MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/circinterventions.124.014420

Медицинская библиотека · Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2024

Association of Baseline Mitral Valve Area With Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Insights From the OCEAN-Mitral Registry.

Mushiake Kazunori, Kubo Shunsuke, Ono Sachiyo, Maruo Takeshi, Nishiura Naoki, Osakada Kohei, Kadota Kazushige, Yamamoto Masanori, Saji Mike, Asami Masahiko, Enta Yusuke, Nakashima Masaki, Shirai Shinichi, Izumo Masaki, Mizuno Shingo, Watanabe Yusuke, Amaki Makoto, Kodama Kazuhisa, Yamaguchi Junichi, Izumi Yuki, Naganuma Toru, Bota Hiroki, Ohno Yohei, Yamawaki Masahiro, Ueno Hiroshi, Mizutani Kazuki, Otsuka Toshiaki, Hayashida Kentaro, OCEAN-Mitral Investigators

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A small mitral valve area (MVA) is one of the challenging anatomies for transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for mitral regurgitation, but the relationship between baseline MVA and clinical outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the association of baseline MVA with procedural and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TEER with MitraClip from the OCEAN-Mitral registry (Optimized Catheter Valvular Intervention-Mitral).

METHODS

A total of 1768 patients undergoing TEER were divided into 3 groups according to baseline MVA: group 1: <4.0 cm2, n=358; group 2: 4.0-5.0 cm2, n=493; and group 3: ≥5.0 cm2, n=917. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization within 2 years of TEER and compared between the 3 groups.

RESULTS

Patients with smaller MVA had significantly fewer clips implanted and higher postprocedural transmitral mean pressure gradient. There was no significant difference in the acute procedural success rate and postprocedural mitral regurgitation severity between the 3 groups. The incidence of the primary end point was similar in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 (35.2% versus 34.5% versus 34.0%; P=0.96) and was also similar in patients with MVA <3.5 cm2 and those with MVA 3.5 to 4.0 cm2. The adjusted risk of MVA <4.0 cm2 relative to MVA of 4.0 to 5.0 cm2 and MVA ≥5 cm2 for the primary end point remained insignificant (hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.79-1.41]; P=0.68; hazard ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.75-1.31]; P=0.96, respectively). At 1 year, no significant difference in the proportion of residual mitral regurgitation 3+/4+ was observed between the 3 groups (7.2% versus 4.4% versus 6.5%; P=0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing TEER, a small MVA <4.0 cm2 may limit the number of clips implanted and increase the transmitral pressure gradient after TEER, but baseline MVA was not associated with mitral regurgitation reduction and clinical outcomes.

REGISTRATION: URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgiope n-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000027188; Unique identifier: UMIN000023653.

Для цитирования: Mushiake Kazunori, Kubo Shunsuke, Ono Sachiyo, Maruo Takeshi, Nishiura Naoki, Osakada Kohei, Kadota Kazushige, Yamamoto Masanori, Saji Mike, Asami Masahiko, Enta Yusuke, Nakashima Masaki, Shirai Shinichi, Izumo Masaki, Mizuno Shingo, Watanabe Yusuke, Amaki Makoto, Kodama Kazuhisa, Yamaguchi Junichi, Izumi Yuki, Naganuma Toru, Bota Hiroki, Ohno Yohei, Yamawaki Masahiro, Ueno Hiroshi, Mizutani Kazuki, Otsuka Toshiaki, Hayashida Kentaro, OCEAN-Mitral Investigators. Association of Baseline Mitral Valve Area With Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Insights From the OCEAN-Mitral Registry.. Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. 2024. DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.124.014420.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.