MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/jaha.124.040166

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025

DK-Crush or Mini-Crush Stenting for Complex Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: The Multicenter EVOLUTE-CRUSH LM Registry.

Uzun Fatih, Güner Ahmet, Hakgör Aykun, Alizade Elnur, Karataş Mehmet B, Alıcı Gökhan, Çizgici Ahmet Y, Şahin İrfan, Gül İlker, Püşüroğlu Hamdi, Karaduman Ahmet, Akman Cemalettin, Ataş Ali E, Deniz Muhammed F, Tekin Deniz N, Serin Ebru, Kocaağa Mehmet, Yaşan Mustafa, Avcı İlhan I, Şenöz Oktay, Varım Perihan, Doğan Abdullah, Dursun Atakan, Unkun Tuba, Çetin İlyas, Gökalp Murat, Tanık Veysel O, Aktük İbrahim F, Çakal Beytullah, Keskin Kudret, Güner Ezgi G, Şimşek Aybüke, Ekiz Muhammet A, Üzel Seda T, Bulus Çağdaş, Çiloğlu Koray, Göksu Muhammed M, Çalık Ali N, Boztosun Bilal

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The comparison of outcomes of mini-crush (MCT) versus double kissing crush (DKC) techniques for complex left main bifurcation (LMB) lesions is still lacking. This investigation aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent MCT or DKC for LMB disease.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2024, patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for complex LMB lesions were retrospectively collected. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events as the combination of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization during follow-up. The secondary end point was measured as major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events including all-cause death, target vessel revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and stroke.

RESULTS

This large-scale multicenter (n=13) observational study included a total of 531 consecutive patients (men: 405 [76.3%], mean age: 63.16±11.26 years) with complex LMB lesions who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. The initial revascularization strategy was MCT in 313 (59%) patients and DKC in 218 (41%) patients. The number of balloons used (5.91±1.53 versus 6.72±1.70, P<0.001) and procedure time (66.60±24.20 versus 72.97±19.97 minutes, P<0.001) were notably lower in the MCT group. In the overall population, the long-term major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.704; P=0.169) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (HR, 0.660; P=0.079) did not differ in individuals with complex LMB lesions treated with MCT and DKC. Other end points were also comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In complex LMB lesions, risk-adjusted major adverse cardiac events and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events rates were comparable between both techniques, with a nonsignificant trend favoring DKC at long-term follow-up.

REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT06546748.

Для цитирования: Uzun Fatih, Güner Ahmet, Hakgör Aykun, Alizade Elnur, Karataş Mehmet B, Alıcı Gökhan, Çizgici Ahmet Y, Şahin İrfan, Gül İlker, Püşüroğlu Hamdi, Karaduman Ahmet, Akman Cemalettin, Ataş Ali E, Deniz Muhammed F, Tekin Deniz N, Serin Ebru, Kocaağa Mehmet, Yaşan Mustafa, Avcı İlhan I, Şenöz Oktay, Varım Perihan, Doğan Abdullah, Dursun Atakan, Unkun Tuba, Çetin İlyas, Gökalp Murat, Tanık Veysel O, Aktük İbrahim F, Çakal Beytullah, Keskin Kudret, Güner Ezgi G, Şimşek Aybüke, Ekiz Muhammet A, Üzel Seda T, Bulus Çağdaş, Çiloğlu Koray, Göksu Muhammed M, Çalık Ali N, Boztosun Bilal. DK-Crush or Mini-Crush Stenting for Complex Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: The Multicenter EVOLUTE-CRUSH LM Registry.. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2025. DOI: 10.1161/jaha.124.040166.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.