two possible outcomes: perfect health with probability p and death with probability 1-p. The other strategy leads to a certain health status which is intermediate in desirability between perfect health and death. Probability p is varied until the respondent registers indifference to the two strategies, at which point the utility value is p. The TTO was developed specifically for use in health care by Torrance et al. to directly assess how long a period in a state of perfect health is equivalent to a given period of ill health 7 ) . By converting a year in a given health status to its equivalent in a state of perfect health, the value of utility can be assessed. Unlike the RS in which the subject provides explicit preference values, the SG and the TTO methods derive preference values implicitly by basing them on the subject’s responses to decision situations. Concurrently, several studies tried to convert RS to SG or TTO and showed satisfactory results 8 , 9 ) .

In spite of a growing accumulation of utility studies, we still have to elicit utility data on a given health status on our own. The reasons seem to include inherent variability among individuals, a uniqueness of health status dealt with in each study, a lack of systematic review and modification for clinical use of already accumulated utility data, and a difficulty searching for relevant studies in computerized database. In fact, the word “utility” is used in many senses in the medical literature, i.e., as an efficacy of examination, a therapeutic intervention, and a representation of HRQOL. Furthermore, utility is not registered as a Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in the MEDLINE database, which makes it difficult to search for articles on utility. Recently, Brazier et al. published an omnibus review on the use of health status measures 10 ) . However, their report focused on technical aspects and did not deal with utility values for diseases as elicited from a variety of subject populations.

We therefore conducted a systematic review of published utility data and listed the results as a reference for researchers in this field.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was searched by using the following terms: rating scal*, analog scal*, linear scal*, categorical scal*, time trade-off, time trade off, time tradeoff, standard gamble, and standard reference gamble. Since “quality adjusted life years” is registered in the MeSH of MEDLINE, we also used this term. The MEDLINE database covers articles published between January 1966 and December 1999. After the first tier of screening of retrieved abstracts for the appropriate contents, full texts were collected and reviewed. Listed reference in the relevant articles and personal files were also searched.

The inclusion criteria for our review were as follows. 1) utilities on a particular health status or disease were obtained from patients with that health status or disease, or from patients with other disease, or from healthy volunteers, 2) target health status or disease was clearly stated, 3) studies were written in English. The exclusion criteria, on the other hand, were as follows. 1) utilities were not represented by definite values, e.g., only by approximations or figures, 2) target health status was complex and determined by multiple attribute, 3) the reference point was not death or perfect health, e.g., best health or worst health, 4) there was no clear definition of zero or one for the RS. In case of duplicate measurements on the same subjects in the same studies, we used the report published earlier.

RESULTS

Retrieval Results

From MEDLINE search, 29044 articles were retrieved. The first tier screening found 376 relevant articles for which full texts were obtained. After a critical review of these articles and relevant articles, 164 articles were judged to meet the inclusion criteria. These articles are classified in Appendix 1 according to the disease category 11 - 174 ) .

Contributed Journals

The number of studies on utility has been increasing almost exponentially in the last decade ( Figure 1 ). The most frequently reporting journal was Medical Decision Making ( Figure 2 ), far ahead in this field, having published 29 utility studies so far. Quality of Life Research , which is designed specifically for the study of HRQOL studies, followed.

Figure 1. The chronological trend of studies reporting utility values in 1973-1999. The number of articles on utilities has been increasing, especially in the last decade.
Figure 1. The chronological trend of studies reporting utility values in 1973-1999. The number of articles on utilities has been increasing, especially in the last decade.
Figure 2. The ranking of journals in terms of the number of articles on utility values. The most frequently reporting journal was Medical Decision Making, far ahead in this field,…
Figure 2. The ranking of journals in terms of the number of articles on utility values. The most frequently reporting journal was Medical Decision Making, far ahead in this field, followed by Quality of Life Research which aims to study HRQL.

Focus of Interest

Medical Decision Making, Quality of Life Research and Medical Care mostly published utility studies conducted for the purpose of technical assessment of utility measurement method or elicitation process itself (25/44, 57%). On the other hand, utility data published in clinical journals were mostly related to clinical trial (29/120, 24%), health outcome measurement (57/120, 48%), cost-effectiveness analysis (18/120, 15%), and decision analysis (4/120, 3%).

Number and Methods of Utility Measurements

In total, 993 utility measurements were reported in the retrieved articles. As to the methods of eliciting utilities, TTO was used for 401 (40% of the total) utility measurements, followed by RS for 304 (31%) and SG for 288 (29%) utility measurements.

Sample Characteristics

The subjects from whom utilities were elicited included, in decreasing order, patients with the disease at issue, healthy volunteers, and patients with the disease unrelated to that at issue. Far majority (55%) of utility data were elicited from patients with the disease at issue ( Figure 3 ). These patients were not recruited for utility measurement in the first place but rather for clinical trials. Healthy volunteers were usually medical staffs or students. Utility values obtained from patients with the disease at issue were significantly higher than those obtained from healthy volunteers or patients with an unrelated disease. For example, Ashby et al. reported that utilities of breast cancer were the highest among breast cancer patients and the lowest among healthy medical staffs and that this difference was statistically significant 151 ) .

Figure 3. The methods of utility elicitation according to subject character. The time trade-off was most frequently used method, followed by rating scale and standard gamble. The …
Figure 3. The methods of utility elicitation according to subject character. The time trade-off was most frequently used method, followed by rating scale and standard gamble. The most frequently studied subjects were patients with the disease at issue, followed by healthy volunteers and patients with the disease unrelated to that at issue.

Measured Health Status

Among 993 measurements, the frequently explored clinical categories were those related to neurology, cardiology, nephrology and gastroenterology & hepatology, in decreasing order ( Figure 4 ). Chronic health status was a dominant topic in these categories. To be concrete, they included coronary heart disease (52 utilities), physical disability due to neurological diseases (45 utilities), chronic renal failure (74 utilities), and colorectal cancer (29 utilities). In contrast, acute diseases were much less studied (86/993, 8.7%). Diseases related to mental or social dysfunctioning, such as anxiety, depression, and hospital confinement, accounted for only a minority proportion (48/993, 4.8%).

Figure 4. The frequency of utility elicitation according to disease category. Diseases related neurology, cardiology, nephrology and gastroenterology & hepatology were most freque…
Figure 4. The frequency of utility elicitation according to disease category. Diseases related neurology, cardiology, nephrology and gastroenterology & hepatology were most frequently measured.

Utility Values

Figures 5 , 6 , 7 and Tables 1 , 2 , 3 show the weighted mean, minimum, and maximum utility values for a variety of health status according to type of samples and methods of measurement. Utilities shown only as a point without a range bar were those reported in a single study. In many cases, utilities for a given health status differed if they were measured by different group of researchers. The values often depended on the subject’s characteristics, the method of measurement, and the expression of health status among others. These figures and tables show only a part of utilities listed in Appendix 1 in order to represent the range of reported utilities as many as possible (31% of the total). For example, utilities of coronary heart disease, ranging from 0.533 to 1, were frequently measured by TTO. Classified by their severity, utilities for mild disease ranged from 0.88 to 1.0, those for moderate disease 0.832 to 0.997, and those for severe disease 0.533 to 0.929. As to the relationship between measurement methods and utility values, there was a strong tendency for RS to yield the lowest and SG to yield the highest. For example. Read et al. reported that utility value corresponding to moderate angina pectoris obtained by SG was 0.93, which was significantly higher than 0.832 obtained by TTO. Furthermore, RS yielded 0.718, which was significantly lower than TTO 32 ) .

Figure 5. Utility values elicited from patients with the disease at issue. Rhombus shows weighted mean utilities. The horizontal bar shows the range of utility values. AIDS: acqui…
Figure 5. Utility values elicited from patients with the disease at issue. Rhombus shows weighted mean utilities. The horizontal bar shows the range of utility values. AIDS: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus infection; AP: angina pectoris; ASO: arteriosclerosis obliterans; PTA: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; CRF: chronic renal failure; HD: hemodialysis; CAPD: continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; HRT: hormone replacement therapy; RS: rating scale; SG: standard gamble; TTO: time trade-off.
Figure 6. Utility values elicited from patients with the disease unrelated to that at issue. Rhombus shows weighted mean utilities. The horizontal bar shows the range of utility v…
Figure 6. Utility values elicited from patients with the disease unrelated to that at issue. Rhombus shows weighted mean utilities. The horizontal bar shows the range of utility values. GS: gallstone; AS: asymptomatic; EA: enlarged abdomen; RS: rating scale; SG: standard gamble; TTO: time trade-off.
Figure 7. Utility values elicited from healthy volunteers. Rhombus shows weighted mean utilities. The horizontal bar shows the range of utility values. AP: angina pectoris; CRC: c…
Figure 7. Utility values elicited from healthy volunteers. Rhombus shows weighted mean utilities. The horizontal bar shows the range of utility values. AP: angina pectoris; CRC: colorectal cancer; CRF: chronic renal failure; HD: hemodialysis; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; PSL: prednisone; RS: rating scale; SG: standard gamble; TTO: time trade-off.

Table 1.
Utility values elicited from patients with the disease at issue.
AIDS: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus infection; AP: angina pectoris; ASO: arteriosclerosis obliterans; PTA: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; CRF: chronic renal failure; CAPD: continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; HRT: hormone replacement therapy; RS: rating scale; SG: standard gamble; TTO: time trade-off.

DiseasesSymptomGradeInterventionMethodNo. SubjectsUtilities
MaxMinWeighted Mean
AIDSRS2540.7440.6430.686
AIDSSG710.7960.7960.796
AIDSTTO1830.8200.7900.811
HIVAsymptomaticRS870.8800.6910.778
HIVAsymptomaticSG400.8040.8040.804
HIVAsymptomaticTTO470.8700.8700.870
HIVSymptomaticRS1630.7290.6780.703
HIVSymptomaticSG1240.8220.8000.809
HIVSymptomaticTTO1140.8100.7700.796
APChest painRS850.9180.5900.880
APChest painSG710.9700.6400.760
APChest painTTO951.0000.7860.791
ASOIntermittent claudicationPTARS2120.8000.7900.796
ASOIntermittent claudicationPTASG2120.9600.9200.946
ASOIntermittent claudicationPTATTO2120.9500.8900.928
ASOIntermittent claudicationPrimary stent placementRS2190.8000.8000.800
ASOIntermittent claudicationPrimary stent placementSG2190.9800.9100.956
ASOIntermittent claudicationPrimary stent placementTTO2190.9300.8700.909
ASOAmputationSG650.9200.9200.920
ASOAmputationTTO650.8600.8600.860
ASOIntermittent claudicationRS2600.8000.7000.739
ASOIntermittent claudicationSG2600.8700.8500.861
ASOIntermittent claudicationTTO2600.7800.7400.758
AsthmaDyspneaRS2290.7700.6800.713
AsthmaDyspneaSG2810.9100.8200.878
AsthmaDyspneaTTO1150.8900.7060.816
CRFHemodialysisRS2140.7700.1400.548
CRFHemodialysisSG1250.5510.4900.522
CRFHemodialysisTTO9970.8100.3900.566
CRFCAPDRS900.7900.6580.693
CRFCAPDSG660.5100.5100.510
CRFCAPDTTO1370.5700.4750.514
CRFKidney transplantRS1390.8600.7300.798
CRFKidney transplantSG660.5650.5650.565
CRFKidney transplantTTO3520.8400.5320.721
MenopauseMildRS1190.6500.6000.626
MenopauseMildTTO1190.8500.7300.794
MenopauseSevereRS1110.3200.3000.309
MenopauseSevereTTO1110.6400.5200.588
MenopauseHRTRS2080.8600.8200.841
MenopauseHRTTTO2080.9500.9000.922

Table 2.
Utility values elicited from patients with the disease unrelated to that at issue.
RUQ: right upper quadrant; RS: rating scale; SG: standard gamble; TTO: time trade-off.

DiseasesSymptomGradeInterventionMethodNo. SubjectsUtilities
MaxMinWeighted Mean
Acute cholecystitisRUQ painRS220.3600.3600.360
Acute cholecystitisRUQ painSG160.7700.7700.770
GallstoneLaparoscopic cholecystectomyRS220.7100.7100.710
GallstoneLaparoscopic cholecystectomySG160.9100.9100.910
GallstoneOpen cholecystectomyRS280.4500.2700.411
GallstoneOpen cholecystectomySG200.8300.7800.790
GaucherAsymptomaticLow blood countSG380.9200.9200.920
GaucherAsymptomaticLow blood countTTO380.8800.8800.880
GaucherBone painSG380.8900.8900.890
GaucherBone painTTO380.7800.7800.780
GaucherEnlarged abdomenSG380.8700.8700.870
GaucherEnlarged abdomenTTO380.7800.7800.780
Ovarian cancerRS220.4300.4300.430
Ovarian cancerTTO220.7100.7100.710
StrokeHemiparesisRS1410.7100.7100.710
StrokeHemiparesisSG1410.9100.9100.910
StrokeHemiparesisTTO1410.8800.8800.880
StrokeHemiplegiaRS1350.3100.3100.310
StrokeHemiplegiaSG1350.6100.6100.610
StrokeHemiplegiaTTO13880.5100.3000.320

Table 3.
Utility values elivited from healthy volunteers.
AP: angina pectoris; CRF: chronic renal failure; HD: hemodialysis; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; PSL: prednisone; RS: rating scale; TTO: time trade-off; SG: standard gamble.

DiseasesSymptomGradeInterventionMethodNo. SubjectsUtilities
MaxMinWeighted Mean
Alzheimer’s diseaseDementiaMildRS540.7500.6500.726
Alzheimer’s diseaseDementiaMildTTO540.6700.5800.648
Alzheimer’s diseaseDementiaSevereRS540.3000.2600.270
Alzheimer’s diseaseDementiaSevereTTO540.3100.2900.305
APChest painMildTTO100.8800.8800.880
APChest painModerateRS600.7180.7180.718
APChest painModerateSG600.9030.9030.903
APChest painModerateTTO600.8320.8320.832
APChest painSevereRS600.3540.3540.354
APChest painSevereSG600.7070.7070.707
APChest painSevereTTO700.6900.5330.555
Colorectal cancerColostomyRS990.7190.5270.636
Colorectal cancerColostomyTTO2000.8000.7500.788
Colorectal cancerColostomySG990.9080.8030.860
Colorectal cancerTTO2000.8500.8000.829
CRFHemodialysisSG1300.6450.4400.487
CRFHemodialysisTTO11210.6780.3200.526
CRFKidney transplantSG110.7960.7960.796
CRFKidney transplantTTO2530.8630.5800.592
RANo prednisoneRS250.2900.2900.290
RANo prednisoneTTO250.3400.3400.340
RAPrednisone 5mg/dRS250.5500.5500.550
RAPrednisone 5mg/dTTO250.6400.6400.640
RAPrednisone 15mg/dRS250.7200.7200.720
RAPrednisone 15mg/dTTO250.8200.8200.820

DISCUSSION

The recent flourish in patient-oriented clinical research and evidence-based medicine attests to the importance of considering patients’ preferences as well as biological or life-and-death measurements. For this reason, the number of studies on utilities has been increasing almost exponentially in the last decade ( Figure 1 ). In addition, the number of articles entitled cost-effectiveness analysis increased from seven in 1989 to 48 in 1999 in accordance with the social needs to consider cost-effectiveness in health policy as well as in clinical practice. This tendency indicates the importance for health service researchers and clinicians to be aware of HRQOL.

Our review on previously published utility studies showed that Medical Decision Making is the leading journal in this field ( Figure 2 ). It reflects the leadership role of this journal in the development of methodologies related to medical decision making in the past 19 years.

Since a single cardinal measure of HRQOL, i.e., utility, is required for decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis, many of which were published in clinical journals 5 ) . On the other hand, Medical Decision Making , Quality of Life Research and Medical Care published far less number of studies of cost-effectiveness analysis and accordingly less data on utility in spite of much data on technical assessment of utility measurement method.

We found that TTO was the most frequently used method, followed by RS and SG. This reflects the fact that RS is easy to use but subject to unreliability and that SG is difficult to use but subject to good validity 10 ) . In this regard, TTO, going in the middle, is fairly easy to use and subject to fair validity.

Our review shows that most of the study subjects from whom utilities were elicited were patients with the disease at issue and that these patients were not recruited for utility measurement in the first place but rather for clinical trials. It reflects that patients’ preference has been widely taken into account in the assessment of outcomes of clinical trials. On the other hand, the majority of healthy volunteers were medical staffs or students. Reasons may include the convenience of access by researchers, quick apprehension of rather difficult concept of utility, and clear imagination of hypothetical clinical situations.

A chronic health status seems to be easier to imagine and assess its utility than acute health status for persons without the disease at issue. A chronic illness lasts for long time and the study subjects can exchange utility values for a given time or gamble their entire life. It is inevitable that real patients in acute distress have difficulty cooperating to answer utility inquiries.

Utility values compiled in the current study for a given health status were wide in range. This is due to the nature of the combined data for a given disease, in terms of disease stage, severity, symptoms and treatment. It is quite natural that individual patient differs from other patients with the same disease in terms of the characteristics of the disease and their own health preference. Therefore, it may be ideal to elicit utility values from particular patient when physicians conduct decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis in particular situation. However, comprehensively compiled data such as this could serve as a benchmark or substitute when individual utility values were not available.

We excluded multiattribute utility methods such as EuroQol, Quality of Well-Being or Health Utilities Index, from this review 2 , 3 ) because they themselves generally do not afford one-to-one corresponding utility values of a given disease and are difficult to use for a quantitative research at the present time. However, utility values of several distinct diseases were recently measured using such multiattribute utility methods and validated 175 , 176 ) . Further studies are necessary in this regard.

The growing necessity of making clinical decisions based on quantitative data should further prompt utility studies in the years to come. We hope that our current review will serve as reference of utility studies ever done in the past 30 years.

List of articles according to the disease category.

Mean age was measured as whole group. If race was not reported in the article, the country where the utility values were elicited were shown in the parentheses.

