Heart rhythm · 2012
Ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation early after defibrillator implantation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is explained by a high-risk subgroup of patients.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alsheikh-Ali Alawi A, Link Mark S, Semsarian Christopher, Shen Win-Kuang, Estes N A Mark, Maron Martin S, Haas Tammy S, Formisano Francesco, Boriani Giuseppe, Spirito Paolo, Maron Barry J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) studies in patients with coronary artery disease report higher risk of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) early post-implant, potentially related to local proarrhythmic effects of ICD leads.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize early and long-term risk of ICD discharge for VT/VF in a large hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) cohort.
METHODS: By using HCM multicenter registry data, we compared long-term risk of VT/VF subsequent to an early post-implant period (a priori defined as within 3 months of implant) between patients with or without VT/VF within 3 months after ICD implantation.
RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 109 of 506 (22%) patients with HCM who received ICDs received at least 1 ICD discharge for VT/VF. Risk of first ICD discharge for VT/VF was highest in the first year post-implant (10.8% per person-year; 95% confidence interval 7.9-13.8) and particularly in the first 3 months (17.0% per person-year; 95% confidence interval 9.8-24.3). Patients with early VT/VF (≤3 months post-implant) were older, and more commonly had secondary prevention ICDs following cardiac arrest or systolic dysfunction (end-stage HCM with ejection fraction<50%). Only 2 of 247 (0.7%) patients with primary prevention ICDs and preserved systolic function had early VT/VF. Patients with VT/VF early post-implant (≤3 months) had more than 5-fold higher risk for future VT/VF during long-term follow-up compared with patients without early VT/VF (adjusted hazard ratio 5.4; 95% confidence interval 2.3-12.6).
CONCLUSIONS: High-risk patients with HCM and VT/VF early after ICD implantation are particularly prone to subsequent VT/VF throughout follow-up. Early ICD interventions for VT/VF are largely confined to patients with prior cardiac arrest or systolic dysfunction and therefore more likely driven by higher arrhythmic risk rather than lead-related proarrhythmia.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize early and long-term risk of ICD discharge for VT/VF in a large hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) cohort.
METHODS: By using HCM multicenter registry data, we compared long-term risk of VT/VF subsequent to an early post-implant period (a priori defined as within 3 months of implant) between patients with or without VT/VF within 3 months after ICD implantation.
RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 109 of 506 (22%) patients with HCM who received ICDs received at least 1 ICD discharge for VT/VF. Risk of first ICD discharge for VT/VF was highest in the first year post-implant (10.8% per person-year; 95% confidence interval 7.9-13.8) and particularly in the first 3 months (17.0% per person-year; 95% confidence interval 9.8-24.3). Patients with early VT/VF (≤3 months post-implant) were older, and more commonly had secondary prevention ICDs following cardiac arrest or systolic dysfunction (end-stage HCM with ejection fraction<50%). Only 2 of 247 (0.7%) patients with primary prevention ICDs and preserved systolic function had early VT/VF. Patients with VT/VF early post-implant (≤3 months) had more than 5-fold higher risk for future VT/VF during long-term follow-up compared with patients without early VT/VF (adjusted hazard ratio 5.4; 95% confidence interval 2.3-12.6).
CONCLUSIONS: High-risk patients with HCM and VT/VF early after ICD implantation are particularly prone to subsequent VT/VF throughout follow-up. Early ICD interventions for VT/VF are largely confined to patients with prior cardiac arrest or systolic dysfunction and therefore more likely driven by higher arrhythmic risk rather than lead-related proarrhythmia.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAge FactorsAgedAustraliaCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicConfidence IntervalsDatabases, FactualDeath, Sudden, CardiacDefibrillators, ImplantableElectric CountershockEuropeFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSex FactorsStatistics, NonparametricSurvival AnalysisTachycardia, VentricularTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesVentricular Fibrillation