MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10384-003-0023-1

Медицинская библиотека · Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2004

Examination and treatment of patients with angle-closure glaucoma in Japan: results of a nationwide survey.

Kashiwagi Kenji, Tsukahara Shigeo

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To assess the present state of examination procedures and treatments for angle-closure glaucoma (ACG) in Japan.

METHODS

A nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted, targeting 1237 registered facilities to Japanese Ophthalmological Society.

RESULTS

Valid replies were obtained from 754 of 1232 facilities (61.2%). Primary ACG comprised a small percentage of the glaucoma types diagnosed in outpatient examinations. More than 50% of the laser iridotomy (LI) procedures were prophylactic at 52.9% of the facilities. Gonioscopy was most frequently used for determining indications for prophylactic LI. Specular microscopy was always performed prior to LI in 7.8% of the facilities. Prophylactic LI resulted in complications at 20.5% of the surveyed facilities, although the incidence was low. The following residual complications were reported at 82.9% of the facilities when treating ACG attacks: cataract, persistent elevation of intraocular pressure, and bullous keratopathy. One-third of the facilities experienced inadequate treatment of an ACG attack by physicians other than ophthalmologists.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of LI-induced complications was higher in ACG eyes than in narrow-angle eyes. However, prophylactic LI sometimes results in persistent ocular complications.

Для цитирования: Kashiwagi Kenji, Tsukahara Shigeo. Examination and treatment of patients with angle-closure glaucoma in Japan: results of a nationwide survey.. Japanese journal of ophthalmology. 2004. DOI: 10.1007/s10384-003-0023-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.