Author, YearReferenceDiseasesMale(%)Mean age (Range)Race (Country)
Cardiology
Bosch JL, 199611Arteriosclersis obliterans7057 (38-88)(Netherlands)
Bosch JL, 199812Arteriosclersis obliterans7057 (38-88)(Netherlands)
Bosch JL, 199813Arteriosclersis obliterans49(United States)
Bosch JL, 199914Arteriosclersis obliterans7259(Netherlands)
Chen AY, 199615Angina9668100% White
Curry CL, 199616Left ventricular hypertrophy6454(International)
de Vries SO, 199817Arteriosclersis obliterans5861(Netherlands)
Fryback DG, 199318Angina, Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Myocardial infarction100% White
Gage BF, 199619Atrial fibrillation867087% White
Glasziou PP, 199420Myocardial infarction60 (17-87)(Australia)
Havranek EP, 199921Congestive heart failure595358% White
Kavanagh T, 199622Congestive heart failure8162 (49-71)(Canada)
Lalonde L, 199923Angina(Canada)
Lalonde L, 199924Risk of ischemic heart disease(Canada)
Lawrence WF, 199625Hypertension4067100% White
Molzahn AE, 199726Congestive heart failure7848Canada
Moskowitz AJ, 199727Congestive heart failure845484% White
Nease RF, 199528Angina(United States)
Nichol G, 199629Angina8858(Canada)
Oldridge N, 199330Myocardial infarction8853(Canada)
Pliskin JS, 198031Angina35 (27-55)(United States)
Read JL, 198432Angina8539 (27-55)(United States)
Shephard RJ, 199833Congestive heart failure8162
Tsevat J, 199134Post myocardial infaction(United States)
Tsevat J, 199335Post myocardial infaction8160 (29-78)(United States)
Tsevat J, 199536Post myocardial infaction8060(United States)
van Wijck EE, 199837Arteriosclersis obliterans8065 (32-81)(Netherlands)
Dentistry
Brickley M, 199538Toothache(United Kingdom)
Downer, MC, 199739Oral cancer6250(United Kingdom)
Fyffe HE, 199240Toothache52(18-65)(Scotland)
Dermatology
Bala MV, 199941Herpes zoster68(Canada)
Kaplan RM, 197942Burn(United States)
Zug KA, 199543Psoriasis49 (19-78)(United States)
Endocrinology
Douzdjian V, 199844Diabetes mellitus59(United States)
Fryback DG, 199318Diabetes mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, Thyroid disease100% White
Kaplan RM, 197942Obese(United States)
Kiberd BA, 199545Diabetes mellitus(Canada)
Lalonde L, 199923Hyperlipidemia(Canada)
MacKeigan LD, 199946Diabetes mellitus5259 (27-84)(Canada)
Otorhinolaryngology
Fryback DG, 199318Sinusitis100% White
Llewellyn Thomas HA, 199347Laryngeal cancer(Canada)
van der Donk J, 199548Laryngeal cancer32, 43, 62(Netherlands)
Gastroenterology/Hepatology
Bass EB, 199449Biliary disease5050(United States)
Boyd NF, 199050Colorectal cancer3749(Canada)
Detsky AS, 198651Total parenteral nutrition(Canada)
Dominitz JA, 199752Colorectal cancer9963(United States)
Fryback DG, 199318Colitis, Hiatal hernia. Peptic ulcer100% White
Irvine EJ, 199553Crohn’s disease, Ulscerative colitis(Canada)
McLeod RS, 199154Ulcerative colitis7034(Canada)
Ness RM, 199955Colorectal cancer5354(United States)
Provenzale D, 199756Ulcerative colitis6440(United States)
Stiggelbout AM, 199557Colorectal cancer4662(Netherlands)
Tillinger W, 199958Crohn’s disease6332(Australia)
Gynecology
Daly E, 199359Menopause052.1(United Kingdom)
Grann VR, 199860Ovarian cancer, Oophorectomy038 (22-63)(United States)
Grann VR, 199961Ovarian cancer033 (20-50)58% White
Llewellyn Thomas HA, 199262Uterus or ovarian cancer058 (27-78)(Canada)
Sculpher M, 199863Menorrhalgia041(United Kingdom)
Sculpher MJ, 199664Menorrhalgia(United Kingdom)
Zethraeus N, 199765Menopause052 (45-65)(Sweden)
Zethraeus N, 199966Menopause052 (45-65)(Sweden)
Hematology
Lee SJ, 199767Graft-versus-host disease(United States)
Szeinbach SL, 199968Multiple myeloma64(United States)
Infectious disease
Bayoumi AM, 199969Human immunodeficiency virus infection9241(Canada)
Johnson ES, 199670Cytomegalovirus infection99(Australia)
Lamping DL, 199471Human immunodeficiency virus infection9336 (24-64)72% White
Law AV, 199872Miscellaneous infection(United States)
Owens DK, 199273Human immunodeficiency virus infection, Hepatitis B virus disease64(United States)
Owens DK, 199774Human immunodeficiency virus infection, Hepatitis B virus disease64(United States)
Revicki DA, 199575Human immunodeficiency virus infection703860% Black
Sackett DL, 197876Tuberculosis(Canada)
Torrance GW, 197377Tuberculosis(Canada)
Tsevat J, 199278Human immunodeficiency virus infection9435(United States)
Tsevat J, 199679Human immunodeficiency virus infection(United States)
Nephrology
Canadian Group, 199080Chronic renal failure5845(Canada)
Churchill DN, 198481Chronic renal failure5645 (16-77)(Canada)
Churchill DN, 198782Chronic renal failure(Canada)
Churchill DN, 199183Chronic renal failure5360 (20-75)(Canada)
Groome PA, 199984Chronic renal failure6853 (21-69)(Canada)
Laupacis A, 199185Chronic renal failure(Canada)
Laupacis A, 199686Chronic renal failure(United Kingdom)
Law AV, 199872Chronic renal failure(United States)
Moizahn AE, 199687Chronic renal failure42, 48(Canada)
Revicki DA, 199288Chronic renal failure3359 (18-75)(United States)
Russell JD, 199289Chronic renal failure7442(Canada)
Sackett DL, 197876Chronic renal failure(Canada)
Sesso R, 199690Chronic renal failure614354% White
Sesso R, 199791Chronic renal failure624964% White
Torrance GW, 197377Chronic renal failure(Canada)
Neurology
Ackerman SJ, 199992Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis(United States)
Aoki N, 199893Cerebral aneurysm(Japan)
Dolan P, 199694Disabled(United Kingdom)
Fryback DG, 199318Migrane, Stroke100% White
Gage BF, 199619Stroke867087% White
Gore JM, 199595Stroke
Hallan S, 199996Stroke(Norway)
Holmes AM, 199797Disabled41(United States)
Kwa VI, 199698Stroke5063(Netherlands)
Messori A, 199899Epilepsy(Italy)
Mushlin AI, 1994100Multiple sclerosis38(Unites States)
Patrick DL, 1994101Coma, Alzheimer’s disease(Unites States)
Richardson J, 1997102Disabled(Australia)
Samsa GP, 1998103Stroke5265(United States)
Sano M, 1999104Alzheimer’s disease7646 (22-65)(United States)
Shin AY, 1997105Arteriovenous malformation5537 (18-57)71% White
Stavem K, 1998106Epilepsy4244 (18-67)(Norway)
Stavem K, 1999107Epilepsy4444(Norway)
Torrance GW, 1984108Disabled(Canada)
Ubel PA, 1996109Meningioma(United States)
Obstetrics
Kuppermann M, 1997110Down syndrome, Artificial abortion, Spontaneous abortion086% White
Kuppermann M, 1999111Down syndrome, Artificial abortion3876% White
Saigal S, 1999112Low birth weight2342(Canada)
Oncology
Grann VR, 199860Metastatic disease38 (22-63)(United States)
Grann VR, 199961BRCA1/2 mutations, Metastatic disease033 (20-50)58% White
Grunberg SM, 1996113Malignant disease2756 (23-78)(United States)
Ophthalmology
Bass EB, 1997114Visual impairment2874(United States)
Brown MM, 1999115Diabetic retinopathy3963 (28-87)95% White
Fryback DG, 199318Cataract, Glaucoma, Macular degeneration100% White
Torrance GW, 198477Visual loss(Canada)
Orthopedics
Chang RW, 1996116Osteoarthrosis(22-62)(United States)
Chung KC, 1998117Carpal tunnel syndrome(United States)
Fryback DG, 199318Musculoskeletal pain, Gout100% White
Gabriel SE, 1999118Osteoporosis, Fracture070(United States)
Goossens ME, 1999119Musculoskeletal disease42(Netherlands)
Kaplan RM, 197942Loss of extremities(United States)
Laupacis A, 1993120Osteoarthrosis5264 (40-75)(Canada)
Patrick DL, 1994101Musculoskeletal pain60(United States)
Ubel PA, 1996109Musculoskeletal disease(United States)
Psychiatry
Chouinard G, 1997121Schizophrenia(United States)
Dolan P, 199694Depression(United Kingdom)
Fryback DG, 199318Depression, Sleep disorder100% White
Hatziandreu EJ, 1994122Depression(United Kingdom)
Revicki DA, 1996123Schizophrenia7649 (20-69)(United Kingdom)
Revicki DA, 1997124Depression(United States)
Revicki DA, 1998125Depression2342 (18-65)(Canada)
Sackett DL, 197876Depression(Canada)
Torrance GW, 1984108Depression(Canada)
Pulmonology
Blumenschein K, 1998126Asthma2540(United States)
Coley CM, 1996127Bacterial pneumonia3644(United States)
Fryback DG, 199318Asthma, Chronic bronchitis, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease100% White
Goodwin PJ, 1988128Lung cancer(Canada)
Guyatt GH, 1999129Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(Canada)
Jaeschke R, 1994130Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7268 (55-77)(Canada)
Juniper EF, 1997131Asthma5812 (7-17)(Canada)
Kaplan RM, 197942Respiratory failure(United States)
Kennedy W, 1995132Lung cancer(Canada)
O’Brien B, 1994133Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5462(Canada)
Ramsey SD, 1995134Respiratory failure3844(United States)
Ramsey SD, 1995135Respiratory failure3844(United States)
Rutten van Molken MP, 1995136Asthma5653 (18-70)(Netherlands)
Stavem K, 1999137Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5857(Norway)
Tousignant, 1994138Sleep apnea syndrome7457 (34-73)(Canada)
Rheumatology
Bakker C, 1994139Ankylosing spondylitis, Fibromyalgia2642(Netherlands)
Bakker C, 1994140Ankylosing spondylitis7144(Netherlands)
Bakker C, 1995141Fibromyalgia043(Netherlands)
Blumenschein K, 1998142Arthritis(United States)
Ferraz MB, 1994143Rheumatoid arthritis7441(Canada)
Fryback DG, 199318Arthritis100% White
Hopman-Rock M, 1997144Arthritis3465 (55-74)(Netherlands)
Lambert CM, 1998145Rheumatoid arthritis2857 (28-78)(United Kingdom)
Moore AD, 1999146Systemic lupus erythematosus444(Canada)
O’Brien BJ, 1990147Ankylosing spondylitis, Rheumatoid arthritis4548(United Kingdom)
Peeters HR, 1999148Rheumatoid arthritis1857(Netherlands)
Thompson MS, 1986149Rheumatoid arthritis(United States)
Verhoeven AC, 1998150Rheumatoid arthritis4249(Netherlands)
Surgery
Ashby J, 1994151Breast cancer25(United Kingdom)
Dranitsaris G, 1999152Breast cancer045 (28-66)(Canada)
Grann VR, 199860Breast cancer38 (22-63)(United States)
Grann VR, 199961Breast cancer033 (20-50)58% White
Hayman JA, 1997153Breast cancer053 (25-84)(United States)
Hutton J, 1996154Breast cancer0(United Kingdom)
Jansen SJ, 1998155Breast cancer0(33-82)(Netherlands)
McLachlan SA, 1999156Breast cancer056 (38-77)(Canada)
McLeod RS, 1995157Operation procedures5258(Canada)
Sackett DL, 197876Breast cancer0(Canada)
Unic I, 1998158Breast cancer038(Netherlands)
Urology
Bennett CL, 1997159Prostate cancer100(United States)
Chapman GB, 1998160Prostate cancer1007183% African American
Cowen ME, 1998161Prostate cancer1006667% White
Krahn MD, 1994162Prostate cancer(Canada)
Kuo RL, 1999163Nephrolithiasis6246 (15-82)(United States)
Matchar DB, 1997164Prostate cancer40(Canada)
Stiggelbout AM, 1994165Testicular cancer10031 (20-56)(Netherlands)
Stiggelbout AM, 199557Testicular cancer10030(Netherlands)
Stiggelbout AM, 1996166Testicular cancer100(Netherlands)
Miscellaneous
Cairns J, 1996167Cystic fibrosis0
Clarke AE, 1997168Gaucher disease3247(Canada)
Cykert S, 1999169debility4160(United States)
Dolan P, 199694Discomfort(United Kingdom)
Fryback, 199318AllergyWhite
Lalonde L, 199923No disease(Canada)
Lalonde L, 199924No disease(Canada)
Lenert LA, 1997170Drug adverse event47(United States)
Lundberg L, 1999171No disease20-80+(Sweden)
Morss SE, 1993172Drug adverse event9443 (23-73)(United States)
Torrance GW, 1984108Discomfort(Canada)
Wells KB, 1999173No disease37(United States)
Wilkinson TJ, 1997174Thiamine deficiency4473(New Zealand)

