MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.06.019

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2023

Semi-Conservative Treatment Versus Radical Surgery in Abdominal Aortic Graft and Endograft Infections.

Gavali Hamid, Mani Kevin, Furebring Mia, Olsson Karl Wilhelm, Lindström David, Sörelius Karl, Sigvant Birgitta, Torstensson Gustav, Andersson Manne, Forssell Claes, Åstrand Håkan, Lundström Tobias, Khan Shahzad, Sonesson Björn, Stackelberg Otto, Gillgren Peter, Isaksson Jon, Kragsterman Björn, Gidlund Khatereh Djavani, Horer Tal, Sadeghi Mitra, Wanhainen Anders

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Abdominal aortic graft and endograft infections (AGIs) are rare complications following aortic surgery. Radical surgery (RS) with resection of the infected graft and reconstruction with extra-anatomical bypass or in situ reconstruction is the preferred therapy. For patients unfit for RS, a semi-conservative (SC), graft preserving strategy is possible. This paper aimed to compare survival and infection outcomes between RS and SC treatment for AGI in a nationwide cohort.

METHODS

Patients with abdominal AGI related surgery in Sweden between January 1995 and May 2017 were identified. The Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) criteria were used for the definition of AGI. Multivariable regression was performed to identify factors associated with mortality.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-nine patients with surgically treated abdominal AGI were identified, comprising 43 SC (14 endografts; 53% with a graft enteric fistula [GEF] in total) and 126 RS (26 endografts; 50% with a GEF in total). The SC cohort was older and had a higher frequency of cardiac comorbidities. There was a non-significant trend towards lower Kaplan-Meier estimated five year survival for SC vs. RS (30.2% vs. 48.4%; p = .066). A non-significant trend was identified towards worse Kaplan-Meier estimated five year survival for SC patients with a GEF vs. without a GEF (21.7% vs. 40.1%; p = .097). There were significantly more recurrent graft infections comparing SC with RS (45.4% vs. 19.3%; p < .001). In a Cox regression model adjusting for confounders, there was no difference in five year survival comparing SC vs. RS (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.6 - 1.5).

CONCLUSION

In this national AGI cohort, there was no mortality difference comparing SC and RS for AGI when adjusting for comorbidities. Presence of GEF probably negatively impacts survival outcomes of SC patients. Rates of recurrent infection remain high for SC treated patients.

Для цитирования: Gavali Hamid, Mani Kevin, Furebring Mia, Olsson Karl Wilhelm, Lindström David, Sörelius Karl, Sigvant Birgitta, Torstensson Gustav, Andersson Manne, Forssell Claes, Åstrand Håkan, Lundström Tobias, Khan Shahzad, Sonesson Björn, Stackelberg Otto, Gillgren Peter, Isaksson Jon, Kragsterman Björn, Gidlund Khatereh Djavani, Horer Tal, Sadeghi Mitra, Wanhainen Anders. Semi-Conservative Treatment Versus Radical Surgery in Abdominal Aortic Graft and Endograft Infections.. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.06.019.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.