Patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and mid-wall striae have similar arrhythmic outcomes as ischemic cardiomyopathy.

PURPOSE: While implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy provides clear benefit in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), this is less clear in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Mid-wall striae (MWS) fibrosis is an established cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) risk marker observed in patients with NICM. We evaluated whether patients with NICM and MWS have similar risk of arrhythmia-related cardiovascular events as patients with ICM.

METHODS

We studied a cohort of patients undergoing CMR. The presence of MWS was adjudicated by experienced physicians. The primary outcome was a composite of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implant, hospitalization for ventricular tachycardia, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or sudden cardiac death. Propensity-matched analysis was performed to compare outcomes for patients NICM with MWS and ICM.

RESULTS

A total of 1,732 patients were studied, 972 NICM (706 without MWS, 266 with MWS) and 760 ICM. NICM patients with MWS were more likely to experience the primary outcome versus those without MWS (unadjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (subHR) 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51-3.41) with no difference versus ICM patients (unadjusted subHR 1.32, 95% CI 0.93-1.86). Similar results were seen in a propensity-matched population (adjusted subHR 1.11, 95% CI 0.63-1.98, p = 0.711).

CONCLUSION

Patients with NICM and MWS demonstrate significantly higher arrhythmic risk compared to NICM without MWS. After adjustment, the arrhythmia risk of patients with NICM and MWS was similar to patients with ICM. Accordingly, physicians could consider the presence of MWS when making clinical decisions regarding arrhythmia risk management in patients with NICM.