REFERENCES

1 Coons SJ , Rao S , Keininger DL , Hays RD . A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments . Pharmacoeconomics , 2000 ; 17 : 13 - 35 . 10747763 10.2165/00019053-200017010-00002

2 Drummond MF, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York, 1997.

3 Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, New York, 1996.

4 Cutler DM, Berndt ER. Medical care output and productivity. The University of Chicago Press, 2001.

5 Torrance GW . Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life . J Chronic Dis , 1987 ; 40 : 593 - 603 . 3298297 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90019-1

6 von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behaviour, 3rd ed. Wiley, New York, 1953.

7 Torrance GW , Thomas WH , Sackett DL . A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs . Health Serv Res , 1972 ; 7 : 118 - 133 . 5044699 PMC1067402

8 O’Leary JF , Fairclough DL , Jankowski MK , Weeks JC . Comparison of time-tradeoff utilities and rating scale values of cancer patients and their relatives: evidence for a possible plateau relationship . Med Decis Making , 1995 ; 15 : 132 - 137 . 7783573 10.1177/0272989X9501500205

9 Torrance GW , Feeny DH , Furlong WJ , . Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2 . Med Care , 1996 ; 34 : 702 - 722 . 8676608 10.1097/00005650-199607000-00004

10 Brazier J , Deverill M , Green C , Harper R , Booth A . A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation . Health Technol Assess , 1999 ; 3 : i-iv, 1 - 164 . 10392311

11 Bosch JL , Hunink MG . The relationship between descriptive and valuational quality-of-life measures in patients with intermittent claudication . Med Decis Making , 1996 ; 16 : 217 - 225 . 8818119 10.1177/0272989X9601600305

12 Bosch JL , Hammitt JK , Weinstein MC , Hunink MG . Estimating general-population utilities using one binary-gamble question per respondent . Med Decis Making , 1998 ; 18 : 381 - 390 . 10372580 10.1177/0272989X9801800405

13 Bosch JL , Tetteroo E , Mali WP , Hunink MG . Iliac arterial occlusive disease: cost-effectiveness analysis of stent placement versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group . Radiology , 1998 ; 208 : 641 - 648 . 9722840 10.1148/radiology.208.3.9722840

14 Bosch JL , van der Graaf Y , Hunink MG . Health-related quality of life after angioplasty and stent placement in patients with iliac artery occlusive disease: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. The Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group . Circulation , 1999 ; 99 : 3155 - 3160 . 10377079 10.1161/01.cir.99.24.3155

15 Chen AY , Daley J , Thibault GE . Angina patients’ ratings of current health and health without angina: associations with severity of angina and comorbidity . Med Decis Making , 1996 ; 16 : 169 - 177 . 8778535 10.1177/0272989X9601600209

16 Curry CL , Robinson H , Brown R , . Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with essential hypertension. Results of 6 month treatment with indapamide . Am J Hypertens , 1996 ; 9 : 828 - 832 . 8862231 10.1016/0895-7061(96)00105-7

17 de Vries SO , Kuipers WD , Hunink MG . Intermittent claudication: symptom severity versus health values . J Vasc Surg , 1998 ; 27 : 422 - 430 . 9546227 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70316-7

18 Fryback DG , Dasbach EJ , Klein R , . The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: initial catalog of health-state quality factors . Med Decis Making , 1993 ; 13 : 89 - 102 . 8483408 10.1177/0272989X9301300202

19 Gage BF , Cardinalli AB , Owens DK . The effect of stroke and stroke prophylaxis with aspirin or warfarin on quality of life . Arch Intern Med , 1996 ; 156 : 1829 - 1836 . 8790077

20 Glasziou PP , Bromwich S , Simes RJ . Quality of life six months after myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. AUS-TASK Group. Australian arm of International tPA/SK Mortality Trial . Med J Aust , 1994 ; 161 : 532 - 536 . 7968752 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1994.tb127596.x

21 Havranek EP , McGovern KM , Weinberger J , . Patient preferences for heart failure treatment: utilities are valid measures of health-related quality of life in heart failure . J Card Fail , 1999 ; 5 : 85 - 91 . 10404347 10.1016/s1071-9164(99)90030-1

22 Kavanagh T , Myers MG , Baigrie RS , . Quality of life and cardiorespiratory function in chronic heart failure: effects of 12 months’ aerobic training . Heart , 1996 ; 76 : 42 - 49 . 8774326 10.1136/hrt.76.1.42 PMC484423

23 Lalonde L , Clarke AE , Joseph L , Grover SA . Conventional and chained standard gambles in the assessment of coronary heart disease prevention and treatment. Canadian Collaborative Cardiac Assessment Group . Med Decis Making , 1999 ; 19 : 149 - 156 . 10231077 10.1177/0272989X9901900205

