Comparison of High-Flow Humidified Oxygen With Conventional Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Nonventilated Lungs During Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Cross-Over Study.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the efficacy of high-flow humidified oxygen (HFHO) as an alternative to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for improving oxygenation while preserving nonventilated lung collapse during one-lung ventilation.

DESIGN

A prospective randomized cross-over trial.

SETTING

A tertiary medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 28 patients undergoing elective thoracotomy with one-lung ventilation using a double-lumen endobronchial tube placement.

INTERVENTIONS: The patients received prophylactic CPAP or HFHO to the nonventilated lung for 20 minutes and were then crossedover to the other oxygenation modality for 20 minutes, with a 20-minute recovery interval between the two modalities.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

Changes in respiratory parameters and lung deflation quality were recorded. Both CPAP and HFHO increased the partial pressure of arterial oxygen in either sequence in both groups, ranging from 31.8-to-66.0 mmHg. However, the increments from these two interventions were not statistically significant (95% confidence interval -12.84 to 21.87; p = 0.597). There were no differences in other parameters. Half the patients receiving CPAP experienced worsening of the surgical condition, whereas the HFHO patients experienced no change or reported a better lung deflation (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

HFHO could be an alternative method to CPAP for improving arterial oxygenation while preserving lung deflation during one-lung ventilation. However, additional studies are warranted in regard to its cost-effectiveness and establishment as a routine treatment.