Annals of plastic surgery · 2017
The Impact of Physician Assistants on a Breast Reconstruction Practice: Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chao Albert H, Yaney Alexander, Skoracki Roman J, Kearns Patrick N
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Physician assistants (PAs) are commonly employed in plastic surgery. However, limited data exist on their impact, which may guide decisions regarding how best to integrate them into practice.
METHODS: A review of the practices of 2 breast reconstructive surgeons was performed. A comparison was made between a 1-year period before to a 1-year period after the addition of a PA into practice. The practice model was a one-to-one pairing of a plastic surgeon and a PA.
RESULTS: A total of 4141 clinic encounters and 1356 surgical cases were reviewed. After the addition of PAs, there was a significant increase in relative value units (1057 vs 1323 per month per surgeon, P < 0.001). Operative times were similar with and without PAs (P = 0.45). However, clinic encounter times for surgeons were shorter for all visit types when patients were first seen by a PA before the surgeon: global follow-up (P = 0.03), other follow-up (P = 0.002), consultation (P = 0.76), and preoperative (P = 0.02), translating to 9 additional patients seen per day. Charges (P = 0.001) and payments (P = 0.007) also increased, which offset the cost of using a PA. However, the financial contribution from PA involvement as first assistant in surgery was limited (5.2%). The peak effect of PAs was observed between the third and fourth quarters.
CONCLUSIONS: In breast reconstruction, PAs primarily enhance the efficiency of plastic surgeons, particularly in the clinic, with downstream clinical and financial gains of an indirect nature for surgeons.
METHODS: A review of the practices of 2 breast reconstructive surgeons was performed. A comparison was made between a 1-year period before to a 1-year period after the addition of a PA into practice. The practice model was a one-to-one pairing of a plastic surgeon and a PA.
RESULTS: A total of 4141 clinic encounters and 1356 surgical cases were reviewed. After the addition of PAs, there was a significant increase in relative value units (1057 vs 1323 per month per surgeon, P < 0.001). Operative times were similar with and without PAs (P = 0.45). However, clinic encounter times for surgeons were shorter for all visit types when patients were first seen by a PA before the surgeon: global follow-up (P = 0.03), other follow-up (P = 0.002), consultation (P = 0.76), and preoperative (P = 0.02), translating to 9 additional patients seen per day. Charges (P = 0.001) and payments (P = 0.007) also increased, which offset the cost of using a PA. However, the financial contribution from PA involvement as first assistant in surgery was limited (5.2%). The peak effect of PAs was observed between the third and fourth quarters.
CONCLUSIONS: In breast reconstruction, PAs primarily enhance the efficiency of plastic surgeons, particularly in the clinic, with downstream clinical and financial gains of an indirect nature for surgeons.