Clinical cardiology · 2012
Impact of acute coronary syndrome classification and procedural technique on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with drug-eluting stents.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sang Song Pil, Ryeol Ryu Dong, Choi Seung-Hyuk, Yang Jeong Hoon, Song Young Bin, Hahn Joo-Yong, Choi Jin-Ho, Seung Ki Bae, Park Seung-Jung, Gwon Hyeon-Cheol
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We examined the impact of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) on clinical outcomes in patients with bifurcation lesions treated with drug-eluting stents.
HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that NSTE-ACS would be attributable to the increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention.
METHODS: We enrolled 1668 patients, using data from a multicenter real-world bifurcation registry. The primary objective was to compare the 2-year cumulative risk of MACE in patients with NSTE-ACS to those with stable angina. Major adverse cardiac events were defined as the composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target-lesion revascularization.
RESULTS: Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome was seen in 969 (58.1%) patients and stable angina in 699. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 7.3% of NSTE-ACS patients and in 5.2% with stable angina (P = 0.042). However, cardiac death, MI, and target-lesion revascularization were similar between the 2 groups. We stratified patients with NSTE-ACS into those with non-ST-segment elevation MI and those with unstable angina. Cumulative risks of 2-year MACEs were 7.0% in non-ST-segment elevation MI patients and 7.5% in unstable angina patients (P = 0.87). In the NSTE-ACS cohort, the baseline lesion length in the side branch (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.07, P = 0.022), paclitaxel-eluting stents in the main vessel (adjusted HR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.21-3.40, P = 0.008), and final kissing ballooning (adjusted HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.10-3.21, P = 0.021) were independent predictors of MACE.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with stable angina patients, the NSTE-ACS patients who underwent bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention had an increased risk of MACE during the 2-year follow-up.
HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that NSTE-ACS would be attributable to the increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention.
METHODS: We enrolled 1668 patients, using data from a multicenter real-world bifurcation registry. The primary objective was to compare the 2-year cumulative risk of MACE in patients with NSTE-ACS to those with stable angina. Major adverse cardiac events were defined as the composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target-lesion revascularization.
RESULTS: Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome was seen in 969 (58.1%) patients and stable angina in 699. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 7.3% of NSTE-ACS patients and in 5.2% with stable angina (P = 0.042). However, cardiac death, MI, and target-lesion revascularization were similar between the 2 groups. We stratified patients with NSTE-ACS into those with non-ST-segment elevation MI and those with unstable angina. Cumulative risks of 2-year MACEs were 7.0% in non-ST-segment elevation MI patients and 7.5% in unstable angina patients (P = 0.87). In the NSTE-ACS cohort, the baseline lesion length in the side branch (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.07, P = 0.022), paclitaxel-eluting stents in the main vessel (adjusted HR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.21-3.40, P = 0.008), and final kissing ballooning (adjusted HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.10-3.21, P = 0.021) were independent predictors of MACE.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with stable angina patients, the NSTE-ACS patients who underwent bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention had an increased risk of MACE during the 2-year follow-up.