MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3950/jibiinkoka.110.410

Медицинская библиотека · Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho · 2007

[Clinical study of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the parotid gland].

Adachi Mari, Iwai Hiroshi, Yagi Masao, Minamino Masayuki, Omae Mariko, Lee Shinryu, Yamashita Toshio

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We report results of a retrospective study of 12 cases of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) in the parotid gland. Local pain was often observed in ACC among other malignant parotid tumors. Although fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNA) was not effective for preoperative diagnosis, frozen section diagnosis (FS) during surgery showed excellent results. Cases with T3 or T4 underwent total or enlarged parotidectomy, but, often showed positive surgical margins. Postoperative radiation therapy seemed useful in these cases and the 5-and 10-year disease-specific survivals in these 12 cases were 90.0% and 80.8%. These compare favorably with other reports in the literature. All 12 cases showed NO and no cervical relapse with or without neck dissection, indicating little effectiveness in prophylactic neck dissection. Tumor size, positive surgical margins, and perineural invasion are risk factors for this tumor as mention previously. Patients with perineural invasion, especially preoperative facial nerve palsy (T4a), are more likely to fail than those with two other factors, so, it seems conceivable for cases of T4a to undergo more positive treatment with surgery and postoperative radiation.

Для цитирования: Adachi Mari, Iwai Hiroshi, Yagi Masao, Minamino Masayuki, Omae Mariko, Lee Shinryu, Yamashita Toshio. [Clinical study of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the parotid gland].. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho. 2007. DOI: 10.3950/jibiinkoka.110.410.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.