BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024
Prognostic implications of increased and final quantitative flow ratios in patients treated with drug-coated balloons physiological evaluation after DCB in de novo lesions.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lin Li, Ding Yaodong, Tang Yida, Wang Guisong, Fu Guosheng, Wang Lefeng, Chen Lianglong, Liu Xi, Liu Bin, Chen Hui, Liu Gang, Tang Qiang, Zeng Yong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Few studies investigated the implications of post-PCI QFR and post-PCI ΔQFR (absolute increase of QFR) in de novo lesions of small coronary disease after drug-coated balloon (DCB).
OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the prognostic implications of post-PCI QFR and post-PCI ΔQFR in patients who received DCB only.
METHODS: Patients were divided according to the optimal cutoff value of the post-PCI QFR and the post-PCI ΔQFR. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including target vessel revascularization (TVR), cardiac death, and myocardial infarction (MI).
RESULTS: The optimal cutoff values of QFR and ΔQFR for the MACE rate were 0.86 and 0.57, respectively. There were 175 patients (61.2%) with a high QFR (≥ 0.86) and 113 patients (39.5%) with a high ΔQFR (≥ 0.57) after PCI. The MACE rate was significantly higher in patients with a low QFR compared to a high QFR (5.7% vs. 27.0%, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.632, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.872 to 7.044, P < 0.001). The MACE rate was higher in patients with a low ΔQFR increase compared to those with high ΔQFR (4.4% vs. 20.2%, HR: 4.700, 95%CI: 2.430 to 9.089, P = 0.001). In multivariable model, a low post-PCI QFR and a low post-PCI ΔQFR was independent predictor of MACE (adjusted HR: 4.071, 95%CI: 2.037 to 8.135, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: After DCB in de novo lesions of small coronary disease, both post-PCI QFR and ΔQFR showed similar prognostic implications in MACE.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the prognostic implications of post-PCI QFR and post-PCI ΔQFR in patients who received DCB only.
METHODS: Patients were divided according to the optimal cutoff value of the post-PCI QFR and the post-PCI ΔQFR. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including target vessel revascularization (TVR), cardiac death, and myocardial infarction (MI).
RESULTS: The optimal cutoff values of QFR and ΔQFR for the MACE rate were 0.86 and 0.57, respectively. There were 175 patients (61.2%) with a high QFR (≥ 0.86) and 113 patients (39.5%) with a high ΔQFR (≥ 0.57) after PCI. The MACE rate was significantly higher in patients with a low QFR compared to a high QFR (5.7% vs. 27.0%, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.632, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.872 to 7.044, P < 0.001). The MACE rate was higher in patients with a low ΔQFR increase compared to those with high ΔQFR (4.4% vs. 20.2%, HR: 4.700, 95%CI: 2.430 to 9.089, P = 0.001). In multivariable model, a low post-PCI QFR and a low post-PCI ΔQFR was independent predictor of MACE (adjusted HR: 4.071, 95%CI: 2.037 to 8.135, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: After DCB in de novo lesions of small coronary disease, both post-PCI QFR and ΔQFR showed similar prognostic implications in MACE.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiac CathetersCoated Materials, BiocompatibleCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationCoronary VesselsFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome