MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/circoutcomes.123.010534

Медицинская библиотека · Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2024

International Variation in Health Status Benefits in Patients Undergoing Initial Invasive Versus Conservative Management for Chronic Coronary Disease: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.

Ikemura Nobuhiro, Spertus John A, Nguyen Dan, Fu Zhuxuan, Jones Philip G, Reynolds Harmony R, Bangalore Sripal, Bhargava Balram, Senior Roxy, Elghamaz Ahmed, Goodman Shaun G, Lopes Renato D, Pracoń Radoslaw, López-Sendón José, Maggioni Aldo P, Kohsaka Shun, Roth Gregory A, White Harvey D, Mavromatis Kreton, Boden William E, Rodriguez Fatima, Hochman Judith S, Maron David J, ISCHEMIA Research Group

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) demonstrated greater health status benefits with an initial invasive strategy, as compared with a conservative one, for patients with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia. Whether these benefits vary globally is important to understand to support global adoption of the results.

METHODS

We analyzed participants' disease-specific health status using the validated 7-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ: >5-point differences are clinically important) at baseline and over 1-year follow-up across 37 countries in 6 international regions. The average effect of initial invasive versus conservative strategies on 1-year SAQ scores was estimated using Bayesian proportional odds regression and compared across regions.

RESULTS

Considerable regional variation in baseline health status was observed among 4617 participants (mean age=64.4±9.5 years, 24% women), with the mean SAQ summary scores of 67.4±19.5 in Eastern Europe participants (17% of the total), 71.4±15.4 in Asia-Pacific (18%), 74.9±16.7 in Central and South America (10%), 75.5±19.5 in Western Europe (26%), and 78.6±19.2 in North America (28%). One-year improvements in SAQ scores were greater in regions with lower baseline scores with initial invasive management (17.7±20.9 in Eastern Europe and 11.4±19.3 in North America), but similar in the conservative arm. Adjusting for baseline SAQ scores, similar health status benefits of an initial invasive strategy on 1-year SAQ scores were observed (ranging from 2.38 points [95% CI, 0.04-4.50] in North America to 4.66 points [95% CI, 2.46-6.94] in Eastern Europe), with an 88.3% probability that the difference in benefit across regions was <5 points.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, initial invasive management was associated with a consistent health status benefit across regions, with modest regional variability, supporting the international generalizability of health status benefits from invasive management of chronic coronary disease.

REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01471522.

Для цитирования: Ikemura Nobuhiro, Spertus John A, Nguyen Dan, Fu Zhuxuan, Jones Philip G, Reynolds Harmony R, Bangalore Sripal, Bhargava Balram, Senior Roxy, Elghamaz Ahmed, Goodman Shaun G, Lopes Renato D, Pracoń Radoslaw, López-Sendón José, Maggioni Aldo P, Kohsaka Shun, Roth Gregory A, White Harvey D, Mavromatis Kreton, Boden William E, Rodriguez Fatima, Hochman Judith S, Maron David J, ISCHEMIA Research Group. International Variation in Health Status Benefits in Patients Undergoing Initial Invasive Versus Conservative Management for Chronic Coronary Disease: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.. Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2024. DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.123.010534.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.