Zeitschrift fur Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie · 2017
[Quality of life and mental health of patients with severe heart failure with or without technical support for the left cardiac ventricle - a cross-sectional study].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dahrmann Birte, Sindermann Jürgen, Geldmacher Thomas, Heuft Gereon
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Quality of life and mental health of patients with severe heart failure with or without technical support for the left cardiac ventricle - a cross-sectional study Objectives: Chronic heart failure is associated with reduced quality of life (QoL) and poor prognosis. Support via a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an alternative to optimised medical management for patients with advanced heart failure. This study evaluated health-related QoL with both therapy options.
METHODS: In this consecutive cross-sectional study, patients with LVAD support (n = 50) and patients with optimised medical management (n = 50) were interviewed comprehensively about various domains of QoL, emotional stress, perceived self-efficacy, social support, life satisfaction, and communication.
RESULTS: LVAD patients had a better overall QoL (KCCQ, clinical summary: MW: 67.4 vs. 52.9). Patients with medical management reported increased emotional stress stemming from depressed mood (HADS-D, MW: 7.1 vs.MW: 6.0). Depressed mood proved to be the most significant negative predictor for health-related QoL as well as for emotional well-being.
CONCLUSIONS: Although they had a worse clinical situation preoperatively, LVAD patients had a significantly better QoL in both physical dimensions and functional competencies as well as significantly less psychological stress through depressed mood and anxiety.
METHODS: In this consecutive cross-sectional study, patients with LVAD support (n = 50) and patients with optimised medical management (n = 50) were interviewed comprehensively about various domains of QoL, emotional stress, perceived self-efficacy, social support, life satisfaction, and communication.
RESULTS: LVAD patients had a better overall QoL (KCCQ, clinical summary: MW: 67.4 vs. 52.9). Patients with medical management reported increased emotional stress stemming from depressed mood (HADS-D, MW: 7.1 vs.MW: 6.0). Depressed mood proved to be the most significant negative predictor for health-related QoL as well as for emotional well-being.
CONCLUSIONS: Although they had a worse clinical situation preoperatively, LVAD patients had a significantly better QoL in both physical dimensions and functional competencies as well as significantly less psychological stress through depressed mood and anxiety.