DOI 10.1007/s00391-026-02604-y
[Communication in later life under institutional conditions : Professional perspectives on communication of ageing people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities].
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
For people with (profound) intellectual and multiple disabilities verbal language is often not the primary means of communication. Communication is closely tied to familiar persons and the interpretation of individual forms of expression. In later life health-related changes, the loss of social relationships and institutional transitions can substantially impair communication.
OBJECTIVE
Based on group interviews with professionals this paper examines the significance of communication partners, the professional and institutional prerequisites for successful communication in later life and the institutional embedding of augmentative and alternative communication.
METHODS
In this study seven group interviews were conducted with professionals working in disability support services. Data were analyzed using structured qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS
Professionals describe social relationships in later life as fragile and communication partners as often confined to institutional settings, which increases the importance of familiar caregivers for successful communication. They further emphasize experiential and specialist knowledge, resources and knowledge transfer across interfaces. Augmentative and alternative communication appears sustainable especially where it is institutionally embedded.
CONCLUSION
In later life communicative participation among this group appears less as a matter of individual competence than as an organizational and knowledge-related task: it requires both preserving biographically developed interpretive knowledge and institutionally embedded augmentative and alternative communication.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.