24 Lalonde L , Clarke AE , Joseph L , Mackenzie T , Grover SA . Comparing the psychometric properties of preference-based and nonpreference-based health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease. Canadian Collaborative Cardiac Assessment Group . Qual Life Res , 1999 ; 8 : 399 - 409 . 10474281 10.1023/a:1008991816278

25 Lawrence WF , Fryback DG , Martin PA , Klein R , Klein BE . Health status and hypertension: a population-based study . J Clin Epidemiol , 1996 ; 49 : 1239 - 1245 . 8892491 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00220-x

26 Molzahn AE , Burton JR , McCormick P , . Quality of life of candidates for and recipients of heart transplants . Can J Cardiol , 1997 ; 13 : 141 - 146 . 9070165

27 Moskowitz AJ , Weinberg AD , Oz MC , Williams DL . Quality of life with an implanted left ventricular assist device . Ann Thorac Surg , 1997 ; 64 : 1764 - 1769 . 9436569 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)01000-x

28 Nease RF Jr , Kneeland T , O’Connor GT , . Variation in patient utilities for outcomes of the management of chronic stable angina. Implications for clinical practice guidelines. Ischemic Heart Disease Patient Outcomes Research Team . JAMA , 1995 ; 273 : 1185 - 1190 . 7707625

29 Nichol G , Llewellyn-Thomas HA , Thiel EC , Naylor CD . The relationship between cardiac functional capacity and patients’ symptom-specific utilities for angina: some findings and methodologic lessons . Med Decis Making , 1996 ; 16 : 78 - 85 . 8717602 10.1177/0272989X9601600116

30 Oldridge N , Furlong W , Feeny D , . Economic evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation soon after acute myocardial infarction . Am J Cardiol , 1993 ; 72 : 154 - 161 . 8328376 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90152-3

31 Pliskin JS , Shepard DS , Weinstein MC . Utility functions for life years and health status . Oper Res , 1980 ; 28 : 206 - 224 .

32 Read JL , Quinn RJ , Berwick DM , Fineberg HV , Weinstein MC . Preferences for health outcomes. Comparison of assessment methods . Med Decis Making , 1984 ; 4 : 315 - 329 . 6335216 10.1177/0272989X8400400307

33 Shephard RJ , Kavanagh T , Mertens DJ . On the prediction of physiological and psychological responses to aerobic training in patients with stable congestive heart failure . J Cardiopulm Rehabil , 1998 ; 18 : 45 - 51 . 9494882 10.1097/00008483-199801000-00006

34 Tsevat J , Goldman L , Lamas GA , . Functional status versus utilities in survivors of myocardial infarction . Med Care , 1991 ; 29 : 1153 - 1159 . 1943274 10.1097/00005650-199111000-00007

35 Tsevat J , Goldman L , Soukup JR , . Stability of time-tradeoff utilities in survivors of myocardial infarction . Med Decis Making , 1993 ; 13 : 161 - 165 . 8483401 10.1177/0272989X9301300210

36 Tsevat J , Duke D , Goldman L , . Cost-effectiveness of captopril therapy after myocardial infarction . J Am Coll Cardiol , 1995 ; 26 : 914 - 919 . 7560617 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00284-1

37 van Wijck EE , Bosch JL , Hunink MG . Time-tradeoff values and standard-gamble utilities assessed during telephone interviews versus face-to-face interviews . Med Decis Making , 1998 ; 18 : 400 - 405 . 10372582 10.1177/0272989X9801800407

38 Brickley M , Kay E , Shepherd JP , Armstrong RA . Decision analysis for lower-third-molar surgery . Med Decis Making , 1995 ; 15 : 143 - 151 . 7783575 10.1177/0272989X9501500207

39 Downer MC , Jullien JA , Speight PM . An interim determination of health gain from oral cancer and precancer screening: 2. Developing a model of population screening . Community Dent Health , 1997 ; 14 : 227 - 232 . 9458580

40 Fyffe HE , Kay EJ . Assessment of dental health state utilities . Community Dent Oral Epidemiol , 1992 ; 20 : 269 - 273 . 1424546 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1992.tb01697.x

41 Bala MV , Wood LL , Zarkin GA , . Are health states “timeless”? The case of the standard gamble method . J Clin Epidemiol , 1999 ; 52 : 1047 - 1053 . 10526998 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00074-8

42 Kaplan RM , Bush JW , Berry CC . Health status index: category rating versus magnitude estimation for measuring levels of well-being . Med Care , 1979 ; 17 : 501 - 525 . 372692

43 Zug KA , Littenberg B , Baughman RD , . Assessing the preferences of patients with psoriasis. A quantitative, utility approach . Arch Dermatol , 1995 ; 131 : 561 - 568 . 7741543

44 Douzdjian V , Ferrara D , Silvestri G . Treatment strategies for insulin-dependent diabetics with ESRD: a cost-effectiveness decision analysis model . Am J Kidney Dis , 1998 ; 31 : 794 - 802 . 9590189 10.1016/s0272-6386(98)70048-4

45 Kiberd BA , Jindal KK . Screening to prevent renal failure in insulin dependent diabetic patients: an economic evaluation . BMJ , 1995 ; 311 : 1595 - 1599 . 8555801 10.1136/bmj.311.7020.1595 PMC2551496

46 MacKeigan LD , O’Brien BJ , Oh PI . Holistic versus composite preferences for lifetime treatment sequences for type 2 diabetes . Med Decis Making , 1999 ; 19 : 113 - 121 . 10231073 10.1177/0272989X9901900201

47 Llewellyn-Thomas HA , Sutherland HJ , Thiel EC . Do patients’ evaluations of a future health state change when they actually enter that state? Med Care , 1993 ; 31 : 1002 - 1012 . 8231333 10.1097/00005650-199311000-00003

48 van der Donk J , Levendag PC , Kuijpers AJ , . Patient participation in clinical decision-making for treatment of T3 laryngeal cancer: a comparison of state and process utilities . J Clin Oncol , 1995 ; 13 : 2369 - 2378 . 7666096 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.9.2369

49 Bass EB , Steinberg EP , Pitt HA , . Comparison of the rating scale and the standard gamble in measuring patient preferences for outcomes of gallstone disease . Med Decis Making , 1994 ; 14 : 307 - 134 . 7808206 10.1177/0272989X9401400401

50 Boyd NF , Sutherland HJ , Heasman KZ , Tritchler DL , Cummings BJ . Whose utilities for decision analysis? Med Decis Making , 1990 ; 10 : 58 - 67 . 2182963 10.1177/0272989X9001000109

51 Detsky AS , McLaughlin JR , Abrams HB , . Quality of life of patients on long-term total parenteral nutrition at home . J Gen Intern Med , 1986 ; 1 : 26 - 33 . 3095514 10.1007/BF02596321

52 Dominitz JA , Provenzale D . Patient preferences and quality of life associated with colorectal cancer screening . Am J Gastroenterol , 1997 ; 92 : 2171 - 2178 . 9399747

53 Irvine EJ . Quality of Life in inflammatory bowel disease: biases and other factors affecting scores . Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl , 1995 ; 208 : 136 - 140 . 7777795 10.3109/00365529509107776

54 McLeod RS , Churchill DN , Lock AM , Vanderburgh S , Cohen Z . Quality of life of patients with ulcerative colitis preoperatively and postoperatively . Gastroenterology , 1991 ; 101 : 1307 - 1313 . 1936801 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90081-u

55 Ness RM , Holmes AM , Klein R , Dittus R . Utility valuations for outcome states of colorectal cancer . Am J Gastroenterol , 1999 ; 94 : 1650 - 1657 . 10364039 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01157.x

56 Provenzale D , Shearin M , Phillips-Bute BG , . Health-related quality of life after ileoanal pull-through evaluation and assessment of new health status measures . Gastroenterology , 1997 ; 113 : 7 - 14 . 9207256 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70074-x

57 Stiggelbout AM , Kiebert GM , Kievit J , . The “utility” of the Time Trade-Off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional Trade-Off . J Clin Epidemiol , 1995 ; 48 : 1207 - 1214 . 7561982 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00011-r

58 Tillinger W , Mittermaier C , Lochs H , Moser G . Health-related quality of life in patients with Crohn’s disease: influence of surgical operation--a prospective trial . Dig Dis Sci , 1999 ; 44 : 932 - 938 . 10235600 10.1023/a:1026600428484

59 Daly E , Gray A , Barlow D , . Measuring the impact of menopausal symptoms on quality of life . BMJ , 1993 ; 307 : 836 - 840 . 8401125 10.1136/bmj.307.6908.836 PMC1678884

60 Grann VR , Panageas KS , Whang W , Antman KH , Neugut AI . Decision analysis of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in BRCA1-positive or BRCA2-positive patients . J Clin Oncol , 1998 ; 16 : 979 - 985 . 9508180 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.3.979

61 Grann VR , Jacobson JS , Sundararajan V , . The quality of life associated with prophylactic treatments for women with BRCA1/2 mutations . Cancer J Sci Am , 1999 ; 5 : 283 - 292 . 10526669

62 Llewellyn-Thomas HA , Thiel EC , McGreal MJ . Cancer patients’ evaluations of their current health states: The influences of expectations, comparisons, actual health status, and mood . Med Decis Making , 1992 ; 12 : 115 - 122 . 1573978 10.1177/0272989X9201200204

