MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jce.16442

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2024

Risk factors associated with clinically relevant pericardial effusion after primary cardiac implantable electronic device implantation.

Zhou Yangzhi, Haxha Saranda, Halili Andrim, Philbert Berit T, Nielsen Olav W, Sajadieh Ahmad, Koeber Lars, Gislason Gunnar H, Torp-Pedersen Christian, Bang Casper N

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Pericardial effusion, a known complication to implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), may cause life-threatening cardiac tamponade. Limited knowledge is available about risk factors for clinically relevant procedural pericardial effusion. The aim is to identify the patient- and procedure-related risk factors associated with clinically relevant procedural pericardial effusion.

METHOD: A nationwide observational cohort study based on data on 55 121 patients from the Danish Pacemaker Register between 2000 and 2018. We defined a clinically relevant procedural pericardial effusion related to the implantation if it occurred within 90 days after the primary CIED-procedure. Prespecified risk factors were analysed by multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the association with pericardial effusion.

RESULTS

There were 115 (0.21%) patients diagnosed with clinically relevant procedural pericardial effusion, with a median age of 75 years and 38.3% were females. Of these, 80.9% lead to a subsequent pericardiocentesis procedure. In adjusted logistic regression analysis, an increased risk of clinically relevant pericardial effusion was associated with female sex (OR:1.49 [95%CI: 1.03-2.16]), heart failure (OR:1.54 [95%CI: 1.06-2.23]), previous cardiac surgery (OR:1.63 [95%CI: 1.05-2.55]), CRT-device (OR:2.05 [95%CI: 1.23-3.41]), tertiary-centres (OR:1.8 [95%CI: 1.18-2.73]), increased procedural volume per year (>1000) (OR:1.85 [95%CI: 1.03-3.30]), indication of device-implantation (atrioventricular block) (OR:2.37 [95CI: 1.45-3.87]), and increasing number of leads implanted (two leads (OR:2.39 [95%CI: 1.43-4.00]), three leads (OR:4.77 [95%CI: 2.50-9.10])).

CONCLUSION

Clinically relevant procedural pericardial effusion is a rare complication after CIED-implantation in Denmark. This study reveals important patient- and procedure-related risk factors associated with clinically relevant procedural pericardial effusion.

Для цитирования: Zhou Yangzhi, Haxha Saranda, Halili Andrim, Philbert Berit T, Nielsen Olav W, Sajadieh Ahmad, Koeber Lars, Gislason Gunnar H, Torp-Pedersen Christian, Bang Casper N. Risk factors associated with clinically relevant pericardial effusion after primary cardiac implantable electronic device implantation.. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2024. DOI: 10.1111/jce.16442.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.