MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/prs.0000000000002165

Медицинская библиотека · Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2016

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Triamcinolone and Radiation Therapy for Ear Keloids after Surgical Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shin Jin Yong, Lee Jin-Won, Roh Si-Gyun, Lee Nae-Ho, Yang Kyung-Moo

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The ear is a common site for keloid formation, usually after trauma or ear piercing. This study is a meta-analysis to identify effective treatments for ear keloids after surgical excision.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed using core databases. Postoperative adjuvant treatment modalities for ear keloids and recurrence rates were extracted and analyzed. Fixed and random effect models were applied.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies published before August of 2015 were identified. The recurrence rate after surgical excision of an ear keloid in the triamcinolone group was estimated as 15.4 percent (95 percent CI, 9.4 to 24.1 percent; p < 0.001). The recurrence rate in the radiation therapy group was estimated as 14.0 percent (95 percent CI, 9.6 to 19.9 percent; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although a large-scale, randomized study is required for confirmation, both triamcinolone and radiation therapy provided outstanding treatment for ear keloids after surgical excision without a significant difference between the two treatments.

Для цитирования: Shin Jin Yong, Lee Jin-Won, Roh Si-Gyun, Lee Nae-Ho, Yang Kyung-Moo. A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Triamcinolone and Radiation Therapy for Ear Keloids after Surgical Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000002165.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.