63 Sculpher M . A cost-utility analysis of abdominal hysterectomy versus transcervical endometrial resection for the surgical treatment of menorrhagia . Int J Technol Assess Health Care , 1998 ; 14 : 302 - 319 . 9611905 10.1017/s0266462300012277

64 Sculpher MJ , Dwyer N , Byford S , Stirrat GM . Randomised trial comparing hysterectomy and transcervical endometrial resection: effect on health related quality of life and costs two years after surgery . Br J Obstet Gynaecol , 1996 ; 103 : 142 - 149 . 8616131 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09666.x

65 Zethraeus N , Johannesson M , Henriksson P , Strand RT . The impact of hormone replacement therapy on quality of life and willingness to pay . Br J Obstet Gynaecol , 1997 ; 104 : 1191 - 1195 . 9332999 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10945.x

66 Zethraeus N , Johannesson M . A comparison of patient and social tariff values derived from the time trade-off method . Health Econ , 1999 ; 8 : 541 - 545 . 10544319 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199909)8:6<541::aid-hec464>3.0.co;2-8

67 Lee SJ , Kuntz KM , Horowitz MM , . Unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia: a decision analysis . Ann Intern Med , 1997 ; 127 : 1080 - 1088 . 9412310 10.7326/0003-4819-127-12-199712150-00005

68 Szeinbach SL , Barnes JH , McGhan WF , Murawski MM , Corey R . Using conjoint analysis to evaluate health state preferences . Drug Inf J , 1999 ; 33 : 849 - 858 .

69 Bayoumi AM , Redelmeier DA . Economic methods for measuring the quality of life associated with HIV infection . Qual Life Res , 1999 ; 8 : 471 - 480 . 10548862 10.1023/a:1008969512182

70 Johnson ES , Sullivan SD , Mozaffari E , Langley PC , Bodsworth NJ . A utility assessment of oral and intravenous ganciclovir for the maintenance treatment of AIDS-related cytomegalovirus retinitis . Pharmacoeconomics , 1996 ; 10 : 623 - 629 . 10164062 10.2165/00019053-199610060-00008

71 Lamping DL . Methods for measuring outcomes to evaluate interventions to improve health-related quality of life in HIV infection . Psycol Health , 1994 ; 9 : 31 - 49 .

72 Law AV , Pathak DS , McCord MR . Health status utility assessment by standard gamble: a comparison of the probability equivalence and the lottery equivalence approaches . Pharm Res , 1998 ; 15 : 105 - 109 . 9487555 10.1023/a:1011913123135

73 Owens DK , Nease RF Jr . Occupational exposure to human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus: a comparative analysis of risk . Am J Med , 1992 ; 92 : 503 - 512 . 1580297 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90747-y

74 Owens DK , Cardinalli AB , Nease RF Jr . Physicians’ assessments of the utility of health states associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection . Qual Life Res , 1997 ; 6 : 77 - 86 . 9062445 10.1023/a:1026473613487

75 Revicki DA , Wu AW , Murray MI . Change in clinical status, health status, and health utility outcomes in HIV-infected patients . Med Care , 1995 ; 33 ( 4 Suppl ): AS173 - AS182 . 7723445

76 Sackett DL , Torrance GW . The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public . J Chronic Dis , 1978 ; 31 : 697 - 704 . 730825 10.1016/0021-9681(78)90072-3

77 Torrance GW, Sackett DL, Thomas WH. Utility maximization for program evaluation: a demonstration application. In; Berg RL, ed. Health status indexes. Hospital Research and Education Trust, Chicago, 1973: 156-171.

78 Tsevat J . Health status and utilities of HIV+ and primary care patients . Clin Res , 1992 ; 40 : 569A . (abstract)

79 Tsevat J , Solzan JG , Kuntz KM , . Health values of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Relationship to mental health and physical functioning . Med Care , 1996 ; 34 : 44 - 57 . 8551811 10.1097/00005650-199601000-00004

80 Anonymous. Association between recombinant human erythropoietin and quality of life and exercise capacity of patients receiving haemodialysis. Canadian Erythropoietin Study Group . BMJ , 1990 ; 300 : 573 - 578 . 2108751 10.1136/bmj.300.6724.573 PMC1662387

81 Churchill DN , Morgan J , Torrance GW . Quality of life in end-stage renal disease . Perit Dial Bull 1984 ; 4 : 20 - 23 .

82 Churchill DN , Torrance GW , Taylor DW , . Measurement of quality of life in end-stage renal disease: the time trade-off approach . Clin Invest Med , 1987 ; 10 : 14 - 20 . 3545580

83 Churchill DN , Wallace JE , Ludwin D , Beecroft ML , Taylor DW . A comparison of evaluative indices of quality of life and cognitive function in hemodialysis patients . Control Clin Trials , 1991 ; 12 ( 4 Suppl ): 159S - 167S . 1663852 10.1016/s0197-2456(05)80020-0

84 Groome PA , Hutchinson TA , Tousignant P , Hanley JA . The repeatability of three methods for measuring prospective patients’ values in the context of treatment choice for end-stage renal disease . J Clin Epidemiol , 1999 ; 52 : 849 - 860 . 10529026

85 Laupacis A , Wong C , Churchill D . The use of generic and specific quality-of-life measures in hemodialysis patients treated with erythropoietin. The Canadian Erythropoietin Study Group . Control Clin Trials , 1991 ; 12 ( 4 Suppl ): 168S - 179S . 1663853 10.1016/s0197-2456(05)80021-2

86 Laupacis A , Keown P , Pus N , . A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation . Kidney Int , 1996 ; 50 : 235 - 242 . 8807593 10.1038/ki.1996.307

87 Moizahn AE , Northcott HC , Hayduk L . Quality of life of patients with end stage renal disease: a structural equation model . Qual Life Res , 1996 ; 5 : 426 - 432 . 8840822 10.1007/BF00449917

88 Revicki DA . Relationship between health utility and psychometric health status measures . Med Care , 1992 ; 30 ( 5 Suppl ): MS274 - MS282 . 1583939 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00027

89 Russell JD , Beecroft ML , Ludwin D , Churchill DN . The quality of life in renal transplantation--a prospective study . Transplantation , 1992 ; 54 : 656 - 660 . 1412757 10.1097/00007890-199210000-00018

90 Sesso R , Yoshihiro MM , Ajzen H . Late diagnosis of chronic renal failure and the quality of life during dialysis treatment . Braz J Med Biol Res , 1996 ; 29 : 1283 - 1289 . 9181098

91 Sesso R , Yoshihiro MM . Time of diagnosis of chronic renal failure and assessment of quality of life in haemodialysis patients . Nephrol Dial Transplant , 1997 ; 12 : 2111 - 2116 . 9351074 10.1093/ndt/12.10.2111

92 Ackerman SJ , Sullivan EM , Beusterien KM , . Cost effectiveness of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I therapy in patients with ALS . Pharmacoeconomics , 1999 ; 15 : 179 - 195 . 10351191 10.2165/00019053-199915020-00006

93 Aoki N , Kitahara T , Fukui T , . Management of unruptured intracranial aneurysm in Japan: a Markovian decision analysis with utility measurements based on the Glasgow Outcome Scale . Med Decis Making , 1998 ; 18 : 357 - 364 . 10372577 10.1177/0272989X9801800401

94 Dolan P , Gudex C , Kind P , Williams A . The time trade-off method: results from a general population study . Health Econ , 1996 ; 5 : 141 - 154 . 8733106 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199603)5:2<141::AID-HEC189>3.0.CO;2-N

95 Gore JM , Granger CB , Simoons ML , . Stroke after thrombolysis. Mortality and functional outcomes in the GUSTO-I trial. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries . Circulation , 1995 ; 92 : 2811 - 2818 . 7586246 10.1161/01.cir.92.10.2811

96 Hallan S , Asberg A , Indredavik B , Wideroe TE . Quality of life after cerebrovascular stroke: a systematic study of patients’ preferences for different functional outcomes . J Intern Med , 1999 ; 246 : 309 - 316 . 10475999 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1999.00531.x

97 Holmes AM . A method to elicit utilities for interpersonal comparisons . Med Decis Making , 1997 ; 17 : 10 - 20 . 8994147 10.1177/0272989X9701700102

98 Kwa VI , Limburg M , de Haan RJ . The role of cognitive impairment in the quality of life after ischaemic stroke . J Neurol , 1996 ; 243 : 599 - 604 . 8865027 10.1007/BF00900948

99 Messori A , Trippoli S , Becagli P , . Adjunctive lamotrigine therapy in patients with refractory seizures: a lifetime cost-utility analysis . Eur J Clin Pharmacol , 1998 ; 53 : 421 - 427 . 9551700 10.1007/s002280050402

100 Mushlin AI , Mooney C , Grow V , Phelps CE . The value of diagnostic information to patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group . Arch Neurol , 1994 ; 51 : 67 - 72 . 8274112 10.1001/archneur.1994.00540130093017

101 Patrick DL , Starks HE , Cain KC , Uhlmann RF , Pearlman RA . Measuring preferences for health states worse than death . Med Decis Making , 1994 ; 14 : 9 - 18 . 8152361 10.1177/0272989X9401400102

102 Richardson J , Nord E . The importance of perspective in the measurement of quality-adjusted life years . Med Decis Making , 1997 ; 17 : 33 - 41 . 8994149 10.1177/0272989X9701700104

103 Samsa GP , Matchar DB , Goldstein L , . Utilities for major stroke: results from a survey of preferences among persons at increased risk for stroke . Am Heart J , 1998 ; 136 ( 4 Pt 1 ): 703 - 713 . 9778075 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70019-5

104 Sano M . Developing utilities: quantifying quality of life for stages of Alzheimer’s disease as measured by the clinical dementia rating . J Mental Health Aging , 1999 ; 5 : 59 - 68 .

