Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support and Shock Teams in High-Risk Cardiac Surgery: The Strategic Evolution of Protected Cardiac Surgery.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Salazar Leonardo, Nersesian Gaik, Meani Paolo, Bari Gabor, Mariani Silvia, Potapov Evgenij, Di Mauro Michele, Gelsomino Sandro, Milojevic Milan, Schmack Bastian, Stein Louis, Zimpfer Daniel, Wiedemann Dominik, Soltetz Edward, Bermudez Christian, Haft Jonathan, Moreno Pedro, Tonna Joseph, Takayama Hiroo, Lamarche Yoan, Rao Vivek, Faerber Gloria, Meyns Bart, Takeda Koji, Boeken Udo, MacLaren Graeme, Whitman Glenn, Patel Bhavesh, Silvestry Scott, Goldstein Daniel J, Arora Rakesh C, Engelman Daniel T, Lorusso Roberto
Аннотация
METHODS: We conducted a structured literature review of peer-reviewed studies published from 2000 to 2024 on temporary mechanical circulatory support in adult cardiac surgery. There were 52 studies selected based on relevance to early or prophylactic support, timing of initiation, risk stratification, and systems of care. Clinical insights from multidisciplinary experts also informed the review framework.
RESULTS: Inotropic escalation after hemodynamic deterioration is consistently associated with poor outcomes. High pharmacologic requirements and severe metabolic derangements predict very high mortality, whereas conventional risk scores often fail to identify vulnerable patients. In contrast, early initiation of mechanical support has been associated with lower in-hospital mortality, reduced dependence on vasoactive agents, and improved recovery. Physiologic markers, such as filling pressures and lactate levels, may provide earlier signals of circulatory decline. Effective implementation also requires institutional coordination, team-based planning, and regional referral systems.
CONCLUSIONS: Protected cardiac surgery reframes success in high-risk cardiac surgery by focusing on recovery rather than survival alone. It integrates physiology-guided support with structured planning and system-level readiness to improve outcomes in vulnerable surgical populations.