MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ccd.23423

Медицинская библиотека · Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2012

Clinical outcome following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function.

van der Boon Robert M, Nuis Rutger-Jan, Van Mieghem Nicolas M, Benitez Luis M, van Geuns Robert-Jan, Galema Tjebbe W, van Domburg Ron T, Geleijnse Marcel L, Dager Antonio, de Jaegere Peter P

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function and its impact on the in-hospital and long-term outcome in patients who underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI).

BACKGROUND

Although impaired LV function may be considered a contra-indication for aortic valve replacement, the hemodynamic characteristics of transcatheter valves may offer procedural and long-term clinical benefit in such patients.

METHODS

230 consecutive patients underwent TAVI with the Medtronic-CoreValve System. Impaired LV function was defined by a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% (European Multicenter Study on Operative Risk Stratification and Long-term Outcome in patients with Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis). Study endpoints were selected and defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium recommendations.

RESULTS

Compared with patients with a LVEF > 35% (n = 197), those with LVEF ≤ 35% (n = 33) were more often male (78.8 % vs. 46.7%, P < 0.001), more symptomatic (NYHA class III or IV, 97.0% vs. 77.2%, P = 0.008) and had a higher prevalence of prior coronary artery disease (63.6% vs. 43.1%, P = 0.029). The Logistic EuroSCORE was 14.8% and 22.8, respectively (P = 0.012). No difference was observed between the two groups in in-hospital or 30-day mortality (3.0% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.21), the Combined Safety Endpoint at 30 days (24.2% and 24.4%, P = 0.99) and survival free from readmission at one year (69.2% and 69.7%, P = 0.85). After adjustment, LVEF ≤ 35% was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality, in-hospital complications and survival free from readmission at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The immediate and long-term outcome after TAVI did not differ between patients with an impaired and preserved LVEF. LVEF ≤ 35% did not predict adverse immediate and long-term outcome. These findings suggest that TAVI should not be withheld in selected patients with impaired LV function.

Для цитирования: van der Boon Robert M, Nuis Rutger-Jan, Van Mieghem Nicolas M, Benitez Luis M, van Geuns Robert-Jan, Galema Tjebbe W, van Domburg Ron T, Geleijnse Marcel L, Dager Antonio, de Jaegere Peter P. Clinical outcome following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function.. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2012. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23423.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.