105 Shin AY , Porter PJ , Wallace MC , Naglie G . Quality of life of stroke in younger individuals. Utility assessment in patients with arteriovenous malformations . Stroke , 1997 ; 28 : 2395 - 2399 . 9412620 10.1161/01.str.28.12.2395

106 Stavem K . Quality of life in epilepsy: comparison of four preference measures . Epilepsy Res , 1998 ; 29 : 201 - 209 . 9551782 10.1016/s0920-1211(97)00075-2

107 Stavem K . Willingness to pay: a feasible method for assessing treatment benefits in epilepsy? Seizure , 1999 ; 8 : 14 - 19 . 10091842 10.1053/seiz.1998.0242

108 Torrance GW , Boyle MH , Horwood SP . Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states . Oper Res , 1984 ; 30 : 1043 - 1069 . 10.1287/opre.30.6.1043 10259643

109 Ubel PA , Loewenstein G , Scanlon D , Kamlet M . Individual utilities are inconsistent with rationing choices: A partial explanation of why Oregon’s cost-effectiveness list failed . Med Decis Making , 1996 ; 16 : 108 - 116 . 8778528 10.1177/0272989X9601600202

110 Kuppermann M , Shiboski S , Feeny D , Elkin EP , Washington AE . Can preference scores for discrete states be used to derive preference scores for an entire path of events? An application to prenatal diagnosis . Med Decis Making , 1997 ; 17 : 42 - 55 . 8994150 10.1177/0272989X9701700105

111 Kuppermann M , Feeny D , Gates E , . Preferences of women facing a prenatal diagnostic choice: long-term outcomes matter most . Prenat Diagn , 1999 ; 19 : 711 - 716 . 10451513

112 Saigal S , Stoskopf BL , Feeny D , . Differences in preferences for neonatal outcomes among health care professionals, parents, and adolescents . JAMA , 1999 ; 281 : 1991 - 1997 . 10359387 10.1001/jama.281.21.1991

113 Grunberg SM , Boutin N , Ireland A , . Impact of nausea/vomiting on quality of life as a visual analogue scale-derived utility score . Support Care Cancer , 1996 ; 4 : 435 - 439 . 8961474 10.1007/BF01880641

114 Bass EB , Wills S , Scott IU , . Preference values for visual states in patients planning to undergo cataract surgery . Med Decis Making , 1997 ; 17 : 324 - 330 . 9219193 10.1177/0272989X9701700309

115 Brown MM , Brown GC , Sharma S , Shah G . Utility values and diabetic retinopathy . Am J Ophthalmol , 1999 ; 128 : 324 - 330 . 10511027 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00146-4

116 Chang RW , Pellisier JM , Hazen GB . A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip . JAMA , 1996 ; 275 : 858 - 865 . 8596224

117 Chung KC , Walters MR , Greenfield ML , Chernew ME . Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a cost-effectiveness analysis . Plast Reconstr Surg , 1998 ; 102 : 1089 - 1099 . 9734428 10.1097/00006534-199809040-00026

118 Gabriel SE , Kneeland TS , Melton LJ 3rd , . Health-related quality of life in economic evaluations for osteoporosis: whose values should we use? Med Decis Making , 1999 ; 19 : 141 - 148 . 10231076 10.1177/0272989X9901900204

119 Goossens ME , Vlaeyen JW , Rutten-van Molken MP , van der Linden SM . Patient utilities in chronic musculoskeletal pain: how useful is the standard gamble method? Pain , 1999 ; 80 : 365 - 375 . 10204750 10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00232-2

120 Laupacis A , Bourne R , Rorabeck C , . The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life . J Bone Joint Surg Am , 1993 ; 75 : 1619 - 1626 . 8245054 10.2106/00004623-199311000-00006

121 Chouinard G , Albright PS . Economic and health state utility determinations for schizophrenic patients treated with risperidone or haloperidol . J Clin Psychopharmacol , 1997 ; 17 : 298 - 307 . 9241010 10.1097/00004714-199708000-00010

122 Hatziandreu EJ , Brown RE , Revicki DA , . Cost utility of maintenance treatment of recurrent depression with sertraline versus episodic treatment with dothiepin . Pharmacoeconomics , 1994 ; 5 : 249 - 268 . 10146899 10.2165/00019053-199405030-00008

123 Revicki DA , Shakespeare A , Kind P . Preferences for schizophrenia-related health states: a comparison of patients, caregivers and psychiatrists . Int Clin Psychopharmacol , 1996 ; 11 : 101 - 108 . 8803647

124 Revicki DA , Brown RE , Keller MB , . Cost-effectiveness of newer antidepressants compared with tricyclic antidepressants in managed care settings . J Clin Psychiatry , 1997 ; 58 : 47 - 58 . 9062373 10.4088/jcp.v58n0201

125 Revicki DA , Wood M . Patient-assigned health state utilities for depression-related outcomes: differences by depression severity and antidepressant medications . J Affect Disord , 1998 ; 48 : 25 - 36 . 9495599 10.1016/s0165-0327(97)00117-1

126 Blumenschein K , Johannesson M . Relationship between quality of life instruments, health state utilities, and willingness to pay in patients with asthma . Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol , 1998 ; 80 : 189 - 194 . 9494453 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62954-7

127 Coley CM , Li YH , Medsger AR , . Preferences for home vs hospital care among low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia . Arch Intern Med , 1996 ; 156 : 1565 - 1571 . 8687265

128 Goodwin PJ , Feld R , Evans WK , Pater J . Cost-effectiveness of cancer chemotherapy: an economic evaluation of a randomized trial in small-cell lung cancer . J Clin Oncol , 1988 ; 6 : 1537 - 1547 . 2845011 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.10.1537

129 Guyatt GH , King DR , Feeny DH , Stubbing D , Goldstein RS . Generic and specific measurement of health-related quality of life in a clinical trial of respiratory rehabilitation . J Clin Epidemiol , 1999 ; 52 : 187 - 192 . 10210235 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00157-7

130 Jaeschke R , Guyatt GH , Willan A , . Effect of increasing doses of beta agonists on spirometric parameters, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with chronic airflow limitation . Thorax , 1994 ; 49 : 479 - 484 . 8016770 10.1136/thx.49.5.479 PMC474870

131 Juniper EF , Guyatt GH , Feeny DH , Griffith LE , Ferrie PJ . Minimum skills required by children to complete health-related quality of life instruments for asthma: comparison of measurement properties . Eur Respir J , 1997 ; 10 : 2285 - 2294 . 9387955 10.1183/09031936.97.10102285

132 Kennedy W , Reinharz D , Tessier G , . Cost utility of chemotherapy and best supportive care in non-small cell lung cancer . Pharmacoeconomics , 1995 ; 8 : 316 - 323 . 10155673 10.2165/00019053-199508040-00006

133 O’Brien B , Viramontes JL . Willingness to pay: a valid and reliable measure of health state preference? Med Decis Making , 1994 ; 14 : 289 - 297 . 7934716 10.1177/0272989X9401400311

134 Ramsey SD , Patrick DL , Albert RK , . The cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation. A pilot study. University of Washington Medical Center Lung Transplant Study Group . Chest , 1995 ; 108 : 1594 - 1601 . 7497767 10.1378/chest.108.6.1594

135 Ramsey SD , Patrick DL , Lewis S , Albert RK , Raghu G . Improvement in quality of life after lung transplantation: a preliminary study. The University of Washington Medical Center Lung Transplant Study Group . J Heart Lung Transplant , 1995 ; 14 : 870 - 877 . 8800722

136 Rutten-van Molken MP , Custers F , van Doorslaer EK , . Comparison of performance of four instruments in evaluating the effects of salmeterol on asthma quality of life . Eur Respir J , 1995 ; 8 : 888 - 898 . 7589374

137 Stavem K . Reliability, validity and responsiveness of two multiattribute utility measures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease . Qual Life Res , 1999 ; 8 : 45 - 54 . 10457737 10.1023/a:1026475531996

138 Tousignant P , Cosio MG , Levy RD , Groome PA . Quality adjusted life years added by treatment of obstructive sleep apnea . Sleep , 1994 ; 17 : 52 - 60 . 8191203

139 Bakker C , Rutten M , van Doorslaer E , Bennett K , van der Linden S . Feasibility of utility assessment by rating scale and standard gamble in patients with ankylosing spondylitis or fibromyalgia . J Rheumatol , 1994 ; 21 : 269 - 274 . 8182636

140 Bakker C , Rutten-van Molken M , Hidding A , . Patient utilities in ankylosing spondylitis and the association with other outcome measures . J Rheumatol , 1994 ; 21 : 1298 - 1304 . 7966073

141 Bakker C , Rutten M , van Santen-Hoeufft M , . Patient utilities in fibromyalgia and the association with other outcome measures . J Rheumatol , 1995 ; 22 : 1536 - 1543 . 7473480

142 Blumenschein K , Johannesson M . An experimental test of question framing in health state utility assessment . Health Policy , 1998 ; 45 : 187 - 193 . 10338950 10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00041-4

143 Ferraz MB , Quaresma MR , Goldsmith CH , Bennett K , Atra E . Corticosteroids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: utility measurements for evaluating risks and benefits . Rev Rheu Engl Ed , 1994 ; 61 : 240 - 244 .

