MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/26326663261478660

Медицинская библиотека · Incarceration : an international journal of imprisonment, detention and coercive confinement · 2026

Carceral tropes in prison-themed escape rooms in Canada, the United States, Australia, and Aotearoa New Zealand.

Walby Kevin, Mussell Linda, Piché Justin

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Escape rooms have grown in popularity across the world, with a number of these sites established in decommissioned sites of confinement or operating in purpose built faux-prisons. Drawing on fieldwork in prison-themed escape rooms across Canada, the United States, Australia, and Aotearoa New Zealand, this article explores how these tourism and leisure sites contribute to meaning-making vis-à-vis imprisonment and punishment. Beyond examining how these games allow game players to consume punishment at a safe distance from the realities of imprisonment, we show how these venues of penal spectatorship commodify major elements of penality, notably by using wrongful imprisonment and the prospect of death behind bars as carceral tropes. This process of commodification distorts and skews the realities of these phenomena, reinforcing hegemonic views of the punitive injustice apparatus. While the prison escape room experience is meant to entertain and though some sites offer surface-level criticisms of penality, our findings show how these sites reproduce carceral logics that sustain imprisonment as a central practice of exclusion in contemporary times.

Для цитирования: Walby Kevin, Mussell Linda, Piché Justin. Carceral tropes in prison-themed escape rooms in Canada, the United States, Australia, and Aotearoa New Zealand.. Incarceration : an international journal of imprisonment, detention and coercive confinement. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/26326663261478660.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.