Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2014
Percutaneous cardiac assist devices compared with surgical hemodynamic support alternatives: cost-effectiveness in the emergent setting.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maini Brijeshwar, Gregory David, Scotti Dennis J, Buyantseva Larisa
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous cardiac assist device (pVAD) therapy in the emergent setting compared with traditional surgical hemodynamic support alternatives.
BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of pVAD hemodynamic support for patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. For patients in cardiogenic shock (CS), use of pVAD therapy has been shown to reduce length of stay (LOS).
METHODS: National utilization and outcome data from the 2010-2011 MedPAR and state-sponsored all-payer databases were collected for patients with an acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS who were treated with either a pVAD (n = 883) or with traditional surgical hemodynamic support alternatives (ECMO and extracorporeal VAD) (n = 305).
RESULTS: Discharge survival was greater with pVADs than with surgical alternatives (56% vs. 42%, P < 0.001) and was achieved with a strong trend toward reduced LOS (13.2 and 17.9 days, respectively, P = 0.055) and a significantly lower cost of the index admission ($90,929 and $144,257, respectively, P < 0.001). Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the national data demonstrated that pVAD achieved improved outcomes at lower cost. Data were also collected for similar patients who underwent protocol-guided pVAD therapy (using Impella 2.5) at PinnacleHealth, between 2009 and 2011 (n = 30). At this site, the survival rate increased to 60%, length of hospitalization was shortened to 6 days, and admission costs were lowered to $53,850 relative to the surgical alternatives strategy.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients in CS requiring emergent hemodynamic support, pVAD therapy offers a less invasive alternative that can be deployed sooner, resulting in better outcomes, shorter LOS, lower costs and with no incremental cost, and a survival benefit when compared with traditional surgical hemodynamic support alternatives. PVAD therapy (and Impella 2.5 in particular) is emerging as a dominant strategy for this challenging patient population.
BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of pVAD hemodynamic support for patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. For patients in cardiogenic shock (CS), use of pVAD therapy has been shown to reduce length of stay (LOS).
METHODS: National utilization and outcome data from the 2010-2011 MedPAR and state-sponsored all-payer databases were collected for patients with an acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS who were treated with either a pVAD (n = 883) or with traditional surgical hemodynamic support alternatives (ECMO and extracorporeal VAD) (n = 305).
RESULTS: Discharge survival was greater with pVADs than with surgical alternatives (56% vs. 42%, P < 0.001) and was achieved with a strong trend toward reduced LOS (13.2 and 17.9 days, respectively, P = 0.055) and a significantly lower cost of the index admission ($90,929 and $144,257, respectively, P < 0.001). Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the national data demonstrated that pVAD achieved improved outcomes at lower cost. Data were also collected for similar patients who underwent protocol-guided pVAD therapy (using Impella 2.5) at PinnacleHealth, between 2009 and 2011 (n = 30). At this site, the survival rate increased to 60%, length of hospitalization was shortened to 6 days, and admission costs were lowered to $53,850 relative to the surgical alternatives strategy.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients in CS requiring emergent hemodynamic support, pVAD therapy offers a less invasive alternative that can be deployed sooner, resulting in better outcomes, shorter LOS, lower costs and with no incremental cost, and a survival benefit when compared with traditional surgical hemodynamic support alternatives. PVAD therapy (and Impella 2.5 in particular) is emerging as a dominant strategy for this challenging patient population.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Cardiac CatheterizationCardiology Service, HospitalCost-Benefit AnalysisEmergency Service, HospitalHeart-Assist DevicesHemodynamicsHospital CostsHumansLength of StayModels, EconomicMyocardial InfarctionPatient DischargePennsylvaniaProsthesis DesignProsthesis ImplantationQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRetrospective StudiesShock, CardiogenicTime FactorsTreatment Outcome