144 Hopman-Rock M , Kraaimaat FW , Bijlsma JW . Quality of life in elderly subjects with pain in the hip or knee . Qual Life Res , 1997 ; 6 : 67 - 76 . 9062444 10.1023/a:1026421629416

145 Lambert CM , Hurst NP , Forbes JF , . Is day care equivalent to inpatient care for active rheumatoid arthritis? Randomised controlled clinical and economic evaluation . BMJ , 1998 ; 316 : 965 - 969 . 9550954 10.1136/bmj.316.7136.965 PMC28498

146 Moore AD , Clarke AE , Danoff DS , . Can health utility measures be used in lupus research? A comparative validation and reliability study of 4 utility indices . J Rheumatol , 1999 ; 26 : 1285 - 1290 . 10381044

147 O’Brien BJ , Elswood J , Calin A . Willingness to accept risk in the treatment of rheumatic disease . J Epidemiol Community Health , 1990 ; 44 : 249 - 252 . 2273365 10.1136/jech.44.3.249 PMC1060652

148 Peeters HR , Jongen-Lavrencic M , Bakker CH , . Recombinant human erythropoietin improves health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and anaemia of chronic disease; utility measures correlate strongly with disease activity measures . Rheumatol Int , 1999 ; 18 : 201 - 206 . 10399796 10.1007/s002960050085

149 Thompson MS . Willingness to pay and accept risks to cure chronic disease . Am J Public Health , 1986 ; 76 : 392 - 396 . 3082226 10.2105/ajph.76.4.392 PMC1646507

150 Verhoeven AC , Bibo JC , Boers M , Engel GL , van der Linden S . Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of combination therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: randomized comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone. COBRA Trial Group. Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoide Artritis . Br J Rheumatol , 1998 ; 37 : 1102 - 1109 . 9825750 10.1093/rheumatology/37.10.1102

151 Ashby J , O’Hanlon M , Buxton MJ . The time trade-off technique: how do the valuations of breast cancer patients compare to those of other groups? Qual Life Res , 1994 ; 3 : 257 - 265 . 7812278 10.1007/BF00434899

152 Dranitsaris G , Hsu T . Cost utility analysis of prophylactic pamidronate for the prevention of skeletal related events in patients with advanced breast cancer . Support Care Cancer , 1999 ; 7 : 271 - 279 . 10423054 10.1007/s005200050260

153 Hayman JA , Fairclough DL , Harris JR , Weeks JC . Patient preferences concerning the trade-off between the risks and benefits of routine radiation therapy after conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer . J Clin Oncol , 1997 ; 15 : 1252 - 1260 . 9060570 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.1252

154 Hutton J , Brown R , Borowitz M , . A new decision model for cost-utility comparisons of chemotherapy in recurrent metastatic breast cancer . Pharmacoeconomics , 1996 ; 9 ( Suppl 2 ): 8 - 22 . 10.2165/00019053-199600092-00004 10163967

155 Jansen SJ , Stiggelbout AM , Wakker PP , . Patients’ utilities for cancer treatments: a study of the chained procedure for the standard gamble and time tradeoff . Med Decis Making , 1998 ; 18 : 391 - 399 . 10372581 10.1177/0272989X9801800406

156 McLachlan SA , Pintilie M , Tannock IF . Third line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an evaluation of quality of life and cost . Breast Cancer Res Treat , 1999 ; 54 : 213 - 223 . 10445420 10.1023/a:1006123721205

157 McLeod RS , Taylor BR , O’Connor BI , . Quality of life, nutritional status, and gastrointestinal hormone profile following the Whipple procedure . Am J Surg , 1995 ; 169 : 179 - 185 . 7817989 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80129-9

158 Unic I , Stalmeier PF , Verhoef LC , van Daal WA . Assessment of the time-tradeoff values for prophylactic mastectomy of women with a suspected genetic predisposition to breast cancer . Med Decis Making , 1998 ; 18 : 268 - 277 . 9679991 10.1177/0272989X9801800303

159 Bennett CL , Chapman G , Elstein AS , . A comparison of perspectives on prostate cancer: analysis of utility assessments of patients and physicians . Eur Urol , 1997 ; 32 ( Suppl 3 ): 86 - 88 . 9267792

160 Chapman GB , Elstein AS , Kuzel TM , . Prostate cancer patients’ utilities for health states: how it looks depends on where you stand . Med Decis Making , 1998 ; 18 : 278 - 286 . 9679992 10.1177/0272989X9801800304

161 Cowen ME , Miles BJ , Cahill DF , . The danger of applying group-level utilities in decision analyses of the treatment of localized prostate cancer in individual patients . Med Decis Making , 1998 ; 18 : 376 - 380 . 10372579 10.1177/0272989X9801800404

162 Krahn MD , Mahoney JE , Eckman MH , . Screening for prostate cancer. A decision analytic view . JAMA , 1994 ; 272 : 773 - 780 . 7521400

163 Kuo RL , Aslan P , Abrahamse PH , Matchar DB , Preminger GM . Incorporation of patient preferences in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi: a decision analytical view . J Urol , 1999 ; 162 : 1913 - 8 ; discussion 1918-1919 . 10569536 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68067-6

164 Matchar DB , McCrory DC , Bennett CL . Treatment considerations for persons with metastatic prostate cancer: survival versus out-of-pocket costs . Urology , 1997 ; 49 : 218 - 224 . 9037283 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00434-7

165 Stiggelbout AM , Kiebert GM , Kievit J , . Utility assessment in cancer patients: adjustment of time tradeoff scores for the utility of life years and comparison with standard gamble scores . Med Decis Making , 1994 ; 14 : 82 - 90 . 8152360 10.1177/0272989X9401400110

166 Stiggelbout AM , Kiebert GM , de Haes JC , . Surveillance versus adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I non-seminomatous testicular cancer: a decision analysis . Eur J Cancer , 1996 ; 32A : 2267 - 2274 . 9038609 10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00279-1

167 Cairns J , Shackley P , Hundley V . Decision making with respect to diagnostic testing: a method of valuing the benefits of antenatal screening . Med Decis Making , 1996 ; 16 : 161 - 168 . 8778534 10.1177/0272989X9601600208

168 Clarke AE , Goldstein MK , Michelson D , Garber AM , Lenert LA . The effect of assessment method and respondent population on utilities elicited for Gaucher disease . Qual Life Res , 1997 ; 6 : 169 - 184 . 9161117 10.1023/a:1026446302100

169 Cykert S , Joines JD , Kissling G , Hansen CJ . Racial differences in patients’ perceptions of debilitated health states . J Gen Intern Med , 1999 ; 14 : 217 - 222 . 10203633 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00320.x PMC1496565

170 Lenert LA , Morss S , Goldstein MK , . Measurement of the validity of utility elicitations performed by computerized interview . Med Care , 1997 ; 35 : 915 - 920 . 9298080 10.1097/00005650-199709000-00004

171 Lundberg L , Johannesson M , Isacson DGL , Borgquist L . Health-state utilities in a general population in relation to age, gender and socioeconomic factors . Eur J Public Health , 1999 ; 9 : 211 - 217 .

172 Morss SE , Lenert LA , Faustman WO . The side effects of antipsychotic drugs and patients’ quality of life: patient education and preference assessment with computers and multimedia . Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care , 1993 ; 17 - 21 . 7907504 PMC2248468

173 Wells KB , Sherbourne CD . Functioning and utility for current health of patients with depression or chronic medical conditions in managed, primary care practices . Arch Gen Psychiatry , 1999 ; 56 : 897 - 904 . 10530631 10.1001/archpsyc.56.10.897

174 Wilkinson TJ , Hanger HC , Elmslie J , George PM , Sainsbury R . The response to treatment of subclinical thiamine deficiency in the elderly . Am J Clin Nutr , 1997 ; 66 : 925 - 928 . 9322569 10.1093/ajcn/66.4.925

175 Mittmann N , Trakas K , Risebrough N , Liu BA . Utility scores for chronic conditions in a community-dwelling population . Pharmacoeconomics , 1999 ; 15 : 369 - 376 . 10537955 10.2165/00019053-199915040-00004

176 Grootendorst P , Feeny D , Furlong W . Health Utilities Index Mark 3: evidence of construct validity for stroke and arthritis in a population health survey . Med Care , 2000 ; 38 : 290 - 299 . 10718354 10.1097/00005650-200003000-00006

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты