MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.01.010

Медицинская библиотека · Indian heart journal · 2023

Cardioverter-defibrillator reduces mortality risk in eligible ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients: Sub-analysis of the multi-center Improve SCA study.

Singh Balbir, Hsieh Yu-Cheng, Liu Yen-Bin, Lin Kuo-Hung, Joung Boyoung, Rodriguez Diego A, Chasnoits Alexandr R, Huang Dejia, Zhang Shu, O'Brien Janet E, Lexcen Daniel R, Cerkvenik Jeffrey, Van Dorn Brian, Ching Chi-Keong

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND &

OBJECTIVE

Despite the burden of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) worldwide, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are underutilized, particularly in Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The Improve SCA trial demonstrated that primary prevention (PP) patients in these regions benefit from an ICD or a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). We aimed to compare the rate of device therapy and mortality among ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM and NICM) PP patients who met guideline indications for ICD therapy and had an ICD/CRT-D implanted.

METHODS

Improve SCA was a prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded multicenter trial that enrolled patients from the above-mentioned regions. All-cause mortality and device therapy were examined by cardiomyopathy (ICM vs NICM) and implantation status. Cox proportional hazards methods were used, adjusting for factors affecting mortality risk.

RESULTS

Of 1848 PP NICM patients, 1007 (54.5%) received ICD/CRT-D, while 303 of 581 (52.1%) PP ICM patients received an ICD/CRT-D. The all-cause mortality rate at 3 years for NICM patients with and without an ICD/CRT-D was 13.1% and 18.3%, respectively (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.68, p < 0.001). Similarly, all-cause mortality at 3 years in ICM patients was 13.8% in those with a device and 19.9% in those without an ICD/CRT-D (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-.0.88, p = 0.011). The time to first device therapy, time to first shock, and time to first antitachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy were not significantly different between groups (p ≥ 0.263).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large data set of patients with a guideline-based PP ICD indication, defibrillator device implantation conferred a significant mortality benefit in both NICM and ICM patients. The rate of appropriate device therapy was also similar in both groups.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02099721.

Для цитирования: Singh Balbir, Hsieh Yu-Cheng, Liu Yen-Bin, Lin Kuo-Hung, Joung Boyoung, Rodriguez Diego A, Chasnoits Alexandr R, Huang Dejia, Zhang Shu, O'Brien Janet E, Lexcen Daniel R, Cerkvenik Jeffrey, Van Dorn Brian, Ching Chi-Keong. Cardioverter-defibrillator reduces mortality risk in eligible ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients: Sub-analysis of the multi-center Improve SCA study.. Indian heart journal. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.01.010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.