m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Medicine · 2025

Intestinal perforation in recurrent cervical cancer following bevacizumab and pembrolizumab therapy: A case report.

СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Fan Yuanchun, Liu Shihao, Zhao Jiangjing, Fu Yawei, Yang Jiahui, Wang Chunyang, Zhang Hui

Аннотация

RATIONALE: Since the advent of immunotherapy in clinical practice, it has profoundly transformed the paradigm of cancer treatment and has been rapidly adopted in clinical settings. Concurrently, the combination of immunotherapy with anti-angiogenic therapy has shown great promise in clinical research. The inevitable joint application brings about a greater number of adverse reactions. These adverse reactions are often perplexing, with the uncertainty of whether they stem from immunotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, or both. This is a case report of adverse reactions occurring when immune drugs and anti-vascular drugs are used together. This case is analyzed to provide a warning for adverse reactions in the clinical application of anti-angiogenic therapy combined with immunotherapy.

PATIENT CONCERNS: A 52-year-old cervical cancer patient with metastases had abdominal pain and fever post-treatment with bevacizumab, pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy, suggesting intestinal perforation.

DIAGNOSES: After 2 chemotherapy cycles with bevacizumab and pembrolizumab, the patient had fever up to 39°C and abdominal pain. Exam showed tenderness, rigidity, and weak bowel sounds. Blood tests revealed leukocytosis and neutrophilia. Imaging indicated pneumoperitoneum and possible intestinal obstruction.

INTERVENTIONS: Emergency laparotomy revealed a small intestine perforation with strictures, leading to resection and ileostomy due to edema.

OUTCOMES: The postoperative recovery was good. We consider intestinal perforation caused by bevacizumab. Therefore, the patient was subsequently discontinued from bevacizumab and continued to receive paclitaxel, cisplatin and pembrolizumab. At present, the patient has finished chemotherapy and is receiving pembrolizumab maintenance therapy with no significant gastrointestinal adverse reactions.

LESSONS: Anti-angiogenic drugs and immunotherapy drugs each have their own side effects, and the occurrence of adverse reactions becomes more complex when used in combination. In the clinical process of combined medication, more attention should be paid to adverse reactions, early identification of severe adverse reactions, and active management.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты