British journal of anaesthesia · 2013
Benefits of smart pumps for automated changeovers of vasoactive drug infusion pumps: a quasi-experimental study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cour M, Hernu R, Bénet T, Robert J M, Regad D, Chabert B, Malatray A, Conrozier S, Serra P, Lassaigne M, Vanhems P, Argaud L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Manual changeover of vasoactive drug infusion pumps (CVIP) frequently lead to haemodynamic instability. Some of the newest smart pumps allow automated CVIP. The aim of this study was to compare automated CVIP with manual 'Quick Change' relays.
METHODS: We performed a prospective, quasi-experimental study, in a university-affiliated intensive care unit (ICU). All adult patients receiving continuous i.v. infusion of vasoactive drugs were included. CVIP were successively performed manually (Phase 1) and automatically (Phase 2) during two 6-month periods. The primary endpoint was the frequency of haemodynamic incidents related to the relays, which were defined as variations of mean arterial pressure >15 mm Hg or heart rate >15 bpm. The secondary endpoints were the nursing time dedicated to relays and the number of interruptions in care because of CVIP. A multivariate mixed effects logistic regression was fitted for analytic analysis.
RESULTS: We studied 1329 relays (Phase 1: 681, Phase 2: 648) from 133 patients (Phase 1: 63, Phase 2: 70). Incidents related to CVIP decreased from 137 (20%) in Phase 1 to 73 (11%) in Phase 2 (P<0.001). Automated relays were independently associated with a 49% risk reduction of CVIP-induced incidents (adjusted OR=0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.77, P=0.001). Time dedicated to the relays and the number of interruptions in care to manage CVIP were also significantly reduced with automated relays vs manual relays (P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the benefits of automated CVIP using smart pumps in limiting the frequency of haemodynamic incidents related to relays and in reducing the nursing workload.
METHODS: We performed a prospective, quasi-experimental study, in a university-affiliated intensive care unit (ICU). All adult patients receiving continuous i.v. infusion of vasoactive drugs were included. CVIP were successively performed manually (Phase 1) and automatically (Phase 2) during two 6-month periods. The primary endpoint was the frequency of haemodynamic incidents related to the relays, which were defined as variations of mean arterial pressure >15 mm Hg or heart rate >15 bpm. The secondary endpoints were the nursing time dedicated to relays and the number of interruptions in care because of CVIP. A multivariate mixed effects logistic regression was fitted for analytic analysis.
RESULTS: We studied 1329 relays (Phase 1: 681, Phase 2: 648) from 133 patients (Phase 1: 63, Phase 2: 70). Incidents related to CVIP decreased from 137 (20%) in Phase 1 to 73 (11%) in Phase 2 (P<0.001). Automated relays were independently associated with a 49% risk reduction of CVIP-induced incidents (adjusted OR=0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.77, P=0.001). Time dedicated to the relays and the number of interruptions in care to manage CVIP were also significantly reduced with automated relays vs manual relays (P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the benefits of automated CVIP using smart pumps in limiting the frequency of haemodynamic incidents related to relays and in reducing the nursing workload.