MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10029-019-01894-z

Медицинская библиотека · Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019

Hernia prevention: practice patterns and surgeons' attitudes about abdominal wall closure and the use of prophylactic mesh.

Fischer J P, Harris H W, López-Cano M, Hope W W

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The penetration of hernia prevention techniques into surgical practice remains unknown.

METHODS

A survey about knowledge/attitudes on hernia prevention was sent to the members of hernia societies.

RESULTS

The 497 respondents were mostly from the US (47%) or Europe (40%). Most reported practicing, but not measuring their suture-to-wound length closure of > 4:1 (63%) and practicing but not measuring the number of stitches (58%). Reasons for not using short stitch closure were: does not apply to patient population (19%), not familiar enough with methods to correctly execute (25%), takes too long (13%), not reimbursed (4%), concerned about closure-related complications (27%), and other (22%). Regarding prophylactic mesh, respondents stated they were not familiar with literature (11%), familiar with literature but would not use (24%), familiar with literature and interested in use (45%), familiar with literature and using (15%), and other (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be some application of hernia prevention principles related to fascial closure; however, the use of prophylactic mesh still appears to be controversial.

Для цитирования: Fischer J P, Harris H W, López-Cano M, Hope W W. Hernia prevention: practice patterns and surgeons' attitudes about abdominal wall closure and the use of prophylactic mesh.. Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-01894-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.