Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease in metabolic syndrome patients with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the treatment of choice for management of multivessel coronary artery disease, but percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) is increasingly being preferred. The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes of PCI with DES implantation (PCI-DES) and CABG for treating multivessel disease in metabolic syndrome patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS AND

RESULTS

A total of 1,839 consecutive metabolic syndrome patients with AMI who underwent PCI-DES (n=1,715) and CABG (n=124) for treatment of multivessel disease were selected from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry from November 2005 through December 2006. Primary endpoint was 12-month all-cause mortality. The mortality rate at 12 months was significantly lower in the PCI-DES group (4.8% vs. 12.2% in CABG, P=0.014) on univariate analysis. According to a Cox model, 12-month mortality was similar between the 2 groups (P=0.603), which remained the same despite propensity score adjustment (P=0.485). Rate of repeat revascularization was significantly higher in the PCI-DES group compared to the CABG group (P<0.001). At 12 months, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE)-free survival was higher in ST-elevation MI (STEMI) patients in the CABG group.

CONCLUSIONS

PCI-DES had an equivalent 12-month mortality risk to CABG for the treatment of multivessel disease in metabolic syndrome patients with AMI. CABG is more favorable for STEMI patients in terms of MACCE.